Thread: Romney peeved over landscaping flap

This ALIPAC member has posted this entity be it editorial opinion, news article, column, or web creation as information for the General Population (public) only. It is not intended as an endorsement for this candidate by this poster. Its use here has not been anticipated to be used as, or used to discredit any candidate mentioned herewith.




Romney peeved over landscaping flap
The candidate lashes out after a question about illegal members of a crew that worked on his yard.
Romney peeved over landscaping flap


By Seema Mehta,
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
seema.mehta@latimes.com
December 8, 2007


DES MOINES -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney lashed out Friday when quizzed about the flap over a landscaping crew working at his home whose employees included illegal immigrants.

Asked by a reporter as he campaigned in Iowa if, especially given his tough stance on illegal immigration, he should have been more vigilant about the workforce at his home, Romney responded with pointed questions of his own.

"If I go to a restaurant, do I make sure all the waiters there are all legal? How would I do that?" the former Massachusetts governor asked.

He stressed that he has never proposed that homeowners, after they hire a contractor, should "then go out and inquire of the company's employees whether they happen to be legal or not."

Romney, who has frequently criticized his GOP competitors as soft on illegal immigration, had learned previously that illegal immigrants were among the workers tending his home's grounds, raking leaves and clearing debris from his tennis courts.

He fired the landscaping company this week after being contacted by reporters and learning that its crew still included illegal immigrants.

In a statement released by his campaign when the firing was disclosed, Romney said, "I gave the company a second chance with very specific conditions. They were instructed to make sure people working for the company were of legal status. . . . The company's failure to comply with the law is disappointing and inexcusable, and I believe it is important I take this action."

On Friday, he said, "The individuals at my home were not my employees. They were hired by a company. The company made a mistake in judgment, that's why I terminated my relationship with them."

Iowa Democratic Party spokeswoman Carrie Giddins took Romney to task in an e-mail to reporters.

"Republicans who have made immigration a central issue in this campaign must be heartened by Mitt Romney's actions," she wrote. "Of course, they are left to ask why Romney simply took the company at its word and never bothered to investigate the legality of the workers on his lawn. It does make you wonder what other things he wouldn't bother to follow up on if he became president and would discover through the newspaper."

Romney's visit to the Des Moines area came as his lead in polls among Republicans in Iowa has vanished.

Romney has spent millions of dollars in the state building an extensive campaign operation and broadcasting ads, but several recent polls showed him either deadlocked or trailing former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee among likely GOP voters in Iowa's Jan. 3 caucuses.

His stop in the state was his first public appearance since he gave a closely watched speech Thursday in Texas about religion and politics that touched briefly on his Mormon faith, which some political observers believe has cost him support in Iowa among its large bloc of evangelical voters.

The purpose of the speech, he insisted Friday, was not to woo those voters.

"That's not what the speech was about," Romney said. "The speech was about faith in America, and religious pluralism, the role of faith in America, the need to maintain the religious base of our country, to keep God in the public square. The speech was not about politics."

At least one voter in Iowa said the speech clinched his decision to support Romney.

"It convinced me," said Claude Jones, 66, who was pastor at the Douglas Avenue Presbyterian Church in Des Moines for 23 years. "I don't agree with a lot of his theology, but we're not electing the national pastor."

Immigration and the 'gotcha' story


December 8, 2007


RE "MORE immigrant woes for Romney" (Page A1, Dec. 5):
Dressing a nasty bit of "gotcha" journalism as an investigative piece did little for the paper and less for the immigrants it threw under the bus.


There was no need for the reporters to hunt down the lawn workers and ask their name, age, and country of origin, then connect that to their legal status.


Intended or not, your reporters held enough sway to get information from those men that could get them thrown in jail three weeks before Christmas, all to get a sexy story about Mitt Romney.


You employ unnamed sources for Beltway stories, but did not extend the courtesy to two taxpaying men making $10 an hour, working 12-hour days - men who might not understand their right to withhold their name, at that.


Further, under federal law, an employee must fill out a form that requires proof of his or her eligibility to work in this country. In this situation, that responsibility falls squarely with the owner of the lawn company, not Romney.


Frankly, I doubt any of the Romneys ever even met any of the lawn workers.


SINEAD O'BRIEN, Boston
The writer is an immigration attorney.

===================================


A LANDSCAPING company hired by Mitt Romney used illegal immigrants without his knowledge, and this is news? Romney's only mistake was to give this company a second chance after he first found out that it employed illegal immigrants.


The real issues are why are these illegal immigrants still in this country, and whether they been reported to immigration so that they can be sent back to their homeland. Also, do Globe editors check the immigration status of landscaping, painting, and construction workers they hire? Will that information make the front page as well?

JOHN TOTO, Wayland*


© Copyright The New York Times Company



Immigration and the 'gotcha' story - The Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/edito ... p-ed+pages

I'm sorry but these are "Details"

Seems to me if ole Mitt cant pay attn to the details of his own little house then how can I expect him to pay attn to all the details that are involved in running this country?

Just a question that I as a voter would like to know before I pull the handle.