Thread: “The Cleaner” Part II – Cleaner Identified – The Plot Thickens…

“The Cleaner” Part II – Cleaner Identified – The Plot Thickens…

September 29, 2016

Unfortunately, this post is going to be severely fragmented. Our apologies in advance. However, if anyone can clean up these videos please notify us ASAP in the comments. You’ll see what I mean.

Earlier during our initial review of the debate we identified something that looked entirely suspicious because it is only evidenced for one specific candidate, and one specific lectern. We initially drew attention to it as “The Cleaner”:



Well, this intrigue just got a whole lot more interesting.

See “The Cleaner” at work here immediately following the debate:



The Cleaner has been identified as Brady Williamson, a long time democrat operative and three-decade member of the democrat debate negotiation team:



Watch:



Here’s where it gets even more interesting. And again, unfortunately no-one is putting these disparate segments together into one cohesive story. First this video where something electronic is clearly visible on Hillary Clinton’s lectern at the conclusion of the debate. Notice it is not present on Donald Trump’s lectern:



There is definitely something going on there, and we already know these were custom built lecterns (podiums) for each candidate. Whatever that is on Hillary’s lectern is not seen operational on Donald Trump’s.

Now here’s another video which delves into both “the cleaner”, and the activity in/around the lectern. Unfortunately the uploader’s narrative makes him sound like a loon. Annoyingly, this is a problem we often run into when there is indeed something very important in the content, but the person creating the video’s narrative is over-the-top. This is where CTH really misses having Diwataman as a frequent YouTube contributor.

Watch the video, at least the first 10 minutes, because it is indeed important. [Ignore the entire last 10 minutes] You have to ignore the barking conspiratorial aspects of the person who created it. Focus on the content, not the narration per se’.



It’s the over-the-top conspiracy narration makes videos like this too easy for people to dismiss. As a result the important facts and truth get hidden or ignored because the creators sound like moonbats. It is frustrating because these videos could be extremely valuable for truth finding.

All of that said, the essential elements remain. The cleaner, Brady Williamson, was trying to remove, and did eventually remove, something much more than just notes atop the lectern. Another person also is seen removing something. All of the key players are very aware of, and very cautious of, the people around them when they are in “cleaning mode”.





https://theconservativetreehouse.com...plot-thickens/

Nothing Suspicious here!

Hillary Caught on Video “Using Hand Signals to Communicate With Moderator Lester Holt”

This article was written by Adan Salazar and originally published at Infowars.com.

Editor’s Comment: Gee, do you think the debate could have been fixed, and heavily slanted to put Trump on the defensive, while giving Hillary a pass for absolutely everything?

Discussion of Hillary’s use of apparent ‘hand signals’ during the debate has been made more difficult by the use of copyright claims against footage from the debate by a third party, which is having the effect of censoring the web as it vets, analyzes and calls B.S. on every moment of this ridiculously fraudulent 2016 election. Hillary is getting away with murder all over again.

Day in, and day out, there is almost nothing that happens on the Clinton campaign trail that isn’t mired in controversy, and careful manipulation of events to ensure the first female pres.
<em>


World Champion Poker Player: Clinton Secretly Signaled Moderator during Debate

by Adan Salazar

Hillary Clinton used hand signals to communicate with moderator Lester Holt during the first US presidential debate, a four time world champion poker player has stated.

A video recently uploaded to Youtube depicts the former secretary of state scratching her face several times during the 90-minute debate – signals to Holt, the video’s editor claims, which “meant Clinton wanted to get a ‘zinger’ in and to go to her without changing the subject.”

“Hillary Clinton used this gesture to signal Holt on six different occasions,” the video asserts.

“The first signal to Holt comes when Hillary wants to get her ‘taxes zinger’ in after Trump talks about the country being in debt.”An earlier version of the video was taken down from Youtube citing a copyright claim by [Merlin] SC Distribution.

Reporters at TruePundit.com claim there were no such signals used by Clinton in previous debate performances.

“True Pundit cross referenced Clinton’s speeches, campaign appearances and her 2008 debate performances against President Obama,” the website reports. “According to that analysis, Clinton never previously used these hand motions to supposedly scratch her face. In fact, she rarely touches her face at all.”

Also investigating the video’s claims, author Mike Cernovich reached out to a professional poker player for assistance analyzing the potential hand signals.

Curious. Do the poker pros like @themouthmatusow see this as a “signal” to moderator Lestor Holt. https://t.co/3uQbpbhSQe
— Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) September 28, 2016

Four time World Series of Poker champion Mike Matusow agreed hand signals were indeed used by Clinton during the debate.

Wow ive watched the debates 3 times & never noticed!! I felt the whole time she had the questions but after watching that she def signals https://t.co/dOSZlmfB9G
— Mike Matusow (@themouthmatusow) September 28, 2016

Analysis following the debate showed Holt came down harder on Trump, interrupting him 41 times during the event compared to Hillary’s seven interruptions.


http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-new...92016?AID=7236