Thread: ‘Deserve to lose': Steven Crowder doesn’t mince words in warning to GOP about 2016

‘Deserve to lose': Steven Crowder doesn’t mince words in warning to GOP about 2016

Posted at 1:50 pm on August 28, 2014 by Twitchy Staff | View Comments

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder
If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

Joe Schmeling @DDayJoe Follow
@scrowder Here ! Here !!
9:02 AM - 28 Aug 2014

There has been some buzz about the possibility of Mitt Romney running for president and being the GOP’s nominee again in 2016.

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder Follow

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.
9:01 AM - 28 Aug 2014

Steven Crowder thinks that’s a bad idea to say the least:

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

KixA @KixAdams Follow

@scrowder - HERE! HERE! I for one refuse to throw my vote away on him again, just so he can LOSE.
9:03 AM - 28 Aug 2014

The definition of insanity has been invoked.

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

#1 RINO Hater @LarryCal1 Follow

MT “@scrowder: If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose Horribly badly.” -- at ALL levels
9:05 AM - 28 Aug 2014



Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

I Took The Red Pill @ITTRP Follow

@scrowder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s …

9:05 AM - 28 Aug 2014




Then again:

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

Lawrence Catt @cattlawman Follow

@scrowder Still better than Hillary.
9:10 AM - 28 Aug 2014


Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder
If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

Susan Vigilante @SusanVigilante Follow
@scrowder Possibly- but the Dems dont' deserve to win under any circs
9:01 AM - 28 Aug 2014


Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder
If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

C.O. Jones @qbnjoe Follow

I agree. Problem is, if Repubs lose, so does the USA. "@scrowder: If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.”
9:04 AM - 28 Aug 2014


Could an “improved” Romney win in 2016?


Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder

If Mitt Romney is the candidate again, Republicans deserve to lose badly.

Jed Skillman @JedSkillman Follow
@scrowder Yes, a bland Mitt Romney loses... But a sharpened, improved Mitt Romney can win.

9:34 AM - 28 Aug 2014

Crowder says no way:


Jed Skillman @JedSkillman
@scrowder Yes, a bland Mitt Romney loses... But a sharpened, improved Mitt Romney can win.

Steven Crowder ✔ @scrowder Follow

No. He can't. RT @JedSkillman Yes, a bland Mitt Romney loses... But a sharpened, improved Mitt Romney can win.
9:48 AM - 28 Aug 2014


http://twitchy.com/2014/08/28/deserv...paign=twupdate

the GOP has got to stop following CNN, ABC and all of the other Progressive Socialist stations that fill the air with Romney is now an Unbeatable powerhouse to get you fired up

OR

Be prepared to get your heart broken again in 2016 as you once again got set up to fail by the Progressive media

Just like they did with John "Attack the world" McCain; 2 time loser Mitten's they hype losers to get you to bite and laugh as you walk home with your tail between your legs and scratching the bald spot on your head

I'm telling you now... be prepared for a Hillary Landslide in 16 as many will once again stay home... and please don't blame the messenger for popping bubbles; I'm just reading the tea leaves from multiple sites and what people are saying

by the way... If you see some super excited people screaming for Mittens... they are probably a paid troll for George Soro's that want a known loser to go up against Hillary for a 3rd beat down

Go read the comments at the bottom of the page

http://twitchy.com/2014/08/28/deserv...paign=twupdate

Twitchy

Whew! This is hard-hitting!
Is he right?




Steven Crowder's Brutal Warning About 2016
twitchy.com

http://twitchy.com/2014/08/28/deserv...paign=twupdate

I want to encourage patriots to stop calling the hard left "liberals, progressives or socialists."

What they are is Marxists. Marxism is the base ideology underlying all modern despotic political movements. Indeed Nazism was Marxism embellished with anti Semitism, liberal (basically Marxist) American Jews need to understand this. Communism is the most militant form of Marxism. All socialism is based upon Marxism implemented in various ways.

Even now with everything going left, the fanatics are very much afraid of being called "Marxists." Even now in America, Marxism is a very bad label; anyone familiar with Karl Marx's political ravings can easily identify the Marxists thinking behind the slogans that are used as a substituted for rational thinking.

PATRIOTS, OBAMA AND HIS JUNTA AND THE WHOLE DEMOCRAT PARTY ARE., BY THEIR OWN WORDS AND DEEDS--MARXISTS. Please expose them for what they are.

I don't care for Romney as a choice either, but when left with two choices ........ Clinton or Romney ......... I'm going Romney. The last candidate (knocked out in the primaries against John McCain) I was really excited about was a former Congressman from California, Rep. Duncan Hunter. That man would have really been a game changer for our side!

The Townhall.com Presidential Straw Poll

Woah! We didn't expect this! http://bit.ly/Z0Aize




Guess Who's Winning In Iowa?
townhall.com

Poll: Meanwhile, Romney's Crushing it in Iowa

Daniel Doherty | Aug 27, 2014



Maybe I spoke too soon.

Hypothetically, according to a new USA Today/Suffolk poll, if Romney defies the odds and runs again for president in 2016, the Hawkeye State may be his for the taking. After all, more than a third of respondents said they’d ditch the candidates they’re currently backing, and choose him instead:

According to the new poll, if Romney was added to the list of potential 2016 GOP White House contenders, 35% of Iowa Republicans say he'd be their first choice in the Iowa caucuses, which kick off the presidential primary and caucus calendar.Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the 2008 Iowa Republican caucuses and is considering another bid in 2016, is a distant second, at 9%. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who narrowly won the 2012 caucuses, are each at 6%. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Texas Gov. Rick Perry are each at 5%, with the remaining potential candidates tested were all in the lower single digits.

Remember, Romney initially thought he won the Iowa caucuses in 2012; it was only later determined that, in fact, he didn’t. The poll, though, suggests that if he ignores the wishes of his wife and family and does run, he could potentially win. That's a seductive and intriguing proposition, but is it enough to sway him to take the plunge?
Incidentally, he appeared on the Hugh Hewitt Show earlier this week, and, as Allahpundit noted, left the door kind of open to running again -- but not really:



In all seriousness, I’m utterly convinced he’s not running, as nice as that might sound, and as fun as that might be. But if he does, I’ll be the first to admit I was wrong.*
*It’s not going to happen.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danield...campaign=straw

Don't care one Bit and not impressed at all; Not interested in Mitten's 3rd Beat down

You can do it without me MeriKa

If you want Hillary Care - Vote for Hillary

If you want Romney Care - Vote for Mittens

If you want a Progressive Democrat Vote for Hillary or Elizabeth Warren

If you want a Progressive Republican Vote for Mittens or John McCain "Both are 2 Time Losers for POTUS"

The difference between all 4 are slight in some areas and minimal in others

Either way I'm Bailing ship and the GOP will once again Deserve to Lose