Thread: “Rogue” U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya

http://www.alipac.us/f19/report-obam...s-down-270949/

Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens'


JANUARY 21, 2013

BY: DAVE GIBSON



On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama's second term.
Garrow made the following Facebook post:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

So, who is the source?

Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

Understand, this is not coming from Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease.

Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country's one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work.

His bio on Amazon.com reads:

Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.

This comes on the heels of Sunday's report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis is being dismissed by Obama and will leave his post in March.

The WFB article states:

“Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

Did Gen. Mattis refuse to "fire on U.S. citizens?"

Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' - Virginia Beach Conservative | Examiner.com

Holy SHIT

A Military Coup In America? - YouTube

Published on Jan 20, 2013

Real Jew News

The Brother Nathanael Foundation - The Brother Nathanael FoundationBroVids.com

http://www.alipac.us/f9/nobel-peace-...2/#post1324102

http://www.alipac.us/f9/nobel-peace-...-citiz-271022/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/huckabee-oba...resign-277990/

Admiral at Center of Inquiry Is Censured by Navy

By C. J. CHIVERS and THOM SHANKER

Published: March 26, 2013

The Navy on Monday officially disciplined the admiral who had commanded a carrier strike group until being abruptly removed from the position last fall while the vessels patrolled the North Arabian Sea.

Mc3 Kenneth Abbate/U.S. Navy, via Associated Press

Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette


Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@NYTNational for breaking news and headlines.
Twitter List: Reporters and Editors

Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette, who led Carrier Strike Group Three, which included the U.S.S. John C. Stennis, had been accused of using profanity in a public setting and making at least two racially insensitive comments, officials familiar with the investigation said.

He was cleared of any criminal violations under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the laws governing the behavior of armed services personnel. But a set of administrative penalties will effectively end his career.

The Gaouette case arrived as a worrisomely large number of senior military officers have been investigated or fired for poor judgment, malfeasance, sexual improprieties or sexual violence over the last year.

Concern over the number of high-profile cases across the armed services is so acute that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Tuesday sent an unusual letter to the Pentagon’s top leadership urging a renewed “commitment to values-based ethical conduct.”

“Each of us must rededicate ourselves to upholding the principles of sound leadership,” Mr. Hagel wrote in the internal memorandum, a copy of which was provided to The New York Times by a senior official. “Our culture must exemplify both professional excellence and ethical judgment.”

Admiral Gaouette was the subject of a five-month investigation by the Naval Inspector General, which had been closely watched within the Navy, partly because of unease among officers about the unusual origins of the case and its potential for embarrassment to the service.

Several officers said the complaint had been filed by Captain Ronald Reis, the commander of the Stennis, after the admiral admonished the captain for his ship-driving practices.

Captain Reis, the officers said, had been an exceptional EA-6 pilot before commanding the carrier, and was highly regarded for his intellect and drive.

But he did not follow normal protocols for driving the ship through busy shipping lanes, and ran a bridge in which the surface officers under his command felt tense and unable to offer their input, the officers said.

Three officers and two former officers familiar with the ship’s bridge procedures said the captain tended to act alone and by eye, and not carefully track the Stennis’s position relative to other vessels in crowded seas; one of them said he tended “to fly the ship.”

After Admiral Gaouette had ordered the captain to slow down as the vessel was steaming through ship traffic in the Malacca Strait in excess of 20 knots, the officers said, Captain Reis filed a complaint to the inspector general, claiming the admiral was abusive.

Reached by e-mail on the Stennis on Tuesday, Captain Reis declined to comment. Admiral Gaouette also declined to comment on details of the case, but released a statement acknowledging mistakes.

“I fully accept responsibility and accountability for my actions while in command,” he wrote, “and deeply regret that my missteps have placed the Navy in this position.”

One former officer who served with both men on the Stennis said that the admiral had acted on a well-documented problem, and then his own missteps became the Navy’s focus.

“We’re not talking about how Ron worked with the harbor pilot when docking at a pier,” the former officer said. “We’re talking about how he was driving through congested seas. People were concerned when he was driving because they were concerned he would hit something.”

He added: “Gaouette’s concern with Ron’s driving was not some power trip or irrational thing.”

After Captain Reis filed the complaint, investigators were flown to the Stennis as it sailed off the coast of Pakistan, flying its aircraft in support of the Afghan war. The ship remains at sea; it is due back to its home port in Bremerton, Wash., this spring.

The investigation ultimately found that the admiral had used profanity while being the subject of a shipboard roast, called a “Foc’sle Follies,” and had made racially insensitive remarks on two previous occasions, officials said.

He received a “nonpunitive letter of caution” and the full inspector-general’s report was ordered to be attached to the admiral’s service record, where it will block his chances at promotion or future command, officials said.

The officials noted that the results of the nonjudicial punishment hearing, or Admiral’s Mast, which was held on Monday in Washington, will now be reviewed up the chain of command, and more serious administrative measures against Admiral Gaouette could still be ordered.

One Navy official familiar with the case also noted that “being cleared of charges doesn’t mean he’s exonerated. And it certainly doesn’t mean his conduct was found to be in keeping with that expected of a strike group commander.”

Because the case is not fully concluded, Navy officials declined to provide details, or discuss precisely what Admiral Gaouette said that Captain Reis and the inspector general deemed insensitive.
“Inasmuch as an administrative review of this case is ongoing, I am unable to comment on any details,” said Rear Admiral John Kirby, the Navy’s top spokesman.

Of all the services, the Navy has been the most aggressive in holding its commanders to strict standards of professional conduct. According to statistics gathered by The Navy Times newspaper, more than 20 Navy commanding officers were fired in 2012 for inappropriate behavior and misconduct; another six commanding officers have been relieved of duty so far this year.


A version of this article appeared in print on March 27, 2013, on page A11 of the New York edition with the headline: Admiral at Center of Inquiry Is Censured.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/us...navy.html?_r=0

Originally Posted by Gordon Duff

US military planned mutiny on the Bounty to topple Obama

Israel rule

The planned overthrow and subsequent declaration of martial law is a massively financed operation with billions of dollars available. The primary impetus for this action is a belief by members of the “dispensationalist” pseudo-Christian heresy that pervades America’s military service academies that the United States should be subservient to the State of Israel.

Over the past three decades, religious extremists have taken over the Air Force Academy, Annapolis and West Point, teaching mandatory classes in obscure religious beliefs, hatred of Is|am and stressing obedience to an “Apocalypse Cult” that stresses pre-emptive nuclear war in order to bring on the “end times” and destroy all life on earth.

Some find these beliefs inconsistent with oaths sworn by all members of the military:

“I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic...”

I consider such drivel absolutely devoid of credibility and unworthy of a response.

I accept the other articles in this thread.

BENGHAZI (27 October 2012), President Obama fired a NAVY ADMIRAL for planning to send help to Benghazi. President Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette [photo 2nd left] from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) [photo 3rd left] currently located in the Middle East.

CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.

The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group’s current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer ( DDG-108 ), USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius (DDG-69).

US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.

This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to“assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:

“The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.”
--
http://www.anexcellentspirit.com/cat...hazi-cover-up/

http://tinyurl.com/c6op5h6