Bilderberg planning on Shutting down Free Speech on Sites like this

**sorg127** · 05-23-2012, 09:06 PM

Please Read:

» Mark of the Beast: Bilderberg Pushes Mandatory Internet ID for Europe Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

You see NOW THE ELITE WANT INTERNET ID so they can keep bloggers and opinions of forums like ALIPAC silenced.

The ELITE want there NEW WORLD ORDER and the Internet and Free Speech are holding them back. They know we reject there internationalist points of view and as a result the power of the internet as the link from the Bilderberg internet id article points out they want to know who you are so they can damage you one way or the other and silence your FREE SPEECH RIGHTS on issues like illegal immigration.

If these Bilderberg people have there way sites like this will be shut down. ALIPAC message to stop illegal immigration will be silenced. CISPA bills which I have been warning about will not only shut down sites like ALIPAC. ALIPAC may e-mail you to call your politician to stop an AMNESTY BILL or sign a petition to stop illegals from getting in-state tuition, under CISPA your ISP can block that e-mail from being received or even change the wording of that e-mail. Sadly are seeing some of are own like Congressman Lou Barletta or Pennsylvanian voting in favor of CISPA. Doesn't Congressman Barletta understand that people and ALIPCA won't be able to warn people about Dream Act legislation or Amnesty if CISPA passes. Right now CISPA is in the Senate under bills S.2151 and S.2105.

The politicians are more and more selling out are privacy. Now they are arming drones to spy on Americans.

Groups Concerned Over Arming Of Domestic Drones « CBS DC

We even see Tea Party Supporter Sarah Palin supporting Illegal Alien Candidate ORRIN HATCH.

Orrin Hatch is now the hunted — but Sarah Palin's surprise endorsement could help | Deseret News

Then again Sarah Palin also supported illegal Amnesty Supporter John McCain.

The point is in order to maintain the fight against illegal immigration ALIPAC must have sites like this and people to be able to speak FREELY online, under this CISPA bill in the House and Senate your ISP can block you from visiting sites and can confiscate e-mails from ALIPAC and all it has to claim is that this was done in the name of Cyber Security.

Please read this link on CISPA.

Senate Cybersecurity Bills Under Fire From CISPA Opponents | TPM Idea Lab

This is why I urge you to call Congress at 2022243121 or e-mail them at:

Congress.org

and tell them NO to S.2105 and S,2151 The Cyber Security bills. These bills have nothing to do with Cyber Security and more to do with spying on your political views especially on illegal immigration if the Department of Homeland Security has its way.

If CISPA goes through ALIPAC had better find another way to get out the message about illegal immigration because now YOUR ISP will be able to spy on your e-mails and webpage views and block out content all in the name of Cyber Security.

Please understand the elites and Bilderberg want to silence the internet and lets face it with Rupert Murdoch supporting New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg's stand on illegal immigration YOU CAN BE SURE WITHOUT THE INTERNET ALIPAC WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AS EASILY AS IT DID BEFORE and under CISPA ALIPAC may no longer exist even when searching for ALIPAC on a search engine online.

Please call the Senate and stop CISPA or S.2105 and S.2151. THANK YOU.

**stevetheroofer** · 05-23-2012, 09:20 PM

working4change · 05-25-2012, 08:08 AM

TPMIdeaLab
Senate Cybersecurity Bills Under Fire From CISPA Opponents
Carl Franzen- May 23, 2012, 5:05 PM

Screenshot of Fight For the Future's new webpage rallying opposition to Senate cybersecurity bills.

Fearing that the U.S. Senate will soon vote to pass a cybersecurity bill that could erode Web user privacy, a prominent Internet freedom advocacy group has launched a new online campaign to get the American public to confront Senators face-to-face during their weeklong Memorial Day recess at the end of the month.

Fight For the Future, a nonprofit advocacy group that in late 2011 helped launch the successful massive online protest against the much-hated anti-online bill known as SOPA (the Stop Online Piracy Act), is turning to some of the same tactics that helped kill that bill.

Only this time, the group is targeting two Senate bills that contain language similar to CISPA (the Cyber Information Sharing and Protection Act), a controversial bill passed by the House of Representatives in a rushed vote in April.

CISPA would allow private companies and the government to share Web users’ personal information, with the goal of repelling and defending against cyber attacks.

“The problem is these [Senate] bills contain language identical to CISPA,” said Donny Shaw, a campaign organizer with Fight For the Future, in a phone interview with TPM.

On Wednesday, Fight For the Future launched a new webpage, “Privacy Is Awesome,” giving Web users a five step guide to pestering their Senators over the phone and via email, with the goal of pressuring the lawmakers into scheduling face-to-face meetings with voters during their upcoming recess, which extends through the week of May 28.

Specifically, Fight For the Future wants voters to complain to Senators about the two CISPA-like bills.

“We think the best strategy is for people to meet with Senators while they are at home on recess and tell them the public’s position on these bills,” Shaw told TPM,

One of the bills, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012, co-sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME), has the tentative support of the Obama Administration and could be put to a full Senate vote sometime in early June.

The other Senate bill Fight For the Future opposes, the SECURE IT Act, sponsored by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), is currently stuck in a Senate committee, which it has to clear before being able to get a full Senate floor vote, so it’s not as pertinent.

Fight For the Future’s major problem with CISPA, SECURE IT and the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 are that all three bills contain language that would allow the government and private companies to share the personal information they’ve collected about Web users with each other, “notwithstanding any other provision of law,” essentially exempting them from current laws restricting how much Web data they can collect in share, and in what instances.

“These provisions would basically waive all existing privacy laws and give corporations legal immunity for sharing information with the government,” Shaw said.

Indeed, a close reading of the bills by TPM reveals that, much like in the case of CISPA, the bills do not contain language specifying what information could be collected and shared and what avenue users or others would have for finding out about government use of their data, nor is there clear legal recourse for users who believe their information was shared improperly.

That said, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 does contain language stating that “nothing in this title may be construed to limit liability for a failure to comply,” with requirements in the bill that all those government agencies and companies that share information “make reasonable efforts…to safeguard information that can be used to identify specific persons…”

The backers of all the bills, as well as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have all stated that cybersecurity legislation allowing this type of information sharing between corporations and the government is necessary to protecting U.S. companies and Web users from hacks, malware and other types of cyber attacks.

However, Fight for the Future won’t say whether it thinks that cybersecurity bills are necessary to stop such attacks.

“We aren’t taking a position on that,” Shaw said. “This isn’t an issue of cybersecurity [for us], its an issue of fundamental rights, offline or online.”

In order to become a law, any of the bills have to pass both the House and the Senate. But CISPA itself hasn’t been introduced to the Senate, so if the Senate voted to pass either of the other two bills, they would need to go back to the House and be voted on again. Then, if a bill passed both houses, the president would still need to sign it. The Obama Administration threatened to veto CISPA but has indicated it will support the Cybersecurity Act of 2012.

Senate Cybersecurity Bills Under Fire From CISPA Opponents | TPM Idea Lab

**SeaBee** · 05-25-2012, 07:35 PM

There may be ways around this for Europe, which has limited speech anyway. That is, if email is not used, you could have people post things people email in, it limits it, but they will find ways around this. What possible good are they claiming this for? What a load of crap. Europe is a fascist state.

Thread: Bilderberg planning on Shutting down Free Speech on Sites like this

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

Bilderberg planning on Shutting down Free Speech on Sites like this

Posting Permissions

Most Americans Support Using The Military To Conduct Mass...

Hotel Quietly Converted Into Migrant Shelter In Up-And-Coming...

BREAKING: State Prosecutors Won’t Retry Arizona Rancher George...

Large Alligator Spotted in Texas-Mexico Border River, Governor...

Sanctuary County Maryland: Illegal Alien Accused of Killing...

Nicaragua Sees Nearly $1 Billion in Remittances from the U.S. in...

72 Hours Till Deadline: Durbin moves on Amnesty

Illegal immigration is costing American hospitals billions of...

ALIEN INVASION: Hundreds of illegal immigrants enter San Diego...

The illegal alien Satanic ritual murder of American Genesis...