Thread: This is one reason why I stopped listening to Rush years ago

http://mediamatters.org/items/200610020 ... dliars.com

Limbaugh: Democrats "set Foley up ... it's all coordinated"

On the October 2 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh suggested that the recent resignation of former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), which came after allegations that Foley sent inappropriate emails to a 16-year-old male congressional page, was a "set ... up" "coordinated" by the Democrats. Limbaugh also stated that "the orgy and the orgasm that has been taking place in the media since Friday and with the Democrats is ... all coordinated, and it's ... all oriented toward the election." He added, "There's no concern about the kid," and blamed Democrats, because "[i]n their hearts and minds and their crotches, they don't have any problem with what Foley did. They've defended it over ... the years." Limbaugh's comments were previously noted in part by Salon.com's War Room.

From the October 2 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: I'm just thinking out loud here. What if somebody got to the page and said, you know, we want you to set Foley up. We need to do a little titillating thing here. Keep it and save it and so forth. How would you get a kid to do that? Yeah, who knows? You threaten him or pay him. There's any number of ways given the kind of people that we're dealing with and talking about here.

Now, folks, I don't want to be misunderstood here. I'm not trying to mount any kind of a defense. That's a bad word. I'm not trying to get into a defense of what Mark Foley did. Please don't misunderstand. I'm just telling you that the -- the -- the orgy and the orgasm that has been taking place in the media since Friday and with the Democrats is -- it's all coordinated, and it's all -- it's all oriented toward the election. There's no concern about the kid -- no concern about the children.

There is -- there is -- there's not even any real problem with what Foley did, as we've discussed. In their hearts and minds and their crotches, they don't have any problem with what Foley did. They've defended it over the -- over the years.

================================================== ==========

This is just absolutely vomit inducing.

Yeah, right Rush. The Democrats set this up 3 YEARS AGO just so they could wheel it out before THIS election. Talk about a 'conspiracy theory'! SHEESH!!!

I don't think they set it up......however I question all the time, the timing of public knowledge on a host of things from both sides. These people are acting worse than small children at times. It makes me ashamed that people of this poor calibur are actually serving in this government. Yet here we are......supposed to vote........and frankly it's not a choice at all anymore. I really wish "none of the above" was an option to let them know that we don't like anything they put in front of us to pick from.

"No one can take you somewhere, you don't already know how to go."

How this came about and who might have done it is of no importance here. Rush get's an F on this one.

I often listen to Rush, and at times I have found his thinking to be a bit paranoid. I honestly think this time his imagination got away from him. Although in todays' world, this scandal doesn't seem too far fetched. I'm not agreeing w/ Rush that this was a plan masterminded 3 years ago, but you have to consider the timing on this was a little perfect to be chalked up as "coincidence. "
Hastert should have acted on this a year ago, which means this little problem was probably known within both parties. My bet is that this little rumor stayed behind closed doors and the Dems were just waiting to use this at a perfect time. They know this could weaken the Republican support and help the Dems regain control.
According to Tom Clancy, this would be the "Potomic Two Step".

Originally Posted by dman1200

http://mediamatters.org/items/200610020013?src=newsbox-www.crooksandliars.com

Limbaugh: Democrats "set Foley up ... it's all coordinated"

Limbaugh is an embarassment.

By the way, does anybody know if Foley was on Limbaugh's recent Viagra tour of the Dominican Republic?

Hastert should have acted on this a year ago, which means this little problem was probably known within both parties. My bet is that this little rumor stayed behind closed doors and the Dems were just waiting to use this at a perfect time. They know this could weaken the Republican support and help the Dems regain control.

Of course.

If the Republicans are stupid enough to provide the Democrats with both the rope and the tree, why should anyone be surprised that they use it.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=52270



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ON CAPITOL HILL
'Gay' activist held
info about Foley
During campaign to 'out' lawmakers
said story would break before election

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 3, 2006
5:00 p.m. Eastern



© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com


Former Rep. Mark Foley
A radical activist on a mission to "out" conservative homosexual lawmakers and Capitol Hill staffers held on to information about Rep. Mark Foley's relationships with underage male pages, suggesting the story would break at the time of mid-term elections.

