Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
That was a moment of silence beginning 9/11 with a prayer for our beloved Constitutional republic.
Heavenly Father, in Jesus' name, save the United States, her free people, and her honorable Constitution.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
That was a moment of silence beginning 9/11 with a prayer for our beloved Constitutional republic.
Heavenly Father, in Jesus' name, save the United States, her free people, and her honorable Constitution.
[quote=MinutemanCDC_SC]Quote:
Originally Posted by "MinutemanCDC_SC":1rz5d6jl
That was a moment of silence beginning 9/11 with a prayer for our beloved Constitutional republic.
Heavenly Father, in Jesus' name, save the United States, her free people, and her honorable Constitution.[/quote:1rz5d6jl] :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yeah right, but it was a good attempt at a cover-up
[quote=cayla99]:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Yeah right, but it was a good attempt at a cover-up[/quote:3tq09suk]
That's the trouble with working with other seekers of the truth. You can't get away with anything!
So let's close 9/11 with a prayer for our beloved Constitutional republic.
Heavenly Father, in Jesus' name, save the United States, her free people, and her honorable Constitution.
Yes, I remember. I would LOVE to see the certs on Kerry in 2004 to see if they too are different.
Thanks, Minuteman. I spent a few minutes re-reading some of the earlier posts, and it is clear to me that 1) we knew a lot of the current knowledge a long time ago, 2) we may be getting closer to actually verifying and/or proving some of the earlier beliefs, and 3) someone needs to write a non-fiction book about this modern day investigative reporting by the common (or maybe, not-so-common) man.Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
The investigative skills of the MSM are clearly dead, and once again it will be shown that truth is strange - stranger than fiction. But the truth must ultimately be revealed.
Happy 9-12, folks. I wonder how many of us rabble will be showing up in WDC today. I hope the numbers are hundreds of thousands. At least.
I think I will make copies of this and present them at our next Citizens for Liberty ,Tea Party meeting. We have 2 State Senators on the board, I think they can do more with this than me.
Hey Patriots... Good Job :wink:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
GREAT information everyone..!! :D
(except obots :roll:)
Latest numbers are 1.5 MILLION, yes, in DC..!! ;) (NOT including other Tea Parties/Town Halls being held across the nation..!! :wink:)
I’m estimating AT LEAST 75% of them are "Tea'd Off" about the usurper & cronies.. :P
It’s LIVE on both FoxNewsChannel & Cspam..
http://www.wnd.com/images/090828obamasign.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/Hitler09.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...hing/oLess.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...aScumBag-1.jpg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"..Seriously, WHY waste ANY time on ANY issue concerning the usurper & fellow cronies, when they ALL should be in prison RIGHT NOW..!!.." :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ligibility.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../WhereBC-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...perSticker.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ForDummies.jpg
www.obamanotqualified.com/eligibility_g ... ummies.htm :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...teTheObots.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/ObamaBot.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tInChief-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../HesNOTGod.gif
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l.../ObamAcorn.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ustMedia-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...oxOfLies-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tsKool-Aid.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...tchingTV-1.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...Corruption.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...stImposter.jpg
www.AmericanGrandJury.org :wink:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ork4us9-12.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...OnDC091209.png
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ricansOnly.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...fiaDiagram.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...amaBinLyin.jpg
PS: Radio & stuff:
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-139157-.html :wink:
:arrow: BIG PS: STOP the chaos, 8O ..this so-called :roll: ‘administration’ is a FARCE..!! :twisted: ..just "Blagojevich" the fascist-marxist usurper & his mafia cronies NOW..!! [..for starters, go (& donate) to: www.alipac.us/ftopict-137238.html , www.ObamaNotQualified.com , www.TheObamaFile.com , www.ObamaCrimes.com , www.WND.com/eligibility :wink:]
iQuestionEverything,
You're not getting very excited about things today, are you. :lol:
Juan
This just might be the turning point to getting our country back. IQuestionEverything, and the rest of us, have earned the right to smile today. However, tomorrow the next battle begins.Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Cayla, the first shots across the bow have been fired and clear warnings relayed to the enemy in DC. We will accept nothing but an unconditional surrender. Pull them from their hiding places, expose them for everyone to see and then try them. Today was D-Day 2009. Sound a little extreme? Maybe, but they won't give up without an epic fight. The worst is yet to come. They're going to "hunker in their bunker" and hope it blows over!!Quote:
Originally Posted by cayla99
Oh I know it, and there will be retaliation. As I said enjoy today's victory, for this is only a single battle in the war for our constitution. However, we must savor the victories to draw hope and strength from in the dark days ahead.Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
A million or more rock Washington
Taxpayer march could be biggest rally ever in capital
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109628
Posted: September 12, 2009 9:57 pm Eastern
"WASHINGTON – The capital was rocked today by a taxpayer march and rally that could be the biggest protest ever – potentially dwarfing the Million Man March and the Promise Keepers Rally.
Though crowd estimates vary from as low as 60,000 to 70,000 according to ABC News to a high of 2 million by London Daily Mail, photographs and videos of the march and rally demonstrate its enormity.
...
The White House said Friday it was unaware of the rally. President Obama has traveled to Minneapolis, Minn., to promote his health-care plans at a rally there."
===========
Talk about bull crap! If I had a crowd of 50,000+ coming to Washington to voice their opinion of me and what I was doing, the Secret Service would have known, I would have known, and I'm certain all of my czars would have known (they are, after all, czars).
Hah ha! These guys are so pathetic in their lies and attempted deception.
Being out of town for a voter rally surely isn't indicative of the actions of a leader of a representative government, but then again, communist leaders aren't known for their responsiveness to anyone but themselves, are they.
Although, having said that, and if I were Obama, I probably would have made certain I had an excuse - any excuse - to be out of town during this particular rally. But, if on the other hand, it was a march of the unions, I would have stayed in town.
One just has to make certain their priorities are set right.
Forget about the citizenship issue, it looks like we have bigger problems. IF we have someone in the whitehouse that is unaware of a million people standing on his front yard, what else is in plain site and he is missing. I believe he needs a mental health check PRONTO.
Cayla, Obama is VERY well aware of the rally! What is unconscionable is that a POTUS would totally ignore Americans in such enormous numbers rallying in front of the WH asking for their voice to be heard. This, my friends, is a pretend president with his own radical agenda to fulfill no matter how loud the voice of the people is. We are in dangerous waters and Obama and his fascist cohorts have to be stopped at all costs.Quote:
Originally Posted by cayla99
I was mocking the statement made by his trained monkey. "Robert Gibbs said the White House wasn’t aware of the Tea Party rally in D. C. on 9/12"Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
Here are a few other things Barak Ostrich was not aware of:
April 15th tea parties
http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/stor ... _says_abc/
"Auntie Zeituni" living in the country illegally
http://www.javno.com/en-world/obama-una ... ign_198955
Unaware of what the health care bill says
Unaware of where he was born
Unaware that his parents never lived together
Unaware that we are broke
Unaware he is NOT KING.
Unaware of the history of the founding of this nation
Unaware that we have a constitution
the list grows by the day.
Bill Maher video sneers at the "Million Moron March" - well, at least he might have the sheer numbers more correct than other MSM outlets trying to minimize it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/1 ... 84314.html
Bill's 15 minutes of fame ended, when? How many years ago?
:roll:
Some excellent video at this link, which comments about the NY Times being an Ostrich-Fellow-Traveler.
www.examiner.com
Great quote about the Washington Post: "How can you not cover a million people in your own back yard?"
Another great quote from a marcher on-camera: "We're not protesting the last six months, we're protesting the last TEN YEARS!"
Interesting. I went to the link you offered and found myself with a banner 'examiner.com' in Portland, Maine. I was really confused, because here in the People's Republic of Maine, there is no chance the Portland news media will cover anything conservative. Looking a bit deeper, I find the source of the link is Clarity Digital Group, Llc, located in Denver. More interesting, because the article originated from the Sacramento Conservative Examiner (located in the People's Republic of California, another un-conservative village).Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomFirst
Somebody (a small group of six people in Denver) seems have figured out how to get personalized conservative news to anybody willing to read it. Good for them!
Let's hear it for a free, honest press! It's about time.
Perhaps what we are seeing here is the unstoppable force meeting with the unmovable object. The one world government socialists everywhere don't want to promote or even acknowledge the world's financial and productivity backbone (i.e. the freedom loving conservatives), so they do everything they can to destroy the conservatives. The conservatives, in the meantime, have just about had it with the lefties, have paused from their work, and have decided to tell the lefties to stop their onerous takeover and just go away.
I feel more positive about the future than I have for the past year, but as Cayla is so quick to remind us, it ain't over til it's over.
I took a quick look at our earlier posts around August 25, and didn't see this article published. Did we miss this while we were concerned about the virus problem on Alipac? I've read some parts of this article somewhere - I just can't remember where.
=================
Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?
Just who has been sending "the message"?
Joan Swirsky
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14089
Canada Free Press
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then -92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualifiedâ€
The following is another Clarity Digital Group sponsored article.
HJ side note. Canada Free Press, Pravda, The Daily Mail, are all examples of foreign news sources that publish information about happenings in America that our own allegedly 'free press' won't print. So, we conservative truthers are forced to shop internationally to get the information we need to know about what is happening in our own country.
This is a sad commentary on how bad things have become in America, largely because of the efforts of George Soros, and other wealthy control-oriented communist freaks, to destroy the best free nation on earth.
=====================
The March on Washington comes, Obama runs, Glenn Beck still driving ACORN nuts.
September 13, 4:32 AM, Wichita Independent Examiner, Geoff Caldwell
http://tinyurl.com/qcckb6
Hundreds of thousands, and possibly over a million Americans upset with an increasingly "non-representative" government marched on Washington yesterday.
But rather than stay and listen to their grievances their President instead chose to hop Air Force One out of town. Once again off at taxpayer expense to yet another one of his healthcare rallies. This one a thousand miles away in much friendlier Minneapolis.
While Obama basked in campaign style chants of "Yes we can!" and "Fired up, ready to go!" the words in Washington were quite different.
From "enough, enough" and "We the People" to "You lie, you lie!" and "Pelosi has to go," the dailymail.co.uk reports the mood was definitely NOT in favor of Obama's plan for health care and his never ending spending.
A culmination of Glenn Beck's 912project , former House Majority Leader Dick Armey's freedomworks.org and other conservative groups, the turnout for yesterday's "March on Washington" surprised not only it's supporters but Washington authorities as well.
None other then the venerable New York Times (http://tinyurl.com/r6k7xr) had to report that:
"A sea of protesters filled the west lawn of the Capitol and spilled onto the National Mall on Saturday".... and.... "the magnitude of the rally took the authorities by surprise, with throngs of people streaming from the White House to Capitol Hill for more than three hours."
The main stream media editors must have been in agony, how DARE these upstarts get in the way of another Presidential rally. (Wouldn't you have loved to been a fly on the wall in those producer meetings when they realized the sheer number of protesters in Washington was going to force them to give coverage to the very people they disdain, AND take away from coverage they had intended to provide their beloved Saint?)
While the administration, its allies in Congress, and the media have done their best to paint the "tea baggers" as an unhinged, dirty, no need to bother with them fringe crowd, the march yesterday showed anything but. Rather it revealed a true grass roots movement rooted in the best of the traditions this country has to offer.
For thousands upon thousands, yesterday was an awakening. Never before protesting anything, they found themselves traveling cross country to join total strangers all for the sake of having their voices heard by a government that has for too long ignored them.
From young to old, white to black, man, woman, Republican, Democrat, Independent, they ALL came together in one unified voice with one unified purpose.
One voice against out of control government spending and the squandering of futures not yet told and generations not yet born.
Glenn Beck-ACORN update:
ACORN is not going to give up their power (no matter how corrupt that power may be) without a fight. Now another high placed nut in the organization has released another rant. Bertha Lewis, ACORN Chief Organizer says:
"The relentless attacks on ACORN’s members, its staff and the policies and positions we promote are unprecedented. An international entertainment conglomerate, disguising itself as a “newsâ€
Remembering that America is a Christian nation, let us not forget that Obama is a strong Muslim supporter. Someone who takes him to task on his views is another free-thinking, not-American, Geert Wilders.
In an article brought to us by Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugs from the Dutch newspaper, De Telegraaf (http://tinyurl.com/orys9u) we have this article:
Geert Wilders warns of the manner in which President Obama is embracing the muslim world. According this member of the Dutch parlaiment, President Obama is following a very dangerous and irresponsible policy and like the Dutch prime minister Balkenende, Obama is closing his eyes "for the big problems which islamization brings with it".
In an interview with the website NU.nl Wilders "slammed" Obama this Sunday. "Obama is familiar with Chamberlain, someone who can't see right who actually is THE enemy and plays soft friendship with them, instead of declaring: I stand for OUR values and that's what I'm fighting for" according to Wilders.
The Brittish Prime minister Chamberlain signed in 1938 the treaty of Munchen, hoping to save the world peace along with it. A big part of Tsjechoslowakije was however given over to Adolf Hitler in the Treaty. One year later Nazi Germany invaded Poland and World war 2 started.
Wilders admits that he makes a harsh comparison with this "But.. it is a very dangerous policy that Obama is following". The leader of the PVV gives as an example of the speech given by Obama earlier this year to the muslim world in Cairo. In this speech Obama declared that he wanted to embrace a new relationship without any mistrust and opposing views between the USA and the appr. 1.5 billion muslims in the world. Wilders called this very naive to embrace Islam and to put them on the same level as the free western world. "That is irresponsible and dangerous, because it will create a situation that people are going to "close their eyes" to the dangers".
People like Obama and Balkenende are just out for holding hands and singing songs under the Christmas tree and closing their eyes the whole year long for the problems that islamization brings with it.
(HJ more reasons to resolve the eligibility issue and get Obama out of office)
Ok folks, look, I don't want to stir up the pot here but someone needs to ask some obvious questions, again. I'm old enough and have the wisdom of years to know when something is terribly wrong. IMO, we are in the fight of/for our lives! I have come to respect the opinions of those on this topic and would like to hear your position on my extremist rantings below:
- How can a President of this country totally ignore one million American citizens who travel from all over the country to the White House to have their voices heard? Is this not just a little unsettling to anyone?
- ACORN by all accounts is a monstrous organization with deep roots in the government, money and power. A cancer with tentacles all across the country. Will they be investigated or will the truth be buried? Who will challenge the government and how?
- What happens if the majority of this country, who are justifiably angry, continue to be ignored and bills are passed, more money spent and the constitution ignored?
- What happens, when and if the truth finally comes out about Obama's eligibility, our government ignores this fact and does nothing? What are the alternatives?
- If the economy worsens as many experts predict, and our government
decides to spend another trillion dollars on bailouts, will Americans be ignored again? What should/can we do?
- Will the American people wait four years for a new election while the country is being destroyed from within?
- Are the 2010 elections our last hope?
Yes, I only spent a few minutes putting this hodgepodge of questions together but bear with my lunacy and give me your thoughts on the jist of my questions.
Bad decision on his part. Even HE can't honestly think his claim of "I didn't know" passes the smell test. He KNEW. It was the ultimate 'dis', in my opinion.Quote:
- How can a President of this country totally ignore one million American citizens who travel from all over the country to the White House to have their voices heard? Is this not just a little unsettling to anyone?
I don't know what will come of the outing of Acorn this time. It would seem, at least in the eyes of the far left, that Acorn can do no wrong. Even when they're caught red-handed, it's just a tickle on the wrist for them.Quote:
- ACORN by all accounts is a monstrous organization with deep roots in the government, money and power. A cancer with tentacles all across the country. Will they be investigated or will the truth be buried? Who will challenge the government and how?
There are a few who are challenging Acorn from the floor of congress. Michelle Bachman is one. There are more. We need to give them our full support while unrelentingly hammering the rest of congress to STOP GIVING THEM OUR MONEY! And if they won't ..... TAX REVOLT.
TAX REVOLT. They only understand money and power in Washington. WE have BOTH. We only need to use them.Quote:
- What happens if the majority of this country, who are justifiably angry, continue to be ignored and bills are passed, more money spent and the constitution ignored?
Not something which should be discussed openly, in my opinion.Quote:
- What happens, when and if the truth finally comes out about Obama's eligibility, our government ignores this fact and does nothing? What are the alternatives?
I have little doubt that we will be ignored again...and again by our current government. Again, I believe a massive, majority TAX REVOLT would go a long way - finally get US noticed - so to say.Quote:
- If the economy worsens as many experts predict, and our government
decides to spend another trillion dollars on bailouts, will Americans be ignored again? What should/can we do?
Until an overwhelming majority of Americans 'get it', or until 'IT' happens to them...meaning the light bulb comes on and folks finally begin to see their rights and liberties being slowly stripped away.... really, really begin to understand and WANT to STOP IT FROM HAPPENING... then Yes, America will wait for 2012. Just pray you hear the popping sounds of millions of heads being pulled out of a$$es so this doesn't happen again.Quote:
- Will the American people wait four years for a new election while the country is being destroyed from within?
NEVER give up hope. The word alone got a Kenyan muslim elected to the white house. Just think what WE could do with a little HOPE.Quote:
- Are the 2010 elections our last hope?
And there's always the good old TAX REVOLT. If everybody does it (or enough 'everybodys') the thieves in Washington would be forced to take notice.
Just my humble opinions.
Thank you florgal.
On the dark side, what is happening in Asia may follow us here. I believe that web censoring (see WSJ article below) is something we really need to pay attention to if we intend to pursue free speech topics like challenging Obama's eligibility. Censorship is what czars do to protect their master.
===========
Web Censoring Widens Across Southeast Asia
Governments Lacking Technical Means Use Coercion and Intimidation in Efforts to Suppress Criticism Online
By JAMES HOOKWAY
WSJ SEPTEMBER 15, 2009, Page A20
BANGKOK -- Attempts to censor the Internet are spreading to Southeast Asia as governments turn to coercion and intimidation to rein in online criticism.
Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam lack the kind of technology and financial resources that China and some other large countries use to police the Internet. The Southeast Asian nations are using other methods -- also seen in China -- to tamp down criticism, including arresting some bloggers and individuals posting contentious views online.
That is distressing free-speech advocates who had hoped that Southeast Asia -- until recently a region where Internet use was relatively unfettered -- would become a model of open debate in the developing world as its economies modernize.
Censorship on the March
Malaysia has recently used its colonial-era Internal Security Act, which allows detention for up to two years without trial, to muzzle bloggers. Thailand is ramping up its reliance on a recently introduced Computer Crimes Act to restrict criticism of its royal family and limit the spread of what the government calls seditious material. Vietnam, an authoritarian Communist state, has been arresting people caught posting thoughts that run contrary to government policy, and has detained lawyers who try to defend them.
"A number of governments in the region have discovered they can't use technology alone to block out dissent because people will always find a way around it," says Roby Alampay, executive director of a Bangkok-based media advocacy group, the Southeast Asia Press Alliance. "Instead they are trying to send out the message that the government is watching what their citizens are up to, and many of these arrests are deliberately high-profile."
To be sure, not every government in the region is trying to bolt down the Internet. Singapore, where mainstream media are largely controlled by the government, has taken a relatively hands-off approach to the Internet. The governments of Indonesia and the Philippines don't limit political content on the Internet in their countries.
The case of Raja Petra Kamarudin, Malaysia's best-known blogger, reveals a different approach. The 58-year-old prince, or raja, in one of Malaysia's royal families started his feisty Malaysia Today news Web site a decade ago after the arrest of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim on sodomy charges, which Mr. Anwar denied. Mr. Anwar was convicted, jailed until the conviction was overturned, and is now being prosecuted again on sodomy charges, which he again is denying.
Since launching his Web site, Raja Petra has been a thorn in the side of Malaysia's ruling National Front coalition, posting a series of articles notable for their criticism of the government. His postings led to his detention for nearly two months under the Internal Security Act in 2008.
Malaysian authorities have accused Raja Petra of suggesting in a letter to prosecutors investigating the murder of a Mongolian model in 2006 that Prime Minister Najib Razak was involved in the killing, which Mr. Najib denies. Raja Petra was charged with sedition and went into hiding. He says the charge is misdirected because he didn't publish the letter, though he admits writing it and stands by its contents.
Malaysian government spokesman Tengku Sharifuddin Tengku Ahmad declined to comment about Raja Petra's allegations, and he didn't respond to questions about the broader issues surrounding Malaysia's approach to censorship.
Malaysia's government is careful not to be seen to be directly censoring the Internet because of a longstanding pledge not to interfere online and potentially scare off foreign technology companies, such as Microsoft Corp., which operate there.
In August, Mr. Najib's government backed off from implementing Web filters similar to those used in China to weed out certain political topics and other contentious discussions. It has also considered requiring that bloggers register with the government, but decided not to implement the rule.
Instead, says Raja Petra, Malaysia's authorities are using criminal laws "to make an example of me so that others will run away from the truth," although he says their efforts will backfire. "Other bloggers are becoming more vocal and more aggressive."
Some media analysts suggest governments are catching up with the impact of the Internet and mobile-phone messaging and how they helped to trigger social upheavals in countries such as Ukraine and the Philippines. Iran's success in putting down Twitter and Facebook-driven protests this summer may have lent some indirect encouragement, too.
"Even if governments aren't censoring outright, they are providing an adequate disincentive to posting criticism. People now know there will be consequences," says Rebecca MacKinnon, a professor of journalism and media studies at Hong Kong University and a co-founder of GlobalVoices, an international citizens' media Web site.
In Thailand, police last month arrested two people for forwarding an audio recording of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva purportedly ordering soldiers to attack antigovernment demonstrators. Mr. Abhisit said the recording is fake. Another Thai, Suwicha Thakor, was sentenced to 10 years in jail in June after pleading guilty to posting videos mocking Thailand's revered monarchy.
Thai government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn says the country's computer-crime laws are designed to protect people from fraud and defamation, and says the laws are at times being used to address what he describes as "national security" issues.
In recent weeks in Vietnam, meanwhile, popular blogger Bui Thanh Hieu was detained for several days after criticizing the government's mining policies; another blogger, Huy Duc, was fired from his job at a Ho Chi Minh City newspaper after the Communist Party complained about his posts, while others have also been briefly detained. A Vietnamese foreign-ministry spokeswoman on Thursday said the bloggers had been detained to enable police to investigate alleged violations of national security.
Internet-freedom advocates worry that more governments beyond Southeast Asia will follow the region's lead and try to take additional steps to tighten Internet controls.
"Being blocked from visiting a Web site is frustrating," Mr. Alampay, the Bangkok-based activist, says. "But when you see or hear about people being arrested, then that could stop you from logging on at all."
Write to James Hookway at james.hookway@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A20
Monday, Sep. 14, 2009
Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certificate in hearing where Army officer fights deployment
By CHUCK WILLIAMS - chwilliams@ledger-enquirer.com
Comments (32)
During a hearing in U.S. District Court Monday, an attorney for an Army officer fighting deployment to Iraq questioned Barack Obama’s legal right to serve as president, asserting he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii.
Judge Clay Land, inquisitive throughout the 90-minute hearing, said he will issue a decision on Capt. Connie Rhodes’ request for a temporary restraining order by noon Wednesday.
Rhodes was represented by Orly Taitz, a California lawyer and a national figure in the “birtherâ€
September 13, 2009
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud
Filed under: A Nation Of Laws, AKA OBAMA AKA Soetoro AKA Dunham AKA God — aconservativeedge @ 9:13 pm
Tags: democrats, obama, fraud, citizen, election, born, investigate, secretary, state, ballot, natural, barack, certification, candidate, new hampshire, misrepresented
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner, a non-partisan appointee, has agreed to investigate allegations that Democrats and Barack Hussein Obama misrepresented his natural born status in order to gain placement on the New Hampshire ballot as a presidential candidate. Gardner agreed to the investigation after a request made by State Rep. Lawrence Rappaport on Thursday. According to a report by The Post & Email, the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama’s nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press. The Post & Email’s John Charlton writes:
http://aconservativeedge.com
[quote="FedUpinFarmersBranch"]Monday, Sep. 14, 2009
Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certificate in hearing where Army officer fights deployment
By CHUCK WILLIAMS - chwilliams@ledger-enquirer.com
Comments (32)
During a hearing in U.S. District Court Monday, an attorney for an Army officer fighting deployment to Iraq questioned Barack Obama’s legal right to serve as president, asserting he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii.
Judge Clay Land, inquisitive throughout the 90-minute hearing, said he will issue a decision on Capt. Connie Rhodes’ request for a temporary restraining order by noon Wednesday.
