Or, 4. He feels he has produced enough documentation and is not worried about any of these "investigators" (like Berg and Martin).
Printable View
Or, 4. He feels he has produced enough documentation and is not worried about any of these "investigators" (like Berg and Martin).
Although extremely lengthy, this information was found on Free Republic in an article. I pasted it here so no one had to go to that article. Explains how Hawaii documents birth certificates.
The “Certificate of Hawaiian Birthâ€
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
What Documentation?
1. He had the Republican Governor of Hawaii seal the Birth Certificate (BC) because he was concerned about his identity being stolen. (Yeah like there is anyone in the US now that doesn't know who he is and will not know that there is something awry with the guy in front of them claiming to be Obama when it is obvious that he is an imposter). He used the law on the books saying that his BC had to be sealed and no one but the Registrant (person born), the spouse of the registrant, heir of the registrant or someone with common ancestry as the registrant could request it. Remember this is the same guy who had 3 Democrat opponents thrown off the ballot for legal technicalities. He understands the vagaries of the law.
2. Where are his immigration documentations that stated that he traveled to Pakistan under a US Passport. Fat chance there. Pakistan us OFF LIMITS to all but emergency travel in 1980-1981.
3. Where are his college documents that he had sealed? Why seal them? Did they include that he was receiving aid because he was a foreign student? We don't know because HE WON'T SHOW US.
Or are you referring to on his Fight the smears site he already admitted he was a UK then Kenyan citizen because of the British Nationality Act of 1948. In that case he has admitted in fact that he is not a Natural Born Citizen because he held a British citizenship at BIRTH. I'm not trying to be argumentative but there are serious questions about this man that HE believes he is too good and beneath him to answer.
But you are right when you say that he is not worried about the investigators. He is convinced that the Men in Black (not the MIB but the Supremes) will rule in his favor. It is almost a certainty that Ginsburg, Stevens, & Breyer will rule in favor of Obama. Likewise it is almost a certainty that Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas will rule with the Constitution. The question then hinges on Kennedy and Souter. And God Himself only knows what they will do. So yeah, Obama likes his chances there, and he is not worried.
Welcome, armbruster512!
jcsjcm, Please post link and please identify the author.
Nowdays, hospital and medical records are private. Of course 'researchers' cannot dig up the records of a living person. Nor can medical personnel come forward. Nor can the Health Department say any more than it has.
The allegation that the state of Hawaii sealed Obama's birth records is untrue. They are not treating his records any differently than they would anyone else's in these times.
The certificate that Obama's team posted clearly says that the location of his birth was Honolulu, Hawaii. It is not a certificate of being born somewhere else. Coupled with the discovery of his birth announcement in the local paper, in a regular column published by the Health Department, I cannot see how a Hawaiian birth location can be falsified at this point.
What has Obama done to show anyone anything true about himself? Everything about him is fake what makes anyone think that his doccuments will be different?
I am amazed this whole thing has taken on a life of its own. Medical records are private, and medical records also includes a birth. (I went ballistic when a doctor sent me a postcard with my results that anyone in the mail processing center and the postman could read.)
No one has yet been able to answer my question about proof that his mother was even in Kenya while she was pregnant. And another thought came to mind: do we know for a fact that a birth of a child of half-Kenyan descent is not celebrated as a spiritual birth? Why I say that is that some Mexican officials have stated that wherever there is a Mexican anywhere in the world, there is Mexico. They are not saying they are claiming territory, but that the spirit of their culture is with that citizen. Of course, when it comes to the US, some are trying to grab territory.
With the great question about Obama's birth certificate and his lawful legitimacy to become President of the United States, I came across this article that sums up the discussion nicely, and according to the author, Obama does have to stand up or step down.
This may be the most complete and thorough legal discussion I have read so far on this topic. It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court looks at the issue.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm
Apologies if this article has already been posted.
Welcome to ALIPAC HighlanderJuan and armbruster512 and jcsjcm :D
Great article too.
I've spent a great deal of time reading an article by Ron Polarik, PhD. It can be found at http://tinyurl.com/6euf2o.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
It is located on the Townhall Blog website. I tried to find a way to quote it to give you some information about the "documents" the Obama team produced. It is however very analagous to trying to drink from a firehose. Here is a brief synopsis.
[color=red]The following report is the culmination of over four months of intensive, empirical research whose sole purpose has been to determine if the images and photographs posted on the Internet are true reproductions of a genuine document purported to be Obama's original birth certificate.
Before seeing the image, I had no idea that Barack Obama's birthplace was in question, or that his status as a natural-born US citizen had never been proven. Like millions of other Americans, I believed the story he told about being born in Hawaii to an American Mother (and a U.S. citizen) and an African Father (a Kenyan national attending college on a student visa). I had no idea that this issue would mushroom and take on a life of its own. What I did know, however, was that from the first time I saw the Daily Kos image, or what I now call, "Obama's bogus birth certificate," that something was just not right about it. As someone who has scanned hundreds of thousands of documents in his lifetime, I had a hard time accepting that this was an original scan image made from an original paper document. As Fate would have it, right then, on June 13, I was looking at the conclusive evidence that the text on this image had been graphically altered, or "manufactured," as my first blog post would claim.
There is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created and distributed by Obama's campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg's Factcheck, and the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification document. Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the photos taken by Annenberg's Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been made from the same false identification document image, as well as from additional false identification documents created for the same purpose; namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, "Certification of Live Birth" document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become their President.
I never imagined that my studies would amount to this. I thought, like most Americans, that maybe the information was accurate even though the document image was fake. I thought, like most Americans, that Obama would simply present a copy of his real, original birth certificate, and that would be that. Yet, here we are, more than twenty months after Obama announced his candidacy for the Presidency, and nearly three weeks after the election, and Obama still refuses to show his real birth certificate!
To validate my findings that the text in this COLB document image was the result of graphic alternations, and not a result of any printer or scanner artifacts, I made over 700 test scans and images using an actual paper COLB and different scanners that were subjected to different combinations of scanning and image parameters. I was finally able to replicate the Kos image so closely that other image experts thought it was the same Kos image, and not my “clone.â€
A student needed an ID card, only available to Indonesian citizens, to attend a public school in Indonesia. If, for the purposes of that regulation, the Catholic school Barack Obama II attended was considered a "public school," then he had to be a citizen, not just claim to be a citizen. The way for him to become an Indonesian citizen was for Lolo Soetoro to adopt him, or at least to acknowledge him as his stepson.Quote:
Originally Posted by Justthatguy
His U.S. citizenship and status were not impaired by being an Indonesian citizen from ages 6 to 10. But unless you have another method, we must assume that he renewed his Indonesian passport upon his return to Indonesia in 1981, in order to travel to Pakistan. As an adult, that required renouncing his U.S. citizenship.
BetsyRoss, we know something wrong happened BECAUSE...Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
1) Something wrong DID happen: ex-Sen. Obama failed to present proof of natural born citizenship to any election official, state or federal. Only Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai'i Department of Health, and Alvin Onaka, the registrar of Vital Statistics, have personally checked and attest that his long form Certificate of Live Birth even exists and is on file. NO ONE has come forward to tell us what is on it: the hospital name and location, the attending physician's signature, the father's name, the mother's occupation and last date worked, or the contents of box 7c., "County and State or Foreign Country".
2) Ex-Sen. Obama has been secretive about his long form Certificate of Live Birth to the point of provoking suspicion. He has hired three law firms to keep his records secret, when he could pay $12, release his birth certificate, and be done with all these lawsuits, 23 at last count, including dismissals. He has not released his long form Certificate of Live Birth, as is customary; he has sealed his admissions and financial forms for Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard School of Law; he has sealed his faculty records at the University of Chicago; he has sealed his hospital records at Queens and Kapiolani, where sheriff's deputies are now posted to prevent unauthorized access; indeed, he has sealed every document that might reference his long form Certificate of Live Birth. Even Kenya says that his records there are sealed, without admitting that they exist. He is obviously hiding something; what is he hiding?
