Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #21
    Senior Member ReformUSA2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,305
    Quote Originally Posted by kathyet
    He sure is acting like he is running again....Hey look at how they managed to get Rauhm Emanuel to run in Chicago even after he was found ineligible and they were taking him off the ballot. Still wanting some one to explain that one to me...


    Kathyet

    So basically what this says is anyone who's lived in Chicago and moved do to job reasons is eligible for running for Mayor right? Lets see this court rule in favor of a random guy who lived in Chicago but had to leave for a couple years because of job reasons.

  2. #22
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Quote Originally Posted by kathyet
    . . . Hey look at how they managed to get Rauhm Emanuel to run in Chicago even after he was found ineligible and they were taking him off the ballot. Still wanting some one to explain that one to me . . .
    Kathyet
    A higher court judge overruled a lower court judge. It happens every day.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #23
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    On the Rahm Emanuel thing




    He’s Back: Rahm Ruled Eligible for Mayoral Run…

    January 28, 2011
    rahm

    The Illinois Supreme Court ruled today that Rahm Emanuel can stay on the ballot for mayor of Chicago, saying in a unanimous decision that he meets the state’s residency requirements despite spending most of the last year as White House chief of staff.

    The decision came without a moment to spare; early voting for the Feb. 22 city election begins Monday, Jan. 31. You can read the opinion by clicking here.

    “The voters deserved the right to make the choice of who should be mayor. And I think what the Supreme Court said was basically, in short, that the voters will make the decision who should be mayor. Nobody else should make it for them,â€

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •