9/12, LEAST 1.5MILLION now..!! ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
TexasBorn, cayla99, HighlanderJuan, FreedomFirst, recall that you read it first at ALIPAC here and here.
Last year, in fact.
Thanks, Minuteman. I spent a few minutes re-reading some of the earlier posts, and it is clear to me that 1) we knew a lot of the current knowledge a long time ago, 2) we may be getting closer to actually verifying and/or proving some of the earlier beliefs, and 3) someone needs to write a non-fiction book about this modern day investigative reporting by the common (or maybe, not-so-common) man.
The investigative skills of the MSM are clearly dead, and once again it will be shown that truth is strange - stranger than fiction. But the truth must ultimately be revealed.
Happy 9-12, folks..!! :D I wonder how many of us rabble will be showing up in WDC today. I hope the numbers are hundreds of thousands. At least.
GREAT information everyone..!! :D
(except obots :roll:)
Latest numbers are 1.5 MILLION, yes, in DC..!! ;) (NOT including other Tea Parties/Town Halls being held across the nation..!! :wink:)
I’m estimating AT LEAST 75% of them are "Tea'd Off" about the usurper & cronies.. :P
It’s LIVE on both FoxNewsChannel & Cspam..
http://www.wnd.com/images/090828obamasign.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/Hitler09.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...hing/oLess.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...aScumBag-1.jpg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"..Seriously, WHY waste ANY time on ANY issue concerning the usurper & fellow cronies, when they ALL should be in prison RIGHT NOW..!!.." :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ligibility.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../WhereBC-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...perSticker.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ForDummies.jpg
www.obamanotqualified.com/eligibility_g ... ummies.htm :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...teTheObots.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/ObamaBot.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tInChief-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../HesNOTGod.gif
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../ObamAcorn.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ustMedia-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...oxOfLies-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tsKool-Aid.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tchingTV-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...Corruption.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...stImposter.jpg
www.AmericanGrandJury.org :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ork4us9-12.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...OnDC091209.png
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ricansOnly.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...fiaDiagram.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...amaBinLyin.jpg
PS: Radio & stuff:
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-139157-.html :wink:
:arrow: BIG PS: STOP the chaos, 8O ..this so-called :roll: ‘administration’ is a FARCE..!! :twisted: ..just "Blagojevich" the fascist-marxist usurper & his mafia cronies NOW..!! [..for starters, go (& donate) to: www.alipac.us/ftopict-137238.html , www.ObamaNotQualified.com , www.TheObamaFile.com , www.ObamaCrimes.com , www.WND.com/eligibility :wink:]
A million or more rock Washington
A million or more rock Washington
Taxpayer march could be biggest rally ever in capital
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109628
Posted: September 12, 2009 9:57 pm Eastern
"WASHINGTON – The capital was rocked today by a taxpayer march and rally that could be the biggest protest ever – potentially dwarfing the Million Man March and the Promise Keepers Rally.
Though crowd estimates vary from as low as 60,000 to 70,000 according to ABC News to a high of 2 million by London Daily Mail, photographs and videos of the march and rally demonstrate its enormity.
...
The White House said Friday it was unaware of the rally. President Obama has traveled to Minneapolis, Minn., to promote his health-care plans at a rally there."
===========
Talk about bull crap! If I had a crowd of 50,000+ coming to Washington to voice their opinion of me and what I was doing, the Secret Service would have known, I would have known, and I'm certain all of my czars would have known (they are, after all, czars).
Hah ha! These guys are so pathetic in their lies and attempted deception.
Being out of town for a voter rally surely isn't indicative of the actions of a leader of a representative government, but then again, communist leaders aren't known for their responsiveness to anyone but themselves, are they.
Although, having said that, and if I were Obama, I probably would have made certain I had an excuse - any excuse - to be out of town during this particular rally. But, if on the other hand, it was a march of the unions, I would have stayed in town.
One just has to make certain their priorities are set right.
Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certif
Monday, Sep. 14, 2009
Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certificate in hearing where Army officer fights deployment
By CHUCK WILLIAMS - chwilliams@ledger-enquirer.com
Comments (32)
During a hearing in U.S. District Court Monday, an attorney for an Army officer fighting deployment to Iraq questioned Barack Obama’s legal right to serve as president, asserting he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii.
Judge Clay Land, inquisitive throughout the 90-minute hearing, said he will issue a decision on Capt. Connie Rhodes’ request for a temporary restraining order by noon Wednesday.
Rhodes was represented by Orly Taitz, a California lawyer and a national figure in the “birtherâ€
NH Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama ,Election Fraud
September 13, 2009
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud
Filed under: A Nation Of Laws, AKA OBAMA AKA Soetoro AKA Dunham AKA God — aconservativeedge @ 9:13 pm
Tags: democrats, obama, fraud, citizen, election, born, investigate, secretary, state, ballot, natural, barack, certification, candidate, new hampshire, misrepresented
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner, a non-partisan appointee, has agreed to investigate allegations that Democrats and Barack Hussein Obama misrepresented his natural born status in order to gain placement on the New Hampshire ballot as a presidential candidate. Gardner agreed to the investigation after a request made by State Rep. Lawrence Rappaport on Thursday. According to a report by The Post & Email, the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama’s nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press. The Post & Email’s John Charlton writes:
http://aconservativeedge.com
Re: Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth ce
[quote="FedUpinFarmersBranch"]Monday, Sep. 14, 2009
Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certificate in hearing where Army officer fights deployment
By CHUCK WILLIAMS - chwilliams@ledger-enquirer.com
Comments (32)
During a hearing in U.S. District Court Monday, an attorney for an Army officer fighting deployment to Iraq questioned Barack Obama’s legal right to serve as president, asserting he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii.
Judge Clay Land, inquisitive throughout the 90-minute hearing, said he will issue a decision on Capt. Connie Rhodes’ request for a temporary restraining order by noon Wednesday.
Rhodes was represented by Orly Taitz, a California lawyer and a national figure in the “birtherâ€
Re: NH Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama ,Election Fra
Quote:
Originally Posted by FedUpinFarmersBranch
September 13, 2009
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud
Filed under: A Nation Of Laws, AKA OBAMA AKA Soetoro AKA Dunham AKA God — aconservativeedge @ 9:13 pm
Tags: democrats, obama, fraud, citizen, election, born, investigate, secretary, state, ballot, natural, barack, certification, candidate, new hampshire, misrepresented
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner, a non-partisan appointee, has agreed to investigate allegations that Democrats and Barack Hussein Obama misrepresented his natural born status in order to gain placement on the New Hampshire ballot as a presidential candidate. Gardner agreed to the investigation after a request made by State Rep. Lawrence Rappaport on Thursday. According to a report by The Post & Email, the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama’s nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press. The Post & Email’s John Charlton writes:
http://aconservativeedge.com
More from the source of this investigation on Orly Taitz web site (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/):
Friday, September 11, 2009 7:21 AM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Larry Rappaportâ€
Repost: eyewitness account of Cook v. Obama
Expect nothing good from U.S. District Judge Clay Land's kangaroo court. Repost from July 17, 2009
Maj. Gen. Childers, Lt. Col. Graef, Maj. Cook v. Col. Good, Col. Wingate, Col. MacDonald, Dr. Robert M. Gates, USSecDef, Barack Hussein Obama, [de facto] President of the United States
Courtroom proceedings are unfamiliar to me, but Major Stefan Cook v. Col. Good et al was a disheartening eye-opener about how unjust "justice" can be. On the morning of July 16, 2009, in U.S. District Judge Clay Land's second-floor courtroom in the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Columbus, Georgia, eight miles north of Ft. Benning, I saw either a preview of the Tribulation or a look back at the Inquisition.
Everything in this courtroom seemed backwards and turned upside down.
