Thread: New rape allegation at DUKE University

Received by email, posting here for review.

--

Wher's this one been in the media?

http://noahdavidsimon.blogspot.com/2010 ... #idc-cover

A new and even more scandalous rape allegation has surfaced at Duke University. Yet the usual media and campus PC crowd are keeping mighty quiet. Identity politics apparently trumps all sense of outrage.

Of course, after the disgraceful media and university reaction to the phony allegations against Duke Lacrosse team members, it is wise avoid jumping to conclusions, but the comparative silence on the current case is nonetheless remarkable, considering how many particulars of the case were left out of the main AP account.

Mike Adams, writing on Townhall, lays out the facts the MSM won't:

Frank Lombard is the associate director of Duke's Center for Health Policy. Lombard, a licensed clinical social worker with a master's degree in social work, is also a health-disparities researcher who studies HIV/AIDS in the rural South. The university administrator was recently arrested by the FBI and charged with offering up his adopted 5-year-old son for sex. I tried to contact Frank Lombard over the weekend to probe his expertise regarding the health benefits of raping small children. So far, he's declined to comment.

University administrator Lombard is accused of logging on to a chat room online and describing himself as a "perv dad for fun." The detective who wisely looked into the suspicious screen name says that Lombard admitted to molesting his own adopted son. All this was before allegedly inviting a stranger to travel to North Carolina from another state to statutorily rape his already-molested adopted son.


It gets worse. The allegations are stunning and sickening. Adams spares us what he says is the worst.

However, identity politics are probably also involved in understanding the media response. Again, Adams:

The Associate Press (AP) did not mention the fact that the five-year old offered up for molestation was black. Bringing that fact to light might be damaging to the political coalition that exists between blacks and gays. Nor did the AP mention that the adopted child is being raised by a homosexual couple. Bringing that fact to light might harm the gay adoption movement.


I am afraid that as far as the media and academic communities are involved, it is not the crime itself that matters, but rather whether the alleged perp is a member of an "oppressor" group. Although white, Lombard is gay, so in the interest of avoiding unpleasant stories involving homosexual adoption, the media is anxious to shut down public interest in the affair.

However, the outspokenness and willingness to judge in advance a case involving white jocks - easy targets - of Duke and media, inevitably place a spotlight on their handling of another Duke rape allegation.

If the media cant demonize white people they will avoid it like the plague...

Yea, he looks like a nice fellow.

Oh and there were two children taken from that home.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/5466526/

What a sicko!

Dixie

The pattern we observe is clear.

The unfair attention is not just directed at white people, it is directed at straight white males.

If the story involves a straight white male being evil it becomes a lesson for the national media to harp on over and over again.

If the perpetrator is a minority or in one of the protected classes of the left the story is hidden from public view and almost completely censored.

The pattern repeats all around us.

W