Blogger Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit points to a campaign by two activists who had Foley on their "target list" of 20 people and shared the information with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Foley abruptly resigned Friday as reports surfaced of inappropriate e-mails with a male page. Later, ABC News released online instant messages of more salacious exchanges. Foley has issued a statement saying he checked himself into an alcohol rehabilitation program at an undisclosed location.

In July 2004, the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade reported the two activists, Mike Rogers and John Aravosis, were "loosely heading an ongoing outing campaign on the Hill" ahead of the Senate vote on the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would bar same-sex marriage.

(Story continues below)


Among nearly 20 names on the "target list" provided to the Blade were Foley and Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland

The paper said a spokesman for Foley declined to comment after Aravosis asserted on his website the previous week that Foley is "gay."

"Both members of Congress have long been the subject of rumors about their sexual orientation," the paper said.

Rogers – in a March 4, 2005, post on his website BlogActive.com – declared Foley to be "gay" and, therefore, a hypocrite for voting for legislation against the homosexual agenda. The post said: "MARK FOLEY WILL BE EXPOSED FOR THE HYPOCRITE HE IS THROUGH A MAIL AND INTERNET CAMPAIGN THAT WILL REACH INTO EVERY HOME IN HIS DISTRICT."

More than a year ago, in a March 2005 post, Rogers said he had thought hard about what kind of action to take and said that while none would be taken at the moment, "When we get closer to the mid-term elections, I am sure more will surface."

Rogers did his own investigation of Foley, writing that through his recorded discussions with current and former staff members he learned how the congressman "hit on" young men at the Republican convention.

In a post Sunday, Rogers wrote about his attempt to communicate with Democrat officials, saying "the good news is that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is finally getting it."

Rogers said that prior to the Foley story breaking Friday, he called the DCCC's director of communications, Bill Burton, to let him know that the information about Foley – and another case – were "coming down the pike."

Burton had promised to have someone e-mail or return Rogers' call but apparently didn't follow though. Now, however, since the story broke Friday, said Rogers, "I am glad he followed up on my call and was ready on Friday to come out of the gate running."

Rogers added: "The bad new is they are still not paying enough attention. ... There are others within reach. ... If the Democrats would only fight half as hard as the Republicans."

Rogers said he posted comments about Foley on the DCCC website, but they were deleted.

In another post, Rogers admitted he had possession of the lurid Foley e-mails before they were posted on the Web.


"As people know, it's not always possible for me to disclose my role in some of the activities.
I can say this. I had the emails before they were on the net. Additionally, I had the additional emails, written by the page to a friend. The story was being written by a number of outlets and I provided additional information to reporters involved in the breaking of this story.

Was (I) the central figure in reporting on Foley’s latest scandal? Never said I was. Was my work on the case important to helping make sure it came out before the election? Yes.

Did I have any idea that the GOP leadership was engaged in a cover-up? Nope. Do I love the fact that they are trying to spin this as "naughty emails?" Yup. because it shows how out of (touch) they are about queer closet cases."

Aravosis, in his AmericaBlog, shows his anger at Foley for keeping his homosexuality hidden while backing President Bush, calling the congressman "our latest closeted gay hypocrite."

Aravosis said Foley made the target list for putting politics ahead of his own community by "whoring for an anti-gay president."

Foley, who at the time was running for the Senate, responded to the "outing" by Aravosis by holding a telephone press conference with Florida media in which he called the discussion about his sexual orientation "revolting." He refused to answer any questions about the charge and later abandoned his bid for the Senate, citing concerns over his father's health.

Blogger Hoft believes, however, Foley dropped out of the Senate race "because of pressure by Aravosis and the radical gay movement to make his life hell for being a closeted homosexual."



So, did the Dems know about this before, and did nothing to help the kid's? If so, they are as bad as the Reps. that knew.