Rhodes was represented by Orly Taitz, a California lawyer and a national figure in the “birtherâ€
[color=red]“If Sen. McCain would have won, would you be objecting to deployment to Iraq?â€
TAX REVOLT. They only understand money and power in Washington. WE have BOTH. We only need to use them.Quote:
Originally Posted by florgal
Not something which should be discussed openly, in my opinion.Quote:
- What happens, when and if the truth finally comes out about Obama's eligibility, our government ignores this fact and does nothing? What are the alternatives?
I have little doubt that we will be ignored again...and again by our current government. Again, I believe a massive, majority TAX REVOLT would go a long way - finally get US noticed - so to say.Quote:
- If the economy worsens as many experts predict, and our government
decides to spend another trillion dollars on bailouts, will Americans be ignored again? What should/can we do?
NEVER give up hope. The word alone got a Kenyan muslim elected to the white house. Just think what WE could do with a little HOPE.Quote:
- Are the 2010 elections our last hope?
And there's always the good old TAX REVOLT. If everybody does it (or enough 'everybodys') the thieves in Washington would be forced to take notice.
Just my humble opinions.[/quote:3vyrad16]
Haven't heard those two words in a while, florgal. They depend on two other words we rarely hear any more: fiscal responsibility. Without fiscal responsibility, refusing to pay tribute is no threat. Socialists and others who have not grown up simply spend money as though there is no tomorrow, with no thought of repaying the debts they create.
The Congressional Budget Office projects a $1.8 trillion federal deficit for fiscal year 2009. The pirates in control of the hijacked ship of state don't care if another $200 billion of taxes don't come in. They'll just print (even more) money and charge it.
Didn't you get the Tea Party message?
[quote="grandmasmad"][color=red]“If Sen. McCain would have won, would you be objecting to deployment to Iraq?â€
More from the source of this investigation on Orly Taitz web site (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/):Quote:
Originally Posted by FedUpinFarmersBranch
Friday, September 11, 2009 7:21 AM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Larry Rappaportâ€
Expect nothing good from U.S. District Judge Clay Land's kangaroo court. Repost from July 17, 2009
Maj. Gen. Childers, Lt. Col. Graef, Maj. Cook v. Col. Good, Col. Wingate, Col. MacDonald, Dr. Robert M. Gates, USSecDef, Barack Hussein Obama, [de facto] President of the United States
Courtroom proceedings are unfamiliar to me, but Major Stefan Cook v. Col. Good et al was a disheartening eye-opener about how unjust "justice" can be. On the morning of July 16, 2009, in U.S. District Judge Clay Land's second-floor courtroom in the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Columbus, Georgia, eight miles north of Ft. Benning, I saw either a preview of the Tribulation or a look back at the Inquisition.
Everything in this courtroom seemed backwards and turned upside down.
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/6...donitshead.jpg
Judge Land acted like an aggressive prosecutor, Dr. Taitz, the prosecuting attorney, acted like a defender of the plaintiff, her wrongly attacked client, and the Army defense attorneys acted like bystanders who refused to get involved. Perhaps this travesty would be better understood if read in reverse order, to see how words were spoken which covered actions which had not even happened yet. It seemed that the script had been written, events in court were predetermined, and everyone knew what would happen next.
_________________________________________________
Dr. Taitz only made a ten or fifteen minute presentation, in which she presciently disassembled and defused the "no standing" ruling which Judge Land would make a half hour thereafter. This was hardly a shot in the dark, there having been 48 previous "no standing" rulings by self-preservationist judges, none of whom has been willing to step out of line and get involved in actually judging between the fraud and the victim.
Dr. Taitz asked that this case serve as representative of the other 170 or so military personnel. She told Judge Land that if he did not accept a representative case on behalf of the others, she would potentially have to bring each one before his court. He declined her request without comment, apparently not taking it seriously.
An almost as blonde female Army defense attorney followed Dr. Taitz with a ten or fifteen minute recitation of how the military expected issues to be addressed through channels [in an ideal, untainted world]. She mentioned Navy Capt. Schiver, Maj. Cook's civilian job supervisor at defense subcontractor Simtech in Pensacola. Capt. Harris had named a July 15, 2009 (the day before this trial date), date of deployment to Afghanistan for Maj. Cook precisely because Maj. Cook had asked for a July 15th date. He had volunteered before Mr. Obama took office and reaffirmed that on May 15 [May 9, actually], The Army confirmed his orders a month later, on June 9.
She claimed that he should not be allowed to change the request he had so recently made or to request emergency action because of the imminence of his deployment. She said the proper procedure was a ???????-43 review process as to whether orders should be revoked. She stated that the 11th Circuit had addressed this military [deployment?] procedure as early as 2003; yet, Maj. Cook did not use those channels. The female Major stated that Maj. Cook had not taken an Article 138 complaint through channels, which is the prescribed procedure.
__________________________________________________ ____
Dr, Taitz objected to that statement as not true, because she had taken the presentment to Adm. Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking what was the proper route for determining the legitimacy of the chain of command for orders. Adm. Mullen's legal counsel told her that because the [de facto] Commander-in-Chief is a civilian, he is not subject to a military determination of legitimacy of chain of command. Therefore, an Article 138 complaint could not require verification of legitimacy of a civilian CinC. [And therefore, sending an Article 138 complaint through channels would be pointless in this particular case.]
Then the Army defense attorney simply restated the necessity of submitting an Article 138 complaint through channels. Otherwise, the Army defense attorney comported herself satisfactorily and without offense.
Judge Land asked Dr. Taitz if she had evidence of her statement. "Evidence... Evidence!" in almost a bullying tone. She said she could present a written affidavit, but she had not brought the original determination, not expecting that the Army attorney would make such a false statement. Judge Land then denied Dr. Taitz' testimony in lieu of written evidence, leaving the argument in the Army's favor, that an Article 138 complaint had not been submitted through channels, and Maj. Cook had gone outside of channels and filed in a civilian court.
The Army defense attorney claimed that filing in a civilian court was improper for determination of legitimacy of chain of command, and the judge appeared to agree. N.B., the Catch-22: the JCS had already determined that a military complaint process cannot validate a civilian Commander-in-Chief, yet Maj. Cook cannot validate a military chain of command in a civilian court;. Did anyone mention that this eventuality had never happened before, and that it would cause a Constitutional crisis?
Although this contradiction was apparent to all, Judge Land accepted it into the record. More than once, I feared I would be reprimanded for my involuntary gasps of disbelief. I should have been able to restrain one moan, though. By contrast, Maj. Stefan Cook sat ramrod straight and, although I could not see his face, he did not make any untoward motions throughout.
____________________________________________
After a 15 minute recess, Judge Clay Land closed the case by rebuking Dr. Taitz for four or five minutes in a statement apparently prepared BEFORE the trial, the gist (NOT A QUOTE) of which was the following:
This court is ruled by the same Constitution your client uses to prompt his refusal of military orders. You came here intending to uncover Pres. Obama's birth certificate. The Constitution defines the separation of powers, and this court will not overstep those bounds to rule on the Executive Branch.
Maj. Cook, your orders to Afghanistan have been revoked; you will not be getting any more orders. Retired Maj. Gen. Childers and Lt. Col. Graef attached their names to this case based on possible orders; this court will not rule on hypotheticals. Your employment in Pensacola is beyond the jurisdiction of this court. Your complaint fails to meet the three requirements for standing. Therefore, this case is dismissed for lack of standing.
You have your orders revoked; that is what your restraining order demanded.
__________________________________________
We all rose to show respect for the judge upon his two entrances. I had to force myself to rise to show him respect when he finally left. But, after the trial, I did render respect where respect was due - to Maj. Stefan Cook. I saluted him and told him he was the bravest man I had ever met. He said, "It's moral courage." I continued to stare at him, wanting to weep. He turned away, saying, "You make me want to cry." He could feel the emotion. Pray for this just man, unjustly persecuted to hide the wickedness of another [snip].
Someone said afterward that this was just the wrong judge. We all expressed our hopes for Keyes v. Obama under U.S. District Judge David O. Carter in Santa Ana, California.
But today, this was truly a kangaroo court; the judge had even prepared his final opinion before the case began.
"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Judge Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."
This bland media statement does not communicate the contempt Judge Land showed the plaintiff and Orly Taitz when he read aloud the requirements for standing:
U.S. District Judge Clay Land read to the court:
There are three requirements for standing:
I) injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is
(a) concrete and particularized, and
(b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;
II) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and
III) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative.
Thus, he spotlighted the irony of his inaction.
I) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that his reserve status is probably revoked along with the orders for Afghanistan. The judge told him he would not be receiving further orders from the Army. The injury is concrete and particularized to him alone, actual and imminent, like day before yesterday.
II) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that the DOD had leaned on his boss to fire him from his job at defense subcontractor Simtech. Maj. Cook was fired from his civilian job within hours of his orders being revoked. Of course, DOD will claim there was no causal connection.
III) Injury would not only be addressed by a favorable decision, but a mere court order for discovery of the usurper's birth documents would end the reign of terror for everyone before it gets really, really dire.
__________________________________________
On the sidewalk in front of the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., and much-decorated Middle East combat veteran Major Stefan F. Cook patiently explained to hostile and provoking reporters about:
- his uniform sprinkled with medals and ribbons and combat buttons;
his four combat tours in the Middle East vs. the "coward objector" slander thrown at him;
his volunteering for another Afghanistan tour under Pres. Bush, but since March, his having second thoughts (considering the Geneva Convention) about serving in combat under a de facto Commander-in-Chief who had not demonstrated his natural born citizenship so as to be a legitimate head of state;
the intricacies of citizenship vs. natural born citizenship;
non-binding Sen. Res. 511 approving Sen. John McCain's purported natural born citizenship vs. the absence of examination of Sen. Obama's bona fides (actually, Sen. John McCain's Panamanian birth certificate states he was born at Colon Hospital in Colon, Republic of Panama);
that natural born citizenship required two citizen parents, not just one, plus birth on soil under U.S. jurisdiction;
Emmerich de Vattel's The Law of Nations, and how its principles of international law were incorporated into the U.S. Constitution;
the 14th Amendment definition of citizenship and why that was irrelevant to natural born citizenship, yet its primary author, Rep. John Bingham, incidentally described natural born citizenship as birth on U.S. soil to parents who are citizens;
and so much more, in her inimitable meticulous detail.
That contrasted with the lack of opportunity given in court to present the same character witness and the history of natural born citizenship. It just didn't come up in the courtroom. Neither did Mr. Obama's proof of qualification nor the lack thereof.
Devvy Kidd does a pretty good job of discussing the current status of the high visibility eligibility cases. This is a revised edition of the original post - I've added the URL links. Please advise if there are broken links.
==============
PATRIOTS: TIME FOR MAJOR PUSH ON USURPER'S CITIZENSHIP ISSUE
By: Devvy Kidd
September 15, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd467.htm
On September 12, 2009, Americans descended on Washington, DC., in one of the largest displays of citizen disgust towards government in the history of this republic. While this patriotic day of fed up Americans was happening, the usurper (Obama/Soetoro) made sure he was out of town.
As usual. Obama aka Soetoro has taken a real fondness to flying around on Air Force One with his inventory of teleprompters and stable of fawning sycophants.
Let's back up one day to September 11, 2009. The flim flam man was at the Pentagon with his militant, Marxist wife and bag lady of fashion, Michelle. The annual ceremony for those murdered on 9/11. At the same time in a court room in Georgia, Obama's lackeys were playing more games in an important case. Americans keeping up on current events know there have been dozens of lawsuits challenging the citizenship eligibility of this guy in the White House who has used five different names (Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham) and concealed every single record of his life except what he wants you to see.
The ignorant, biased media continues to ridicule those of us who believe the Constitution matters. Know what? I could care less. They don't pay my mortgage and I understand how the game is played. I say those who will not stand up for the truth are cowards. These useful fools who call any American vile labels for challenging the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro are either intellectually lazy and refuse to do the real research, their paychecks mean more to them than the truth, or they believe in Obama/Soetoro's Marxist agenda. This usurper must be removed from office. Not because Obama/Soetoro is a communist and is destroying this country (true), but because he never had the legal right to run for the presidency or take the oath of office on January 20, 2009.
Let's get caught up on recent events which seem to be causing 'The One' some stress. If you'll notice, the usurper doesn't seem to be walking to our helicopter with his usual jaunty stride. There is a tension there that is palpable. Stress from trying to sell his unconstitutional health care "reform" mess? I don't think so. On September 8, 2009, there was another hearing in the Barnett v Obama case in a federal court house in Santa Ana, California. I was most disturbed about what I have learned went by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation. As this can get a little confusing, I'll try to summarize here as clearly as I can.
That hearing (Barnett v Obama) was scheduled for weeks. The attorney's for the defendants, that would be the usurper and his minions, filed an eleventh hour motion on Friday, September 4, 2009. Monday the 7th was a holiday. The hearing was Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009. How coincidental that Obama/Soetoro decided to pump some more of his propaganda to America's school children at the same time a hearing was underway that could eventually remove his lying backside from office.
There are a number of plaintiffs, but from what I can determine, things got nasty during the hearing. Here are two posts from actual plaintiffs in the case for you to read:
Plaintiff MSgt USMC Jeff Schwilk: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4247
Plaintiff Pamela Barnett: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4249
Orly has filed a notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest ( http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4305 ).
This uphill battle should not be a damn bully contest, but that's exactly what it appears to me by Kreep. Now, all that aside, Judge Carter has set October 5, 2009 ( http://tinyurl.com/modhap ), as the next hearing to consider the motion by the Defendants; they want this to go away. A trial date, should this matter move forward, is set for January. Too far away because everyday the usurper remains office, the more complicated this constitutional crisis gets because of bills Obama/Soetoro is signing into law. Not to mention deploying soldiers as Commander-in-Chief. Although I've been told Judge Carter has further issued an expedited hearing, I am not certain as I write this. However, you can read this explanation of the judge's order here:
Judge Carter orders Motion for Rogatory Discovery to be heard: http://tinyurl.com/mg5xrh
September 11, 2009 by John Charlton
Referral Order gives rise to speculation that expedited discovery is to commence
(Sept. 11, 2009) — "Yesterday U.S. Federal District Judge David Carter (Central District of California, Souther Division) ordered the Amended Motion for expedited Rogatory Discovery, filed by Attorney Taitz in the action Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al. referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. This order followed Carter's denial of Taitz’ request to remove Judge Nakazato from his role overseeing admission of evidence to the case, which duty he has according to Federal Court rules of procedure. Judge Nakazato is now to review the first Kenyan Birth Certificate.
"Attorney Taitz had submitted in July a Kenyan Birth Certificate (hereafter the Lavendar Document) to be authenticated by means of a mandamus to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to move her to formally request the Kenyan Government to authenticate the document. This motion was denied by Judge Nakazato, whereupon Taitz filed a motion refusing to proceed before him, and a subsequent amendment to the initial Rogatory motion, on Aug. 20th.
"Attorney's for Barack Hussein Obama, led by Mr. George S. Cardona, acting U.S. Attorney, almost immediately replied to Carter's order, with an ex-parte Application (accompanied by a proposed order), requesting immediate halt to any discovery which might be granted by the Magistrate Judge."
One other comment here about the Defendant's motion to dismiss and I cover this in my letter to Judge Carter: Their entire argument is based after the barn door was left open ( http://tinyurl.com/o567mf ). There was zero vetting at the state level to ensure Obama aka and so forth, was constitutionally eligible. That glaring error (or cover up) caused everything to snow ball from there into the mess underway.
Meanwhile, Orly was in Georgia (September 11, 2009) on another eligibility case, Rhodes v McDonald, et al. Orly was notified by the clerk that an expedited hearing had been granted, so she caught a red eye flight to Georgia for a hearing last Friday. Here is the antics of our government that should make everyone sick; posted by Orly:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4283
"We had a hearing on 11th. Defendants were represented by 3 attorneys: US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney. they claimed that my client, flight surgeon Cpt Rhodes MD didn't show up for no reason, she just didn't feel like coming.
"I presented to the judge a notarized statement, showing that Col Jeffrey Johnson, her commander from Fort Riley, KS has forbidden Connie from leaving Fort Riley a day early and she was threatened that if she does, she will be court martialed and can be thrown into military prison. In this fashion the gov. prevented Connie from being at her own hearing and 5 minutes before the hearing they served me with the motion to dismiss.
"Judge Land did not appreciate this strong hand tactic of the government and he ordered the government to make sure Connie is able to leave the base to be at her hearing, which was scheduled for Monday at 12 noon. This time it is their responsibility to do whatever is necessary for Connie to be in court. It is a tough week for me as in 5 days I am making 5 red eye flights and long trips between OC, LA, Atlanta, Columbus and WA DC."
Here is the Notarized statement from Plaintiff ( http://tinyurl.com/rdpdyw ), Cpt Connie Rhodes MD, attesting to the fact that she was forbidden to leave the base and appear in court. Because of the shenanigans by these lawyers, a US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney, another hearing was scheduled for Monday, September 14, 2009, at noon.
I spoke with Orly by phone at about 5:45 pm EST (Sept. 14, 2009). She sounded exhausted, but said the hearing was concluded; she was able to speak for about two hours. Judge Land will issue a decision tomorrow.
While all this is going on, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and CNN have remained silent. Not a single minute of coverage. Yo! That includes the 'fair and balanced' FOX News Network.
On September 10, 2009, an exposure of documents hit the Internet courtesy of JB Williams. Two different Official Certification of Nomination letters submitted by Nancy Pelosi and a woman named Alice Travis Germond. Read the posting and copy of the documents here:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm.
This now brings me to my work over the weekend because time is of the essence.
This is a letter I sent to Judge David O. Carter in the Barnett case: ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/carter.pdf ). It is permissible for citizens to send polite correspondence to judges regarding a case he/she is presiding over. If you will notice, no where in my letter do I refer to the usurper's party, politics or policies. Judge Carter is ruling on the law and that must be the only point you bring out if you decide to send him a letter. I hope everyone can take a few minutes (especially vets and active duty military) to pen a polite letter to Judge Carter asap.
Next, this is a request to my Secretary of State for a copy of the Official Certification of Nomination sent for Obama/Biden by Pelosi ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/texas.pdf ). I want to see what was submitted as a result of the revelations mentioned above by JB Williams.
Next, another letter to two U.S. Attorneys requesting a full investigation into those documents ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/durbin.pdf ).
Next, no not fun in the sun. One of Orly's plaintiffs is New Hampshire State Representative Laurence M. Rappaport. According to his post ( http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4280 ), Mr. Rappaport had a meeting with his Secretary of State (SOS), William Gardner, on September 11, 2009. I am quite familiar with Gardner from the recount last year over the vote fraud in NH during the primaries. I am not impressed with Gardner or his staff. However, since Rappaport is a member of the New Hampshire General Court, an elected official, he does have some clout.
I have sent a letter ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/rappaport.pdf ) and the following documents in a nice, neat folder to Rep. Rappaport:
Letters to Janet Brown, Committees on Presidential Debates ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/brown.pdf )
Dr. Edwin Vieira on Standing (Due to length, I put on a CD): http://tinyurl.com/ku6rsw
Letters to the Secretary of State and Elections Board - State of Illinois: http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/illinois.pdf
Letter to my SOS ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/texas.pdf ) and the JB Williams article: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm
Due to the length of these, I put them on the CD: Leo Donofrio's legal and historical research ( http://devvy.net/pdf/may09/donofrio_final.html ) on the issue of natural born citizen at birth;
another legal analysis on McCain's ineligibility ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/mccain_cd.pdf );
a document on how certain members of Congress tried to legislate Obama/Soetoro's citizenship by trying to sneak in McCain's and my letter to two U.S. Attorneys ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/legislate_obama.pdf ).
I think that about covers things for now on Orly's cases. Let me go over to Leo Donofrio's web site. For those who have been following this the past almost one year, Leo's was the first case to the U.S. Supreme Court and kicked without a hearing. Leo has been posting more of his research ( http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ ); hopefully you can book mark and read when you can because it's important. Be sure to visit Leo's site and scroll down for this: FACTCHECK.ORG CAPITULATES – Admits Error In Obama Kenyan Citizenship Analysis. Why is this important? Because that web site has been the water carrier for the usurper from day one.
Next, is another very important case, Kerchner v Obama
( http://tinyurl.com/ql892d ). I have interviewed both Charles Kerchner and his attorney, Mario Apuzzo. The issue of these certifications filed with the SOS and the one Pelosi signed from the convention is already part of that lawsuit. Please see this link ( http://tinyurl.com/ql892d ); scroll down to Item 89 - 91. The docket for Charles' case is here ( http://tinyurl.com/r3g4n6 ); you can follow the progress of that case.
For almost a year, those who care absolutely nothing for the U.S. Constitution, Obama/Soetoro's supporters, newspaper pundits and popular cable news network anchors, have been screeching, calling people like you and me "wing nuts," Kool Aid drinkers, racists and conspiracy wackos. Ignore them. Don't let them sap your strength and energy. Stay focused. Below is a list of state legislators (there may be more at this time, but I don't have the full list) who are Orly's plaintiffs. Ask them to do the same as Rep. Rappaport. Now, that he has taken this first step with his Secretary of State, I believe these other stand up Americans will follow.
Mr. Eric Swafford, in his capacity of the State representative from the State of Tennessee; Mr. Timothy Jones, ESQ, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Timothy Comerford, in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Frank Niceley in his capacity of the state representative from the state of Tennessee; Ms. Cynthia Davis, in her capacity of a State representative from the State of Missouri; Mr. Larry Rappaport in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Stacey Campfield in his capacity of a State representative from the state of Tennessee; Mr. Casey Guernsey in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Glen Casada, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Tennessee
Please feel free to send this column or any of the material in it to your state rep or senator with a polite snail mail letter asking for them to come forward as has Rep. Rappaport. If one of the above is your rep, be sure to thank them in a polite letter for already being plaintiffs in Orly's legal challenges and ask them to join Rep. Rappaport by petitioning your SOS. They need to know you will stand with them.
Let us keep the momentum going and show both Washington, DC and our state legislatures that we the people will no longer be ignored and we will not stop until the whole truth about the usurper is exposed and he is removed from office. Yes, Obama, we can and we will.
"But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution." -- John Adams, letter to H. Niles, February 13, 1818
Links:
1 - Federal judge calls soldier's Obama challenge 'frivolous.' The judge whose backside is protected by soldiers like Major Cook: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106692
2 - Proof of judge Lazzara sealing and hiding his orders from the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney and public: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3813
3 - Why For McCain, But Not For Obama? http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
1 - Photos show President Barack Obama as Barry the freshman ( http://tinyurl.com/ojn6j9 ) - Hey, let's just change your name! "It was at Occidental where he stopped being called “Barryâ€
Because I get sick of hearing the National Anthem sung badly, I thought maybe you would enjoy hearing this also.
And with no "artistic interpretation" - this, my friends, is the way it should be sung.........
It just doesn't get any better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ETrr-XHBjE
Please do not stand next to me when the anthem is played. My college room mate described my singing voice as comparable to a dying water buffalo in heat (How she knows what a dying water buffalo in heat sounds like is beyond me.) However, when my anthem is played, I stand at attention, hand over heart, and sing loudly.Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Highlander...wow! Just no words to describe...thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
I am sorry if this is a dupe. If you go to url you can see the document.
Meet The Soetoros!
Posted by Dale Gordon on September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment
Received this in an email:
This DOES ANSWER a NUMBER OF QUESTIONS and RAISES OTHER ISSUES! The AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THE TRUTH!
Indonesia
Left to Right:
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year oldBarry Soetoro
This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia,
shows the registration of Barack Obama <http://www.daylife.com/topic/Barack_Obama> under the nameBarry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.
Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: ….. Islam
Nationality: ….. Indonesian
How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group
“Americans for Freedom of Informationâ€
Thanks....I needed that!Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
[quote="butterbean"]I am sorry if this is a dupe. If you go to url you can see the document.
Meet The Soetoros!
Posted by Dale Gordon on September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment
Received this in an email:
This DOES ANSWER a NUMBER OF QUESTIONS and RAISES OTHER ISSUES! The AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THE TRUTH!
Indonesia
Left to Right:
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year oldBarry Soetoro
This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia,
shows the registration of Barack Obama <http://www.daylife.com/topic/Barack_Obama> under the nameBarry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.
Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: ….. Islam
Nationality: ….. Indonesian
How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group
“Americans for Freedom of Informationâ€