Thread: Careening from one budget crisis to another is no way to govern

Careening from one budget crisis to another is no way to govern

12/19/17 11:40 AM EST



The on-again, off-again threat of a government shutdown and the repeated reliance on temporary funding resolutions to keep federal agencies afloat — a political drama we are now once again experiencing— represents a huge disservice to the American people.

Careening from one budget crisis to another has eroded the capabilities of our government on everything from national defense to the delivery of social services and unfortunately has become the norm rather than the exception.

The current stalemate has left the children’s health program in limbo, held up disaster relief and immigration enforcement funding, placed constraints on our military services and created headaches for agencies across the government. In the long run, Congress is contributing to a waste of taxpayer dollars.

Navy Secretary Richard Spencer, for example, told a U.S. Naval Institute forum on Dec. 4 that his service has wasted $4 billion since 2011 because of continued budget ambiguity that has stalled new acquisition programs, resulting in deferred maintenance, hindered troop readiness and caused a wide range of operational inefficiencies.

“We have put $4 billion in a trash can, poured lighter fluid on it and burned it,” Spencer said. “Four billion is enough to buy a squadron of F-35s, two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, 3,000 Harpoon missiles.

"It’s enough money to buy us additional capacity that we need. Instead, it’s lost because of inefficiency in the ways of the continuing resolution," Spencer said.

Current and former federal executives have said the inability of Congress to meet annual funding deadlines and instead turn to short-term spending bills has hampered efforts to plan and prudently manage their agencies.

Temporary funding has delayed private-sector contracts for a range of services and purchases, including information technology upgrades and plans to protect federal computer systems from cyberattacks. It has made it impossible to terminate unnecessary activities, stalled critical hiring decisions, resulted in lost productivity, delayed new projects and caused lapses in the delivery of grants to states and localities.

Members of Congress often rail against the inefficiency in government, but seldom take responsibility for being part of the problem. When Congress fails to fulfill even its basic constitutional responsibility to appropriate money for our government, the result is usually finger-pointing, not problem-solving — and it comes quite literally at the expense of the American people.

President Trump tweeted in May that, “Our country needs a good ‘shutdown’...to fix mess,” but is likely learning that brinkmanship around the budget contributes to the very mess against which he campaigned.

It is important that his appointees, like Secretary Spencer, are speaking out and quantifying the colossal waste that results from temporary funding measures. No one benefits when government operations are disrupted, not the public and not our elected leaders.

In the past decade, Congress has resorted to more than three dozen interim funding measures to keep government agencies running, with those organizations having to scramble to meet their obligations.

Since 1995, there have been two significant partial government shutdowns, one that lasted 21 days from Dec. 16, 1995 to Jan. 6, 1996, and a 16-day closure that occurred in October 2013.

During the 2013 event, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention curtailed its monitoring of disease outbreaks, reviews of veterans’ disability applications virtually came to a halt, National Parks closed, new drug approvals were delayed, environmental inspections stopped, small businesses couldn’t get federal loan approvals, seriously ill patients were denied access to National Institutes of Health clinical trials and 850,000 federal workers were furloughed.

In a new report, S&P Global analysts said a shutdown would cost the economy about $6.5 billion a week, and if lasting for an extended period of time, could possibly curtail economic momentum.

There are always disagreements about policy priorities, funding levels and the role of government, but Congress has routinely taken the process to the extreme, failing to fulfill one of its primary leadership responsibilities. This has contributed to the erosion of public trust in government and served to undermine the central institution of our democracy.

It is time to put the threat of a shutdown where it belongs, back in the category of the unthinkable, and to make short-term funding resolutions the exception rather than the rule.

It is also time to consider biennial budget and appropriations processes to give agencies a higher degree of certainty. Most of all, it is time for our elected representatives to do their jobs.

http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/3...-way-to-govern

I totally agree. Not sure what you do to stop it from happening, but it would be nice if someone would or could stop it.

Go after taxes owed to the federal government. Usually about $450 billion per year, so that means we have lost about a trillion dollars every three years in the last decade, and maybe every four years prior to that. Nobody will talk about this, since the IRS is the number one whipping horse in the US. Whether the rich are Democrats or Republicans they've got offshore tax havens, or at least accountants figuring out how to avoid paying.

The underground economy is the other big leak in the whole system.At least get Social Security on firmer footing. I don't think the average retired person is just a drain on society. Most want to have something productive to do.

Most of that isn't real which is why they don't waste time and money going after it. It's theoretical. Sooner or later, hopefully, sooner, people will realize that the income tax is a failed system that has never paid the bills, not once, in its 114 year history. But it has wasted people's time, ruined businesses, run our manufacturers out of our country, left a swath of unemployment, depressed wages, ruined lives, bad personal and business decisions based on tax implications, and to date $20 trillion in unpaid bills. Americans who really want to solve this will eventually figure out that the only fair tax is an inclusive retail sales tax on consumption of new goods and services collected at the final point of sale with a rebate for a household consumption allowance. Until then, everyone want watch the debt clock and worry about whether they're going to continue to fund SS and Medicare.

No it is because "they" are not clever enough to go after it. And frankly as more people go into retirement status, and their taxable income drops, flat tax and fair tax lose their appeal. Paul Ryan has a single track mind apparently---he seems devoted to cratering the social safety net. I met him in 2010 and told him there were smaller fixes to entitlement reform. Diminishing Social Security or Medicare will automatically turn the GOP into a minority party. I would think that if employment is picking up Medicaid should be dropping. Reforming the SSI system is another reform. And probably several other piecemeal programs. Ryan doesn't have the patience for that.

Why would fair tax lose its appeal when you go into retirement status?