Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member fedupinwaukegan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Waukegan, IL
    Posts
    6,134

    Breaking News House Passes Puerto Rico Statehood Measure

    Breaking News House Passes Puerto Rico Statehood Measure

    just saw this on Fox. No story yet. Now what does this mean...

    http://www.foxnews.com/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member dregerk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bertram, Texas, United States
    Posts
    829

    reply

    It means that the left wing nut jobs in the House blessed it, notw it goes to the Senate. Where it will be killed!
    Any and all comments & Opinions and postings by me are considered of my own opinion, and not of any ORG that I belong to! PERIOD!

  3. #3
    JAK
    JAK is offline
    Senior Member JAK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,226
    O M G ! ! !

    After watching Glen Beck and the comment that one or some of the "refounders" said they were lied to, I was hoping it wouldn't make it at all! How STUPID can these people be?!!!!
    Please help save America for our children and grandchildren... they are counting on us. THEY DESERVE the goodness of AMERICA not to be given to those who are stealing our children's future! ... and a congress who works for THEM!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    House Of Representatives

    Articlecomments
    Updated April 29, 2010

    House Approves Puerto Rico Statehood Measure
    By John Brandt Chad Pergram
    - FOXNews.com

    The House voted Thursday to allow Puerto Ricans to decide their own political future and relationship with the United States.

    The vote was 223 to 169. Rep. Louise Slaughter,D-N.Y. voted present.

    The bill introduced a two-step ballot measure for Puerto Rico to decide if its residents want to change their current relationship with the United States. If they vote to change their status, they can then choose to become a state, pursue independence, or seek some other "political association between sovereign nations." ‬‪ ‬‪

    Proponents say the measure gives citizens of the island the right to self-determination.‬‪ ‬‪Critics say the measure is a device to impose statehood on a population that doesn't want it.‬‪ ‬‪Thursday's action was nonbinding, and if Puerto Ricans eventually select statehood, Congress would still have to vote to admit the island to the union as the 51st state.‬‪ ‬‪
    The issue divided Democrats and Republicans alike as liberal Democrats with ties to Puerto Rico teamed with conservative Republicans to oppose the measure.

    The divides were particularly stark among members of the House Republican leadership team. House Minority Leader John Boehner,R-Ohio, voted against the legislation. Meantime, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., and Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence, R-Ind., voted in favor.

    Puerto Rico Gov. Luis Fortuno (R) cobbled together more than 50 Republican sponsors in favor of the package.

    But there was drama as the majority Democrats narrowly avoided an upset on the House floor.

    Republicans attempted to add provisions to the legislation that would have made English the official language of a potential Puerto Rican state.

    Republicans also tried to modify the bill by banning any infringement of the Second Amendment in Puerto Rico.

    The Democratic majority defeated the GOP effort, 198 to 194.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04 ... d-measure/

  5. #5
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    This was not just Democrats, I heard mike Pence support this legislation along with other Republicans....and guess what Luis GutierreZ was against it, I was so confused what anyone was thinking when they were done debating I am still confused.

    Thank goodness it goes to the Senate.
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    My guess SoSad is because it is the "self-determination" language. Perhaps Pence and the other GOPs liked that choice to be available for these people.

    Anyway, the measure is non-binding which means it cannot become a law without another statehood formal legislation by Congress.

  7. #7
    Senior Member alisab's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,136
    This is a confusing thing: I see this as bad in more welfare, and government handouts due to the low income in that area but good b/c they serve in our military and are part of our Country anyway but don't pay the same taxes and are considered a 'commonwealth?'

    If this passes what are the good and bad points for those who understand this. Very confusing issue and more confusing watching the debate today for those who stood for and against it???

    Help
    Once abolish the God and the government becomes the God.*** -G.K. Chesterton from the book 'The Shack' by Wm. Paul Young-

  8. #8
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    Im lost on this one too. Does PR even WANT to become a state? Why can't they continue to stand on thier own? Why do these politicians want them? More taxpayers?

    Does this mean we will have to add another star to our flag?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    319
    If Glenn is right on this and I believe he is it means the dims will have control for decades and this country will be totally destroyed and barry will be another Hugo....
    Detect, Detain, and Deport - The 3-D method of choice!!

  10. #10
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Puerto Rico has been under U.S. sovereignty for over a century and Puerto Ricans have been U.S. citizens since 1917.[1][2][3] Since the establishment of the current Commonwealth status in 1952, further local attempts to change the island's political status took place in 1967, 1993, and 1998. An additional referendum held in 1991 sought to amend the relationship through an amendment to the Puerto Rican constitution. Each time, the results favored retaining the commonwealth status over the possible independence of Puerto Rico and statehood alternatives.

    Although Puerto Rico presently has a certain amount of local autonomy, according to the U.S. Constitution ultimate governance of the island is retained by both the U.S. Congress and President.[4][5] Thus, plebiscite results (and especially if not authorized by the Congress), while they reflect public sentiment, and thus bear some impact, can be ignored by Congress. Ultimately, the results of Puerto Rican plebiscites are opinions, although Congressional resolutions have expressed support for following the will of the Puerto Rican people.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ ... uerto_Rico
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •