Thread: UN Wildlands Project: Taking Over America Starting W/Florida

Convention on Biological Diversity: Set aside half the land in America for animals

The UN Wildlands Project…Taking Over America Starting With Florida

- James Lampe
Monday, July 25, 2011
many links on this post
if the charts dont show; go to the link to view them

Almost all Americans know about the United Nations, but few know about Agenda 21, or the US government’s implementation of UN policies.

The UN issued several policies at the 1992 Earth Summit, one of which was the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Compliance with this UN policy is being driven and managed by the Wildlands Network which shares the same goals as the CBD; to set aside half the land in America for animals.

But let’s reframe this issue just a bit and put it into perspective; is there any reason you would turn over half of America to Vladimir Putin? What is the difference between living under Putin’s rule or living under UN rule? We are giving the eco-socialists our land (the agencies buy it with our taxes) and we are sliding down the slope to living under UN rule. In Florida, the government has acquired 28% of the land (9.9 million acres), so the UN’s work is already better than 50% done in Florida!

The process of returning land to its wild state is referred to as “re-wilding.â€

Calling it a "conspiracy theory" no longer means it's not true

Posted by drik on Monday, July 25, 2011 12:59:43 PM
Debbie Coffey The PPJ Gazette

People have noticed the 25 government agencies on Obama's new White
House Rural Council. And, they're questioning what might be the need
for all of them.

What people may not have noticed yet, is that the government agencies in
this council are also on other councils. These councils, as well as the
individual government agencies, are implementing international laws that
have taken effect through Executive Orders, Memorandums of
Understanding, agreements and regulations that most Americans don't even
know about. These have bypassed Congress. And, it also seems they have
completely bypassed the Constitution.

The devil is in the details
These agencies and councils are forming "partnerships" with members and
groups other than the American people. However, our tax dollars pay for
their salaries and for the programs.
Some "partnerships" sound innocuous, but as you might guess, the devil
is in the details.

I?ll give you an example. There is a BioEco Working Group (
www.bioeco.gov), which at first glance seems to be part of the
Department of Interior's U.S.Geological Survey, since it is listed as
creating the website. But the actual Charter has National Science and
Technology Council in the heading. (The National Science and Technology
Council includes 20 of the same agencies that are on the new Rural
Council, but with some additional agencies, including the CIA. It also
includes the Vice-President, Cabinet Secretaries, heads of Agencies and
some White House officials.)

Participating agencies in the BioEco Working Group are the Depts. of
Agriculture, Defense, Energy, State, EPA, NASA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Dept. of the Interior), U.S. Geological Survey (Dept. of the
Interior), Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes
of Health, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration,
National Science Foundation, and the Smithsonian Institution. It seems
BioEco also wanted to solicit the membership of the National Archives
and Records Administration and U.S. AID.

In the Appendix of the Charter, signed in 2008 by Ann Bartuska of the
U.S. Forest Service (under the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture) and Susan
Haseltine of the U.S. Geological Survey (under the U.S. Dept. of the
Interior), it states activities of this work group are to:

Provide a focal point for coordinating U.S. biodiversity and
ecosystem informatics activities with international efforts and
organizations in this and related areas (such as the Global Biodiversity
Information Facility (GBIF), the Global Earth Observation System of
Systems (GEOSS), the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL), and the
Encyclopedia of Life (EoL), to ensure compatability of standards and
approaches, facilitate sharing of technologies, and provide for
equity/reciprocity in data access and exchange.

You might think, "this is nice, we're sharing information with
everybody." Then you might notice that these organizations seem to map
land and catalog biological resources.

On the website of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF),
which is an international organization with "many partners," the GBIF's
Memorandum of Understanding (with its participants), Paragraph 3, states
Objectives:

Purpose

The purpose of GBIF is to promote, co-ordinate, design and implement
the compilation, linking, standardisation, digitisation and global
dissemination of the world's biodiversity data, within an appropriate
framework for property rights and due attribution.

