Thread: Alex Jones Vs. Piers Morgan on CNN Tonight, let's tune in together!

I cannot wait to watch Alex Jones mop up the floor with Piers Morgan on national TV tonight.

Piers Morgan is probably mad that Alex Jones has given so much air time to Larry Pratt from Gun Owners of America after Pratt completely cleaned up with Morgan a few weeks back.

Piers Morgan is probably hoping he can pull out something outlandish sounding that Alex Jones has said in the past to try to marginalize him. He probably thinks Alex Jones is an easy target. Boy is Morgan in for a shock.

Alex Jones is probably going to make some TV history tonight and the American public is going to get a rare dose of the real deal tonight. Alex Jones brings a passionate perspective to news coverage that Americans can't get from the lame stream media.

Also, Alex Jones was briefly detained by TSA today trying to make his way to this show. They knew he was coming and the officers called him Mr. Jones lol.

Check this out and tune in with me tonight for TV history!

Alex Jones To Debate Piers Morgan Tonight
Alex Jones To Debate Piers Morgan Tonight | Alternative


Alex Jones Detained By TSA
» Alex Jones Detained By TSA Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


W

Monday, January 7, 2013

Shoe Removal at TSA Checkpoints

(Photo courtesy of Infowars)

I kept noticing a story circulating around the web involving Alex Jones, shoes, and TSA, so I checked it out. After reading, I felt a bit let down.

I would have expected that Alex knew all of TSA’s policies and procedures by heart. He talks about them fairly often. Well, today, he refused to remove his shoes at the Austin-Bergstrom Airport (AUS) while on his way to an interview with Piers Morgan in New York City. As you can see from the photo, (Conveniently taken by somebody from InfoWars), it was quite the scene.

Shoe removal has been mandatory for quite some time now. Even I have to take my shoes off when I travel. There are a lot of questions that could be asked about his motivation today, but what is clear, is that our officers followed standard operating procedures today.The only exceptions for shoe removal are:

• Passengers 12 and under
• Passengers 75 and older
• Members of the Military
• TSA Pre✓™/Global Entry Participants

All other passengers must undergo shoe screening and passengers with a disability or hindering medical condition who cannot remove their shoes can be screened using alternative methods.

TSA’s objective is to mitigate risk in a way that ensures security measures while both promoting the safe movement of people and commerce and guarding against a deliberate attack against our transportation systems.

Bob Burns
TSA Blog Team

If you have a travel related issue or question that needs an immediate answer, you can contact us by clicking here.

http://blog.tsa.gov/2013/01/shoe-removal-at-tsa-checkpoints.html

I just got word that Joe Arpaio is going to be on with Piers Morgan tonight as well. This is gonna be exciting!

W

Alex Jones to debate Piers Morgan on CNN live, spars with TSA (Video)

• January 7, 2013
• By: Andrew Moran

Thousands Sign Petition to Have Piers Morgan DeportedThousands Sign Petition to Have Piers Morgan Deported

Alex Jones, a conservative radio talk show host and conspiracy theorist, has headed to New York to debate CNN host Piers Morgan. On his way, though, he got into a fight with TSA for refusing to take off his shoes.

Jones announced the debate Sunday on his radio show. The debate is scheduled for Monday, Jan. 7 at 9 p.m. EST. The popular radio talk show host claimed that the network wanted to do a via satellite interview, but Jones said he wanted to look at everyone face-to-face.

“I thought, you know what, I want to look that guy in the eyes. So we’ll see if they’ll chicken out,” explained Jones. “Boy, they swore to me they won’t. I’ve had CNN chicken out before via satellite interviews, but I’ll get really upset they do. That political rumble in the jungle is set for tomorrow night.”


Alex Jones Photo credit: YouTube screengrab

As Jones traveled to New York, he got into a spat with TSA officials, who wanted Jones to take his shoes off. The Jones-led InfoWars.com claims that he saw other people not having to take their shoes off and the security officers discriminated him because he is an ardent critic of the administration.

The account then later described Jones agreeing to take his shoes off and pass through the metal detector. The beep was sounded and the agents were then accused of laughing at Jones, who alleged that they purposely set the screeners off “possibly by order of the officer, so that they could harass Jones further.”

“The officer continued to detain Jones as he talked to other cops. Despite the officer seemingly wanting to take further action, TSA management, presumably aware of the potential scandal that could ensue, said they were happy to let Jones go on his way,” wrote InfoWars.com reporter Paul Joseph Watson. “Jones is now considering a civil rights lawsuit against the TSA for discrimination. As we have previously documented, journalists who are critical of the TSA are routinely targeted for harassment.”

It was reported last month that InfoWars.com started a petition to deport Morgan. Infowars.com writer Kurt Nimmo launched the petition on the White House website in order to deport Morgan because he was accused of being an enemy of the United States constitution and Bill of Rights.

The petition garnered a total of 104,127 signatures (at the time of this writing) and clearly exceeded the 25,000 threshold to generate a response from the White House.

http://www.examiner.com/article/alex-jones-to-debate-piers-morgan-on-cnn-live-spars-with-tsa

Maybe sheriff Joe will arrest Morgan for being in the country illegally and have him deported.

http://www.alipac.us/f9/alex-jones-v...n-away-269917/

I support Alex Jones and of course I do not agree with him on everything. One always has to stay that because the liberal illegal alien supporters like to always claim that if you support someone you therefore support everything that person believes and does.

Tonight's interview could have gone a lot better. I think Piers Morgan and CNN had a trap in place that Alex Jones fell into too much.

Alex had a lot of important things to say that never get heard on the main stream news channels, but his deliver would have been much better if he hard remained more calm, intentionally softer spoken, and made his points slower.

Ive just spent the last hour reading what many of Alex's supporters say and while most are enthused about his strong showing, there is a lot of disappointment about how he came across as over the top.

But again we all owe Alex Jones a great deal of thanks for his valiant efforts. The man is very passionate and he is trying very hard to get important information out there.

What happened after Alex Jones left the stage is what disturbs me the most.

Piers Morgan and Alan Morton Dershowitz (born September 1, 193 is an American lawyer, jurist, and political commentator... Mr. Harvard Law School started saying that Alex Jones was "dangerous" and how they would be afraid if they were in his home and disagreed with him that he might go get one of his guns and blamo!

I will have to look at the playback, but at one point Alan Dershowitz said that "people like him" meaning people like Alex Jones should not have guns!

Now I dont agree with everything Alex Jones says or believes, but the same could be said of most public personalities. But Alan Dershowitz's comments that Alex Jones should not have guns because of his political beliefs is highly disturbing.

Desrshowitz's comments were elitist, authoritarian, oppressive, and counter to the American Spirit in so many ways.

I wish that Alex Jones had repeated the point, and elaborated more, on how defense rifles like AR-15's are important to protect the power balance between our citizens and organized crime and the government or any potential invading force.

Gun equality, gun equality, gun equality <--- this is the term that needs to used and instead of "assault rifles" people on our side need to call them Defense Rifles.

And Id like to make two important points in closing.

First, it is improper for Piers Morgan to be lecturing Americans about our gun policy at all because he is not an American citizen and it is overtly rude for him to lecture us about our policies. He comes across as the nosy neigbor that pops by to tell people how they should raise their chidlren with unwanted advice that is inappropriate.

Also, Piers Morgan is a member of the MEDIA, it is not his job to crusade for political causes. The big problem with the American media today is that instead of using their power of the broadcast to simply educate people with facts, they are too focused on trying to shape public opinion for politics! This is not the proper role for journalists and members of the media. Piers Morgan is supposed to be a damn reporter and if he wants to do issues he should run for office or form a Political Action Committee.

Americans are sick of all the leftist communist spew coming out of the media.

Alan Desrshowitz has shown us their real card. They are crafting a narrative about crazy violent people that are the ones that want strong defense rifles, and Alex Jones of course is crazy and violent and anyone supporting the second amendment of the US Constitution is somehow crazy and violent.

I see that Alan Dershowitz has filed several high profile cases regarding defamation. Such a shame to see him so eagerly engage in what I believe to be a form of mass defamation himself live on CNN.

William Gheen

Related ..


Americans never give up your guns

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

28.12.2012

pravda.ru
By Stanislav Mishin

These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.


This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.

For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

Stanislav Mishin

Americans never give up your guns - English pravda.ru

Wow... the FORMER Communist's are telling the Newest Communist Country AmeriKa to NOT Give up our Gun's

WHODATHUNKIT

Originally Posted by AirborneSapper7

Wow... the FORMER Communist's are telling the Newest Communist Country AmeriKa to NOT Give up our Gun's

WHODATHUNKIT

-----------------------------------------

I have a Russian in-law (an excellent man) who knows our Constitution better than most congressmen.

He tells me we are headed straight for Stalin communism, and gun confiscation is the last step ..