3) At least four Kenyans have stated that Barack Obama II was born in Kenya: Mama Sarah Onyango Obama in Kolego, Kenya, Barack Obama II's half-sister and half-brother in Kenya, and the Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S., H.E. Peter Ogego in Washington, D.C.. The first and last of these are on tape (see page 1, post 4, and page 7, post 4).
4) If all four of the above lied, and the masses in Kenya - who have no doubt that he was born there - lied, and Islamist leaders such as Muammar Qaddafi lied after supporting him financially, then it might be possible that Barack Obama II was born in Hawaii. In that case, he would have been born a U.S. citizen. But he also was born a British subject, because his father was a British subject: Kenya was a British protectorate until 1963. That divided loyalty to two countries spoiled his claim to "natural born citizenship." If it did not, the U.S. Supreme Court should be telling us so within weeks.
5) By his own admission, Barack Obama II traveled to Pakistan in 1981, which was prohibited for U.S. citizens bearing U.S. passports. The only other possibility is that he traveled on a passport from another country, e.g., Indonesia. To get a passport from another country, even to renew his childhood Indonesian passport, required renouncing his U.S. citizenship. Therefore, he is no longer a U.S. citizen, much less a natural born citizen. If you know ANY other way he could have traveled back and forth to Pakistan without setting off alarms at his U.S. port of entry, there are MANY Is'amist terr0rists who want just a minute of your time.
A hospital information management employee or Div. of Vital Statistics employee willing to take refuge in the federal Whistleblower Act and/or the Witness Protection Program could access the record and mail it to the Supreme Court Justices, the FBI, the U.S. Attorney General, and anyone else with the power to arrest ex-Sen. Obama for election fraud.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
1. If no one wants to be a whistleblower, maybe there is no whistle to blow? In any case, no one is forced to be a whistleblower. If he really was born in Honolulu, like the certificate says, someone would be risking their job in a recession to claim to be a whistleblower if there was no scandal to uncover. They might simply be fired for leaking private information. Whistleblower laws might not cover a person who violates HIPAA.
2. It is not the policy of the United States to give much credence to the assertions of foreigners when it comes to invalidated a documented US birth. The certificate says he was born here, the Honolulu Heath Department said he was born here back in 1961 in a newspaper column.
3. It is not the policy of the US to withdraw or invalidate US citizenship based on accidentally or incidentally acquired foreign dual citizenship. Ones citizenship is only called into question in cases where deliberate, volitional activities are involved. Otherwise, foreign nations could be laying claim on a bunch of us, and we would be allowing foreign nations to decide who is and who is not a citizen of the US. (Note, this could have inheritance ramifications, as it is in Indonesia where hospitals are accused of fabricating deathbed conversions to Islam, and diverting inheritance away from Christian dependents)
4. If it is true that Obama acquired dual citizenship as a result of his father, this would fall into #3 above, as he would have been a babe in arms when it happened. How can something that happened when you were a little kid taint and divide the loyalties of the subsequent adult? The US State Department would disagree that it would necessarily do that (see their website). I cannot believe how much weight people are giving to things that were basically done to little Obama before he was even 10.
5. If Obama Jr. ever had British, then Kenyan citizenship, he no longer does and has not for a long, long time. From Factcheck: "But the paper failed to note that the Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya's Constitution specifies that at age 21, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya. " (http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/d ... nship.html)
The issue of the Barack Obama (or Barry Soetoro) birth certificate being valid seems almost moot at this point, but if you would like a fairly thorough review of the Hawaiian birth certificate process, try this site:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/ ... h_cer.html
If you want more on Barack Obama specifically, here's one more review for you to examine (this is part 1 of 4 parts):
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/P ... /12932.htm
I'm kinda wondering if we elected Barack Obama or Barry Soetoro.
Anybody know the answer to that question?
I thought all four IsraelInsider articles were linked, but they are not. The four article links are below:
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/P ... /12932.htm
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/P ... /12939.htm
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/P ... /12944.htm
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/P ... /12956.htm
Sorry about that.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-blo ... 9603/postsQuote:
Originally Posted by vortex
The post is still on freerepublic but I'm unable to locate an author in the article, but as usual the site that this came from is no longer available. As many other sites it went poof! There is much more information on their site such as photos of birth certificates.
Airbornesapper wrote:
Nov. 27, 2008
More on thread below.Quote:
Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none!
There is no Obama documentation -- no records -- no paper trail -- none -- this is no accident. It is being done on purpose with Media help - but to serve whom & why??
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-139333.html
I have two points that I would like to put forth.
1. Man of mystery, B. Obama, appears to be hiding all of his school records and documents which should, beyond a doubt, show him to be natural born. To what end? Who is behind this fraud?
2. Although he has not been sworn in as POTUS, Obama is being briefed on top secret security matters. What becomes of him if indeed, he is found to be constitutionally ineligible for office? Will he be tried for fraud? Will those Dems. who nominated him also be held equally culpable?
[quote="BetsyRoss"]Nowdays, hospital and medical records are private. Of course 'researchers' cannot dig up the records of a living person. Nor can medical personnel come forward. Nor can the Health Department say any more than it has.
The allegation that the state of Hawaii sealed Obama's birth records is untrue. They are not treating his records any differently than they would anyone else's in these times.
The certificate that Obama's team posted clearly says that the location of his birth was Honolulu, Hawaii. It is not a certificate of being born somewhere else. Coupled with the discovery of his birth announcement in the local paper, in a regular column published by the Health Department, I cannot see how a Hawaiian birth location can be falsified at this point.[/quote]
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...nouncement.jpg
In and of itself BR, the announcement published by the Health Dept. means absolutely nothing toward proving that he was born in HI.
All it means is that there was a birth, registered in the state of HI, of a child to these two people who allegedly resided at that address.
This was pretty standard Health Dept reporting of births back then. In later years they did stop printing the parents' address and the format changed to giving the parents' names, the town or city they claimed as their residence, and the sex of the baby.
The birth announcement is corroborating circumstantial evidence that the Obama family resided in Honolulu at the time of their baby's birth. The Health Department customarily obtained their information from hospitals.
It remains the case that the certificate posted on his website claims that the location of birth was Honolulu, not elsewhere.
Minuteman wrote:Are you speaking with any knowledge of the Indonesian school system paperwork in the 1970s? And IF always bothers me. IF Obama was actually born on the planet Krypton and sent here in a rocketship that landed in Hawaii...Quote:
A student needed an ID card, only available to Indonesian citizens, to attend a public school in Indonesia. If, for the purposes of that regulation, the Catholic school Barack Obama II attended was considered a "public school," then he had to be a citizen, not just claim to be a citizen.
We cannot gauge his time in Indonesia by American standards. Who knows if stepdad paid a few bucks to someone for a phony ID. It happens in this country daily.
It also remains the case that the certificate posted on his website is a VERIFIABLE FRAUD. I can publish a Hawaii COLB that says that I was born in Antarctica. Just producing that document in photoshop or one of another half dozen programs don't make it so, if the truth is something else.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
He can say all he wants that he was born in Hawaii. It only matters what he can and will prove.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
The Health Dept ONLY receives their information from hospitals if that is who is submitting the paperwork to register births and generate the documents.
If a child is not born in a hospital.....such as in the case of a planned home birth......then the Dept of Vital Stats receives only the information provided them by the parents in registering the birth and has to rely on affidavits from anyone who witnessed/attended the birth, including midwives.
And then there is still the little matter of HI allowing a child's birth to be registered there, even if the child was born elsewhere, if in the year preceeding the birth the parent's residence was in HI.
Either way, the issue is that this man is hiding something. Now whether it's his true nationality, or just the fact that both his parents, and later he, himself, were just consumate liars when it suited their ends to do so....for instance enrolling him in schools where he was required to be an Indonesian citizen and muslim and his obtaining college aid to foreign students or traveling to Pakistan in violation of laws........is anyone's guess.
But the fact remains that this individual is being asked, by the people whose country he wants entrusted to him, to do one simple thing and instead of putting minds at ease he has instead run all over God's creation slamming the lid on anthing and everything including elementary school records and travel records of his dead parents.
I'm sorry, but it just doesn't look right and smells even worse.
A student needed an ID card, only available to Indonesian citizens, to attend a public school in Indonesia. Barack Obama II attended a public school, Mentung No. 1 in Jakarta, Indonesia, for the 1970-71 school year. He had to be a citizen, not just claim to be a citizen.Quote:
Originally Posted by vortex
"In Indonesia, which was under tight rule in 1967, Obama clearly took on the last name of his stepfather in school registration documents. All Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards, or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, which needed to bear the student's legal name, which should be matched in public school registration filings... According to Indonesian legal experts, it was difficult to enroll non-Indonesian citizens in public schooling."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=72656
Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP) - kartu identitas di Indonesia
Indonesia's House of Representatives and government have agreed to continue listing one's religion on identity cards. Members of different faiths have criticized the agreement as a violation of fundamental human rights and myopic political opportunism.
On 16 November, [2006,] the House announced the deal in the context of wider parliamentary debate on a civil registry bill. Indicating one's faith on identity cards has long been a source of discrimination against followers of religions different from the six faiths recognized by Jakarta: Is|am, Catholicism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism.
http://smithfiles.com/2008/08/14/breaki ... -religion/
See paragraphs 41 through 48 of Citizenwells at http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/ ... vember-10/.
The rest of us are concerned that a phony ID is being presented, now, in this case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortex
I apologize for the "if" in my post, Vortex. I hope this has relieved your uncertainty.
Just because Hawaii allows people to register births that occurred elsewhere, that does not mean that Hawaii will allow them to state that the birth occurred in Honolulu, which is what Obama's certificate says. I think some people are wasting an enormous amount of time and energy on a non-issue, when we have a million new issues advancing upon us.
Azwreath - Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:26 pm
Good post.
MinutemanCDC_SC - Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:54 am
Likewise a good post.
BetsyRoss - Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:03 am
With all due respect, your arguments have you coming across as an apologist, not a seeker of truth.
I think everyone in America who is aware of this problem wants to see the truth in the end. Unless Obama opens up, the uncertainty of this basic issue of qualification for office will follow Obama throughout his administration if he is successfully crowned ‘The One’ in January, and will, in my opinion, render him impotent as our president.
I'm not an apologist, I'm a realist. The tenacity with which some folks are pursuing this scares me. Obama won the popular vote. We have a regime change to deal with. Let's get on with it. He has more documentation for his natural citizenship than I could muster right now.
I guess that's where we disagree. Whereas I would accept your credentials without question because you have nothing to gain by deceiving me, Obama has a rotten history of using his training and experience to suit his own ends, rather than helping others. He also has a huge problem with telling an open, consistent, and truthful story about his background and experience, and he has a lot to gain or lose by his answers.
It is my humble opinion that is why he does not disclose his background and experience details to anyone. He's smart, and he realizes that the skeletons in his closet will out him for what he really is.
Until he opens up honestly to the American people, he will come across as a fraud to those who ask questions of him.
Would you like that moniker attached to you?
If this was anyone else in America they would be labeled a fraud and unfit to serve, the media alone would be relentless!!! Nothing will come of this and no one will be able to know anything of this man or his wife. The media and government is so afraid of minority backlash and non minority Obama supporter backlash the supreme court will tell us to shut up and butt out. So will the electoral college. As much as we know even if were right what will it matter were just cattle to the ones who call the shots! So I'm willing to step out on a limb here and label Obama a fraud until he PROVES different, But I also believe that he will be our president because the ones in charge are too afraid to expose a man with so much support already! I would have to say that more people don't care about our constituntion than the ones that do and the deconstruction of it is also happening right in front of us and we are powerless to stop it, just wait until he takes office well be lucky to have half of it still intact in 2012. But what can you do? Time will tell I guess. :evil: :cry:
Avenger posted.
Quote:
Obama Birth Certificate Rears Its Head - Again
By Liza Porteus Viana
Dec 1st 2008 2:44PM
Filed Under:eBarack Obama, 2008 President, Obama Administration
The election may be over, but not the controversy.
Just when you thought the flap over the genuineness of Barack Obama's birth certificate was all said and done, in comes the We The People Foundation.
The group purchases a full-page ad in The Chicago Tribune - the newspaper of the president-elect's hometown - today and Wednesday, called "Open Letter to Mr. Obama." It's described by the foundation as a "formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the 'natural born citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States of America."
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 ... ead-again/
read more on this thread:
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-139460.html
lots of good information. Listen to www.LiveFreeRadsio.net on Wednesday 7 pm EST
CCUSA posted:
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-813955.html#813955Quote:
Obama, DNC elude citizenship lawsuit deadline
Solicitor general's office dodges questions about birth certificate complaint
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 01, 2008
10:35 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Attorney Philip J. Berg
President-elect Barack Obama and the Democratic National Convention have let a Dec. 1 deadline slip by without responding to Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg's petition for writ of certiorari demanding Obama produce a legitimate birth certificate to document his eligibility for office.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=82492
Actually you seem to be wasting an enormous amount of time asking that we not continue our quest for the live birth certificate. No one will stop until the hospital name and the attending physicians name is known. You can not state that you know for a fact that this is where he wes born. His sister Maya born in Jakarta, Indonesia also holds a Hawaiian birth certificate just like Obama's. She of course was not born in Hawaii. So, how is your information factual??? Once the doctors name and hospital are revealed then the passport used in 1981 to Indonesia might be next on the list. Possibly the documents of the name change, or possibly how he financed his college years (as we assume using foreign aid as a foreign exchange student). So many questions - so little time!Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
I have come to the fact that I will proudly wear my tin-foil hat until our leader who we pay to lead our land coughs up the information we require to put him in this job. If he can ask Bill Clinton to reveal 280,000 donor names before Hillary can be S of S, then I can also demand that he prove he is a citizen. This man is vile!
New Video: Dr. Ron Polarik on the authenticity of Obama's COLB
Video
AND
LISTEN TO MIKE IN THE MORNING'S CALL TO THE KENYAN EMBASSY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA
http://my.wrif.com/mim/?p=916
And MORE
http://www.khow.com/pages/boyles.html
WND has an email allert out to send the Justices a letter by fedx to arrive before they meet to decide what cases will be heard. I don't like paying to get things done that should be done by law, but this time I have no choice. It costs a total of $10.95
http://tinyurl.com/69dechQuote:
Case challenging candidacy set for December 5th
'conference' of Supreme Court justices
A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a "conference" at the U.S. Supreme Court on December 5 — this Friday!
Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. If only four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral arguments may be scheduled.
Here's How YOU Can Help:
You and 125,000 others have already signed the WND petition on this issue. If even a tiny percentage of you can respond to help us take the next step, the justices will know that millions of concerned Americans believe passionately that the Constitution must be followed to the letter.
Because the Supreme Court justices do not accept faxes or emails or telephone calls, there is only one way to make your voice heard in time for Friday's preliminary hearing — overnight delivery of your letters.
To make that process simpler, more convenient and less expensive, WND has devised a plan to get the following letter sent on your behalf by FedEx to each of the nine justices by Friday's hearing:
That's a third less than the $16.50 I paid USPS to send a similar packet of 10 letters on Nov. 26, in order to get it to the Supreme Court Justices before Phil Berg's Writ of Certiorari date. If I had only known that Phil Berg's Writ of Certiorari was not going to be decided on Monday, I could have saved ten bucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightowl
Readers Weigh In On President-Elect Obama’s "Natural-Born" Status; Peter Brimelow Comments.
Letters Editor Joe Guzzardi writes: As Barack Obama races to appoint his Cabinet, rumors surrounding his eligibility to be President continue to swirl. Some skeptics claim that Obama is rushing his appointments to establish himself as de facto president and to render any challenges to the legitimacy of his presidency as after the fact. [A Handpicked Team for a Sweeping Shift in Foreign Policy by David Sanger, New York Times, November 30, 2008]
Still, agitation mounts that Obama may be unqualified to be president because he does not meet the Constitutional requirement that he is “natural born citizen.â€
Wow ccusa, excellent find!