Co-operation and Co-ordination

The Participants intend to encourage co-operation amongst themselves
in the implementation of GBIF and in the development of joint work
programmes in areas of mutual interest with the Secretariat of the
Convention on Biological Diversity and other appropriate bodies and
initiatives?

Wait a sec, our U.S. Senate didn't ratify the treaty for the Convention
of Biological Diversity (which means the U.S. Senate didn?t formally
approve of or vote for the U.S. to be part of the Convention on
Biological Diversity). So now all of these U.S. agencies are
encouraging each other to develop "programmes" that the Secretariat of
the Convention on Biological Diversity is interested in? Wouldn't that
be "the Convention on Biological Diversity".

If the same U.S. agencies that have agreed to encourage each other are
on the new White House Rural Council, are these agencies going to
encourage each other to develop and implement the Convention on
Biological Diversity in the Rural Council meetings, too?

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
This is an internationally binding treaty and was presented for
signature at the Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Sounds like
the treaty should be about biological diversity, doesn"t it?

If you read the text of the treaty, you?ll find out that if there's a
"dispute" that isn?t resolved between two parties, the State or
organization has to settle it in the International Court of Justice, or
in a three person arbitral tribunal, where each party gets one
arbitrator and the third arbitrator, the President of the Tribunal, is
to be from an entirely different nation.

The CBD website states that this treaty was "Conceived as a practical
tool for translating the principles of Agenda 21 into reality."

The United Nations' Agenda 21
If you look at the United Nation's Agenda 21 (Section 1, 7.28 and 7.29),
you see why the BioEco Working Group might be mapping land and creating
an inventory of biological resources:

All countries should consider, as appropriate, undertaking a
comprehensive national inventory of their land resources in order to
establish a land information system in which land resources will be
classified according to their most appropriate uses and environmentally
fragile or disaster-prone areas will be identified for special
protection measures.

(Who will decide the most "appropriate? use of our land" The United
Nations?)

More importantly, above this description is the OBJECTIVE, which is "the
encouragement of communally and collectively owned and managed land."

Cassandra Anderson of www.morphcity.com pointed out that collectivism is
a "Political philosophy where a small group determines the" "greater
good" for the masses. While it could take the form of communism,
fascism, socialism, etc, the common denominator is control over the
population.?

Although the White House Rural Council might seem to be about helping
our rural communities, it's more likely going to be about letting
international interests help themselves to our rural communities.

AUTHOR'S NOTE: The Bureau of Land Management is removing our wild horses
from their federally protected Herd Management Areas, then leasing the
same land for $2 an acre for oil and gas lease sales, or permitting new
mining and mining expansions to foreign owned companies. I think the
wild horses are like the canary in the coal mine. As go these American
icons that stand as symbols of our freedom, so goes our freedom.

TO LEARN MORE:
www.morphcity.com for excellent articles by Cassandra Anderson
and excellent articles by Marti Oakley:
http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/07/14/ex ... more-17083
http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/ju ... more-16780


SOURCES:
http://www.bioeco.gov/binary_docs/Chart ... 202008.pdf
http://www.gbif.org/governance/governing-board/
http://www.gbif.org/governance/partnerships/
http://www.gbif.org/governance/governin ... ticipants/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administratio ... ut/members
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administratio ... nstc/about
http://www.cbd.int/secretariat/role.shtml
http://www.cbd.int/secretariat/structure/
http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/
http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_ ... 1_07.shtml
http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_ ... 1_00.shtml
http://www.cbd.int/convention/

The new White House Rural Council includes: the Departments of
Agriculture, Treasury, Defense, Justice, Interior, Commerce, Labor,
Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development,
Transportation, Energy, Education, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security,
Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Communications Commission, the Offices of Management and Budget, Science and Technology Policy,
National Drug Control Policy, White House Office of Public Engagement
and Intergovernmental Affairs, Office of Public Affairs, and other
Councils, including Council of Economic Advisors, the Domestic Policy
Council, National Economic Council, Small Business Administration,
Council on Environmental Quality.

http://dissembler.blogtownhall.com/2011 ... true.thtml

Karl Marx never had it so easy

I'm sure they figured out a way to allow the Mexicanus immigrantus to continue migrating, too.