Thread: Obama: More uninsured than you think

Obama: More uninsured than you think

During weekly address, President Obama cites new Treasury figure that says nearly half of Americans go without health insurance for a month over 10 years.

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) -- In an effort to cast health care reform as helpful to more Americans, President Obama on Saturday pounded home a new statistic: Nearly 50% of people under 65 have gone without coverage for at least one month over a decade.

"It can happen to anyone," Obama said in his weekly address. "In the United States of America, no one should have to worry that they'll go without health insurance -- not for one year, not for one month, not for one day. And once I sign my health reform plan into law -- they won't."

The new figure comes from a Treasury Department analysis of survey data collected by the University of Michigan. The data tracked health insurance coverage through phone interviews with some 17,000 individuals from 1997 to 2006.

It appears to be the first such analysis of its kind to look at the population of uninsured Americans over a lengthy period of time.

Treasury's analysis also found that roughly two out of five Americans, under 65, go without health insurance for at least six months over a ten-year period. And a little more than one out of three go without insurance for a year over the course of a decade.

"This report is an indictment of the status quo," a senior Treasury official said. "It makes it clear that the status quo is a plan that would allow half of Americans some spell that they'd go without insurance, and a significant percentage of them would go without insurance for over a year."

0:00 /5:27Health care's whistle-blower

The report is the latest in a week-long barrage by the White House to turn up the pressure for health care reform. Obama started the recent campaign with a Labor Day speech to AFL-CIO members in Cincinnati, culminating in an address to Congress on Wednesday night.

White House staffers have been meeting with Democrats and Republicans, hammering out concern about different parts of bills. The main goal of the legislation is to get more people covered while reining in health care cost increases.

So far, four main bills are in play. Observers have been waiting for the powerful Senate Finance Committee to release its bill. The panel, headed by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., has been scrambling to get bipartisan consensus.

Baucus told Democratic leaders that he will unveil a bill on Wednesday, congressional aides said on Friday. The committee will start publicly debating the details of the bill in the following week.

The parties remain bitterly divided.

In the Republican weekly address on Saturday, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said Obama's health care proposals are too costly.

And Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., said Obama should "start from scratch" if he wants a bill passed soon. "There are things we can agree on, and things we can't," Kline said in a conference call with reporters.

Obama heads to Kline's home state on Saturday for a rally in support of health care reform.

CNN's Ted Barrett and Emily Sherman contributed to this report.

First Published: September 12, 2009: 6:01 AM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/12/news/ec ... gletoolbar

I would rather have no health care than allow the Gov't to dictate my health care and/or force me to pay for illegals.

We're so removed from free markets in health care and true competition, already, that we've got idiots paid with our tax dollars trying to stomp it out. See what happened in New York.

The federal "reform" is just a subterfuge for going in for the final kill. Then you'll have doctors like the ones in England who are committing homicide on the elderly, claiming they're at end of life when they're not. They're just inconvenient. And the docs who are PAID EMPLOYEES OF THE GOVERNMENT, and not paid by the patients, are doing what their employer tells them to do. It's all about scarce money that's been handed out in big bundles to Wall Street and the Auto Bigs, and not having enough to fund Medicare when Baby Boomers reach retirement. If you're a boomer, you're as good as forced-dead if ObamaCare passes. Camel's nose was already under the tent and now it's all about getting the entire beast inside.



State Slaps Dr. Do-Good



The state is trying to shut down a New York City doctor's ambitious plan to treat uninsured patients for around $1,000 a year.

Dr. John Muney offers his patients everything from mammograms to mole removal at his AMG Medical Group clinics, which operate in all five boroughs.

“I'm trying to help uninsured people here,â€

Instead of punishing the doctor and changing the healing end of healthcare, why aren't we looking at INSURANCE reform? That's where all the problems are. Makes sense to me.

In addition, why should Americans have to pay for health insurance when illegal aliens get it for free using ERs? That may be one of the reasons some people drop insurance. Makes sense to me. WHy aren't we doing something about the problem, which is illegal immigration?

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

We're so removed from free markets in health care and true competition, already, that we've got idiots paid with our tax dollars trying to stomp it out. See what happened in New York.

The federal "reform" is just a subterfuge for going in for the final kill. Then you'll have doctors like the ones in England who are committing homicide on the elderly, claiming they're at end of life when they're not. They're just inconvenient. And the docs who are PAID EMPLOYEES OF THE GOVERNMENT, and not paid by the patients, are doing what their employer tells them to do. It's all about scarce money that's been handed out in big bundles to Wall Street and the Auto Bigs, and not having enough to fund Medicare when Baby Boomers reach retirement. If you're a boomer, you're as good as forced-dead if ObamaCare passes. Camel's nose was already under the tent and now it's all about getting the entire beast inside.

The doctors are not committing homicide on the elderly in England. I'd like to see some kind of warrant or evidence on this claim. Furthermore, considering that the life expectancy/health in the European countries with national health care is better than the US's I'd say that their plan is probably more beneficial. Moreover, in regards to the fact that doctors will be dictated on what to do, they will only be put under regulations (as they are now) so they do not do stupid stuff to increase funding costs. Hmm... you seem to want to fund Medicare but you do know that Medicare is a form of government provided health care right? Furthermore, baby boomers would do better under Obamacare as the reorganization of the health system transfers money away from the greedy insurance companies and to the people who actually need this money in the form of aid.