Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,726

    "PRO-LIFE" CANDIDATES SHOULD PUT UP OR SHUT UP

    "PRO-LIFE" CANDIDATES SHOULD PUT UP OR SHUT UP

    By Pastor Chuck Baldwin

    November 30, 2007

    NewsWithViews.com

    Please consider this scenario. Several youngsters are drowning in a neighborhood lake. They are thrashing the water and crying out for help. There is a large, heavy raft nearby that could be used to rescue the drowning youths, but it would take several people to haul it into the water and then row it out to the victims.

    Now, as it happens, there are more than enough people standing around the lake whose combined efforts would be more than adequate to rescue the drowning young people. Instead of grabbing the life raft and heading out to save the victims, however, they all start making speeches.

    One by one, the would-be rescuers holler out that they believe in life; they believe in saving the lives of the drowning young people. They are all "pro-life." The only problem is, none of them grabs the raft and actually attempts to save the victims. So, here is the sixty-four million dollar question: are these people really "pro-life"? Do they really want to save the victims, or are they simply pro-life pretenders who only want to talk about saving lives but not actually do anything about it?

    There is no one reading this column who would accept the pro-life rhetoric of the people around the lake as justification for not grabbing the life raft and actually saving the lives of those who were drowning. Then, why do "pro-life" conservatives accept the rhetoric of Republican politicians when there is no action to back it up?

    If Mitt Romney, John McCain, Fred Thompson, and Mike Huckabee are truly "pro-life," they need to do more than just talk. They need to put up or shut up!

    Ladies and gentlemen, it doesn't take some magical Supreme Court appointment to overturn Roe v. Wade and end abortion-on-demand. If all the Republicans who keep telling us that they are "pro-life" (including President George W. Bush) were really pro-life, then why, in spite of having had ample time and opportunity to end the abortion holocaust, have they not done so?

    In fact, the GOP has controlled the U.S. Supreme Court since the infamous Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion-on-demand was handed down in 1973. That means GOP appointments have dominated the Court for over thirty years, and yet abortion-on-demand is still the law of the land.

    Beyond that, for six years (2000-2006), "pro-life" Republicans controlled the entire federal government. And, for six years, millions of unborn babies cried their silent screams as the abortionists' scalpels ripped their little bodies apart in abortuaries throughout America. And to use my opening analogy, all these "pro-life" Republicans did was stand by the side of the lake and talk "pro-life," while the youngsters drowned in front of their eyes. During all this time, the life raft sat unused on the shore.

    Dear reader, the life raft for the millions of unborn babies victimized by abortion-on-demand is the U.S. Constitution. However, we have a bunch of arrogant and conceited imbeciles in Washington, D.C., who have neither the smarts nor guts to use this wonderful life raft. It seems that the vast majority of them have absolutely no knowledge of the Constitution--even though each and every one of them takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defend it.

    The only presidential candidate who has a commitment to saving the lives of unborn babies and who understands the constitutional authority of Congress to end abortion-on-demand is Texas Congressman Ron Paul (with the exception of Alan Keyes, who recently announced his candidacy). You read it right. At this point, John McCain is all talk; Mitt Romney is all talk; Fred Thompson is all talk. And even Mike Huckabee is all talk.

    Huckabee says that when he was Governor of Arkansas he required parental notification for abortions, required a woman give informed consent before having an abortion, and required a woman be told that her baby would experience pain and be given the option of anesthesia for her baby. (Source: Mike Huckabee's website) While this is commendable, none of Huckabee's actions did anything to actually end abortion-on-demand.

    When it comes to ending abortion-on-demand and overturning Roe v. Wade, the only thing Mike Huckabee (and the rest of the Republican presidential candidates, save Ron Paul and Alan Keyes) will say is that they will appoint the right judges, as if they have no power as President to do anything else. (Good grief! Even Rudy Giuliani says as much.) My friends, these "pro-life" Republicans are either woefully ignorant themselves or they are pulling the proverbial wool over our eyes.

    Ron Paul seems to be the only presidential candidate who understands that under Article. III. Section. 2., the Constitution gives to the Congress of the United States the power to hold rogue courts in check and to overturn outlandish rulings such as Roe v. Wade.

    Accordingly, Ron Paul has introduced and reintroduced the Sanctity of Life Act (including in the current Congress). If passed, this Bill would recognize the personhood of all unborn babies by declaring that "human life shall be deemed to exist from conception." The Bill also recognizes the authority of each State to protect the lives of unborn children. In addition, this Bill would remove abortion from the jurisdiction of the Court, thereby nullifying the Roe v. Wade decision. The Bill would also deny funding for abortion providers. In plain language, the Bill would overturn Roe v. Wade and end abortion-on-demand.

    Is it not more than interesting that "pro-life" President George W. Bush, along with the "pro-life" Republican Party leadership of both houses of Congress, refused--and continues to refuse--to support Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act? In addition, not a single "pro-life" presidential candidate outside of Ron Paul has even bothered to mention the Sanctity of Life Act, much less aggressively call for its implementation with a promise that, if elected President, he would sign it into law. Not Huckabee; not McCain; not Thompson; not Romney; none of them!

