Justice Alito, we need your cooperation.
"Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get four people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument. I got a feeling that he was saying that one of these four that call themselves constitutionalists went to the other side," [Dr. Orly] Taitz said.
Justice Clarence Thomas referred Donofrio v. Wells for conference on 11/19/08.
Justice Antonin Scalia referred Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz for conference on 12/08/08.
Justice Antonin Scalia referred Berg v. Obama for conference on 12/23/08.
Chief Justice John Roberts referred Lightfoot v. Bowen for conference on 12/29/08.
Pray that Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Anthony Kennedy will soften their hearts, give attention to the truth about Mr. Obama, and act to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
Re: Justice Alito, we need your cooperation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
I thought that Alito was one of 4 Justices who'd already been "tested" in one of the cases that got to SCOTUS, and that Taitz's request that Roberts take the case was to "test" him as a potential 4th vote after the first geographically-mandated Justice (Kennedy for 9th Circuit) had declined her Petition.
After Alito joined the court in 2006, here's how the circuit assignments were made:
- For the D.C. Circuit, John G. Roberts, Jr.
For the First Circuit, David H. Souter
For the Second Circuit, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
For the Third Circuit, David H. Souter
For the Fourth Circuit, John G. Roberts, Jr.
For the Fifth Circuit, Antonin G. Scalia
For the Sixth Circuit, John Paul Stevens
For the Seventh Circuit, John Paul Stevens
For the Eighth Circuit, Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
For the Ninth Circuit, Anthony M. Kennedy
For the Tenth Circuit, Stephen G. Breyer
For the Eleventh Circuit, Clarence Thomas
For the Federal Circuit, John G. Roberts, Jr.
Connecticut (Wrotnowski) went to Ginsburg initially as the Justice for 2nd Circuit; PA and NJ (Berg and Donofrio) would have gone to Souter for 3rd Circuit; CA (Lightfoot) would have gone to Kennedy for 9th Circuit.
Reference source: http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Supreme ... ted_States
Re: Justice Alito, we need your cooperation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Here we go, in what's gone to SCOTUS so we have a record in this thread ...
Quote:
No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
Dec 9 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Cort Wrotnowski filed. (Distributed)
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A469) denied by the Court.
=====================
Quote:
No. 08A407
Title: Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant
v.
Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2 at the New Jersey Appellate Division without a docket number)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A407) for stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 6 2008 Application (08A407) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 14 2008 Application (08A407) refiled and submitted to Justice Thomas.
Nov 19 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.
Nov 19 2008 Application (08A407) referred to the Court by Justice Thomas. Nov 26 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Leo C. Donofrio filed. (Distributed)
Dec 1 2008 Letter from applicant dated November 22, 2008, received.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A407) denied by the Court.
============================
Quote:
No. 08A505
Title: Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 21 2009 Application (08A505) denied by the Court.
==============================
Quote:
No. 08A391
Title: Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
=====================
Quote:
No. 08-570
Title: Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 12 2009 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
Jan 12 2009 Petition DENIED.
Jan 21 2009 Application (08A505) denied by the Court.
=======================
Quote:
No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008 Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 7 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 23, 2009.
Jan 7 2009 Application (08A524) referred to the Court.
Jan 13 2009 Suggestion for recusal received from applicant.
Jan 22 2009 Supplemental brief of applicant Gail Lightfoot, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2009 Application (08A524) denied by the Court.
==========================
Quote:
No. 08A592
Title: James D. Schneller, Applicant
v.
Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Case Nos.: (199 MM 2008)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jan 7 2009 Application (08A592) for a stay, submitted to Justice Souter.
Jan 8 2009 Application (08A592) denied by Justice Souter.
==============================
Initial rejections:..................Refiled and Referred to Conference by:
GINSBURG...........................SCALIA
SOUTER...............................THOMAS
SOUTER (1st rejection)
KENNEDY (2nd rejection).......SCALIA
KENNEDY ............................ROBERTS
Missing in Action:
ALITO
BREYER
STEVENS
Kennedy seems to have no value as potential help on these cases (he provided secondary rejection), and although I thought Orly Taitz had "tested" Alito with that case, it was the Chief Justice who was fresh territory to see if there would be a referral to conference. I know I read on one of the blogs out there that Alito was going to be the next in line for the rejection/refiling maneuver and while I thought it was Orly Taitz who wrote about that intention, I now wonder if it was Pidgeon's blog. Except that the group of plaintiffs out of Washington never pursued their dismissal from their state supreme court to SCOTUS.
