Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING?



    WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING?

    By Kelleigh Nelson
    October 17, 2009
    NewsWithViews.com

    In the late 70s and early 80s, many grassroots Americans found out about the movement for a new Constitutional Convention (con-con). By 1986, 32 of the 34 states needed for a new constitutional convention had passed calls for a convention. The reason used for this call for a con-con was for a balanced budget amendment. Sounds great doesn’t it? However, it was a ruse used by those who want to radically change our constitution and basically destroy the founding fathers’ document. Many of the states and most of the legislators that called for a con-con did so without any public oversight or knowledge, basically because it was a good sounding conservative idea to require a balanced budget amendment.

    Seven to ten of the 32 states have succeeded in recalling their calls for a con-con, including Alabama, Louisiana and Florida. The opportunity to change the constitution exists in Article V, which says the constitution can be changed in two ways, either by two-thirds of both houses of Congress sending an amendment to the states and three-quarters of the states ratifying it, (which is how we have ratified every amendment since the Bill of Rights). The other way is to have two-thirds of the states, that is, 34 states petitioning Congress for a Constitutional Convention. When the latter is used, the entire document is taken down and re-examined.

    The proponents of a con-con under the guise of a balanced budget amendment still believe that if they get another two states who call for a balanced budget amendment that they can open a convention, despite the states that have recalled their calls. Con-con supporter James Dale Davidson of the National Taxpayers’ Union even stated that he didn’t care if the con-con couldn’t be limited to the Balanced Budget. As well, Henry Hazlitt (renowned conservative) was the NTU’s economic advisor wrote a book in 1974 entitled, “A New Constitution Now.â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    We don't need a new Constitution. A Constitutional Convention amidst this band of liar, cheaters and thieves in our federal and state governments would most definitely be the fait accompli by globalists and socialists to end our nation.

    The only thing we need to do with the Constitution is enforce it and of course pass the FairTax legislation and within the 7 year sunset provision, repeal the 16th Amendment.

    Aside from the 16th Amendment, there's nothing wrong with what's in our Constitution, what's wrong isn't with what words are in our Constitution, it's with what people are in our government. Pass the FairTax, take back the power of the people by controlling the purse strings as the FairTax allows, and then kick these liars, cheaters, thieves and traitors in our government to the curb without pensions and health insurance. They'll soon realize the grotesque errors of their ways, and those to follow will know better than to repeat those errors.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Rai7965's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    427
    We do need to remove the strong arm of the Internal Revenue. Removing the Internal Revenue Service is a good idea. I have no idea what "can of worms" a Constitutional Convention would open. Scary

    The IRS reared its head about 1918. The IRS retains the legal authority to enforce liens and seize assets without obtaining judgment in court. Also scary.

    They remain the strong arm that has in the past and will in the future take from the working... so politicians can distribute the fruits of America’s labor force, AND, will be force that will oversee and carry out the planned destruction of America by taking from the working people and giving to the non-working. It is an institution that for many years has served at the pleasure of third world dictatorships across the globe…all which makeup the majority membership of thugs who operate under the banner of the United Nations.

  4. #4
    Rai7965's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    427
    Confusion reigns

    I too have allowed every issue in this article to settle in my mind now filled with worry. The hard fact that “We The Peopleâ€

  5. #5
    April
    Guest
    We don't need a new Constitution. A Constitutional Convention amidst this band of liar, cheaters and thieves in our federal and state governments would most definitely be the fait accompli by globalists and socialists to end our nation.
    You got that right!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •