Thread: Boundless Immigration: The Silent Killer of the Welfare Sta

Boundless Immigration: The Silent Killer of the Welfare State

Posted by dhorowitz3
Tuesday, April 12th at 12:53PM EDT



As we finally embark on the imperative discussion of entitlement reform, we cannot overlook immigration and its disproportionate effect on the welfare state.

Our immigration system is stuck in the Kennedy days of the 1960’s when our population was half of what it is today. Over the past few decades, in addition to the migration of 12 million+ illegals, we have allowed legal immigration to spiral out of control. We no longer promote an immigration system which benefits Americans, rather an unsustainable system of chain migration. This system encourages immigration which is too random, too low skilled, and quite simply too much. While our historical average for annual immigration ranged from 200,000-400,000, the current inane system has allowed for over 1 million new immigrants almost every year for the past decade. Again, a disproportionate number of those immigrants are low skilled.

There are obviously numerous challenges that are endemic in such a reckless immigration system, but the detrimental factor that is most relevant to the budget fight is the strain on our welfare system. Yesterday, Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies published a timely study on the impact of immigration on the welfare state. Here are some key findings:

In 2009 (based on data collected in 2010), 57 percent of households headed by an immigrant (legal and illegal) with children (under eighteen) used at least one welfare program, compared to 39 percent for native households with children.
Households with children with the highest welfare use rates are those headed by immigrants from the Dominican Republic (82 percent), Mexico and Guatemala (75 percent), and Ecuador (70 percent). Those with the lowest use rates are from the United Kingdom (7 percent), India (19 percent), Canada (23 percent), and Korea (25 percent).
The states where immigrant households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62 percent); Texas, California, and New York (61 percent); Pennsylvania (59 percent); Minnesota and Oregon (56 percent); and Colorado (55 percent).
Welfare use tends to be high for both new arrivals and established residents. In 2009, 60 percent of households with children headed by an immigrant who arrived in 2000 or later used at least one welfare program; for households headed by immigrants who arrived before 2000 it was 55 percent.

Undoubtedly, as many have suggested, immigration in general has been good for the country throughout most of our history. However, the puerile platitudes from immigration advocates concerning the benefits of immigration are as vapid as an unqualified declaration of the advantages of calorie intake to the human body. Yes, a certain amount is absolutely necessary for the body to function. A further increase in calorie intake might be innocuous in its effects. However, overindulgence in calorie consumption is inimical to the body. Furthermore, if the calories come from certain things like saturated fat, they can be harmful even in smaller quantities. Just ask Michelle Obama.

Our immigration system works the same way. We need a certain amount of immigration to sustain our growth and continue the American tradition to be the land of opportunity for those who seek liberty. But if we continue to invite an unlimited number of immigrants and grant a disproportionate bias towards low skilled newcomers, we will no longer serve the best interests of the American citizens. Any serious immigration system must be judicious in the numbers of immigrants, their origin (national security concerns), and their potential as an asset to this country. Instead, we have a system based on chain migration, and in some ways, even a random lottery.

The last time we invited so many immigrants was during the great immigration wave from 1880-1924. At that time, there was no robust welfare state to join as a permanent rent-seeker. Now, the welfare state is so entrenched that even the boldest reform plans merely call for a reduction in the rate of increase, or the reinstatement to pre-Obama levels. How are we ever going to control the entitlement crisis if we continue this reckless immigration policy?

Needless to say, illegal aliens are an even larger burden to the welfare system than legal immigrants. According to the CIS study, a whopping 71% of illegal alien households benefited from at least one welfare program on behalf of their U.S. born children, compared to 52% of legal immigrant households. If we were to grant them “a pathway to citizenshipâ€

Related Threads on Welfare Use by Immigrants


Illegal Aliens Get More Welfare Benefits Than Citizens
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-234185-welfare.html



Study: 57% of Immigrant Households with Children Use Welfare
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-233592-wel ... immigrants


Most Social Welfare Programs Closed to Illegal Aliens
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-233187-wel ... immigrants


Arizona migrant households use welfare at high rate, report
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-233738-wel ... immigrants

Poverty Immigrating to America’s Welfare State
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-233751-welfare.html

People keep saying that a major reason for massive immigration being a bad this is because too many of them are low skilled. I say that it doesn't matter because if more of the immigrants are college educated, they will be taking the jobs that should go to American college graduates!

Whether they are low or high skilled, too many immigrants flooding the job market is not good for they will in the end take SOMEONE'S job. There has been terrible problems with the medical community in California importing Asian nurses for a while now. It is getting to where the new nurse graduates in California cannot get jobs anymore because too many foreign nurses are being imported.