Checking that Broe v. Reed blog, the archives don't appear to have everything that might have been written at the time, except this
http://decalogosintl.org/?p=211
[quote]Washington Supreme Court clears hurdle to allow Broe v Reed to push for SCOTUS review.
January 8, 2009
The Washington Supreme Court, without comment, has dismissed the claims of the 12 Broe v Reed plaintiffs, who sought to require the Secretary of State to do his constitutionally imposed duty and disallow the votes for Senator Obama on the basis that Senator Obama has failed to establish that he is a natural born citizen; that he is an American citizen, or that he was running under his legal name.
As Jim Broe put it to the Secretary: “If not you, who?â€
Orly Taitz on WOR-710 Today
Attorney Orly Taitz will be a guest on the Steve Malzberg Radio Show, Tuesday, March 17, 2009.
Ms. Taitz is expected to give updates on her case along with a discussion surrounding her recent encounters with Justices Roberts and Scalia of the United States Supreme Court.
The show begins at 3:00PM EST and ends at 6:00PM EST. We have been told her slot is at 4:00PM.
If you are a first time listener of WOR-710 News Talk Radio, you will need to install an ActiveX script before you can access the show online.
Click the LISTEN LIVE button on the navigation bar, top left of the following page and install:
http://www.wor710.com/pages/3736426.php?
Also included, is a chat room.
For future reference, the main website is below and includes their entire lineup and podcasts:
http://www.wor710.com
Starts: 03/17/2009/15:00
Finishes: 03/17/2009/18:00
Re: Orly Taitz on WOR-710 Today
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Attorney Orly Taitz will be a guest on the Steve Malzberg Radio Show, Tuesday, March 17, 2009.
Ms. Taitz is expected to give updates on her case along with a discussion surrounding her recent encounters with Justices Roberts and Scalia of the United States Supreme Court.
The show begins at 3:00PM EST and ends at 6:00PM EST. We have been told her slot is at 4:00PM.
If you are a first time listener of WOR-710 News Talk Radio, you will need to install an ActiveX script before you can access the show online.
Click the LISTEN LIVE button on the navigation bar, top left of the following page and install:
http://www.wor710.com/pages/3736426.php?
Also included, is a chat room.
For future reference, the main website is below and includes their entire lineup and podcasts:
http://www.wor710.com
Starts: 03/17/2009/15:00
Finishes: 03/17/2009/18:00
Uh, from "internet radio" to major market talk radio out of New York.
I'd say that's going to raise visibility on the issue.
Ms. Cris Ericson's arguments
[ED.: Although I do not vouch for all of Ms. Cris Ericson's arguments and analyses, this one on decaLogos has some merit.]
Please read
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov
on the right
Hawaii Revised Statutes
and use various search phrases:
certification of birth;
birth certificate;
certificate of birth.
If you keep trying, you will find at least 41 statute sections that allow a person born in a foreign country to receive a Hawaii birth certificate, [which] is supposed to say the person was born in a foreign country. But then the person can apply to have an altered birth certificate with the original information changed.
There are two main ways to do this.
One is "Hawaii Rule 803, Hearsay Admissible,"
where you get any one to say that the original facts and information need to be changed because they were in error,
and you get the original birth certificate sealed and a new one issued.
Another way is under HRS § 338-17, where there are various sub-sections like 338-17.5, 338-17.7, [and] 338-17.8,
and under [any] one of those, any Law enforcement agency can certify that, for the safety of the birth registrant, the original information has to be changed and new information put on the certificate.
It is strangely worded because first it says the new birth certificate will have a new number but the original will still stay in the file. Then in the next part of that sub-section, it states that the original will be sealed and the new birth certificate issued.
So the statute subsection contradicts itself, and if you only read part of it, and not the whole thing, you will think the original birth certificate is still on file with the old number as well as the new certificate with the new changed information and the new number. So if you don't keep reading, you will miss the next part that says the previous birth certificate will be sealed.
So, the sneaky thing about Hawaii Revised Statutes is to read the whole entire text down to the very bottom, and you will see the date the law was enacted at the bottom.
I am hoping that Attorney Stephen Pidgeon will ask this Question to the Court when he files the appeal to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and I certainly hope he files an appeal FAST!
SHALL the Supreme Court of the United States take JUDICIAL NOTICE of all of the Hawaii Revised Statutes regarding certificates of birth and birth certificates and certification of live births, and also take Judicial Notice of Hawaii Rule 803 Hearsay Admissible, and take Judicial Notice in particular of the HRS § 338-17 subsection (either 338-17.5 or 338-17.7, because 338-17.8 allows a person born in a foreign country to receive a Hawaii birth certificate) which allows LAW ENFORCEMENT [to request an altered or fictitious birth certificate in order to keep the registrant safe.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by H.R.S. § 338.07
(5) Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly, and shall not substitute for the birth registrant's original birth certificate, which shall remain in place.
[A subsequent statute provides that when the new birth certificate is issued, the original birth certificate shall be SEALED.]
Hollister update on BlogTalkRadio today - 3:00 p.m.
From MommaE & Matt
I just want to tell you that this afternoon's show is on. I will be giving an update on the Hollister case! Berg, Joyce and Hemenway has filed their answer to the dismissal by Roberts and his call for them to show cause as to why their should not be any Sanctions!
All kinds of good things to talk about and it will be 90 minutes of hot topics, updates and fun. It should be a HOT rocking show, as well as interesting.
Please post this on your web site, blogs or any blogs you are associated with or have access to and send to everyone in your address book.
Link, schedule, call in number and times for the Show is below!
http://blogtalkradio.com/mommaeradiorebels
Call In # 347-237-4870
NOON PM Pacific Time
1:00 PM Mountain Time
2:00 PM Central Time
3:00 PM Eastern Time
I hope to see you all there. There are 3 ways to listen to the show, they are as follows:
1. When you get to the Show page if the show doesn't immediately start playing for you, you can click on the radio on the right, minimize the page and listen while doing something else.
2. You can enter the chat as a Guest and read what is being said while listening.
3. You can register/log-in and chat while listening.
The choice is yours.
I hope to see you all there.
MommaE and Matt
Starts: 03/18/2009/15:00
Finishes: 03/18/2009/17:00
Re: Hollister update on BlogTalkRadio today - 3:00 p.m.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
From MommaE & Matt
I just want to tell you that this afternoon's show is on. I will be giving an update on the Hollister case! Berg, Joyce and Hemenway has filed their answer to the dismissal by Roberts and his call for them to show cause as to why their should not be any Sanctions!
All kinds of good things to talk about and it will be 90 minutes of hot topics, updates and fun. It should be a HOT rocking show, as well as interesting.
Please post this on your web site, blogs or any blogs you are associated with or have access to and send to everyone in your address book.
Link, schedule, call in number and times for the Show is below!
http://blogtalkradio.com/mommaeradiorebels
Call In # 347-237-4870
NOON PM Pacific Time
1:00 PM Mountain Time
2:00 PM Central Time
3:00 PM Eastern Time
I hope to see you all there. There are 3 ways to listen to the show, they are as follows:
1. When you get to the Show page if the show doesn't immediately start playing for you, you can click on the radio on the right, minimize the page and listen while doing something else.
2. You can enter the chat as a Guest and read what is being said while listening.
3. You can register/log-in and chat while listening.
The choice is yours.
I hope to see you all there.
MommaE and Matt
Starts: 03/18/2009/15:00
Finishes: 03/18/2009/17:00
[color=blue][b]One has to enable pop ups & click “PLAYâ€
Rollye James Interview of Orly Taitz 3-17-09
Rollye James Interview of Orly Taitz 3-17-09:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeckRxaEfO8
There's more sections of the interview, but this segment discusses Obama's identity (or more accurately - identities).
Re: Rollye James Interview of Orly Taitz 3-17-09
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
..oops, didn't see those yet, will later, when I can..! :wink:
Bless you Orly..!! 8)
Planned MASSIVE registration AND voter fraud primarily by ACORN is HOW we got RINO McCain for the Republican nominee, a HUGE distraction for the Party..
Hussein IS a sociopath, a usurper, a COMPLETE fraud, and needs to be impeached ASAP..!!
There's a plethora of info and I hope there are some MAJOR investigations into this..!!!
I CAN'T STAND to hear OR watch the usurper at ANY time, changing the station immediately..!!
Hawaii rules for political candidates
www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol01_Ch0001-0042F/HRS0012/HRS_0012-0003.htm
[H.R.S.] § 12-3 Nomination paper; format; limitations. (a) No candidate's name shall be printed upon any official ballot to be used at any primary, special primary, or special election unless a nomination paper was filed in the candidate's behalf and in the name by which the candidate is commonly known. The nomination paper shall be in a form prescribed and provided by the chief election officer containing substantially the following information:
(1) A statement by the registered voters signing the form that they are eligible to vote for the candidate;
(2) A statement by the registered voters signing the form that they nominate the candidate for the office identified on the nomination paper issued to the candidate;
(3) The residence address and county in which the candidate resides;
(4) The legal name of the candidate, the name by which the candidate is commonly known, if different, the office for which the candidate is running, and the candidate's party affiliation or nonpartisanship; all of which are to be placed on the nomination paper by the chief election officer or the clerk prior to releasing the form to the candidate;
(5) Space for the name, signature, date of birth, last four digits of the social security number, and residence address of each registered voter signing the form, and other information as determined by the chief election officer; provided that no more than the last four digits of a voter's social security number shall be required;
(6) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by the candidate that the candidate qualifies under the law for the office the candidate is seeking and that the candidate has determined that, except for the information provided by the registered voters signing the nomination papers, all of the information on the nomination papers is true and correct;
(7) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by a party candidate that the candidate is a member of the party;
(8 ) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath, where applicable, by the candidate that the candidate has complied with the provisions of article II, section 7, of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii;
(9) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by the candidate that the candidate is in compliance with section 831-2, dealing with felons, and is eligible to run for office; and
(10) The name the candidate wishes printed on the ballot and the mailing address of the candidate.
When hearsay about a birth is admissible in Hawaii.
www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol13_Ch0601-0676/HRS0626/HRS_0626-0001-0803.htm
Rule 803 Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:
(9) Records of vital statistics. Records or data compilations, in any form, of births, fetal deaths, deaths, or marriages, if the report thereof was made to a public office pursuant to requirements of law.
(11) Records of religious organizations. Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths, legitimacy, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization.
(19) Reputation concerning personal or family history. Reputation among members of the person's family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among the person's associates, or in the community, concerning a person's birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of the person's personal or family history.
Rehashing some earlier discussion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
From what I read, Obama's mother was single at the time of conception, and was married to Obama Sr. when she was around three months along, on Maui.
I want so very much for this to be true, and I pray it is a fact.
However, is it correct to say that there is no known documentation of this marriage?
Has any investigator secured a notarized copy of the marriage license?
I would have expected to have seen a copy by now, if one were available to the public. Or are marriage licenses, like birth certificates, only accessible to relatives?
Was the marriage on Maui a feigned, pretend marriage to keep from embarrassing Madalyn Dunham, however radically unconventional she was?
When she died the day before the election, did she take to the grave the truth about her daughter Stanley Ann's marital status with Barrack Obama Snr.?
And while we are discussing embarrassing certifications, recall that FreedomFirst showed us here these RNC and DNC Certifications of Nomination, in the last post of 2008 on this thread.
FreedomFirst copied the Certifications of Nomination from Justin Riggs' blog. Mr. Riggs apparently sent letters to the Republican and Democrat chairpersons in many states, or in every state, in order to secure these documents, a search which he narrates on his Your Fellow Citizen blog.
When Pres. of the Senate Dick Cheney failed to call for objections to the electoral college ballots, Rep. Pelosi's burst of excitement was an outward indication of her inner anxiety about a challenge. Given that she has sworn a statement that Mr. Obama is "legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution," she still has cause for anxiety. Perjury may mean hard time for Rep. Pelosi, especially considering the enormity of the consequences of her deception of the voters.
It is inconceivable that she didn't know what we know about Mr. Obama's birthplace, his Kenyan father, and his citizenship status. So, "accessory to the fraud of usurping the office of the Presidency" would be more like it.
Be very afraid, Ms. Pelosi. Be very, very afraid.
letter to send to Christian and conservative leaders
[ED.: Letter to Mrs. Bay Buchanan of TeamAmericaPAC:
send freely to leaders of other Christian and/or conservative causes.]
Dear Mrs. Buchanan,
You wrote, "The audacity of Congress never ceases to amaze me. After taking orders from the Obama Administration, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd created a loophole..."
Everyone has a righteous complaint against the Obama Administration.
"Change" hopefuls point to Cabinet appointments and complain about "the new boss - same as the old boss."
Patriots complain that Mr. Obama is on board with the efforts to subject the United States to the NAU, the North American sector of the New World Order or the one-world government.
The pro-life faithful complain about suspension of the Mexico City policy against funding abortions in foreign countries, and about federally funding the destruction of human embryos to harvest their embryonic stem cells for research.
Joni and Friends complain about legalizing the murder of born-alive babies by abortionists.
Citizens Against Government Waste and other advocates of responsible financial policy complain about trillions - who knows how many trillions - of dollars being spent in a panic, without adequate oversight, just in the past six months.
Veterans and active military don't often complain, but they aren't happy about giving up hard-fought, blood-bought ground in Iraq to Iranian Shi'ites and Sunni terrorists.
Friends of Israel complain about the push to give Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem to Fatah and the PLO, who may then turn them over to Hamas and Hezbollah. That would put Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and most of the Jewish population within easy striking distance of terrorists with Iranian NBC weapons.
Immigration law enforcement and border control advocates complain about the use of ACORN to change illegal aliens into citizens, without lawful naturalization.
Christians and other heterosexuals complain about the imminent implementing of the homosexual agenda, same-sex marriage, and adoption by homosexual couples, regardless of Mr. Obama's statements to the contrary.
Christians complain about Mr. Obama's past associations with Is|am and with black liberation theology (Marxist), or we hope they are "past".
Attorney Phil Berg complains that the Obama Administration and Attorney General Eric Holder plan to use H.R. 45 to cripple the Second Amendment.
Home schoolers complain about Mr. Obama's plan for "0 to 5" government preschool and the threat of mandatory enrollment.
Advocates and practitioners of realpolitik complain about Mr. Obama's "outreach" to Iran, the same kind of "warm and fuzzy" thinking that invited the Shi'a radical student takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979. Except this time, the stakes are atomic bombs and the homelands of Israel and the U.S..
Even Osama complains about Obama, that he is just another American war-monger who isn't leaving the Middle East fast enough.
My complaint is that everyone else is attacking cobwebs in his or her corner, while the real task is to remove the 800-pound gorilla-spider from the center of the room.
The only solution to the many, many disasters Mr. Obama is perpetrating is to annul his election due to his disqualification under the Constitution. Nothing else will stop this perpetual train wreck from bringing America to a dead stop.
All the whining in the world isn't going to stop this catastrophe from happening. All the complaints are just so much whining unless the complainers get on board to nullify Mr. Obama's election. Either we must hang together, or we will surely hang separately. Unite and fight, or scatter and splatter.
Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen, per Article II, § 1 of the U. S. Constitution.
He was
a. born in Kenya;
b. born of a Kenyan father, a British protected citizen;
c. not repatriated after being adopted as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia;
d. not repatriated after getting an Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan in 1981.
Check one, or more, or all of the above.
There have been 42 lawsuits with the common plaint that Mr. Obama is Constitutionally ineligible for office. Many have been denied or dismissed on procedural grounds, but not on the merits or the facts of the case. In just one lawsuit, Dr. Orly Taitz represents nine state representatives and one hundred and twenty military personnel, with more being added to the list of plaintiffs.
Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices Thomas and Scalia are willing to hear oral arguments, but they need four to play, and Constitutionalist Justice Alito appears to be missing in action so far. The four original constructionist Justices also need Justice Kennedy's vote in order to remove the impostor from office.
The Rev. David Wilkerson, author of The Cross and the Switchblade, says God sent him a prophetic vision of New York City in flames. DHS and law enforcement anticipate just that if the usurper is denied the Presidency. But "Let Justice prevail, though the heavens fall." Better that America fall to looters among her own people than to One-World Globalists and J|hadists for the Ca|iphate.
Mrs. Buchanan, please read the five attached articles, pray, and act. Do not just "do what you can." Do whatever the Lord commands and empowers you to do.
Sincerely in Christ,
MinutemanCDC_SC
o-bots are trying to control..
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Here is the video (with lousy volume) of Orly Taitz, DDS, Esq. submitting a question to Chief Justice John Roberts during the 2009 Bellwood Lecture at the University of Idaho.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fAEFbgkpWg
Sound is poor the first 2.13 secs (of 3.25), still audible :wink:
Man, there's a LOT of “obotsâ€
Re: Rehashing some earlier discussion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
From what I read, Obama's mother was single at the time of conception, and was married to Obama Sr. when she was around three months along, on Maui.
I want so very much for this to be true, and I pray it is a fact.
However, is it correct to say that there is no known documentation of this marriage?
Has any investigator secured a notarized copy of the marriage license?
I would have expected to have seen a copy by now, if one were available to the public. Or are marriage licenses, like birth certificates, only accessible to relatives?
Was the marriage on Maui a feigned, pretend marriage to keep from embarrassing Madalyn Dunham, however radically unconventional she was?
When she died the day before the election, did she take to the grave the truth about her daughter Stanley Ann's marital status with Barack Obama Snr.?
And while we are discussing embarrassing certifications, recall that FreedomFirst showed us here these RNC and DNC Certifications of Nomination, in the last post of 2008 on this thread.
FreedomFirst copied the Certifications of Nomination from Justin Riggs' blog. Mr. Riggs apparently sent letters to the Republican and Democrat chairpersons in many states, or in every state, in order to secure these documents, a search which he narrates on his Your Fellow Citizen blog.
When Pres. of the Senate Dick Cheney failed to call for objections to the electoral college ballots, Rep. Pelosi's burst of excitement was an outward indication of her inner anxiety about a challenge. Given that she has sworn a statement that Mr. Obama is "legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution," she still has cause for anxiety. Perjury may mean hard time for Rep. Pelosi, especially considering the enormity of the consequences of her deception of the voters.
It is inconceivable that she didn't know what we know about Mr. Obama's birthplace, his Kenyan father, and his citizenship status. So, "accessory to the fraud of usurping the office of the Presidency" would be more like it.
Be very afraid, Ms. Pelosi. Be very, very afraid.
I'm wondering if a lawsuit against Pelosi in Hawaii might have standing; some kind of "compel production" action to prove she didn't sign her name to a document which had a false swearing. Unlike the direct challenge to Obama which was ruled to be time-barred because it didn't get filed soon enough to disqualify him, after his name went on the ballot, this would be something different.
Dunham vs. Obama libel for divorce
Is the following libel for divorce, sworn to by Stanley Ann D. Obama, adequate proof of her marriage to Barack Obama Snr.?
Kenya (and Is|am) allowed multiple wives. Even though Barack Obama Snr. was still married to Kezia Obama in Kenya, and Stanley Ann D. Obama knew it, she got a divorce rather than an annulment. Doesn't their divorce indicate that the State of Hawai'i considered them to be married just as Kenya did?
(Her statement that they were "lawfully married" imparts new meaning to the word, "lawfully".
No matter... "married" still means "married", even in this alternate reality.)
http://www.plainsradio.com/obama1.html
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII
DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS
AT CHAMBERS
IN DIVORCE
STANLEY ANN D. OBAMA,
Libellant,
vs.
BARACK H. OBAMA,
Libellee.
GRIEVOUS MENTAL SUFFERING
LIBEL FOR DIVORCE
TO THE HONORABLE THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT:
Comes now STANLEY ANN D. OBAMA, Libellant above named, and complaining of BARACK H. OBAMA, Libellee above named, respectfully shows as follows:
I
That Libellant is now and for more than two years past has been a resident of Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, State of Hawaii; that Libellee is residing at 170 Magazine Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
II
That Libellant and Libellee were lawfully married in Wailuku, Maui, State of Hawaii, on February 2, 1961, by a person duly authorized to perform marriage ceremonies and ever since that date have been and are now husband and wife.
III
That Libellant and Libellee last lived together as husband and wife in Honolulu, Hawaii, but said parties are now living apart.
IV
That one child has been born to said Libellant and Libellee as issue of said marriage, to wit: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, a son, born August 4, 1961.
etc. ...
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, this 20th day of January, 1964.
(signed) Stanley Ann D. Obama
STANLEY ANN D. OBAMA, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: That she is the Libellant above named; that she has read the foregoing libel for divorce, knows and understands the contents thereof and that the same are true.
(signed) Stanley Ann D. Obama
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20th day of January, 1964.
(signed) Notary Public, First Judicial Circuit, State of Hawaii.
Courtesy of PlainsRadio.com...
Here is the resulting divorce decree, which is not subscribed and sworn to by Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham.