Thread: REMAINING QUESTIONS on Barack Obama's Origin Of Birth

REMAINING QUESTIONS on Barack Obama's Origin Of Birth

Very interesting

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya, East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Resources:
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-chil ... fault.aspx

Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

if all 3 points, or really any of them can be verified how on earth is this not BIG news?

could it really be that the entire Washington establishment knows that Obama should not be in the White House and nobody says anything, but why?

Originally Posted by alamb

Could it really be that the entire Washington establishment knows that
Obama should not be in the White House and nobody says anything, but why?

Welcome to the "birther" party, alamb, where nothing is as it seems:

black-robed white-wigs are AWOL for fear of ridicule,

blind Justice passes assault weapons to drug cartels, while only bigots cling to guns,
their Bibles, and that obsolete U.S. Constitution, and telling the truth is Racist!!! ;


the Cheshire cat has who-knows-what in his hookah,


and the furious Red Queen has Y chromosomes and says,
"Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.
If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!"

HAPPY2BME'S questions are only a few of the many questions that were raised
when the Obama Campaign first began to weave their tangled web of deception,
before that O.C. became better known as the Obama Cartel & Crime Syndicate.

Yes, alamb, before Mr. Obama's confirmation by Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 8, 2009,
1400+ persons having authority to challenge his ineligibility for the Presidency were aware of the scam,
and by their silence and their refusal to examine the evidence, they were complicit in it, namely:

the heads of the Democratic National Convention, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Chair, and Alice Travis Germond,
Vice-Chair, the head of each state Democratic Convention, and the corresponding Republican officials;

538 State Electors, 50 Secretaries of State, 50 Governors, and 50 Attorneys General;

435 U.S. Representatives, 100 U.S. Senators, and Pres. of the Senate Dick Cheney;

Pres. George W. Bush, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Attorney General Michael Mukasey and certain U.S. Attorneys;

Federal Election Commissioners Cynthia L. Bauerly, Caroline C. Hunter, Donald F. McGahn II,
Matthew S. Petersen, Steven T. Walther, and Ellen L. Weintraub - they pleaded out for lack of jurisdiction;

U.S. Supreme Court Justices John G. Roberts, Jr., Antonin Scalia, Samuel A. Alito, Anthony M. Kennedy,
Stephen G. Breyer, John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Clarence Thomas,
who said, "We're evading that one" [the Obama ineligibility issue]; along with about 50 lower U.S. Court Judges.

We were prohibited from ex parte communication with the Justices and Judges, so we can only assume that they understood Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, of the Constitution, the "No person except a natural born Citizen shall be eligible" clause. We contacted the rest by Certified Mail with Return Receipt. If they were ignorant, it is because they ignored the truth and the facts. They are legally liable for their actions, and they are all guilty, so they must stick together, with no one breaking ranks, lest they all fall together. Any doubter is immediately frozen out, excommunicated, or perhaps worse.

You are cordially invited to read the ALIPAC Obama ineligibility thread at
http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-d...rasc-4650.html .
Enough evidence is documented there to sink a large Pacific island, never mind a battleship.

Remember, a natural born Citizen is

• a citizen
  born in the country
  of parents who were then citizens.

Originally Posted by HAPPY2BME

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?

[quote="U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare"][size=117]VITAL STATISTICS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1961
VOLUME I- NATALITY

“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.â€