Thread: Charles Krauthammer: Benghazi Obama’s 10PM Call to Clinton Was Crafting Cover Story

Benghazi… Obama’s 10PM Call to Clinton Was About Crafting a “Cover Story” While 2 Victims Were Still Alive

Posted on May 30, 2013 by Dean Garrison

On Tuesday Night Charles Krauthammer dropped another Benghazi bombshell on The O’Reilly Factor. He claims that the President’s phone call to Hillary Clinton was made so that they could develop their “cover story” shortly before she released this statement at approximately 10 PM:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

The first confirmed death would have been Sean Smith whose body was found some six hours before this statement was issued. It is Charles Krauthammer’s contention that at least two of the victims were still alive when Clinton’s statement was released and also during the President’s call to Clinton.

I think there is a bigger story here that will in time come out. The biggest scandal of all, the biggest question is what was the president doing in those eight hours. He had a routine meeting at five o’clock. He never after during the eight hours when our guys have their lives in danger, he never called the Secretary of Defense, he never calls the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, he never called the CIA Director, Who does he call? But five hours in he calls the Secretary of State. And after the phone call she releases a statement essentially about the video and how we denounce any intolerance. It looks as if the only phone call is to construct a cover story at a time when the last two Americans who died were still alive and fighting for their lives. There’s the scandal and that has to be uncovered.

It should also be noted that roughly four hours before Clinton issued her statement there was an email sent to the White House. Factcheck.org reports:

6:07 p.m.: The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts. (The existence of the email was not disclosed until Reuters reported it on Oct. 24.)

Krauthammer’s reasoning is solid. Government officials were already aware at this point that Al Qaeda linked terrorists were claiming credit for the attack. Obama and Clinton likely had to get their story straight before Clinton released her statement.

Krauthammer is not the only one questioning this phone call. AIM’s Andrew McCarthy reported on May 22nd:

“What would you be focusing on in the Benghazi investigation?” I spent many years in the investigation biz, so it’s only natural that I’ve been asked that question a lot lately.

I had the good fortune to be trained in Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Rudy famously made his mark by making law enforcement reflect what common sense knew: Enterprises take their cues from the top. Criminal enterprises are no different: The capos do not carry out the policy of the button-men – it’s the other way around.

So if I were investigating Benghazi, I’d be homing in on that 10 p.m. phone call. That’s the one between President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton – the one that’s gotten close to zero attention.

Benghazi is not a scandal because of Ambassador Susan Rice, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, and “talking points.” The scandal is about Rice and Nuland’s principals, and about what the talking points were intended to accomplish. Benghazi is about derelictions of duty by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton before and during the massacre of our ambassador and three other American officials, as well as Obama and Clinton’s fraud on the public afterward.

In another stunning turn of events, WND’s Aaron Klein broke a huge story on Wednesday that uncovered a non-reported Library of Congress document from August 2012:

A Library of Congress report that received almost no media attention detailed – one month before the deadly Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi – how al-Qaida established a major base of operations in Libya in the aftermath of the U.S.-NATO campaign that deposed Muammar Gadhafi and his secular regime.

The report documented al-Qaida and affiliated organizations were establishing terrorist training camps and pushing Taliban-style Islamic law in Libya while the new, Western-backed Libyan government incorporated jihadists into its militias.

The document named Benghazi as a new central headquarters for al-Qaida activities.

Amazing. The Library of Congress reports that Benghazi, Libya is the new central hub for Al Qaeda activities in the region and Clinton and Obama insisted on trying to spin this incident. The report is 54 pages but if you would like to see it, you can find it here.

The question remains the same.

What did Obama know and when did he know it?

As more and more people are forced to perjure themselves in order to cover for the president, we get closer and closer to the truth.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter.

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/05/30/...e-still-alive/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/benghazi-%96...unning-278192/

Benghazi Scandal - Benghazi Eyewitnesses Speak Congress Questions CIA Contractors - Kelly File

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=j88AZ2TF64A

Major Benghazi Inconsistency Revealed after Closed Session

Posted by Bill Bissell, Admin II on November 17, 2013 at 10:52pm in Patriot Action Alerts
View Discussions

Reprinted with full permission of Shoebat Foundation

CIA personnel who witnessed the Benghazi attacks on 9/11/12 testified in front of the House Intelligence Committee behind closed doors this week. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the committee and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who sits on the committee, appear to be at complete variance on one key issue. That issue?

Was there a lull in the fighting from approximately 0100 – 0500?

Nunes (L) and Rogers (R): Conflicting accounts on a key Benghazi fact. Rogers says yes; Nunes says no.

The “Independent” Accountability Review Board (ARB) clearly implies that there was a four-hour lull, in its Unclassified Report. After closed-door testimony this week, Rogers indicates the lull was approximately three hours. Nunes indicated that there was none at all.

So, after talking to witnesses and getting more details, how come there are even more discrepancies?

This detail is important because Obama administration officials have attempted to assert that the reason help never came for the first attack is that there wasn’t sufficient time to respond. The reason given for why no help came for the second attack, which took place more than seven hours later, was because they thought everything was over. If there weren’t two separate attacks but one protracted fight that took place on two proximate fields of battle, the administration has a major problem on its hands.

That leads to an interview between Fox News Channel’s Megyn Kelly and Rep. Rogers, in which the closed door testimony is discussed.

During this exchange, Rogers essentially echoes the findings of the ARB, saying that there was a lull in the fighting before the deaths of Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, that lasted about three hours (ARB implies it was four). He is then caught flat-footed when Kelly plays a short excerpt of an exchange between Nunes and Chris Wallace from one day earlier:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=j88AZ2TF64A


This was an excellent accountability moment for Kelly and a weak response from Rogers, who seems to be saying that a key fact can be disagreed on by him and a fellow committee member from the same party after hearing witnesses give firsthand accounts. This is simply not acceptable or believable. As a key point, it should have been made clear during the session so there wouldn’t be any inconsistencies.

In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee earlier this year, former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said the following:

“The bottom line is this: that we were not dealing with a prolonged or continuous assault which could have been brought to an end by a U.S. military response… Very simply, although we had forces deployed to the region, time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, [and] events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.” {emphasis ours}

If this obvious contradiction continues to play in the media, look for Nunes to fall in line behind Rogers, the chairman. Should that happen, it should raise more questions, not fewer ones. If, as Rogers said, both he and Nunes heard things differently, we deserve to know why.

The conflicting accounts from Rogers and Nunes should be explained, not dismissed. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) also sits on the Committee. Perhaps she can help clear some of this up.

Here is the full interview between Nunes and Wallace:

Click Shoebat Foundation for Nunes, and Wallace interview in case the full interview embedd doesn't work


Walid Shoebat

http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...sg_share_topic

Obama LIED About Benghazi Attack!!! (Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer Interview)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNZAw8hpIZs

Hillary’s “Phone Call” Came, And She Used It To Cover Up With Obama

Posted on 19 November, 2013 by Dylan



By: Brandon Walker

Free Patriot The “phone call” that Hillary talked about in her campaign add came at 10 AM EST instead of her dreaded 3 AM. Charles Krauthammer dropped a bombshell on The O’Reilly Factor that the phone call at 10 PM was to conspire with President Obama on getting their story concocted for the press. The bad part is two American Soldiers were fighting for their lives when she made her press statement. What’s worse is that the 54 page article in the Library of Congress backs up Krauthammer’s account!



We all remember the 2008 presidential race where Democrat candidates Senator Hillary Clinton (D NY) was running against then Senator Barack Obama (D IL) for the slot in the race. She placed a lot of campaign funds to run a nation wide add saying that now President Obama wouldn’t know what to do and didn’t have the experience to handle a high pressure situation if he got a “3 AM Phone Call”.

Well, a dreaded phone call came in Benghazi the night Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans and injuring 10 other American personnel. She got a phone call with President Obama right before making this speech.

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.~Associated Press Transcript

We know that this was a lie, and can prove it. Her phone records prove that the “President” she spoke to was none other than President Obama. What’s more is Charles Krauthammer dropped his bombshell live on TV about this. It seems that the first confirmed dead was 6 hours earlier by the name of Sean Smith. He contends that two of the 4 were still alive during her phone call with Obama and the interview.



Not only is the account according to him plausible but extremely credible.

What the White House Staff and Hillary wish us to forget was recorded on the timeline of events from Factcheck.org. There was an e-mail that detailed the attack as Al Qaeda based militants.

6:07 p.m.: The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts.

To be clear, the reasoning is beyond solid on Krauthammer’s accusation at the then Secretary of State. We already knew it was Al Qaeda. There had been several e-mails begging for help that were either ignored or denied. The terrorists had already began claiming the credit before the last two individuals died in that battle.

They were still fighting for their lives against an overwhelming Al Qaeda presence and President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were too busy getting their story strait on the absolute dereliction of duty.

It seems that Krauthammer is not the only one to question this “phone call” either. It seems back in May, AIM’s Andrew McCarthy wrote the following:

What would you be focusing on in the Benghazi investigation?” I spent many years in the investigation biz, so it’s only natural that I’ve been asked that question a lot lately.

I had the good fortune to be trained in Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Rudy famously made his mark by making law enforcement reflect what common sense knew: Enterprises take their cues from the top. Criminal enterprises are no different: The capos do not carry out the policy of the button-men – it’s the other way around.

So if I were investigating Benghazi, I’d be homing in on that 10 p.m. phonecall. That’s the one between President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton – the one that’s gotten close to zero attention.

Benghazi is not a scandal because of Ambassador Susan Rice, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, and “talking points.” The scandal is about Rice and Nuland’s principals, and about what the talking points were intended to accomplish. Benghazi is about derelictions of duty by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton before and during the massacre of our ambassador and three other American officials, as well as Obama and Clinton’s fraud on the public afterward.”

To put the icing on the cake, WND’s Aaron Klein came out Wednesday after Krauthammer’s accusations with another bombshell. The PDF file from Libya survived the purging of documentation and sits at the Library of Congress. WND writes:

A Library of Congress report that received almost no media attention detailed – one month before the deadly Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi – how al-Qaeda established a major base of operations in Libya in the aftermath of the U.S.-NATO campaign that deposed Muammar Gadhafi and his secular regime.

The report documented al-Qaeda and affiliated organizations were establishing terrorist training camps and pushing Taliban-style Islamic law in Libya while the new, Western-backed Libyan government incorporated jihadists into its militias.

The document named Benghazi as a new central headquarters for al-Qaida activities.

See more via Free Patriot

http://gopthedailydose.com/2013/11/1...d-cover-obama/