Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Hybrid View
-
06-29-2026, 11:59 AM #1
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Federal Law Does NOT Require Mail-In Ballots to Be Rece
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Federal Law Does NOT Require Mail-In Ballots to Be Received by Election Day – Amy Coney Barrett, Roberts Side with Liberal Justices
by Cristina Laila Jun. 29, 2026 9:30 am

The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 that federal law does not require mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day.
The lawsuit challenging the mail-ballots was filed by the Republican National Committee and the Libertarian Party of Mississippi.
Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion and said state laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day do not conflict with federal law.
Chief Justice Roberts joined Amy Coney Barrett and sided with the liberal justices.
“A Mississippi law permits the counting of absentee ballots postmarked by election day but received up to five days later. We must decide whether the federal election-day statutes preempt Mississippi’s law.
They do not,” Amy Coney Barrett wrote.
“The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose,” Barrett wrote in the majority opinion.
“Due dates for absentee ballots have shifted over time. During the Civil War, States that allowed absentee voting imposed an election-day deadline for ballot receipt,” Coney Barrett said.
Recall that earlier this year Conservative Justice Samuel Alito blasted the endless counting of mail-in ballots during oral arguments.
“We have lots of phrases that involve two words, the second of which is ‘day.’ Labor Day, Memorial Day, George Washington’s birthday, Independence Day, birthday, and Election Day,” Alito said.
“They are all particular days. So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase ‘Election Day,’ I think this is the day in which everything is going to take place,” Alito added.
Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett appeared skeptical during the oral arguments.
BREAKING…please check back for updates.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-law-does-not/
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Similar Threads
-
Federal appeals court upholds Texas voter ID requirement for mail-in ballots
By Airbornesapper07 in forum Non-Citizen & illegal migrant votersReplies: 0Last Post: 08-07-2025, 04:50 PM -
BREAKING! Supreme Court Decision To Block Late Mail-In Election Votes Now Set In Moti
By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-30-2024, 06:52 AM -
Supreme Court rules Trump must remain on primary, general ballots in 2024 election
By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 03-05-2024, 05:18 PM -
GOOD NEWS! Supreme Court Rules Against Universal Vote-By-Mail in Texas — Thieving Dem
By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 01-15-2021, 08:49 AM -
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Mail-In/Absentee Ballots with No Dates or Handwritte
By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-23-2020, 09:14 PM


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
Breaking News: Mamdani Goes Hides In Terror as Italians Revolt...
07-10-2026, 11:47 PM in General Discussion