My original ss card had prominently printed on it "NOT FOR ID PURPOSES" Well we all know how well that was enforced.Quote:
Originally Posted by hardlineconstitutionalist
Printable View
My original ss card had prominently printed on it "NOT FOR ID PURPOSES" Well we all know how well that was enforced.Quote:
Originally Posted by hardlineconstitutionalist
In case you guys have missed it. video of Michelle Obama referring to Kenya as Baracks home country.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLDHDfPN ... _embedded#
Quote:
Originally Posted by cayla99
At 0:43, Mrs. Obama said, "We visited his home country in Kenya."
Evidence against Obama’s Hawaiian birth story mounts
MICHELLE OBAMA NOT THE ONLY ONE CALLING KENYA OBAMA’S “HOME COUNTRYâ€
http://www.americanthinker.com/images/at-painter.gif http://www.americanthinker.com/images/at-logo.gif
April 08, 2010
President Obama Needs to Prove His Constitutional Eligibility to Be Commander-in-Chief
By Terrence Lakin, MD
171 Comments
Last week, I entered Walter Reed Army Hospital to notify the Department of Defense that I would refuse to obey any orders from my commanding officers -- including President Obama -- until the president produces his original birth certificate. After nearly eighteen years of wearing the military uniform of the country I have proudly served, including overseas assignments in imminent danger/combat areas in Bosnia and Afghanistan, I felt compelled to take this step.
I made this decision from much deliberation, after lengthy consultations with many friends, family members, and colleagues, and I firmly believe that all servicemen and women, and the American public, have the right to know the truth about President Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
http://www.americanthinker.com/LTC%20Lakin.jpg
As military officers, we all take a solemn oath upon commissioning into the Uniformed Services. In this oath, we swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Upholding the law is an essential part of our role as citizens; in the military, we are the ultimate protectors of that law. The Constitution is our social compact, which safeguards all of us and ensures the "equal rights" that we are entitled to as American citizens.
Since Nuremberg, My Lai, and even Abu Ghraib more recently, the military has been taught the hard lessons of following illegal orders. Any reasonable person looking critically at the information and evidence currently in the public domain about Obama's birthplace would have questions about President Obama's claim to be a natural born citizen. I made the decision to disobey all military orders, including my deployment order to Afghanistan, in pursuit of the truth of whether President Obama can legally occupy the high post that he holds today and which entitles him to send servicemembers into harm's way.
The United States serves an example to the rest of the world of a stable, civilized, democratic government, where all men are equal under the law and the rule of law is cherished and obeyed. The U.S. military teaches and promotes the rule of law and civilian control of the military to many other nations and military forces around the world. Every soldier learns what constitutes a lawful order and is encouraged to stand up and object to unlawful orders. This is called the "duty to disobey."
My deployment orders for a second tour in Afghanistan included a requirement to bring copies of my birth certificate. I would be glad to obey this order and provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital. Every day in transactions across the country, American citizens are required to prove their identity; standards for identification have become stricter since the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
Since fall 2008, I have been troubled by reports that the president's original birth certificate remains concealed from public view along with other records which, if released, would quickly end questions surrounding his place of birth and "natural born" status. Many people mistook the online Certification of Live Birth for an original birth certificate. Until the summer of 2009, the Hawaiian Department of Homelands would not accept this Certification of Live Birth to determine native Hawaiian identity -- the Department insisted upon also reviewing an original birth certificate.
Many do not understand that the online document was from 2007, generated by computer, laser-printed, and merely a certification that there is something on file which may or may not be sufficient proof of a birth in Hawaii. An original birth certificate could be the underlying document that presumably includes a hospital and attending physician's or midwife's name. Such a document should lay to rest the "natural born" dispute. This controversy was further escalated by media reports that gave two different hospital names for Obama's birthplace -- even today, the public does not know what doctor delivered the then-future president or which hospital was the site of his birth. No eyewitnesses have stepped forward to affirm that he was born in Hawaii in 1961. Under immigration laws in force at the time, if born in Kenya to a father who was not a U.S. citizen, Barack Obama had no right to American citizenship of any kind, and he could never qualify as "natural born." This is why determining his actual birthplace is crucial.
In 2008, after pressure from news media, President Obama's rival, candidate McCain, produced an original birth certificate from the Panama Canal Zone; a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing examined and affirmed his "natural born" status and constitutional eligibility to serve as president. The U.S. Senate was strangely silent about President Obama's eligibility despite statements from Kenyan citizens that he was born there, evidently including his paternal grandmother and the Ambassador from Kenya to the U.S. during a November 2008 radio interview. Hawaiian state officials claim that they cannot release an original birth certificate without Obama's consent, declaring that the public has no "tangible interest" in seeing this vital birth record.
I attempted without success through my chain of command for over a year to get answers to the questions surrounding the president's eligibility. I was told that I have no standing to make this inquiry, and moreover, that no one in DoD could answer this question. I made inquiries, unsuccessfully, through my congressional delegation, which simply referred my questions back to DoD. No one I spoke to was able to offer any evidence that the president is "natural born." The burden of proof, it seems, must rest with the White House-- with president Obama himself, as these records are his, and he has chosen to conceal them at considerable legal expense. Remarkably, there is no enforcement mechanism for the Constitution's Article II, Section 1 requirement that the president be a "natural born" citizen -- voters have largely relied on an honor system and a free press to vet candidates for the highest political office in the nation.
