Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Orange County.CA
    Posts
    490

    Toll Roads Planned For LA, CA

    U.S. offers L.A. $213 million for toll lane plan
    MTA will weigh project to convert carpool lanes to congestion pricing, beginning with parts of the 10 and 210 freeways, but many obstacles remain.
    By Steve Hymon, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
    April 24, 2008
    The federal government has offered Los Angeles County $213 million to convert carpool lanes to special, congestion-pricing toll lanes on three freeways, according to county government documents.

    The freeways involved first would be short stretches of Interstates 10 and 210 in the San Gabriel Valley, and then, if any money remained, part of the 110 south of downtown Los Angeles.

    The federal funding, however, would come to L.A. County only if local and state transportation officials agreed to the changes, which are highly controversial in the region, where most motorists expect "free" freeways.

    Board members of the county Metropolitan Transportation Authority today will consider adopting a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Transportation.

    Also, the California Transportation Commission and the state Legislature would probably have a say before the special toll lanes were created, sources said.

    The idea of the special lanes is to impose costly tolls during rush hours to unclog congestion by discouraging people from driving during busy times -- so-called "congestion" pricing.

    Tolls would vary by time of day, with the highest fees during the busiest times. Cars with single occupants would probably be allowed to use the lanes -- if they pay a price.

    In the proposed deal, the federal money would go toward the purchase of about 60 high-volume buses that would use the new toll lanes. That would free up MTA funds for creating the toll lanes.

    L.A. Councilwoman Wendy Greuel, who chairs the council's Transportation Committee, said she's cautiously optimistic that the MTA board would adopt the plan today.

    She said that although she understands that fees are unpopular, it was time to try something new.

    "The most important aspect of this is the breadth of the money," Greuel said. "We're in the 21st century and that means we have to look at solutions we never have before."

    A spokesman for L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said Wednesday night that the mayor is supportive of the plan and feels it deserves "a test ride."

    MTA spokesman Marc Littman declined to comment on the funding offer. Officials with the U.S. Department of Transportation did not return calls.

    Transportation officials hope enough people use the buses and the tolls clear enough space in the carpool lanes for traffic flow to remain at 45 mph or more at all times.

    Many carpool lanes are near capacity and frequently suffer the same stop-start traffic that grips regular lanes.

    Only short stretches of freeway fall under the proposal.

    On the I-210, the tolls would be in effect between junctions with the 710 and 605 -- an 11-mile stretch that includes some of its heaviest volumes of traffic, according to Caltrans.

    On the I-10, the tolls would affect the El Monte Busway, a distance of about 10 miles. The first parts of the project could be implemented in 2010.

    The federal offer has come to Los Angeles County after New York City failed to approve a congestion pricing program.

    "We feel it's important for the public to feel this and taste it," Tyler Duvall, acting undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Transportation, said earlier this month. "L.A. is a national interest area, and it's important in our view to get [congestion pricing] on the ground and demonstrated to everyone."

    steve.hymon@latimes.com
    IT'S NOT HOW YOU GET IN, IT'S HOW YOU GET OUT

  2. #2
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074
    No federal funds to sanctuary cities like LA.
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    why should taxpayers pay for a freeway that is already built and paid for my the taxes?

  4. #4
    Senior Member cayla99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
    Posts
    4,889
    Quote Originally Posted by jamesw62
    why should taxpayers pay for a freeway that is already built and paid for my the taxes?
    Because the political sponges are upset that you are keeping a small amount of your own money. Now if they DEPORTED ALL of the illegals down there, congestion would not be a problem.
    Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •