Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Pelosi's monumental abuse of military aircraft privileges



    February 01, 2010

    Pelosi's monumental abuse of military aircraft privileges (Updated)

    Rick Moran

    Doug Ross has been on this story and broke some news yesterday http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... feurs.html about the millions of dollars - that's right, millions - that Speaker Nancy Pelosi has rung up in travel using military aircraft.

    Now we learn from Doug that it appears Pelosi is using military jets to facilitate the personal travel of her children and grandchildren. No member of congress involved, just the junketing of her kids:

    Since Nancy Pelosi took over as Speaker in 2006, she's rung up millions in military travel expenses http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2010/ ... e-aircraft

    Worse still, she also appears to have requisitioned entire flights for the personal use of her children and grandchildren. That is, unaccompanied by any member of Congress, her kids, in-laws and grandchildren are utilizing entire military passenger jets for their routine travel needs.

    Using the documents obtained by Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, I have discovered the following manifests and travel requests.

    22-Feb-2007: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of the Speaker's son, Paul Jr.

    13-Apr-2007: A military jet is utilized for the unaccompanied travel of the Speaker's daughter, son-in-law and grandson.

    30-Oct-2008: A military jet is requisitioned for the Speaker's daughter and a son-in-law, Peter Kaufman. to commute between San Francisco and Washington.

    Military flights cost between $5-$20 thousand dollars per hour to operate. Pelosi only reimburses the government between $120-$400 per flight. You and I pick up the rest of the tab with our tax dollars.

    It's all perfectly legal, of course - or is it? Even if it is, perhaps we should start asking why a politician's children and grandchildren should have their travel subsidized at taxpayer expense?

    Update and Clarification:

    I received an email from Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch whose FOIA request brought these documents to light.

    He informed both Doug Ross and me that documents Judicial Watch received last year "seem to show that the Speaker was on most if not all of the flights in question."

    That may be true. But as a commenter points out at Doug's site:

    ":Even if these were scheduled flights, the individuals are not dependents of the Speaker. While they may be her children, they are grown adults, and do not meet the eligibility requirements of DOD 4515.13-R. Her son and daughter should not be flying on military aircraft at all.

    The idea that any of her adult children should be subsidized by the taxpayer for anything is ludicrous. Pelosi's husband owns real estate worth as much as $25 million: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelo ... ial_status

    The Pelosi family has a net worth of nearly $12.5 million as of 2008, largely from investments. In addition to their large portfolio of jointly owned San Francisco Bay Area real estate, the couple also owns a vineyard in St. Helena, California, valued between $5 million and $25 million. Pelosi's husband also owns stock, including $1 million in Apple Computer, and is the owner of the California Redwoods of the United Football League. Pelosi continues to be among the richest members of Congress.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... of_mi.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member NOamNASTY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,746
    This is the fault of the higher ranking military for allowing it ! The same ones who want open homosexuality in our military .

    This will like a woman showing naked with men, or close sleeing quarters .

    It just keeps getting worse and more insane everytime you read the news .

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dianne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,858
    You have a rogue government, with rogue Senators... they are not here for us; they are here as prostitutes for foreign governments. When I look at the current government... Sodom und Gomorra come to mind; just before the end.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •