Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Threaded View
-
10-29-2010, 10:28 AM #1
New York Times and Election Project Not Telling Full Truth
Friends of ALIPAC,
There's a lot of talk about how many seats Republicans will take on Tuesday Nov 2. Some estimates are now as high as 55-60.
Many of the estimates are coming from predictions by the New York Times and the Election Project. While I know the NYT Times is a highly biased source that supports far left positions, I've heard nothing about Election Projection yet.
Well, this morning I went to check on of ALIPAC's TARGETED campaigns for Anna Little who is our GOP Challenger in New Jersey's sixth congressional district. Anna Little is running against illegal alien amnesty supporter Frank Pallone.
Frank Pallone has a grade of F with our friends at NumbersUSA
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/my/co ... rd/RECENT/
While a recent poll from a left leaning University source says the Little Pallone race has closed to within only 5% points, a professional poll from earlier this month shows an only 1% spread!
Sources
National Research poll shows Pallone barely ahead of Little: 44-43%
http://www.politickernj.com/back_room/n ... ttle-44-43
Tea Party Republican Little gains ground on Rep. Pallone, poll says
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/1 ... _pall.html
I went to check and found a BIG PROBLEM.
NEITHER THE NEW YORK TIMES OR THE ELECTION PROJECTION HAVE THIS DISTRICT AS BEING IN PLAY AT ALL!
Either these people do not know what they are doing or they are concealing this race from others. If that is the case, there are probably more candidates like Anna Little out there that are close and would be receiving more support from people if the NYT and Election Projection were not covering for Dems!
LET's TAKE ACTION TOGETHER.
I am sending the following message to both the New York Times and Election Projection immediately.
Please...
1. Craft your own distinct message and
2. Send your distinct message to NYT and Cook with me to put pressure on them....
[quote}New York Times and Election Projection,
Please add New Jersey's district 6 to your list of close campaigns this year immediately.
Several scientific and certified polls are showing the Democratic incumbent within 5-1% of losing his seat!
The credibility of the Election Projection and New York Times prediction charts is at stake here. If your firms are going to conceal close races like NJ 6 to protect incumbents, then other media sources and voters will be unable to trust your presentations.
Please take immediate action to correct your mistake by adding NJ 6 to your list of seats that are in play for the 2010 election cycle and please do the same for any other close races you may currently be leaving off. A lot of questions will be raised once candidates like Anna Little of NJ 6 win across the country and everyone realizes you left competitive races off your charts.
Sincerely,
William Gheen
[/quote]
CONTACT INFO FOR NEW YORK TIMES ELECTIONS PREDICTIONS
Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Chairman & Publisher:
publisher@nytimes.com.
Scott H. Heekin-Canedy, President, General Manager
president@nytimes.com.
The Editors
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com
CONTACT INFO FOR ELECTION PROJECTION
thebloggingcaesar@yahoo.comJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu Giving Tax Dollars Exclusively to...
09-29-2026, 08:48 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports