Thread: White House using global warming as a tool against capitalism? Global Warming Scam

CFACT

There's been no warming for 17 years. With the computer models wrong, and the policies proposed useless for making meaningful adjustments to the planetary thermostat, what do Obama, Gore, Kerry and the big global warming machine really want?
Share the facts at CFACT.org: http://www.cfact.org/?p=22953
'The real core of 350.org’s mobilization is more bluntly stated in a cover article Klein wrote for the November 2011 issue of The Nation (the self-described “flagship of the lef...t).” Klein reported on one of the conservative Heartland Institute’s International Conferences on Climate Change with its hundreds of climate skeptics who saw political agendas behind climate alarmism, and she did something remarkable: she admitted that the left really is using global warming as a tool in its campaign against capitalism, and urged leftists to stop denying and trying to hide the fact.
Klein wrote, “It is true that responding to the climate threat requires strong government action at all levels. But real climate solutions are ones that steer these interventions to systematically disperse and devolve power and control to the community level, whether through community-controlled renewable energy, local organic agriculture or transit systems genuinely accountable to their users. Arriving at these new systems is going to require shredding the free-market ideology. So when the Heartlanders react to evidence of human-induced climate change as if capitalism itself were coming under threat, it’s not because they are paranoid. It’s because they are paying attention.”
Her shredding machine is adapted from standard Leftist Utopia dogma: government will pay for everything with seized corporate profits, it will dismantle the fossil fuel infrastructure, mandate public transit instead of cars, allow only no-carbon energy sources, pretend to feed 318 million Americans from community organic farms, create make-work jobs for the disemployed, regulate personal incomes with caps and subsidies, and so on. Read The Nation article and see for yourself.
Heartland’s President, Joseph Bast, said, “Naomi Klein is willing to say publicly what everyone in the climate change debate knows, that the left is only interested in the topic because it can be used to justify its anti-capitalist agenda. The only science they care about is political science, not climate science. Klein is no farther to the left than President Obama, just a lot more honest when discussing climate change.”
The words may be different, but it’s a good bet that President Obama will be reading from Naomi Klein’s Capitalism vs. the Climate mobilization handbook at Climate Summit 2014.'
What's the real agenda behind the UN's NY climate summit?




White House using global warming as a tool against capitalism?
September 15, 2014 by Ron Arnold, 0 Comments Tweet Tweet President Barack Obama will star in next week’s United Nations Climate Summit in New York City,...
cfact.org

White House using global warming as a tool against capitalism?



September 15, 2014 by Ron Arnold, 5 Comments

President Barack Obama will star in next week’s United Nations Climate Summit in New York City, and is expected to push his “climate accord in lieu of treaty” strategy to bypass the necessary two-thirds Senate ratification vote, seeking a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” recalcitrant countries into emissions control commitments. But Obama’s speech may not be the most influential performance on the New York stage.United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon invited heads of state to the Summit nine months ago, beginning the scramble to persuade world leaders to show up for his all-ceremony, no-negotiations pep rally, which was rejected by the heads of state of China, India, Germany, Australia, and Canada – and gave plenty of notice for left-leaning Non-Governmental Organizations to steal the show.
While Ban desperately hoped his Summit would “put climate change back on top of the international agenda,” to kickstart stagnated treaty talks and stifle yawns from the world public, veteran anti-fossil fuel campaigner Bill McKibben ramped up his 350.org network for a 2014 replay of his 2009 blitz of 5,200 simultaneous climate demonstrations in 181 countries trying to support the failed Copenhagen climate talks.
While Ban looked in dismay as world polls relegated global warming fears to dead last (including one which showed that half of Britiain’s members of parliament reject man-made climate change as a fact), 350.org was recruiting 1,207 allied groups with its $3.6 million revenue – 25 of them local 350.org chapters – to launch the progressive Left’s dream, a “grassroots global revolt as the key answer to the climate crisis.”
While Ban asked heads of state for “bold announcements and actions to reduce emissions, strengthen climate resilience, and mobilize political will to build momentum for a meaningful universal climate agreement” at the crucial 2015 Paris climate talks, 350.org commissioned filmmakers to produce a new documentary film called Disruption, a melodramatic call for “social justice” in the form of “a mass social movement to disrupt the status quo and business-as-usual approach which is inhibiting the bold actions necessary to protect the planet’s future.”

Bill McKibben


Two days before Obama’s Summit speech, “Climate Week NYC” will launch 350.org’s “bold actions” with the Climate People’s March & Mobilization. McKibben hopes to bus in over 100,000 protesters from the U.S. and Canada to bolster thousands of New Yorkers, all demanding that governments do a “fast” changeover to a no-carbon economy. So far, McKibben mobilizations are also set for London, Berlin, Paris, Delhi, Rio and Melbourne.
McKibben’s mobilization has its own handbook, written by 350.org board member Naomi Klein and titled, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. The newly published book concentrates on the evils of corporations, Big Green groups colluding with industry, the infallibility of climate science, and more evils of corporations.
However, the real core of 350.org’s mobilization is more bluntly stated in a cover article Klein wrote for the November 2011 issue of The Nation (the self-described “flagship of the left).” Klein reported on one of the conservative Heartland Institute’s International Conferences on Climate Change with its hundreds of climate skeptics who saw political agendas behind climate alarmism, and she did something remarkable: she admitted that the left really is using global warming as a tool in its campaign against capitalism, and urged leftists to stop denying and trying to hide the fact.
Klein wrote, “It is true that responding to the climate threat requires strong government action at all levels. But real climate solutions are ones that steer these interventions to systematically disperse and devolve power and control to the community level, whether through community-controlled renewable energy, local organic agriculture or transit systems genuinely accountable to their users. Arriving at these new systems is going to require shredding the free-market ideology. So when the Heartlanders react to evidence of human-induced climate change as if capitalism itself were coming under threat, it’s not because they are paranoid. It’s because they are paying attention.”
Her shredding machine is adapted from standard Leftist Utopia dogma: government will pay for everything

Naomi Klein


with seized corporate profits, it will dismantle the fossil fuel infrastructure, mandate public transit instead of cars, allow only no-carbon energy sources, pretend to feed 318 million Americans from community organic farms, create make-work jobs for the disemployed, regulate personal incomes with caps and subsidies, and so on. Read The Nation article and see for yourself.
Heartland’s President, Joseph Bast, said, “Naomi Klein is willing to say publicly what everyone in the climate change debate knows, that the left is only interested in the topic because it can be used to justify its anti-capitalist agenda. The only science they care about is political science, not climate science. Klein is no farther to the left than President Obama, just a lot more honest when discussing climate change.”
The words may be different, but it’s a good bet that President Obama will be reading from Naomi Klein’s Capitalism vs. the Climate mobilization handbook at Climate Summit 2014.

About the Author: Ron Arnold

Ron is a free enterprise activist, author, and newspaper columnist. He pioneered methods to expose the money and power of Big Green in nine books and hundreds of magazine and newspaper articles. He mentors promising activists and writers as a civic duty.


http://www.cfact.org/2014/09/15/whit...st-capitalism/

Racketeering 101- RICO Act

Extortion
Bribery
Money Laundering

UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

Reality is engineered consensus. But when that doesn’t work, “experts” just assert there is a consensus when there isn’t




by Jon Rappoport | Infowars.com | September 19, 2014

Read it.

It’s a shocking 321-page report assembled by The Climate Depot:
“More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims.”

It names names. It lists reasons for the dissent.
Reality is engineered consensus. But when that doesn’t work, “experts” just assert there is a consensus when there isn’t.
“What the hell, let’s just say that ‘everybody agrees’ manmade warming is destroying Earth and we have ten minutes to solve it, and let’s get our friends in the press to shut out the naysayers. You know, media blackout.”
Science is supposed to be about evidence and proof, not consensus. But that idea is now laughed out of court. Science is about P.R. and who sits on the important thrones.
Which is why the UN is holding Climate Summit 2014 in New York in a few days. Yes, the city that never sleeps will be hosting the gala and also kicking off Climate Week NYC 2014.
And then there is this. The UN Secretary General has appointed Leonardo DiCaprio a “…Messenger of Peace with a special focus on climate change.” Messenger of Peace. Wow. Will Leo appear out of a cloud hovering above the Chrysler Building? Will an angel anoint Leo? Will anybody call the Ghostbusters?
Will Obama show up and read from the teleprompter, “The science is settled, the science is settled…”
Will a CIA drone zoom over Times Square and launch gluten-free electromagnetic love bombs on the adoring crowds?
Will a blimped-out Al Gore waddle into the UN General Assembly hall, trailing fumes from his jet and casting oil leases to a few favored ambassadorial hustlers?
The latest climate science tells us that upcoming freezing weather or boiling hot weather are both reasonable inferences from the basic Climate Change hypothesis. This is, logically speaking, a new brand of tautological “research.” Round and round it goes, inside its bubble.
“Useful predictions? We don’t need no stinkin’ useful predictions. We just need dupes, and we got plenty of them.”
Here are a few excerpts from the boggling Climate Depot report:
“We’re not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.”
— UN IPCC’s Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] since 2004 and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium.
“Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself — Climate is beyond our power to control…Earth doesn’t care about governments or their legislation. You can’t find much actual global warming in present-day weather observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone’s permission or explaining itself.”
— Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, who won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1998, and was formerly a research scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
“The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” The global warming establishment “has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the [UN] IPCC.”
— Swedish Climatologist Dr. Hans Jelbring of the Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics Unit at Stockholm University.
“The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded. There appears to have been money gained by Michael Mann, Al Gore and UN IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri as a consequence of this deception, so it’s fraud.”
— South African astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA) and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics.
“In December 8 2009, 166 scientists from around the world wrote an Open Letter to the UN Secretary-General rebuking the UN and declaring that ‘the science is NOT settled.’”
“On May 1, 2009, the American Physical Society (APS) Council decided to review its current climate statement via a high-level subcommittee of respected senior scientists. The decision was prompted after a group of over 80 prominent physicists petitioned the APS [to] revise its global warming position and more than 250 scientists urged a change in the group’s climate statement in 2010. The physicists wrote to APS governing board: ‘Measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th – 21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today.’”
Consensus on manmade global warming? Are you kidding?
The “consensus” is in favor of something else: staging and maintaining a media blackout to conceal the dissenters, to pretend they don’t exist, to pretend “the science is settled.”
Leo DiCaprio, messenger of peace. We’re living in a cartoon of a cartoon.
This post originally appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com.


http://www.infowars.com/un-climate-c...ntists-say-no/