Thread: War on drugs...a failure or insidious success?

By using the Freedom of Information laws, the Associated Press has learned how some of our first trillion dollars in the failed "war on drugs" was spent.

Inside this article it makes reference to what we all know as FACT...prohibition produced one result: bigger and more powerful underworld AND a more powerful and corrupt government. The only question is...was it a serendipitous accident or by design?

In the tail wag the dog theory and in view of how corrupt government has become... the claims that we should have learned from that "mistake" may not be valid. Is it possible... that prohibition produced exactly what our usurping government wanted? Power and money for themselves? And the war on drugs was simply another chance to do it again but even more grandiose than the first time entangling the entire world and not just the USA?

Conspiracy theory or conspiracy fact? Could it be that the "underworld" and our government are simply one in the same entangled in a symbiotic co conspirator feeding frenzy in a thinly vailed act of good vs. evil?


http://bestoftheblogs.com/Home/29456
It is said that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat that history, and that is obviously true with prohibition. We should have learned from the first time it was tried in this country in the 1920s, when alcohol was outlawed. That did not prevent the use of alcohol. Anyone who really wanted it could still get it. All it did was create a huge black market that made underworld gangs rich and much more powerful. It also increased the violence of these underworld gangs as they struggled to control that black market, and many times that violence spilled over to affect innocent people.

Our second attempt at prohibition, the "war on drugs", has done exactly the same thing. It has not stopped or decreased drug use. Anyone who really wants to use drugs can easily get them. It has also enriched underworld gangs (we now call them "drug cartels") and made them very powerful. And it has increased the violence connected with those gangs, with much of that violence spilling over to affect innocent people. And it is all caused by the "war on drugs".

By using the Freedom of Information laws, the Associated Press has learned how some of our first trillion dollars in the failed "war on drugs" was spent. Here are the figures:


*$20 billion to fight the drug gangs in their home countries. In Colombia, for example, the United States spent more than $6 billion, while coca cultivation increased and trafficking moved to Mexico — and the violence along with it.
*$33 billion in marketing "Just Say No"-style messages to America's youth and other prevention programs. High school students report the same rates of illegal drug use as they did in 1970, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says drug overdoses have "risen steadily" since the early 1970s to more than 20,000 last year.
*$49 billion for law enforcement along America's borders to cut off the flow of illegal drugs. This year, 25 million Americans will snort, swallow, inject and smoke illicit drugs, about 10 million more than in 1970, with the bulk of those drugs imported from Mexico.
*$121 billion to arrest more than 37 million nonviolent drug offenders, about 10 million of them for possession of marijuana. Studies show that jail time tends to increase drug abuse.
*$450 billion to lock those people up in federal prisons alone. Last year, half of all federal prisoners in the U.S. were serving sentences for drug offenses.
*At the same time, drug abuse is costing the nation in other ways. The Justice Department estimates the consequences of drug abuse — "an overburdened justice system, a strained health care system, lost productivity, and environmental destruction" — cost the United States $215 billion a year.

DRUG WAR INVENTED
BY NIXON
TO EXTEND HIS POWER
by Fintan O'Toole

"... It was a Watergate legacy so insidious that few people remember its origins. Only now, after decades of waste and failure, is it becoming possible to think of drug abuse in terms other than those which were invented by Nixon's crooks..."

The Irish Times



13 Aug 1999--This week, when the Garda seized 100,000 ecstasy tablets in Dublin, the haul was widely reported to have a "street value" of 1.2 million pounds. That phrase "street value" has become so familiar a part of drugs crime reporting that we take it for granted. And yet it is, if you think about it, a rather obvious distortion
Valuing a wholesale load of drugs by the price it might fetch if and when it reaches the point of sale is like valuing a herd of rustled cattle by calculating what the meat might sell for as prime steak in a fancy restaurant By quoting such figures, rather than the actual cost to the dealers of the drugs, the success of the operation is dramatised
This game suits the Garda and the media and probably does little harm. It's worthy of attention only as evidence of the forgotten but pervasive legacy of events which culminated 25 years ago this summer and which continues to be recognised by a single word - Watergate
The long-term consequences of Watergate are agreed to be profound. It massively enhanced the power of the press. It greatly diminished the prestige of public office, creating, far beyond the US, a scepticism about the integrity of great leaders. All of this has been commented on as nauseam, most recently during the Lewinsky affair
And yet the most profound effect of Watergate may well be something which is seldom if ever mentioned in the history of those strange events - the distortion of public policy on drugs
Who now remembers that the Watergate conspirators (G. Gordon Liddy, John Ehrlichman, John Mitchell, Egil Krogh and others) were among the fathers of the "drugs war"? Their invention and manipulation of understanding the drugs problem was at the heart of Nixon's attempt to build a private security apparatus to extend his power beyond its democratic limits
The drugs war started out as a matter of cynical politics. Nixon won office in 1968 largely on the back of a "law and order" campaign. He promised to crack down on street crime and to make the US safe
Once in office, he quickly discovered that the president had no real control over law enforcement and that he would have to run for re-election in 1972 in the face of ample evidence that crime was continuing to rise and that all his tough talk had led nowhere. The solution was to build up a panic about drugs and to invent a war on heroin in which the president could be the hero
The men who would become notorious through Watergate were brought in to create this war. They started by manufacturing an emergency, hyping up an "epidemic" which had in fact reached its peak before Nixon took office and was actually declining. In 1971, Nixon's administration claimed that heroin use was responsible for $18 billion of property crime a year. In fact, the total of all property crime in the US in 1971 was $1.3 billion
Likewise, the total number of heroin addicts was wildly exaggerated. Data for 1969 showed that there were 68,000 addicts in the US. These same data, however, were statistically "reinterpreted" to increase the figure first to 315,000 and then to 559,000. By reworking precisely the same set of figures, Nixon's people produced a "tenfold" increase in the number of junkies in two years. This increase was accepted by the media and Congress
Then, in the real master stroke, the same figures were reworked again to show that there were 150,000 addicts. This massive "decrease" was then cited as the great success of the war on drugs. The term "street value" was given currency as a way of glorifying these apparent successes
Nixon's drug war delivered large doses of farce. A doped-out Elvis Presley was inducted as an honorary member of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. A heroin "sniffer" device - conspicuously concealed in a Volkswagen camper van with a snorkel sticking out of the roof - was dispatched to Marseilles in the belief that it could locate the labs where morphine was turned into heroin. The intricate map of heroin labs it produced turned out to be a map of Marseilles restaurants: the "sniffer" was unable to distinguish the fumes emitted by heroin from those emitted by salad dressing
In spite of these and other fiascos, however, the drugs war took hold in the public imagination. Instead of being understood as a health and social problem, drug addiction was defined as a law-and-order problem. Movies and TV serials spread the image of the drugs war around the world and shaped the way most countries responded to the problem of drug abuse
There was, though, a hidden agenda. Nixon wanted all along to have his own private security agency, beyond the control of the FBI, the CIA or any other official government body, which could investigate leaks, tap phones and gather intelligence on his internal and external opponents
G. Gordon Liddy came up with the brilliant idea that the best way to do this was to establish the agency under the cloak of the war on drugs. Who, after all, would complain if a little illegality was indulged in the cause of protecting the families of US from the plague of heroin?
Nixon ordered John Ehrlichman and Egil Krogh to establish this unit which was to be called the Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement
The Watergate conspirators who came to be known as "the plumbers" - Liddy and Krogh, who had been leading figures in the administration's drugs war, Howard Hunt, who was brought in from the CIA, and others - were assembled, a preliminary version of this putative anti-narcotics agency. Krogh, the official co-ordinator of Nixon's war on drugs, was also, in his unofficial capacity, the head of "the plumbers" who organised the Watergate break-in
Liddy, the most colourful and notorious of "the plumbers", was Krogh's assistant. Hunt was a consultant on the drug problem to the president's Domestic Council. Essentially, Nixon's covert criminals and his drug warriors were one and same. As Edward Jay Epstein put it in his remarkable 1977 investigation, Agency of Fear, "the new opiate war provided the perfect cover for this seizure of power"
The weird thing is that long after these people were found out and sent to jail, the rhetoric and imagery which they had pioneered in the manipulation of the drugs issue retained its power
By a supreme irony, these criminals shaped a key aspect of law enforcement worldwide. The notion that drug addiction needed to be fought as a war between the state and the traffickers, rather than a social disease, took a hold which has yet to be relinquished
It was a Watergate legacy so insidious that few people remember its origins. Only now, after decades of waste and failure, is it becoming possible to think of drug abuse in terms other than those which were invented by Nixon's crooks

http://www.druglibrary.org/think/~jnr/nixon.htm

strange...

I am sad that no one is picking up on how bad this issue is also...