Thread: Obama to Kill Tomahawk and Hellfire Missile Programs … Cornerstone of US Navel Power

TREASON: Obama to Kill Tomahawk and Hellfire Missile Programs …The Cornerstone of US Navel Power

by admin · March 24, 2014
BY: Adam Kredo

President Barack Obama is seeking to abolish two highly successful missile programs that experts say has helped the U.S. Navy maintain military superiority for the past several decades.

The Tomahawk missile program—known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile”—is set to be cut by $128 million under Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal and completely eliminated by fiscal year 2016, according to budget documents released by the Navy.



Image: nation.foxnews.com

In addition to the monetary cuts to the program, the number of actual Tomahawk missiles acquired by the United States would drop significantly—from 196 last year to just 100 in 2015. The number will then drop to zero in 2016.

nation.foxnews.com

Watch this video for a better explanation. This has nothing to do with a lack of funds. This CIA asset was chosen to destroy America from the inside, and it’s all by design!



http://asheepnomore.net/2014/03/24/t...s-navel-power/

Obama seeks to weaken Navy, kill Tomahawk, Hellfire missiles



Obama budget would wipe out Tomahawk, Hellfire missiles, weaken Navy.Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Joe Newby
Policy & Issues Examiner
March 24, 2014

If Barack Obama gets his way, the U.S. Navy will no longer have the highly successful Tomahawk or Hellfire missiles within two years, the Washington Free Beacon reported Monday.
Obama's budget proposal, if passed, would cut the Tomahawk missile program by $128 million in fiscal year 2015, and eliminates the program completely in 2016.
The president's proposal would also force the Navy to cancel its acquisition of the well-regarded and highly effective Hellfire missiles in 2015, the Free Beacon said.
Making matters worse, the money would be diverted to a missile system that won't be ready for combat operations for at least 10 years.
Experts say the cuts will severely impact the Navy's ability to maintain its superiority on the seas.
Seth Cropsey, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for American Seapower, said the cuts would move "the U.S. away from a position of influence and military dominance.”
If someone were trying to “reduce the U.S. ability to shape events” in the world, he added, “they couldn’t find a better way than depriving the U.S. fleet of Tomahawks. It’s breathtaking.”
Moreover, he added, the cuts are “like running a white flag up on a very tall flag pole and saying, ‘We are ready to be walked on.’”
Steve Russell, a retired Army officer running for Congress, called the cuts devastating for a number of reasons.
“We run a huge risk because so much of our national policy for immediate response is contingent on our national security team threatening with Tomahawk missiles,” he said.
“The very instrument we will often use and cite, we’re now cutting the program,” he added. “There was a finite number [of Tomahawk’s] made and they’re not being replenished.”
“If our national policy is contingent on an immediate response with these missile and we’re not replacing them, then what are we going do?” Russell asked.
At the current rate of use, the inventory of Tomahawk missiles will be completely depleted by 2018, and the Navy will have nothing to use in their place.
"Yet another move in which Barack Obama is clearly weakening the United States just as Russia gains strength," Bryan Preston said at PJ Media. "Two words: Fundamental transformation."

Related:

• Obama to bypass law, slash military pay raises by nearly half
• Barack Obama refers to 'my military' at G20 summit (Video)
• President Obama: Troops 'fighting on my behalf'
• Renowned author: Obama wants military leaders who will fire on U.S. citizens
• Obama threatens defense veto if health care premiums for military not increased
• Obama to cut medical benefits for active, retired military, not union workers

----------------------------------------------------------------
If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, visit and like his Facebook page, or subscribe to receive email updates when a new article is published.

http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...lfire-missiles

http://www.alipac.us/f19/obama-kill-...2/#post1401864

Navy Top Gun Trainer: Social Conditioning Focus Is Suffocating Retention Efforts

March 25, 2014 by Ben Bullard

Social “conditioning” programs aimed at making the U.S. military a kinder, gentler, more lawsuit-proof workplace have begun supplanting its core mission: fighting and killing enemies.
That’s the open message a former Top Gun instructor is sending the U.S. Navy’s top brass.
The website of the nonprofit U.S. Naval Institute is featuring this month a lengthy study by Commander Guy Snodgrass, who cautions that a lack of trust in senior Naval leadership – borne from a combination of factors that includes too great an emphasis on social issues and not enough on fighting wars – is precipitating a severe enlistment and retention crisis.
“Put simply, there is no dollar amount that can be spent, or amount of training that can be conducted, that will completely eradicate complex issues such as suicide, sexual assault, or commanding officer reliefs for cause – yet we continue to expend immense resources in this pursuit,” he wrote.
“Sailors are bombarded with annual online training, general military training, and safety stand-downs – all in an effort to combat problems that will never be defeated. The perception is that these efforts are not undertaken because they are incredibly effective, but rather because of significant political and public oversight…Sailors continue to cite the over-focus on social issues by senior leadership – above and beyond discussions on warfighting – a fact that demoralizes junior and mid-grade officers alike.”
Snodgrass, an F-18 pilot who went on to write speeches for the Pentagon Chief of Naval Operations, doesn’t solely attribute the Navy’s retention problem to its leaders’ forced fixation on sensitivity training – he lists a number of factors, each of which poses a serious problem on its own: attitudes of millennial-generation recruits about work for pay, sustained campaigns that lack tangible and principled objectives, a distressed global economy, and changes in promotional incentives within the Naval command hierarchy.

Filed Under: Liberty News, Staff Reports

http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/2...ntion-efforts/