    Why did John McCain not introduce Dr. Paul's Sanctity of Life bill in the U.S. Senate? Why have Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Fred Thompson not committed to use the power of the bully pulpit of the White House to push Congress to implement this Act? Again, either these men are ignorant of their constitutional duties and responsibilities (in which case, they are unqualified for the office of President) or they are not truly serious about overturning Roe v. Wade and ending abortion-on-demand (in which case, they are conservative phonies and frauds).

    I say again, it is time for "pro-life" Republicans to put up or shut up!

    Beyond that, it is time for Christian conservatives to stop being so gullible. We need to start looking beyond eloquent rhetoric and campaign clichés. We need to begin demanding results.

    Every four years, Republicans trot out a conservative façade during an election season for the purpose of obtaining the votes of susceptible Christians. And every four years, conservative Christians--like starving catfish--take the bait: hook, line, and sinker.

    "Save us from the monster," seems to be the cry of well-meaning--but easily manipulated--conservatives. The "monster" is whoever the Democrats nominate, of course. But, ladies and gentlemen, the Republican Party has done absolutely nothing to change the course of the country. Nothing! In fact, it has only gotten worse with Republicans in charge.



    Ron Paul is the only candidate running against the status quo. He is the only candidate who takes his oath to the Constitution seriously. He is the only candidate who, if elected, would actually turn the country around. A Ron Paul victory would launch a new American revolution: a revolution of freedom and independence such as we have not seen since 1776. Furthermore, among the major Republican presidential contenders, Ron Paul is the only candidate whose pro-life commitment extends beyond rhetoric.

    (c) Chuck Baldwin



    PS. One further note regarding Mike Huckabee. He will not win the GOP nomination, but what he will do is wind up endorsing (or perhaps even being selected as the Vice Presidential candidate) whichever Republican candidate wins the nomination--even if he is a pro-abortion candidate. Thus, he will fulfill his role in this election: to bring Christian conservatives into the Republican fold, even without a commitment to the life issue by their standard-bearer. In other words, Huckabee is the establishment's guy to make sure that the Christian conservatives stay "in line."

    © 2007 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved

    http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin415.htm

  2. #2
    Senior Member NOamNASTY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,746
    Ron may want to read up on the people who wrote the constitution , like Jefferson for example .

    Jefferson was left with the problem of the Barbary Pirates . The past president had tried appeasement and even bribery to stop them from attacking our ships .

    Jefferson got himself a quran to see what kind of people he was dealing with . When he realized the only thing people who obey this kind of instruction understood was force, he sent our navy there to kill the heck out of them , a live by the sword die by the sword kinda thing .

    No more problem with pirates ,plus they got a new name to boot, 'barbareans '. This is the way I remember the story I read years ago and again a few months ago .

    Ron can give them all the land on this earth and they will still not stop until they conquor all or are stopped by force . And until he reads why they kill, live in hellholes and haven't evolved they will use him to accomplish their goals .

    Just like Davy Crocket learned not to give away other peoples money when the town burned down , Jefferson learned not to give bribes to pitates .

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    870
    Ron Paul has been a Pro-Life stalwart. Here's someone else, who has "put up": www.house.gov/hunter/news_prior_2006/righttolife03.html

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    was Georgia - now Arizona
    Posts
    4,477
    Quote Originally Posted by NOamNASTY
    Ron may want to read up on the people who wrote the constitution , like Jefferson for example .

    Jefferson was left with the problem of the Barbary Pirates . The past president had tried appeasement and even bribery to stop them from attacking our ships .

    Jefferson got himself a quran to see what kind of people he was dealing with . When he realized the only thing people who obey this kind of instruction understood was force, he sent our navy there to kill the heck out of them , a live by the sword die by the sword kinda thing .

    No more problem with pirates ,plus they got a new name to boot, 'barbareans '. This is the way I remember the story I read years ago and again a few months ago .

    Ron can give them all the land on this earth and they will still not stop until they conquor all or are stopped by force . And until he reads why they kill, live in hellholes and haven't evolved they will use him to accomplish their goals .

    Just like Davy Crocket learned not to give away other peoples money when the town burned down , Jefferson learned not to give bribes to pitates .
    Please explain these bolded words. Kindly show me where Dr. Paul is giving anybody anything or SHUT THE HELL UP WITH YOUR SLANDER!!!

    You're really starting to PISS ME OFF!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    It is very simple, really.

    Neither of the socalled two parties, want to settle the abortion issue.


    It is a cash cow for them - both sides.

    All they have to do if they need an influx of cash is to mention abortion. The pro-abortion people will begin screaming 'they are going to overturn Roe v. Wade, we need help to stop it'.

    The anti-abortion politicians will say, 'We are going to work to overturn Roe v. Wade, we just need some funding to do it.'

    You can hear checkbooks slapping down on the tables all over the country.

    They don't want that flow of money to dry up.

    None of them care one way or the other.

    I absolutely did not know that Ron Paul had that stance on abortion. I am happy to see this, and will read up on it.

    .
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •