Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074

    NE- Prosecutor details what's behind flag desecration charge

    Prosecutor details what's behind flag desecration charge

    OMAHA, Neb. (AP) -- Sarpy County prosecutors have formally spelled out why they are prosecuting a member of the Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas for flag mutilation.

    The prosecutors explained the charges against Shirley Phelps-Roper in a two-page court filing Monday morning.

    The case stems from the Westboro Church's protest at the funeral of Nebraska Army National Guard Spc. William "Bill" Bailey in Bellevue last June.

    Prosecutors said the flag desecration charge is based on Phelps-Roper's decision to let her 10-year-old son stand on an American flag and her choice to wear a flag as a skirt that drug on the ground.

    Phelps-Roper is a member of the Topeka, Kan.-based Westboro Baptist Church, whose members believe that U.S. troop deaths in Iraq are punishment for the nation's tolerance of homosexuality.

    The protesters carry signs bearing such slogans as "Thank God for dead soldiers." Followers say they are entitled to protest at soldiers' funerals under the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and religion.

    Phelps-Roper's attorney Bassel El-Kasaby of Omaha had asked for Monday's filing, so he could better challenge the charge and the state law it is based upon.

    El-Kasaby maintains that Nebraska's flag mutilation statute is unconstitutional because the U.S. Supreme Court has thrown out similar laws in other states.

    The state's flag law defines flag mutilation as when a "person intentionally casts contempt or ridicule upon a flag by mutilating, defacing, defiling, burning or trampling upon such flag."

    El-Kasaby declined to comment on the filing Monday because he wanted to review it further.

    Sarpy County Attorney Lee Polikov has acknowledged that winning the flag desecration case will be difficult. But he has said the circumstances at the funeral should justify the charge.

    Polikov has said the boy's standing on the flag is tantamount to "fighting words," which are not protected free speech.

    Both sides will get a chance to argue more about the merits of the desecration charge and law at hearings this summer.

    Phelps-Roper also has been charged with disturbing the peace, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and negligent child abuse.

    On the Net:

    Sarpy County Court: http://www.sarpy.com/countycourt

    First Amendment Center: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org

    Link

    GOD BLESS AMERICA AND THOSE WHO HAVE OR ARE DEFENDING HER.
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Americanpatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,603
    Polikov has said the boy's standing on the flag is tantamount to "fighting words," which are not protected free speech.
    Those are definately fighting words.
    <div>GOD - FAMILY - COUNTRY</div>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •