.
.
See: COMPLAINT AGAINST TEXAS BORDER SECURITY LAW

Lie number 1:

“The United States brings this action to preserve its exclusive authority under federal law to regulate the entry and removal of noncitizens.”

In fact, our Constitution is the supreme federal law, and nowhere in its wording has the federal government been delegated an "exclusive" authority to regulate the entry and removal of noncitizens from a State.

The truth is, our federal government is granted exclusive authority to “. . . establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization . . . “ Naturalization involves the process by which a foreign national, who is already in the United States, is granted citizenship. Immigration, other hand, involves a foreign national traveling to and entering the United States. The two terms are distinct and very different activities!

Lie number 2

“Texas’s SB 4 is preempted by federal law and thus violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.”

The relative parts of the “Supremacy Clause” mentioned reads as follows:

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land”

As it turns out, only those laws made in pursuance of our Constitution - a constitution which is designed to promote the common defense and general welfare of the United States – “shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”

The State of Texas has not “preempted” any federal law designed to promote the common defense and general welfare of the United States. To the contrary, Texas’s SB 4 in reality, is protecting the common defense and general welfare of the United States by working to prevent millions upon millions of unwanted foreign nations from crossing it border and trespassing into Texas where they then travel to the interior of the United States and cause severe and devastating social and economic disruptions, which do not occur when orderly immigration policies are adhered to which do promote the general welfare of the United States.

While the Biden Administration’s complaint dwells on a number of court cases, mostly taken out of context to distract from the actual ongoing events taking place, and likewise is intended to distract from the specific wording in our Constitution, and the documented intentions and beliefs under which its provisions were adopted, which gives context to its text, the bottom line is, the very wording used in the Biden Administration complaint exhibits lies and distortions of our Constitution, which are put forth for no other reason than to disrupt Texas from exercising an authority expressly stated in our Constitution, and its working to prevent an ongoing invasion of the United States which is destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens. The expressed power authorizing the actions of Texas cannot be denied and are stated as follows:

"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." [emphasis added]

Additionally, let us not forget that our Constitution also declares: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion . . . "



JWK

The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)