While President Obama's records remain hidden, public consternation is growing. The American people have the right to know that their president is constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct servicemembers into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but I should do so only with the knowledge that this important requirement of our Constitution is respected and obeyed. Those in uniform who continue to risk their lives and give the ultimate sacrifice to the service of our country deserve to know that they do so upholding their vows to the oath of office and to the Constitution.
Until an original birth certificate is brought forward that will validate the Commander-in-Chief's constitutional eligibility and put to rest the reasonable questions surrounding it, I cannot in good conscience obey any of my military orders. Unless it is established (sufficient proof that should be easily within the president's power to provide) that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as president and Commander-in-Chief, I and all other military officers are at risk of following illegal orders.
There is no legitimate privacy right to information necessary to prove that President Obama is legally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
I remain at risk of arrest and court-martial, but am mindful always that my oath of office is to the Constitution. It fills me with great sadness that on 31 March, I declined a direct order from my Medical Brigade Commander. This is a man I honor and wished to meet in order to thank him for his unquestionable valor and courage, and yet I could not obey his order. Now, he could order my arrest at any time.
I hope that President Obama will demonstrate his respect for the U.S. Constitution and release his original birth certificate. My bags are packed, and I look forward to joining my fellow soldiers in Afghanistan, but I will deploy only with the knowledge that I am following legal orders under a lawful Commander-in-Chief.
For those readers wanting to follow my ongoing story, the American Patriot Foundation has set up a legal defense fund to help me, and they tell me that they will be posting up-to-date information about my case. Their website is safeguardourconstitution.com.
Dr. Terrence Lakin is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel who serves as Chief of Primary Care at the Pentagon's TRICARE health clinic; he has been selected for promotion to Colonel.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/04/ ... ove_1.html
Jack Cashill's take on Mr. Obama's origins, presented without comment.[quote=Jack Cashill] http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/ ... igins.html
February 07, 2010
Another Look at Obama's Origins
By Jack Cashill
The murky circumstances of Obama's birth invite attempts to make the known facts fit together. This article was prompted by two e-mails. The first asked me why I had never weighed in on the birth certificate controversy surrounding President Barack Obama.
I responded that although I was troubled by the lack of documentation regarding all phases of Obama's history -- I'd be content with his SAT scores -- I could not understand why any pregnant American woman would go anywhere near Kenya.
The second e-mail was more interesting. It came from a Michigan entrepreneur named Don Wilkie, with whom I had not previously communicated. Knowing my interest in the authorship questions surrounding Obama's writing, he presumed that I was intrigued as he was by a cryptic poem the nineteen-year old Obama wrote called "Pop," the best thing that Obama himself has actually written. He was right.
"Pop" relates an encounter between Obama and a man most reviewers presume to be Obama's maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham. Dunham would have been in his early sixties at the time. In the poem, Obama has "Pop" wondering drunkenly about the boy, "What to do with me, a green young man."
The Obama of the poem is cynical, even a little bitter. He makes several allusions to the fact that he and the old man look and even smell alike, a fact that strikes Obama as more ironic than reassuring. The poem ends, however, with reconciliation when Pop stands and asks for a hug. Writes Obama:
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Barack Obama":3jtfnwsy
Wilkie offers a novel interpretation of "Pop." Says Wilkie, "I think the poem zeros in on that poignant moment when Obama was told that his grandfather was in reality his father."
Wilkie concedes his theory is "off-the-wall," but he also offers photographic evidence to show that Obama much more closely resembles Dunham -- especially by the telltale ears -- than he does Barack Obama, Sr.
http://www.americanthinker.com/standunham.jpg
Intriguing as the theory is, I thought it would be easy to disprove. I was wrong. For starters, in his 1995 memoir Dreams From My Father, Obama refers to his grandfather not as "Pop," but as "Gramps." If he were writing about his grandfather in this poem, the title "Pop" may very well be suggestive of a more direct kinship.
For another, there is little known about the marriage between Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's presumed mother, and Barack Obama, Sr. According to most accounts, Dunham and Barack Sr. were married on the Hawaiian island of Maui -- in some reports on February 2, 1961, and in others, on February 21.
Obama knows little about the wedding. He writes in Dreams, "In fact, how and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I've never quite had the courage to explore. There's no record of a real wedding, a cake, a ring, a giving away of the bride."
In his fair-minded biography, Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage, Christopher Andersen concedes, "There were certainly no witnesses -- no family members were present; and none of their friends at the university had the slightest inkling they were even engaged."
Another conflicting bit of evidence is that at the time of his alleged marriage to Ann Dunham, Barack Sr. had a pregnant wife and a son back in Kenya. There is more. In July 2008, speaking at a university roundtable, Michelle Obama said of Barack's mother that she was "very young and very single when she had him." This could well have been a slip of the tongue, but it may not have been.
Obama was reportedly born roughly six months after the February wedding date on August 4, 1961. Andersen reports that Barack Sr. drove Ann to Honolulu's Kapiloani Hospital for Women and Children to have the baby.
Andersen's account, however, suffers from chronology problems. He relates that Ann told the Dunhams of her pregnancy in "late October." Even if she had she been impregnated in early October -- it probably would have been earlier -- Obama's official birth date came ten months later.
In any scenario, Obama had at least one black parent, and if it is not Obama Sr., who then is it? Obama offers a possible clue in Dreams:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barack Obama (or William Ayers)
The "Frank" in question is Frank Marshall Davis, a black communist, pornographer, and poet who had abandoned Chicago for Hawaii. In "Pop," it should be noted, the Pop character "recites an old poem" just before the reconciliation and reeks of whiskey. Davis would have been in his mid-seventies at the time. Some have theorized that Davis, in fact, is Obama's father and the "Pop" of the poem. This theory, though tenuous, cannot be ruled out. A grandson can look more like his maternal grandfather than his father. That happens. And then, too, there is Davis's Chicago connection.
The "Frank" passage and the ones that follow, however, tell us something suggestive about Stanley Dunham, namely that he frequented otherwise all-black bars in an area rife with prostitution. That a black woman -- perhaps a friend of Davis's -- gave birth to a child of Dunham's may explain "the complicated, unspoken transaction between the two men." If this were the case, it would have caused far less societal stress for Ann Dunham to assume maternity of her little brother than for Stanley Dunham to assume paternity of his son.
We also know that Stanley Dunham so desperately wanted a boy that he named his only child "Stanley Ann." That he chose to raise the young Barack would not have been out of character.
Is it possible that Barack Sr. obliged the Dunhams and went along with the charade? If so, as Andrew Young attests in The Politician, he would not have been the last good friend to claim false paternity for a larger cause.
As a Kenyan, Barack Sr. would have given the boy more than a name. He would give him a distinctive identity as an "African," a more respected ethnicity in the America of the 1960s than "Negro." Indeed, Obama has built his career around his exotic identity. Were he named after an American father -- say "Darnell Johnson" -- he may never have been elected president.
This hypothetical extended charade would help explain why Barack Sr. blithely blew off his new family when he headed for Harvard a year later, rejecting a reported opportunity to take both wife and child to New York, and began dating as soon as he arrived at Harvard. It would explain too why Ann Dunham felt free to leave young Barack with her parents for years at a time when her career beckoned.
Barack Sr.'s cooperation would also put Stanley Dunham's fondness for him in perspective. In Dreams, Gramps speaks so respectfully of his prodigal son-in-law that the whole opening sequence rings false to anyone who knows the larger story. A man, and a black man at that, has knocked up Dunham's daughter. Ann and Barack Sr. marry despite reported opposition from both families. The man then abandons wife and child, and the grandfather can only sing his praises to the man's son. This makes no sense at all and would have made even less sense in the racially charged 1960s.
Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily has found additional evidence that argues against Obama's birth to Ann Dunham in August 1961. As the records clearly show, "Stanley Ann Dunham" enrolled for classes at the University of Washington at Seattle on August 19, 1961, fifteen days after Obama's presumed birth. It defies all logic -- and logistics as well -- that Dunham would have flown her newborn across the Pacific, found an apartment and a job, and enrolled at school all within two weeks of the birth.
Most accounts put young Barack with Dunham in Seattle when she was attending college, but the sourcing on these accounts is suspect. One person cited often is Dunham's good childhood friend, Maxine Box. In February 2008, Box told the Seattle Times that the last time she saw Dunham was "in 1961," when, says Times reporter Nicole Brodeur, "[Dunham] visited Seattle on her way from Honolulu to Massachusetts, where her then-husband was attending Harvard."
"She seemed very happy and very proud," Box tells the Times of Dunham. "She had this beautiful, healthy baby. I can see them right now."
There are any number of problems with this account, beginning with the fact that Barack Sr. did not attend Harvard until the fall of 1962. Box also gives no sense that Dunham lived in Seattle or attended classes there through the winter and spring sessions of 1962, as records show she did. Whether Dunham was actually heading for Harvard, we have no real way of knowing.
A seeming hole in Andersen's account is that he missed the Washington adventure and has Ann remaining in Hawaii through Obama's first few years. He makes no mention of any trip to Harvard by Ann.
One other scenario makes sense out of a falsely assumed paternity by Barack Sr. This begins with the abrupt departure of the Dunham family from the Seattle area in the late summer of 1960. In Dreams, Obama tells how pleased the senior Dunhams were with the success of Ann in high school, but Stanley forbade her to go to the University of Chicago, "deciding that she was still too young to be living on her own."
http://www.americanthinker.com/obama...ernal-side.jpg
Soon thereafter, however, the family decamped for Hawaii.
"Something must have still been gnawing at my grandfather's heart," writes Obama. He attributes the move to his wanderlust and the "limitless" prospects offered by a new furniture store in Honolulu. Adds Obama, "He would rush home that same day and talk my grandmother into selling their house and packing up yet again."
What Obama does not mention is that even at this time, his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, likely earned more than her furniture salesman husband. To move, she had to give up her job as a bank officer in Seattle. Arriving in Honolulu, she worked as a by-the-hour bank teller. This job would, however, have given her the opportunity to tend to the young Barack.
It seems altogether possible that the progressive and adventurous seventeen-year-old Dunham was impregnated by a black man while the family was still living in the Seattle area. If so, this pregnancy could have prompted the family to uproot to Hawaii, where no one knew them and where mixed-race babies were more accepted. According to the Andersen account, whose source was Maxine Box, "There were loud arguments between father and daughter -- fights that sometimes turned violent." Ann did not want to go.
Both the "Dunham as father" and the "anonymous black father" scenarios would make the Obama camp wary of sharing Obama's actual birth certificate, either because Dunham was not Obama's mother, or, if she were, because Obama was born much earlier than August 4, 1961.
If Obama were born, say, in February or March 1961, it would clarify why, as documented, Dunham attended the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the fall semester of 1960, but not in the spring semester of 1961. This timetable would have also allowed Dunham enough time to recover and prepare for a return to college in Seattle in August with or without the baby. Dunham would not return to the University of Hawaii until 1963. She filed for divorce in 1964, and little was heard from Barack Sr. ever again.
Scientists use the phrase "inference to the best explanation" to illuminate an unproven phenomenon. Given the available evidence, including the fact that some evidence has been strategically withheld, one can infer that Obama likely was born in Hawaii but that Ann Dunham did not give birth to Barack Obama, Sr.'s child on August 4, 1961.
So much depends on Obama's fabled "story," however, that the mainstream media have chosen not to investigate. When Christopher Andersen tried, he found himself immersed in a swamp of conflicting and concocted stories that tested the savvy of even a veteran biographer.
And so Obama's birth remains a mystery a year after his inauguration. The mainstream media, meanwhile, have paid more attention to the origins of Trig Palin than to those of the president, and they have spent their excess energy mocking those who do the reporting they once did.
If my humble efforts to clarify matters make me a "birther," then so be it.[/quote:3jtfnwsy]
A personal story:Quote:
Originally Posted by cayla99
A few years back I need a SS card to apply for a job. I have always owned my own company and was never asked for one before and did not know where it was. I had to drive to Phx (160miles) to get a duplicate. I came armed with everything I had. A "real" birth certificate, drivers lic, home deed, pass port, credit cards, bank papers...you name it.
Now you have to remember this is a true and factual story even though some here think I am a nut job... You could not make this up...
The "lady" looked me square in the eye and said "have you used these as identification before?" Of course I had...they are identification. Hand to God... she said "You can't use these again...do you have a report card?" A what? Ya...she wanted a report card from grad school. Or...I could use my MOTHER if she could come in and vouch for me... I'm 55 years old...gray hair...with a pass port and deed to my house...and I need a report card from the 6th grade to get a "COPY" of my SS card...
There were people in there of every shape, color and description most could not speak English using interpreters to fill out the paper work, they were stamping and handing out paper to everyone like so much trash.
Needless to say...I ended up escorted out of the building... The police were nice to me, said they see this daily and don't get it either but that I needed to leave the property.
Am I sick of this country? No I love it here...it is politicians, the out of control law and growing racial inequality that I hate.
End of story?...my mom actually found a grad school report card...and I used it as ID. Now...you tell me what is up with that!?
This is not "our government" any more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Rondeau
This is an unlawful usurpation. This is a treasonous takeover. This is a coup d'état by an impostor.
[quote=MinutemanCDC_SC]This is not "our government" any more.Quote:
Originally Posted by "Sharon Rondeau":2q3p4fka
This is an unlawful usurpation. This is a treasonous takeover. This is a coup d'état by an impostor.[/quote:2q3p4fka]
We are in agreement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
And this is a totalitarian state in the making.
Stanley Ann Dunham, or Mrs. Barack Obama, Snr., was at least three months shy of fulfilling this requirement of INA 1952 § 301(a)(7).Quote:
Originally Posted by The U.S. Dept. of State
BORN IN THE USA?
3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case
Argument alleges Obama probably not even American citizen
Posted: April 08, 2010
12:35 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
A federal court case that argues President Obama probably is not even a U.S. citizen, much less a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution of the chief executive officer, has been scheduled by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for June 29.
In a letter dated yesterday to Mario Apuzzo, the attorney representing plaintiff Charles Kerchner and others, the clerk of the court said the case has been "tentatively listed on the merits on Tuesday, June 29, 2010."
The notice said there is a possibility the case would have to be moved, and the court "will determine whether there will be oral argument and if so, the amount of time allocated for each side."
Those decisions would be announced later if necessary, the notification said.
On a blog dealing with the case, lead plaintiff Kerchner wrote that the case will be addressed by three members of the 3rd Circuit, but those names have not yet been announced.
WND previously has reported on the case filed against Obama, Congress and others, just before Obama was sworn into office.
Sign the petition that asks state officials to validate Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility.
The case has argued, "Under the British Nationality Act of 1948 his father was a British subject/citizen and not a United States citizen and Obama himself was a British subject/citizen at the time Obama was born."
"We further contend that Obama has failed to even conclusively prove that he is at least a 'citizen of the United States' under the Fourteenth Amendment as he claims by conclusively proving that he was born in Hawaii, the arguments have claimed.
The claims from Apuzzo came in opposition to government demands that the case be dismissed for lack of "standing" on the part of the plaintiffs.
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!
Apuzzo has argued that standing should be a simple decision.
"How can you deny he's affecting me?" Apuzzo told WND during a recent interview. "He wants to have terror trials in New York. He published the CIA interrogation techniques. On and on. He goes around bowing and doing all these different things. His statements we're not a Christian nation; we're one of the largest Muslim nations. It's all there."
The case was brought by Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.
Named as defendants are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives, former Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The case alleges Congress failed to follow the Constitution, which "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."
The complaint also asserts "when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same." The case contends the framers of the U.S. Constitution, when they adopted the requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen," excluded dual citizens.
Apuzzo's latest filing has been posted online.
It argues Obama's arguments "are nothing more than presentations of general statements on the law of standing which do not address the specific factual and legal content of plaintiffs' claims. … The defendants in much of their brief basically tell the court that the Kerchner case should be dismissed because all other Obama cases have been dismissed."
Apuzzo said it is "self-evident" under the Constitution that "anyone aspiring to be president has to conclusively prove that he or she is eligible to hold that office. Part of that burden is conclusively showing that one is a 'natural born citizen.' Hence, the citizenship status of Obama is critical to the question of whether plaintiffs having standing, for it is that very statute which is the basis of their injury in fact."
He noted the case was filed before Obama became president.
"At this time he was still a private individual who had the burden of proving that he satisfied each and every element of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. That plaintiffs filed their action at this time is important for it not only sets the time by which we are to judge when their standing attached to their action against Obama, Congress and the other defendants … but also to show that Obama has the burden of proof to show that he is a 'natural born citizen' and satisfied the other requirements of Article II," Apuzzo wrote.
"At no time in these proceedings or in any other of the many cases that have been filed against him throughout the country has Obama produced a 1961 contemporaneous birth certificate from the state of Hawaii showing that he was born there … We must conclude for purposes of defendants' motion that since Obama is not a 14th Amendment 'Citizen of the United States' let alone an Article II 'natural born citizen,' he is not eligible to be president and commander in chief. Not being eligible to be president and commander in chief he is currently acting as such without constitutional authority. It is Obama's exercising the singular and great powers of the president and commander in chief without constitutional authority which is causing plaintiffs' injury in fact."
WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Some of the lawsuits question whether he was born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.
Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born. And still others contend he holds Indonesian citizenship from his childhood living there.
Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and the appointment – at a cost confirmed to be at least $1.7 million – of myriad lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation. While his supporters cite an online version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii as his birth verification, critics point out such documents actually were issued for children not born in the state.
WND also has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=137773
WorldNetDaily's original petition to federal authorities for public release of Mr. Obama's birth certificate needs 243 more signatures to reach the half-million mark of significance.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81550
EDIT: The original WND petition passed the half-million mark on Friday, April 9.
WorldNetDaily now also has a petition to state authorities for validation of Mr. Obama's Constitutional eligibility for office.
http://www.wnd.com/validationofbarackobama
I have done all I can on this "Un-Constitutional" Usurper. I sent documents to the Sec. of State, The States Attorney, I took the Documents to Senator Tim Johnsons office, Senator John Thunes office and Rep. Stephanie Herseths office.
I read a story a few weeks ago that made alot of sense, it had to do with the Federal Court System. And why would these "Federal" employees (Judges) want to upset Thier Bosses? Just something to think about.
I personally believe ANY Court action should be taken to the States and Finished at the State Level, because the Feds are NOT going to eat thier own.
Unless they are not a "tow the party line" person like Jim Traficant. Then they railroad you.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotofPast
I have come to the cold hard conclusion that the courts will do NOTHING to hear the case against Obama. It's a dead end. Nada. They won't touch it. IMO, the only possibility is that there is enough pressure from the citizens to force the hand of both the Dems and Repubs to save their own skin. Short of that, an uprising will be the only solution. Do I sound defeatist? Yep. But I am a realist. As citizens, we no longer have a legal recourse against our own government. These are sad and dangerous times we are facing. Make no doubt about it. I urge others not to be lulled into a false sense of security that the courts will somehow allow us our day in court. They won't. We all know this deep down but are afraid to admit it. I am disgusted with my government and with that segment of the population that falsely believes that our government is some benevolent entity. I have news for those folks...it isn't. Ask yourself, why do they keep trying to shove these grossly unpopular bills down our collective throats? Why is our nuclear defense system being dismantled under this new treaty? Why is Israel, one of our staunchest allies being kicked to the curb in favor of a Muslim aggressor? Why is our usurper in office on a non stop apology tour for the U.S.? Why, why why ad infinitum?
BORN IN THE USA?
NPR archive describes Obama as 'Kenyan-born'
Description accompanies interview about 'son of Africa'
Posted: April 08, 2010
11:30 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Editor's Note: Shortly after this WND report was posted, NPR changed its web page to delete the reference to "Kenyan-born" Sen. Obama.
Those crazy "birthers" are citing National Public Radio.
Really? NPR?
Archives for the tax-supported organization reveal that a 2008 report described then-Sen. Barack Obama as "Kenyan-born" and a "son of Africa."
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/100408npr.jpg
NPR's promotion for the story included a brief description of West African correspondent Ofeibea Quist-Arcton, who "describes the stories that have been exciting, including the U.S. presidential race of Kenyan-born Sen. Barack Obama."
After discussing various issues developing in Africa at the time – such as Kenya's violent elections, the attacks in Zimbabwe and the presidency of South Africa – the conversation on the program "Tell Me More" turned to Obama.
New strategy unveiled today on answering Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help.
At about 9:45 of the audio report, interviewer Michelle Martin said "a son of Africa. Barack Obama is poised to at least have the opportunity to become the next president of the United States." She asked, "How does this campaign look overseas?"
Quist-Arcton responded by describing Obama as a member of the Kenyan Luo tribe and reporting how Africa viewed the race.
"You know [the campaign] has absolutely fired the imagination not only of American people but of people in Africa," she said. "For a start Barack Obama's father is from Kenya. People were very excited and because they had had a failed election in Kenya, and the opposition leader Raila Odinga comes from the same tribe as Barack Obama's father, the Luo. The joke was going around Kenya that America is going to have a Luo president before Kenya does."
She continued, "There's huge interest. Not just in Kenya. All over the continent. … The fact that a black man and one with African blood has managed to get this far … you know, I think has made young people sit up and listen and watch and follow the campaign and made the older generations who lived through the colonization and independence say, 'Well, well, well. So it can happen in American too."
LISTEN HERE:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... d=95550177
WND also reported this week when a video appeared in which Michelle Obama said her husband's "home country" was Kenya.
The video, posted April 3 on YouTube and forwarded by a score of Internet e-mails, shows Michelle Obama saying, "When we took our trip to Africa and visited his home country in Kenya, we took a public HIV test."
The reference drew attention because of the claim made in numerous lawsuits and other challenges to Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office that he is not eligible to be president under the requirement of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution that the president be a "natural born citizen."
But the NPR reference and Michelle Obama's comment are far from the only ones of their kind.
At one point, there were reports that even Obama's grandmother claimed being in attendance at his birth in Africa.
According to a compilation of images at a military forum, another reference was made in 2008 in the Nigerian Observer.
Under a byline from Solomon Asowata and a Washington dateline, the report says, "Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next president with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The Kenyan-born Senator will, however, face a stiff competition from his Republican counterpart…"
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/040810obama.jpg
A commentary at the Post & E-mail website said, "It is no wonder that many doubt Obama's claim of a Hawaiian birth."
It cited another report from African Travel Magazine that said, "As Kenyan born U.S. Senator Barack Obama jets into Kenya today as part of his African tour, concerns have once again been raised on the security preparations for other visitors and residents. ...."
The commentary cited a similar report from Indonesia Matters but noted that the references had been "scrubbed" from the Internet.
WND documented earlier several other statements linking Obama and Kenya.
These included the apparently archived article from the Sunday Standard in Kenya.
The report begins, "Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack (sic) Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations."
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/standardb.jpg
The article is credited to the wire service Associated Press at the bottom of the page. However, the article could not be found either in the AP archives available to the public online or the archive on the newspaper's website. WND telephone calls and e-mails to the newspaper did not generate a response.
Last year, an African news site and an MSNBC broadcaster referred to President Obama's birthplace as being outside of the United States.
Network correspondent Mara Schiavocampo was reporting on the celebratory atmosphere in Accra
, Ghana, immediately prior to Obama's visit to the west African nation.
Interviewing a person who appeared to be a shop operator, she stated, "Barack Obama is Kenyan … but Ghanaians are still proud of him."
The video of the report is at this link.
Also, a report at Modern Ghana posted in advance of the president's visit cited his birthplace on the continent of Africa.
"For Ghana, Obama's visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth," the report said
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/ghana1two.jpg
the article continues at
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=138293
. Duplicate entry.
It's always good to be an attorney as well as a dentist when someone like the feds come after you and your medical practice with unconstitutional legislation. Maybe especially true if you already have a pretty good idea of who it is that you are fighting.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29673900/Orly ... ice-4-9-10
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29673900/Orly ... ice-4-9-10
[size=117]Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, § HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH
§ PRESIDING
v. § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
§
Barack Hussein Obama, §MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
§
§
Defendant. §
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Plaintiff in this case respectfully requests a judicial notice of the order by Judge Roger Vinson,
Northern district of Florida, State of Florida et al v Department of Health et al
3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT. Exhibit 1.
Plaintiff in this case, being a Doctor of Dental Surgery, was seeking an intervener
status in case 10-cv-91, which was brought by attorneys of 13 states challenging
constitutionality of the Healthcare Bill H.R. 3590. While motion to intervene
was not granted under judicial discretion due to the fact that multiple interveners
have filed their motions and the presiding judge decided to limit the case to the issue
of the Commerce clause raised by the original plaintiffs, this order provides an indication
of the plaintiff’s standing to bring forward her challenge of the H.R. 3590, noting
“Taitz contends, and I agree, that she has satisfied steps (1) and (2).
Her motion to intervene was timely and, as a Doctor of Dental Surgery,
who will be affected by this act, she clearly has an interest in this actionâ€
We have a new article up on Scribd.com.
[b]IS MR. CHARLES EVANS HUGHES A “NATURAL BORN CITIZENâ€
You gotta see this one:
====================
Kenyan Parliament claims Obama born in Kenya
SO WHERE IS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 11, 2010) — A member of the Kenyan Parliament has stated in a meeting of that body on March 25, 2010 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
The statement, which discussed the concept of “devolution,â€
[quote="HighlanderJuan"]You gotta see this one:
====================
Kenyan Parliament claims Obama born in Kenya
SO WHERE IS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 11, 2010) — A member of the Kenyan Parliament has stated in a meeting of that body on March 25, 2010 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
The statement, which discussed the concept of “devolution,â€
[quote="TexasBorn"][quote="HighlanderJuan"]You gotta see this one:
====================
Kenyan Parliament claims Obama born in Kenya
SO WHERE IS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 11, 2010) — A member of the Kenyan Parliament has stated in a meeting of that body on March 25, 2010 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
The statement, which discussed the concept of “devolution,â€
URGENT FLORIDA ALERT!!!ACTION NEEDED NOW!
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1041093.html#1041093
FBI says the file was destroyed in 1997
FBI Destroyed File on Obama’s Grandfather, Journalist Discloses
By Christian Newswire
Monday, April 12, 2010
The FBI destroyed a file on Barack Obama’s grandfather, the man who selected Communist Frank Marshall Davis to be the future president’s mentor during his growing-up years in Hawaii.
“The FBI confirms that a file was maintained on Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham,â€
Barack Hussein Obama is not qualified to be the U.S. President
Should Obama Step Down? Hell, Yes!
By Bob Beers
Monday, April 12, 2010
On page 31 in the transcribed text of the March 25, 2010 session of the Kenyan Parliament, there is a brief statement by the Kenyan Minister for Lands (Mr. Orengo). What Mr. Orengo says is nothing short of a bombshell, and yet not a mention has been made anywhere in the mainstream media. I think, for obvious reasons. http://www.parliament.go.ke/parliament/ ... 25.03P.pdf
Here is the text of the salient portion:
“In the colonial days, these things were being done on the ground and they could give bursaries and build roads. I commend devolution. Those who fear devolution are living in the past. They are being guided by their ethnic consideration and objectives. They are living in the past. If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion.â€
Is the Military Brass Aiding and Abetting Obama’s Fraud?
ARE THEY KNOWINGLY SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF A FOREIGN-BORN USURPER? IF SO, WHY?
by Kathleen Gotto
Wednesday, April 14, 2010 A.D.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/13/ ... mas-fraud/
Several active duty and retired military members last year initiated lawsuits challenging Barack Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to serve as President and their Commander-in-Chief. They got nowhere. As previously reported, we have two more warriors, and our heroes, who are putting it all out there for the sake of truth and the oath they took to support and defend the Constitution. This is the same oath all commissioned officers take:
I, _____ , having been appointed an officer in the (Service) of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God. (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
As reported on both WorldNetDaily and The Post & Email, one of the two officers to publicly defend his oath and the Constitution is Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a decorated Army physician, who takes his oath seriously. Lakin serves as the flight surgeon for 3rd Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment and has orders to deploy to Afghanistan for his second tour of duty there. He has reservations about Obama’s legitimacy to serve as president and commander-in-chief because of mounting evidence that Obama was born overseas. In defense of the constitutional requirement that a president must be a “natural born citizen,â€
THIS WILL CURDLE YOUR BLOOD AND CURL YOUR HAIR.
http://img161.imagevenue.com/loc505/..._122_505lo.jpg
The name of the book Mr. Obama is reading is called:
The Post-American World, written by fellow Muslim Fareed Zakaria.
(It's not all that... Zakaria's book is about the slide of the United States from global economic dominance.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Orly Taitz
I'm not sure what this has to do with Mr. Obama's ineligibility for office, or if this case is contingent upon it.
Hi Juan,
At long last, after over 2 months of production, the Official Continental Congress DVD is ready!
http://www.freedom.tv
This video presentation contains nearly 2 hours of highlights from the presentations at the Congress and debate from the delegates.
This Official DVD comes with an Unlimited distribution license to copy and distribute far and wide. And if you order your copy today, you may still get it in time to make copies to pass out when we serve the Articles Of Freedom on Monday, April 19th.
http://www.freedom.tv
But, you have to hurry!
In Freedom,
Gary
P.S. The proceeds from the DVDs will help us cover the costs of the event, Please help support this historic initiative.
http://www.freedom.tv
Restore The Republic!, 3149 Dundee Rd #176, Northbrook, Illinois 60062, USA
That book cover should be enough evidence for Anyone... The guy is a Usurper, and his Goal is to see the United States suffer as a Third World Country.
I don't understand why the book makes him bad. I have a lot of books, and an active library card. I often read about world views I don't share. Besides, it's good to know what the other side is thinking. I'd rather criticize Obama on fumbling the jobs problem, bailing out the banks while Main Street is twisting in the wind, and allowing China and India to back their trucks up for what is left of American money and lucrative industries.
Betsy, I agree with you philosophically, but common sense would dictate that the President of the United States would keep such a book out of sight of photographers.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
How would you feel if Obama was reading a copy of Das Kapital during his travels and was photographed carrying the book openly and in public? Would that concern you?
I would rather see Obama carrying a copy of 'Common Sense' under his arm.
Actually, if he were reading Das Kapital I would wonder what took him so long - that's an old book. Of course, I am considering that perhaps I should get around to reading On the Road, but only out of nostalgia. I would file this as one of many unfortunate photo gaffes of the President.
WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA?
Officer challenging Obama 'reassigned'
No charges yet for surgeon demanding eligibility proof
Posted: April 14, 2010
8:35 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
The U.S. Army says a surgeon who has publicly refused to follow any further orders until he sees documentation that Barack Obama is eligible to be president is being "reassigned" at Walter Reed Army Hospital after he refused to deploy to Afghanistan as scheduled.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is the highest-ranking and first active-duty officer to refuse to obey orders based on President Obama's eligibility.
While there have been reports Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is facing an imminent court-martial, Army spokesman Chuck Dasey told WND today that Lakin is only "under investigation" at this point.
"Lakin reported to the commander, Medical Center Brigade, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, on Monday, 12 April, after failing to report for duty at Fort Campbell, Ky.," a statement sent by Dasey to WND today said.
"Lakin will be assigned to duty at Walter Reed pending investigation."
A spokeswoman for the case, Margaret Calhoun Hemenway, told WND that whatever the "assignment" amounts to, Lakin's access privileges were revoked, his computer was confiscated and he "is not permitted to support his Hippocratic oath … and take care of the troops as a doctor and a surgeon."
On the day he was supposed to have reported for deployment, Lakin was read his rights by Col. Gordon Roberts, his brigade commander, who discussed the situation with him and told him he had the "right to remain silent" because he was about to be charged with "serious crimes."
Hemenway said the message was that "he will shortly be court-martialed for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor."
Lakin earlier released a copy of a letter he sent to Obama saying, "the burden of proof must rest with you."
The letter, posted at the Safeguard Our Constitution website, which is assembling support for the officer, describes how Lakin tried through his chain of command and his congressional office to get answers to questions about Obama's eligibility.
Lakin originally announced his position with a video stating he would not follow orders because he was not sure of their legality under Obama, who has concealed personal information that could confirm he meets the constitutional requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen."
There's a new strategy to get answers to Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help.
"You serve as my commander-in-chief. Given the fact that the certification that your campaign posted online was not a document that the Hawaiian Department of Homelands regarded as a sufficient substitute for the original birth certificate and given that it has been your personal decision that has prevented the Hawaiian Department of Health from releasing your original birth certificate or any Hawaiian hospital from releasing your records, the burden of proof must rest with you," Lakin wrote.
"Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as commander-in-chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm's way," he continued. "I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but I should only do so with the knowledge that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed."
He had noted that every soldier "learns what constitutes a lawful order and is encouraged to stand up and object to unlawful orders." And he noted his orders to deploy include a demand for copies of his birth certificate.
But he said he was troubled by the president's decision to conceal "from public view" records that could easily end questions about Obama's place of birth and "natural born" status.
Lakin concluded: "Unless it is established (by this sufficient proof that should be easily within your power to provide) that you are constitutionally eligible to serve as president and my commander-in-chief, I, and all other military officers may be following illegal orders. Therefore, sir, until an original birth certificate is brought forward that validates your eligibility and puts to rest the other reasonable questions surrounding your unproven eligibility; I cannot in good conscience obey ANY military orders."
The Army earlier informally recommended a mental evaluation and then threatened Lakin with punishment.
"On 30 March 2010, this command became aware of your intentions to refuse to follow deployment orders. Your stated reason for refusal was your belief that the election of the President of the United States is invalid because you believe he is not 'native born' [sic]. This counseling is to inform you that your deployment orders are presumed to be valid and lawful orders issued by competent military authority," said the document from the "counselor," Lt. Col. William D. Judd.
The letter reminded Lakin of his April 12 due date at Fort Campbell, Ky.
"Failure to follow your reassignment and/or deployment orders may result in adverse action including court-martial," the officer was warned.
A statement released by Hemenway noted Lakin is being supported by "hundreds" of people who have donated to his legal defense fund.
WND has reported that the controversy raises the prospect that the government ultimately may not want to pursue a prosecution because a defense attorney could demand in court proof that the orders are issued by an eligible president.
Lakin is not the first officer to raise questions. Others have included Army doctor Capt. Connie Rhodes and Army reservist Maj. Stefan Cook. But Lakin is the highest-ranking officer to raise the question.
One of the organizers behind the Safeguard Our Constitution website, serving in emeritus status, is John Hemenway, an attorney who previously fought in the U.S. court system on behalf of a retired military officer, Gregory S. Hollister, who also questioned Obama's eligibility.
Here is the only 'birth certificate store" around! Read about the hunt for Obama's documentation!
The case ultimately was dismissed by Judge James Robertson who ruled that the dispute had been "twittered" during the 2008 election campaign.
In that opinion, Robertson sarcastically wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his commander in chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven – to the colonel's satisfaction – that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president.
"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court," Robertson wrote.
The judge also suggested sanctions against Hemenway for bringing the case, and Hemenway responded that process then would provide him with a right to a discovery hearing to see documentation regarding the judge's statements – not supported by any evidence introduced into the case – that Obama was properly "vetted."
Hemenway warned at the time, "If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past.
"The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said.
WND columnist Vox Day earlier wrote about this very scenario, calling it a "Get out of war" free card.
The comments followed the case of Cook, the reservist who challenged his deployment orders over questions about their legality under Obama.
"Rather than contesting the suit," Day wrote, "the Army took the highly peculiar step of revoking the major's deployment order, suggesting that the Pentagon generals are not entirely confident that they can demonstrate the legitimacy of their purported commander in chief.
"The Pentagon's decision to back down rather than risk exposing Obama's birth records to the public means that every single American soldier, sailor, pilot and Marine now holds a 'get out of war free' card."
Obama's actual response to those who question his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement that the U.S. president be a "natural born citizen" has been to dispatch both private and tax-funded attorneys to prevent anyone from gaining access to his documentation.
Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
WND has reported on a multitude of cases that have been brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the office.
The issue has prompted a number of state legislatures to work on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.
The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.
The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment.
the article continues at
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=140897
Unbelievable! Another ranking officer who refused a deployment order escapes court martial? I want him court martialed! I want Obama's attorneys to grill this traitor in court! I want Obama to shut all those nonbelievers up by proving to the world once and for all that he really is a legitimate POTUS! What? What do you mean you can't court martial him? What's that? You don't want to have to reveal Obamas' records? Why, is there something wrong? Geesh, what has become of military justice?!
It is almost embarrassing that we have come to this point. It has become painfully and glaringly obvious that something is wrong. Just how long can Obama and the courts dodge this issue? Til the cows come home? Til the bars burn down? BTW, I like the "get out of war free' card. I wonder how many more of those will be issued until someone cries uncle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florgal
[b]Kenyan Parliament website scrubs November 2008 Minutes which confirm Obama as “son of this soilâ€
[quote="HighlanderJuan"][size=117][b]Kenyan Parliament website scrubs November 2008 Minutes which confirm Obama as “son of this soilâ€
On April 15, Christian talk show hostess Janet Mefford had an open line call-in show about Lt. Col. Dr. Terry Lakin. She insisted she is not a birther and that she really has no position on the controversy. But she allowed 30 minutes of open discussion without making negative comments, and she admitted that the arguments that callers presented were sound.
JANET's Poll:
First Lady Michelle Obama was recently discovered
to have made reference to President Obama's
"home country in Kenya." Do you believe
President Obama was actually born in Kenya?
Yes: 72%
No: 28%
But...but...O'Reilly said last night the 'birther movement' never caught on! Only a handful of the folks believe it! :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC