Thread: Liberalism Bombs Bambay

Interesting commentary.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberalism bombs Bombay

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 29, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2008

But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.
~ Numbers 33:55

The heart is deceitful and desperately wicked above all things. Who can know it?

~ Jeremiah 17:9

The gut-wrenching headlines told of the recent terrorist attacks in India – "Day 3: Terror at the Taj"; "Gunmen seemed to be sure of hotel terrain"; "Rabbi and wife killed"; "New York guards against Mumbai-like attacks" – yet all of the liberal media outlets, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and even Fox News seem to ask the same ignorant questions: "Who is behind the recent terrorist attacks? What is the motive of the people who perpetrated the bombings and kidnappings in India?"

The Prime Minister of India seems to be the only person on the planet who realizes who perpetrated such horrid terror upon his country: "India points the finger at Pakistan." Yes, it is quite obvious for any person who hasn't been completely indoctrinated by our Stalinist public school system that Muslim religious fanatics, perhaps trained in or facilitated by neighboring Pakistan, are the culprits.

If one needs further assurance of who these evil men were, just ask some of the hostages who were lucky enough to escape who said the first question the Islamic terrorists asked the kidnapped victims was, "Who has an American or British passport?"

(Column continues below)




The plot gets more diabolical. Now we know that perhaps the only Jews in this city of 14 million residents were also killed. A Brooklyn rabbi and his wife were found among the dead in a series of terrorist attacks in India that have claimed more than 150 lives. Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, who ran the Chabad-Lubavitch local headquarters in Mumbai were killed during a hostage standoff at the center. The chances of indiscriminately killing perhaps Mumbai's only Jewish family? One in 14 million.

Yet the liberal media, the president, the president-elect, the politicians on both sides of the aisle and the ubiquitous "military experts" all seem to be dumbfounded about who caused these well-orchestrated series of seven concurrent terrorist attacks? And more importantly, what to do?

Who are these enemies of civilization? Yes, in India's case, Islamic terrorists, but it goes deeper than that.

What cultural, societal, political philosophy allows a pseudo-religion like Islam to exist and grow in its midst? Liberalism. In my view the political madness of liberalism is the real culprit behind the bombs of Bombay.

How?

Liberalism preaches a brand of egalitarianism that places all religions, beliefs and ideas on the same intellectual plane, but this contradicts the principle of rationality because all ideas and religions are not equal – some are evil.

Nonetheless, under the liberal tenets existent at the founding of the League of Nations (President Woodrow Wilson, 1919) and United Nations (FDR, 1945), nations are mandated under international law to take the diplomatic route verses common sense tactics when their country suffers an unprovoked, naked act of religious-based terrorism.

Therefore, liberalism prevented India from taking common sense action against her Muslim enemies when, in 1947, the U.N. formed Pakistan out of whole cloth, trying to stem the tide of Islamic fanaticism against the nation of India, but effectively leaving the country to be overrun by the more than 115 million Muslims living in India today.
Conservative intellectual, Ann Coulter eloquently prophesied the world's pathetic reaction to an international crisis:

There are only two choices with savages: Fight or run. Democrats always want to run, but they dress it up in meaningless catchphrases like "diplomacy," "détente," "engagement," "multilateral engagement," "multilateral diplomacy," "containment" and "going to the UN."
Instead of exporting throughout the world the elements of a representative democracy and a republic rooted in the Judeo-Christian traditions of intellectual thought, America has since FDR exported a bastardized socialism – a diabolical brand of liberalism that is more akin to Marxism and communism than it is to republicanism and freedom.

How do you "negotiate" with an enemy like radical Islam whose proponents think they are following the will of Allah when they mercilessly murder as many innocent men, women and children as they are able?

Liberalism seeks to "understand," to justify, rationalize and form a consensus with our Muslim brothers under the presumption, "Why do they hate us?"

The madness of liberalism is that it always shifts the blame away from the perpetrators to America. We are the only nation that has this developed sense of self-hatred, an irrational self-loathing that borders on the mentally insane.

Regarding the recent bombings in Bombay, liberalism says, "We can't jump to conclusions that these terrorists' acts had anything to do with Islamic radicalism. No, no, no. That would be imprudent, rash and racist. We must dialogue with our Muslim brothers to find the real reasons for their rage against us."

This kind of perverse logic will cause the death of America, the West and the entire civilized world and what I mean by 'civilized' here are those nations that still believe in and practice the fundamentals of civilization: obeying the rule of law, a Constitution rooted in liberty, justice and equality, freedom of religion, the press, the right to protest and freedom of assembly.

The last rudiment of civilization any nation needs to survive is to have the courage to outlaw and destroy any philosophy, religion, ideology or belief that doesn't honor the aforementioned fundamentals of civilization.

On this point I wrote an earlier article, "Is Islam compatible with a republic?" In a word, No!

In my opinion Islam is ipso facto contrary to every vestige of liberty, morality and truth that mankind has fostered for the past 6,000 years of human history. Why civilized nations allow Islam to even exist in their countries is, as evidenced by the most recent episode in India, only an invitation to a slow and painful national genocide.

While President George Bush, the invisible President-elect Barack Obama, the leaders of the free world, U.N. diplomats and the liberal media all mindlessly wring their hands and fret about what to do to in response to the recent savage acts of Islamic terrorism, Israeli commandos are plotting lex talionis, an eye for an eye justice. Why? Because contrary to the self-genocide of liberal egalitarianism and U.N. diplomacy, when dealing with bloodlust savages, only a more savage nation can survive.






http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=82257

While President George Bush, the invisible President-elect Barack Obama, the leaders of the free world, U.N. diplomats and the liberal media all mindlessly wring their hands and fret about what to do to in response to the recent savage acts of Islamic terrorism, Israeli commandos are plotting lex talionis, an eye for an eye justice. Why? Because contrary to the self-genocide of liberal egalitarianism and U.N. diplomacy, when dealing with bloodlust savages, only a more savage nation can survive.

Does this mean we should throw a nuke somewhere just to make a point? And anyone that quotes "eloquent" Ann Coulter to prove a case for world-wide annihilation must have been dropped on his head as a child.
I am dumbfounded by these type of writers, through their racist rhetoric, are promoting purification of the world population by their standards, of course.

Just debating vortex. Not angry. I really think it's Saudi Arabia financing this HATRED AGAINST Judeo/Christian values which are in the WEST. They are way beyond racist in countries like Saudi Arabia. The terrorist in Bombay were looking for westerners. They are indoctinated into hating the west in the Islamic schools or Madrassas.


Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdallah al-Sabil, member of the Council of Senior Religious Scholars, Saudi Arabia:

“Any attack on innocent people is unlawful and contrary to shari'a (Islamic law). ... Muslims must safeguard the lives, honor and property of Christians and Jews. Attacking them contradicts shari'a.â€