Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By 6 Million Dollar Man
  • 1 Post By 6 Million Dollar Man
  • 2 Post By 6 Million Dollar Man

Thread: White House: No exemptions from steel, aluminum tariffs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member 6 Million Dollar Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1,142

    White House: No exemptions from steel, aluminum tariffs

    White House: No exemptions from steel, aluminum tariffs

    re the winners and losers from Trump's new tariffs?

    Scroll back up to restore default view.




    WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Donald Trump's administration appears unbowed by broad domestic and international criticism of his planned import tariffs on steel and aluminum, saying Sunday that the president is not planning on exempting any countries from the stiff duties.

    Speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said: "At this point in time there's no country exclusions."

    Trump's announcement Thursday that he would impose tariffs of 25 percent and 10 percent, respectively, on imported steel and aluminum, roiled markets, rankled allies and raised prospects for a trade war. While his rhetoric has been focused on China, the duties will also cover significant imports from Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan and the European Union.

    The Pentagon had recommended that Trump only pursue targeted tariffs, so as not to upset American partners abroad. But Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said Sunday that was not the direction the president would take.
    "He's talking about a fairly broad brush," Ross said on ABC's "This Week." He rejected threats of retaliation from American allies as "pretty trivial."

    Few issues could blur the lines of partisanship in Trump-era Washington. Trade is one of them.

    Labor unions and liberal Democrats are in the unusual position of applauding Trump's approach, while Republicans and an array of business groups are warning of dire economic and political consequences if he goes ahead with the tariffs.

    Trade politics often cut along regional, rather than ideological, lines, as politicians reflect the interests of the hometown industries and workers. But rarely does a debate open so wide a rift between a president and his party — leaving him almost exclusively with support from his ideological opposites.

    "Good, finally," said Sen. Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat and progressive as he cheered Trump's move. Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, a Democrat who has called for Trump to resign, agreed.

    "I urge the administration to follow through and to take aggressive measures to ensure our workers can compete on a level playing field," Casey tweeted.

    This moment of unusual alliance was long expected. As a candidate, Trump made his populist and protectionist positions on trade quite clear, at times hitting the same themes as one of the Democratic presidential candidates, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

    "This wave of globalization has wiped out totally, totally our middle class," Trump told voters in the hard-hit steel town of Monessen, Pennsylvania, during one of his campaign stops. "It doesn't have to be this way."

    Trump's criticism of trade agreements and China's trade policies found support with white working-class Americans whose wages had stagnated over the years. Victories in big steel-producing states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana demonstrated that his tough trade talk had a receptive audience.

    Both candidates in a March 13 House election in Pennsylvania have embraced the president's plans for tariffs. They addressed the topic Saturday in a debate that aired on WTAE in Pittsburgh.

    "For too long, China has been making cheap steel and they've been flooding the market with it. It's not fair and it's not right. So I actually think this is long overdue," said Democratic candidate Conor Lamb.

    "Unfortunately, many of our competitors around the world have slanted the playing field, and their thumb has been on the scale, and I think President Trump is trying to even that scale back out," said Republican candidate Rick Saccone.

    But Trump's GOP allies on Capitol Hill have little use for the tariff approach. They argue that other industries that rely on steel and aluminum products will suffer. The cost of new appliances, cars and buildings will rise if the president follows through, they warn, and other nations could retaliate. The end result could erode the president's base of support with rural America and even the blue-collar workers the president says he trying to help.

    "There is always retaliation, and typically a lot of these countries single out agriculture when they do that. So, we're very concerned," said Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.

    Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., asked the administration to reconsider its stance. He said American companies could move their operations abroad and not face retaliatory tariffs.

    "This scenario would lead to the exact opposite outcome of the administration's stated objective, which is to protect American jobs," Walker said.

    The Business Roundtable's Josh Bolten, a chief of staff for President George W. Bush, called on Trump to have "the courage" to step back from his campaign rhetoric on trade.

    "Sometimes a president needs to, you need to stick to your principles but you also need to recognize in cases where stuff you said in the campaign isn't right and ought to be drawn back," he said on "Fox News Sunday." ''The president needs to have the courage to do that."

    Tim Phillips, president of the Koch Brothers-backed Americans for Prosperity, noted that Trump narrowly won in Iowa and Wisconsin, two heavily rural states that could suffer if countries impose retaliatory tariffs on American agricultural goods.

    "It hurts the administration politically because trade wars, protectionism, they lead to higher prices for individual Americans," Phillips said. "It's basically a tax increase."

    The president wasn't backing down, at least on Twitter, where he posted this message: "Trade wars are good, and easy to win."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/switch-de...--finance.html


    Last edited by 6 Million Dollar Man; 03-04-2018 at 02:23 PM.
    Judy likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member 6 Million Dollar Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1,142
    If you go to the original article and read the comments, this is what one poster said:



    • Tom2You 2 hr ago
      Steel and aluminum are basic industries, for consumer goods and for defense, yet we have allowed these industries to be eroded by foreign dumping. A major German steel company says on its website, "As a basic industry, the steel sector is of particular importance for the value-creation chains, and is the backbone of Germany’s economy." The same should be true for US steel.



    And Here are 2 replies to his comment:


    • Barry 14 min ago
      I also agree.....Unfortunately, we have so few operational steel mills left, we are now put at a disadvantage. I lived in the south suburbs of Chicago where almost everyone I knew had great jobs at steel mills and had to go back to school to learn new trades. The area never recovered from the steel industries leaving.






      • Carolyn 46 min ago
        I agree Tom2you......I live in Knoxville, Tennessee....Alcoa Aluminum used to be one of the biggest employers as a manufacturer of aluminum....until it closed because it could not compete with foreign nations importing it, with no consequence of a tariff. I think this is the best move the President has made thus far....and he has done wonderfully well on very many fronts. The only ones who will be complaining about this is the Rinos in congress who have large investments in those foreign companies.....and fools!!!
    Last edited by 6 Million Dollar Man; 03-04-2018 at 02:30 PM.
    Judy likes this.

  3. #3
    Senior Member 6 Million Dollar Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1,142
    Did I emphasize enough what the poster Tom2You said, when I put into bold letters:

    A major German steel company says on its website, "As a basic industry, the steel sector is of particular importance for the value-creation chains, and is the backbone of Germany’s economy." The same should be true for US steel.

    Any idiot with an understanding of basic economics knows this.

    And did anyone get the part of the reply by poster Carolyn when she said:

    • The only ones who will be complaining about this is the Rinos in congress who have large investments in those foreign companies.....and fools!!!
    • In other words, the people bitching and screaming about this are rich people who have a personal stake in these foreign companies because they have investments there. They don't give a sh*t about working class Americans.
    Judy and jtdc like this.

Similar Threads

  1. Unions praise Trump on steel tariffs
    By Judy in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-04-2018, 03:39 PM
  2. Trump steel tariffs: IMF warns plan would hurt US
    By Judy in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-03-2018, 01:10 PM
  3. Trump Likely to Impose Stiff Steel, Aluminum Tariffs
    By Judy in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-02-2018, 03:16 PM
  4. Trump weighs tariffs, quotas on US steel, aluminum imports
    By Judy in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-14-2018, 05:45 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-09-2015, 10:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •