Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Pa-Governors talk of moving beyond corn-based ethanol

    Jul 13, 2:32 PM EDT


    Governors talk of moving beyond corn-based ethanol

    By ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS
    Associated Press Writer




    PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- Governors from the coal fields of West Virginia to the corn fields of Iowa talked Sunday at their summer meeting about moving beyond ethanol produced just from food sources.

    They sometimes have different priorities in reaching this conclusion - priorities that can be as simple as who grows corn and who feeds it to livestock.

    And they're also not talking about replacement so much as supplementing: using switchgrass or wood waste products, for example, along with corn.

    Still, the conversation - including an energy forum Sunday - has big implications. The nation has 134 ethanol plants in 26 states with 77 more under construction or expanding, according to the Renewable Fuels Association, a trade group for the ethanol industry.

    This year's corn crop, expected to be a record, is worth about $52 billion.

    Meanwhile, the Agriculture Department says economic growth in developing countries, tight global grain supplies and demand for ethanol have pushed corn prices to record or near-record prices.

    That in turn has led some to blame the push for ethanol on high food prices. Disagreeing sharply, the ethanol industry and corn growers point the finger at record fuel prices driving up the cost of growing and shipping food.

    "Corn-based and commodities-based ethanol for states like Minnesota has been a success story," said the state's governor, Tim Pawlenty.

    "But we recognize that this has to now move to phase two," he said.

    Pawlenty was among about half the nation's governors who gathered for the summer meeting, where clean and renewable energy is the top official topic.

    Pawlenty, a Republican, launched "Securing a Clean Energy Future" when he took the reins of the National Governors Association last year as the group's chairman, a one-year post.

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry raised the stakes in the debate in April when he asked the Environmental Protection Agency to cut by half a requirement in last year's energy law to produce 9 billion gallons of ethanol in 2008 for blending into gasoline.

    Perry and other opponents of the requirement say the push to turn more corn into ethanol is raising food prices and the cost of feed for livestock.

    The EPA hasn't acted on Perry's request and the Energy Department isn't thrilled about it, saying it would slow investment in biofuel technology.

    Several Republican lawmakers - but no other governors - have signed onto Perry's request.

    "I truly do not believe that a food-based product should be used for energy," said Gov. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, where almost all energy needs are met by coal. "It should be used for human consumption."

    Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina called the EPA requirement "a totally bogus government mandate" at Sunday's energy forum.

    The current buzz is cellulosic ethanol, or ethanol made from plant matter. Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm pitched the idea Sunday of using more wood products because of the large number of forests in her state.

    Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania says his state "could be to cellulosic ethanol what Iowa was to corn-based ethanol." A new state law will require a minimum of a billion gallons of fuel annually pumped in Pennsylvania come from renewable fuels.

    Iowa Gov. Chet Culver said he welcomed the debate as a way to reduce the country's dependence on foreign oil. But he said that "you can't get to cellulosic ethanol until you do ethanol first."

    He pointed to the construction of a plant in Emmetsburg, Iowa, by ethanol maker Poet where the company hopes to produce cellulosic ethanol on a large scale.

    "We should be thanking these Iowa farmers, these ethanol producers, these innovators, that are - as we speak today - out in Iowa trying to solve that energy security challenge," Culver said.

    "No one believes that, long term, ethanol is going to be the silver bullet, but it is clearly one of the better options right now," he said.

    Pawlenty says biofuels will be a big part of the nation's energy future but the type of biofuels will evolve and change.

    Gov. Jon Huntsman of Utah echoed that notion when he dismissed the idea of an energy argument along the lines of to drill or not to drill for oil.

    "The choices increasingly are plentiful," he said on C-SPAN Sunday.

    "The question before policy makers really is what are the choices we have to get us from today's very hydrocarbon dependent world to one, 20, 30, 40 years from now, that will be much less hydrocarbon dependent," he said.



    http://www.dailytimes.com/wire.lasso?re ... AL_WARMING
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Is ethanol used for fuel now? Are there ANY cars running on ethanol? Machinery? ANYTHING? Seems to me if it was, why the hell are energy and food costs through the roof?!?!?!

    Stop pissing in the wind and use the corn for FOOD!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member gofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,728
    The highest ethanol content is E85 or 85% ethanol. The only reason for adding gasoline to ethanol is so you can't drink it!! Besides it absorbs water and it determinal to engines, you can't run it thru pipelines because of the corrosive factor, so you have to use diesel to truck the stuff. It's a total waste. Can you imagine the oil it takes to farm MILLIONS of acres, including fertilizers to produce this stuff and still you have to spend more energy harvesting and trucking it and to power the plants. I suspect it would be lucky to break even in energy gains.

    It's highly arrogant to use FOOD for fuel while the idiot enviromentalist claim that global warming is going to cut food production and increase starvation. Apparently they don't believe that or they wouldn't be behind ethanol.

    I wonder what the crop losses to flooding is going to do to ethanol and corn prices??

    As a taxpayer, you are paying twice for fuel. Ethanol is subsidized by .51 cents per gallon and then you pay for it again at the pump with more taxes added on.

    The govt wants higher mileage cars and electric cars, etc., so WHAT happens when the gas tax collection falls flat??? THey are going to up it again! You are going to be PUNISHED for conserving and driving more fuel-efficient cars!!

    DRILL and PUMP our own oil!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •