Thread: Obama quietly erasing borders-advancing Nau

WorldNetDaily
By Jerome R. Corsi

Obama quietly erasing borders-advancing Nau

Acting quietly, below the radar of U.S. public opinion and without congressional approval, the Obama administration is implementing a key policy objective of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to erase the border with Mexico and Canada.

The administration is acting under a State Department-declared policy initiative described in a March 23 fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision."
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/03/138926.htm

"Mexico and the United States have a shared interest in creating a 21st century border that promotes the security and prosperity of both countries," the State Department declared. "The U.S. and Mexican governments have launched a range of initiatives that challenge the traditional view of 'hold the line' and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st century border management."

At the same time, CTV News in Canada has obtained a draft copy of a declaration between the U.S. and Canada entitled "Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness," to be implemented by a newly created Canadian-U.S. "Beyond the Border Working Group."

The two documents strongly suggest the Obama administration is pursuing a stealth bureaucratic methodology to establish a common North American border around the continent, encompassing the U.S., Canada and Mexico, while simultaneously moving to erase the borders between the U.S. and Mexico as well as between the U.S. and Canada.

Under the Bush administration's SPP, the U.S., Mexico and Canada organized some 20 different "shadow government" bureaucratic working groups composed of agency heads and undersecretaries in the three nations. The groups span a wide range of policy areas, from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration, trilateral travel, transportation, energy, environment, food and agriculture, health and financial services.

WND has reported since 2006 that a blueprint published in 2005 by the Council on Foreign Relations entitled "Building a North America Community" called for the establishment of a common security perimeter around North America by 2010 to facilitate the free movement of people, trade and capital between the three nations of North America.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=36586

In his 2001 book, "Toward a North American Community," American University professor Robert Pastor, a co-chair of the CFR blue ribbon committee that authored "Building a North American Community," called for the creation of a North American Commission, a North American Parliament, and a North American Court on Trade and Investment.

The language of the documents declaring "A New Border Vision" with Mexico and Canada could easily have been lifted directly from the CFR report or Pastor's book.

The 2005 CFR report "Building a North American Community" called on page xvii of the Foreword for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security perimeter, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter."

CTV News reported that the language of the draft agreement specified that "A New Border Vision" for the U.S. and Canada would involve "a perimeter approach to security, working together within, at, and away from the borders of our two countries in a way that supports economic competitiveness, job creation and prosperity, and in a partnership to enhance our security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people and goods between our two countries."

Similarly, the U.S. State Department fact sheet calling for "A New Border Vision" with Mexico specified five areas of "joint border management, co-responsibility for cross-border crime, and shared commitment to the efficient flow of legal commerce and travel," namely: enhancing public safety, securing flows of people and goods, expediting legitimate commerce and travel, engaging border communities, and setting policy.

Under "setting policy," the State Department fact sheet with Mexico called for achieving rapid policy change through "an agile inter-agency process within each country as well as a means by which both governments can easily coordinate at a bi-national level."

This provides additional support for the conclusion that the bureaucratic "working groups" established under SPP in the Bush administration will continue to operate under Obama administration.

CTV News reported that the draft declaration of "A New Border Vision" with Canada similarly also specified a cross-border policy agenda, including:

* An integrated cargo security strategy;

* A joint approach to port and border security and screening;

* Cross-border sharing of information between law enforcement agencies;

* A closer working relationship between the two militaries in the event of emergencies;

* A new level of collaboration on preventing and recovering from counter attacks.

Affirming the continuance of the working group process, the draft declaration with Canada specifies the U.S. and Canada "intend to address threats at the earliest point possible, including outside the perimeter of our two countries."

The origin of the SPP can be traced to a trilateral summit meeting in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005, between President George W. Bush, then-Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.

At the end of the Waco summit, the three leaders simply declared that the U.S., Mexico and Canada were now in the Security and Prosperity Partnership, without the signing of any international agreement between the three countries or the ratifying of any trilateral treaty by the U.S. Senate.

The SPP in the administration of President Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, operating as the European Union, with its own currency, the euro, functioning as the sole legitimate currency in what has become known as "the eurozone."

The concern was that under the SPP, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could evolve into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the Amero, designed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.

WND has reported analysts have believed the North American integration plan will proceed incrementally, largely below the radar, since the SPP was declared "dead" by one of its chief architects, American University Professor Robert A. Pastor, who for nearly 15 years has been a major proponent of building a "North American Community."
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=70864

Source: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.pr ... eId=240045

From free trade, to super highways, to same legislation being written to countless speeches from prominent leaders telling the world globalization is inevitable, I don’t think it’s a stretch any longer to seriously begin talking about a union within the next decade or two in North America.

The government of Canada is currently crafting a public relations campaign to convince Canadians this is what they need to make their lives and their safety approve but I ask that you take the time, upon this perimeters official announcement to stand up and tell the powers that be that Canadians will not stand for the deterioration of our national sovereignty.

http://nauresistance.org/2010/12/nafta- ... a-reality/

http://anoninformer.yolasite.com/making ... -a-reality

It seems that many Canadians oppose this too.

Obama is just continuing what Bush started. Remember it was Bush who twice tried to ram amnesty down our throats and even after 9/11 refused to close the border. McCain, Grahamnesty and other dirt bag RINOs lent all the help they could to him to screw over the country.

This is part of why they have not controlled illegal immigration. I've been fighting this for years.

It's not just Bush. This has been the plan of the globalists/socialists for decades. Remember 2 comments by Obama, with obamacare...'we've been working on this for 100 years', and very recently, when discussing the continuation of the Bush Tax Cuts, paraphrased 'Remember that this is a long term effort'. IMHO, he was reminding the PROGRESSIVES, the Marxists, that their stealth efforts towards a USSA, and global gov't have been stealthly worked on for 100 years, so stick together. The Fabian Socialists in the UK (started the Progressive movement here), have as their shield, a wolf in sheep's clothing. Here, went and got it for you.



Question: If Socialism is so great, why didn't Obama just come out and say, PRE-ELECTION, 'hey folks, I'm a Marxist, and the 'Hope and Change' and 'Fundamental Transformation' that I keep referrring to, is a Socialist America. I believe it's better than the system set up by the Founders of this nation"? Do you think that he would have won, then? I sure don’t. With the collusion of the mainstream media, he won. Well, the Socialist mask is off, Americans screamed 'NO" during the Nov. elections. We cannot go back to sleep. We MUST keep fighting the traitors.

Originally Posted by curiouspat

Remember 2 comments by Obama, with obamacare...'we've been working on this for 100 years', and very recently, when discussing the continuation of the Bush Tax Cuts, paraphrased 'Remember that this is a long term effort'.

http://qbit.cc/nau-currency-or-another-hoax/

http://www.federaljack.com/?p=7560