Thread: Arizona Rancher Will Fight Court Order To Pay Damages to Und

Arizona Rancher Will Fight Court Order To Pay Damages to Undocumented Immigrants

By Elizabeth Llorente

Published February 09, 2011

A group of undocumented immigrants on the property of Arizona rancher Roger Barnett, who says he is tired of the trespassing on his land and the trash illegal crossers leave behind.

Courtesy of David T. Hardy

An Arizona rancher who was ordered to pay nearly $90,000 in punitive damages to undocumented immigrants he confronted, with a gun, is going to request a rehearing, his attorney said.

“We’ll be filing a motion for a rehearing,â€

What I want to say will get me in trouble

He could have avoided the whole mess really

The sooner Americans do what is necessary the sooner this problem will
be solved

I don't know all the facts of the case but I know the 9th circus court is pro illegal , pro reconquista and anit American

"Yeah! that would get you in trouble here Superman, but I know what you mean!" It's our own fault for being too passive!

he should not have to pay they . they should No tbe on his Land it look a mess . this was on Be for & i said the same thing
no Amnesty

Its what I woulda done Justthefacts.

[quote]“We’ll be filing a motion for a rehearing,â€

This man didn't hurt anyone , and furthermore he assited our country in detaining enemies of the state ....

if he has to pay for detaining crminals , then he should sue the united states for pain and suffering .

Originally Posted by marquis

This man didn't hurt anyone , and furthermore he assited our country in detaining enemies of the state ....
if he has to pay for detaining crminals , then he should sue the united states for pain and suffering .

"Damn it's nice to see your face on these boards again!"

What I found interesting is on the news a week ago the article was saying those he held were citizens but now again of late as previously stated they are again saying illegals.

Anyways I could see an issue if he wasn't on his own property. But if he's on his property I for one believe in the right to defend ones own property with any force necessary.

Originally Posted by ReformUSA2012

What I found interesting is on the news a week ago the article was saying those he held were citizens but now again of late as previously stated they are again saying illegals.

Anyways I could see an issue if he wasn't on his own property. But if he's on his property I for one believe in the right to defend ones own property with any force necessary.

Exactly right! However ironically enough, the trial judge would not allow the defense to present the “self-defenseâ€