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/6...donitshead.jpg
Judge Land acted like an aggressive prosecutor, Dr. Taitz, the prosecuting attorney, acted like a defender of the plaintiff, her wrongly attacked client, and the Army defense attorneys acted like bystanders who refused to get involved. Perhaps this travesty would be better understood if read in reverse order, to see how words were spoken which covered actions which had not even happened yet. It seemed that the script had been written, events in court were predetermined, and everyone knew what would happen next.
_________________________________________________
Dr. Taitz only made a ten or fifteen minute presentation, in which she presciently disassembled and defused the "no standing" ruling which Judge Land would make a half hour thereafter. This was hardly a shot in the dark, there having been 48 previous "no standing" rulings by self-preservationist judges, none of whom has been willing to step out of line and get involved in actually judging between the fraud and the victim.
Dr. Taitz asked that this case serve as representative of the other 170 or so military personnel. She told Judge Land that if he did not accept a representative case on behalf of the others, she would potentially have to bring each one before his court. He declined her request without comment, apparently not taking it seriously.
An almost as blonde female Army defense attorney followed Dr. Taitz with a ten or fifteen minute recitation of how the military expected issues to be addressed through channels [in an ideal, untainted world]. She mentioned Navy Capt. Schiver, Maj. Cook's civilian job supervisor at defense subcontractor Simtech in Pensacola. Capt. Harris had named a July 15, 2009 (the day before this trial date), date of deployment to Afghanistan for Maj. Cook precisely because Maj. Cook had asked for a July 15th date. He had volunteered before Mr. Obama took office and reaffirmed that on May 15 [May 9, actually], The Army confirmed his orders a month later, on June 9.
She claimed that he should not be allowed to change the request he had so recently made or to request emergency action because of the imminence of his deployment. She said the proper procedure was a ???????-43 review process as to whether orders should be revoked. She stated that the 11th Circuit had addressed this military [deployment?] procedure as early as 2003; yet, Maj. Cook did not use those channels. The female Major stated that Maj. Cook had not taken an Article 138 complaint through channels, which is the prescribed procedure.
__________________________________________________ ____
Dr, Taitz objected to that statement as not true, because she had taken the presentment to Adm. Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking what was the proper route for determining the legitimacy of the chain of command for orders. Adm. Mullen's legal counsel told her that because the [de facto] Commander-in-Chief is a civilian, he is not subject to a military determination of legitimacy of chain of command. Therefore, an Article 138 complaint could not require verification of legitimacy of a civilian CinC. [And therefore, sending an Article 138 complaint through channels would be pointless in this particular case.]
Then the Army defense attorney simply restated the necessity of submitting an Article 138 complaint through channels. Otherwise, the Army defense attorney comported herself satisfactorily and without offense.
Judge Land asked Dr. Taitz if she had evidence of her statement. "Evidence... Evidence!" in almost a bullying tone. She said she could present a written affidavit, but she had not brought the original determination, not expecting that the Army attorney would make such a false statement. Judge Land then denied Dr. Taitz' testimony in lieu of written evidence, leaving the argument in the Army's favor, that an Article 138 complaint had not been submitted through channels, and Maj. Cook had gone outside of channels and filed in a civilian court.
The Army defense attorney claimed that filing in a civilian court was improper for determination of legitimacy of chain of command, and the judge appeared to agree. N.B., the Catch-22: the JCS had already determined that a military complaint process cannot validate a civilian Commander-in-Chief, yet Maj. Cook cannot validate a military chain of command in a civilian court;. Did anyone mention that this eventuality had never happened before, and that it would cause a Constitutional crisis?
Although this contradiction was apparent to all, Judge Land accepted it into the record. More than once, I feared I would be reprimanded for my involuntary gasps of disbelief. I should have been able to restrain one moan, though. By contrast, Maj. Stefan Cook sat ramrod straight and, although I could not see his face, he did not make any untoward motions throughout.
____________________________________________
After a 15 minute recess, Judge Clay Land closed the case by rebuking Dr. Taitz for four or five minutes in a statement apparently prepared BEFORE the trial, the gist (NOT A QUOTE) of which was the following:
This court is ruled by the same Constitution your client uses to prompt his refusal of military orders. You came here intending to uncover Pres. Obama's birth certificate. The Constitution defines the separation of powers, and this court will not overstep those bounds to rule on the Executive Branch.
Maj. Cook, your orders to Afghanistan have been revoked; you will not be getting any more orders. Retired Maj. Gen. Childers and Lt. Col. Graef attached their names to this case based on possible orders; this court will not rule on hypotheticals. Your employment in Pensacola is beyond the jurisdiction of this court. Your complaint fails to meet the three requirements for standing. Therefore, this case is dismissed for lack of standing.
You have your orders revoked; that is what your restraining order demanded.
__________________________________________
We all rose to show respect for the judge upon his two entrances. I had to force myself to rise to show him respect when he finally left. But, after the trial, I did render respect where respect was due - to Maj. Stefan Cook. I saluted him and told him he was the bravest man I had ever met. He said, "It's moral courage." I continued to stare at him, wanting to weep. He turned away, saying, "You make me want to cry." He could feel the emotion. Pray for this just man, unjustly persecuted to hide the wickedness of another [snip].
Someone said afterward that this was just the wrong judge. We all expressed our hopes for Keyes v. Obama under U.S. District Judge David O. Carter in Santa Ana, California.
But today, this was truly a kangaroo court; the judge had even prepared his final opinion before the case began.
"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Judge Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."
This bland media statement does not communicate the contempt Judge Land showed the plaintiff and Orly Taitz when he read aloud the requirements for standing:
U.S. District Judge Clay Land read to the court:
There are three requirements for standing:
I) injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is
(a) concrete and particularized, and
(b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;
II) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and
III) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative.
Thus, he spotlighted the irony of his inaction.
I) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that his reserve status is probably revoked along with the orders for Afghanistan. The judge told him he would not be receiving further orders from the Army. The injury is concrete and particularized to him alone, actual and imminent, like day before yesterday.
II) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that the DOD had leaned on his boss to fire him from his job at defense subcontractor Simtech. Maj. Cook was fired from his civilian job within hours of his orders being revoked. Of course, DOD will claim there was no causal connection.
III) Injury would not only be addressed by a favorable decision, but a mere court order for discovery of the usurper's birth documents would end the reign of terror for everyone before it gets really, really dire.
__________________________________________
On the sidewalk in front of the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., and much-decorated Middle East combat veteran Major Stefan F. Cook patiently explained to hostile and provoking reporters about:
- his uniform sprinkled with medals and ribbons and combat buttons;
his four combat tours in the Middle East vs. the "coward objector" slander thrown at him;
his volunteering for another Afghanistan tour under Pres. Bush, but since March, his having second thoughts (considering the Geneva Convention) about serving in combat under a de facto Commander-in-Chief who had not demonstrated his natural born citizenship so as to be a legitimate head of state;
the intricacies of citizenship vs. natural born citizenship;
non-binding Sen. Res. 511 approving Sen. John McCain's purported natural born citizenship vs. the absence of examination of Sen. Obama's bona fides (actually, Sen. John McCain's Panamanian birth certificate states he was born at Colon Hospital in Colon, Republic of Panama);
that natural born citizenship required two citizen parents, not just one, plus birth on soil under U.S. jurisdiction;
Emmerich de Vattel's The Law of Nations, and how its principles of international law were incorporated into the U.S. Constitution;
the 14th Amendment definition of citizenship and why that was irrelevant to natural born citizenship, yet its primary author, Rep. John Bingham, incidentally described natural born citizenship as birth on U.S. soil to parents who are citizens;
and so much more, in her inimitable meticulous detail.
That contrasted with the lack of opportunity given in court to present the same character witness and the history of natural born citizenship. It just didn't come up in the courtroom. Neither did Mr. Obama's proof of qualification nor the lack thereof.