Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

This looks like a showdown between the federal government and the states, state governments, local governments, and the rest of us beyond the Beltway. But the rogue, out-of-control federal government is counting on some states saying, "That's not my problem," and others accepting a Cornhusker Kickback, so that it can divide and conquer, marginalize and demonize, states which refuse to surrender the Constitution to tyrants.

Originally Posted by Alan Jones at communities.washingtontimes.com

Brittany H. at NARA's National Personnel Records Center customer service department in St. Louis on Monday, May 7, [2012,] directed requests for selective service records for anyone born after 1960 to the Selective Service System in Arlington, Virginia.

Asked if NARA maintains any selective service records for anyone born after 1960 in long-term storage at any other NARA Federal Record Centers, she stated that "those records are not archived. The only long-term storage is at Selective Service."

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM,
INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

September 21, 2000 Selective Service System Privacy Rules: State and local government agencies—to provide information which may constitute evidence of a violation of State or local law, for law enforcement purposes. WAS CHANGED TO: September 20, 2011 Selective Service System Privacy Rules: State and Local Governments—To provide data that may constitute evidence and facilitate the enforcement of state and local law.

If investigators with the Cold Case Posse were to argue that the Selective Service System was required to be responsive to a records request for the purpose of the Maricopa’s County Sheriff’s Office investigation or enforcement of any violation of federal law, such as mail fraud, wire fraud, identity theft, or violations of the Military Selective Service Act, the 2000 privacy rules might have permitted such a records release, under the four-word clause “for law enforcement purposes”.
[BUT the 2000 rules also restricted disclosure to "evidence of a violation of State or local law."]

The 2011 updated rules, however, appear to have narrowed the legal requirements under which the Selective Service System must release records to local and state law enforcement agencies engaged in “the enforcement of state and local law”.

The changes could be challenging to any local or state law enforcement agencies, including the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, seeking to obtain a selective service card as evidence in the investigation of federal crimes.

Lawyers seeking to prevent Obama’s registration records from being released again by the Selective Service System could conceivably argue that enforcement of federal law by a state or local agency is not a qualifying reason. Any possible legal ambiguity found in the 2000 rules appears to have been eliminated in the 2011 update, a preliminary analysis by Communities @WashingtonTimes.com has concluded.

Both the 2000 and 2011 versions of the Selective Service System’s privacy rules allow the FBI to request records when investigating possible violations of the Military Selective Service Act.

The question of President Obama's draft card: Has evidence been destroyed? | Washington Times Communities

The cessation of NARA archiving of Selective Service records issued in or after 1960, making it the exclusive purview of the Selective Service System (in Chicago, I presume?), is indeed a treacherous action by the Executive Branch of the Federal government. The Selective Service System in Arlington, Virginia, may be in possession of all Selective Service registration form original documents (doubtful). Records of the Selective Service System State Headquarters for Hawaii is in San Francisco, and HQ for Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin is in Chicago, within reach of the minions of the Chicago Machine. If SSS Chicago is now the only storage location for Mr. Obama's fraudulent Selective Service registration form, then it no longer exists in original document form.

The public rationale for the NARA contraction in storage services is to reduce expenses for duplicate services, but off-site archived storage has long been considered a justifiable expense for data security and recovery. That leaves Mr. Obama's registration of July 29, 1980, as the potentially εxplosivε record, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Sep. 16th announcement of his Cold Case Posse Investigation as the bµrning fµse, leading up to the rules change on Sep. 20th. Coincidence does not prove or indicate causation. But the fishy smell still lingers.

As for the wording of the 2000 privacy rules:

"To provide information which may constitute evidence of a violation of State or local law, for law enforcement purposes," changed on Sept. 20, 2011, to

"To provide data that may constitute evidence and facilitate the enforcement of state and local law,"

what's the difference?