Thread: The Ramifications of an Illegitimate President

The Ramifications of an Illegitimate President
7Share



Is every member of the U.S. House and Senate guilty of treason for failing to expose Obama's fraud?


WHAT WILL BE THE FALLOUT? by David LaRocque (Mar. 18, 2011) — The Hawaii Petition letter is a definitive and comprehensive statement of the constitutional concerns we all share with respect to the actions of the State of Hawaii and its officials in the matter of the apparently fraudulent 2008 U.S. presidential election. Perhaps a [...]

WHAT WILL BE THE FALLOUT?

by David LaRocque

Is every member of the U.S. House and Senate guilty of treason for failing to expose Obama's fraud?

(Mar. 18, 2011) — The Hawaii Petition letter is a definitive and comprehensive statement of the constitutional concerns we all share with respect to the actions of the State of Hawaii and its officials in the matter of the apparently fraudulent 2008 U.S. presidential election.

Perhaps a similar letter should be directed to the President of the United States Senate and the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, including a copy of this letter, laying out the specific constitutional concerns of the people relating to the federal government in this matter. This would include the apparent corruption of the federal judiciary which has repeatedly denied to the people their vested legal right under the provisions of the United States Constitution to have a constitutionally-eligible individual serving in the office of president.

According to Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison: “The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.â€

Any one of these concerns, if raised in connection with a background investigation for a standard security clearance for access to classified information, would be disqualifying. Taken in combination, it is inconceivable that a person with these issues in his background, and one who objects vigorously to any attempt to seek additional information or to gain access to original documentation about his origins and background, could be allowed to serve in the highest office in the United States government.

This is so true. Admitted use of illegal controlled substances as well as personal ties to anti-American revolutionaries would be enough for any federal employee to fail a security investigation and lose his/her security clearance, thus making them ineligible for their position. I have a hard time understanding how someone who wouldn't be qualified to be a pencil-pusher for the DEA is the leader of the executive branch...

Sad fact is our media is so bad that very little truth comes out and second
corruption within out government has reached a point in my opinion that
money will buy any office desired. Fair elections,not sure we could have
that in current times.

[quote]“The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.â€