Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266

    Charlie Rose Wonders If Republicans Will 'Overplay Their Hand' on Obama Scandals

    Charlie Rose Wonders If Republicans Will 'Overplay Their Hand' on Obama Scandals


    Published: 5/17/2013 4:43 PM ET



    By Matthew Balan


    In the latest instance of liberal journalists thinking alike, Charlie Rose asked practically the same question on Friday's CBS This Morning that ABC's George Stephanopoulos did on Good Morning America. Rose wondered if congressional Republicans "may overplay their hand and somehow squander what they think is opportunity" on the three scandals currently surrounding the Obama White House.

    The CBS anchor proposed this question not even four minutes after Stephanopoulos asked ABC correspondent Jonathan Karl, "Are some of [the GOP] leaders worried that some of the Republicans may be overplaying their hand?"

    Rose and co-anchor Norah O'Donnell brought on correspondent Major Garrett to discuss the IRS, Justice Department/AP, and Benghazi controversies. O'Donnell first asked, "How much has the White House been on the defensive this week, and what are they doing?" Garrett replied, in part, that he had "covered lots of White Houses in defensive crouches in the middle of a scandal, and this White House feels about the same as those previous ones – hunkered down and trying to get its message out over the din of scandal-related questions."

    The CBS journalist continued by forwarding the administration's spin on each scandal:

    MAJOR GARRETT: The White House feels...that they've succeeded in, at least, putting some distance between the President and the IRS scandal; a great distance between the President and the scandal involving the Justice Department search of phone logs from the Associated Press; and they're still dealing with Benghazi, but they believe that wound has largely been cauterized by the release of more than 100 pages of e-mails about all the conversation there. So, on balance, the White House feels it's in stronger position today than it was on Monday, when it felt like it was a bit under siege.
    Rose then asked his "overplaying their hand" question. Garrett answered by asserting that "in politics, that is always possible, and it's a huge concern the Republican leaders have on Capitol Hill. They don't want rank and file members to lob charges that can't be substantiated by the facts....The White House believes its greatest ally, in all these scandals, are Republicans who overreach, and they will try to exploit that to the maximum whenever they can."

    Near the end of the segment, O'Donnell and Garrett discussed a detail of the IRS scandal that Stephanopoulos and ABC journalist Jonathan Karl omitted during their segment: how the former head of the office that targeted conservative groups, while giving a pass to liberal ones, now leads the division that will be handling ObamaCare:

    NORAH O'DONNELL: And Major, what about the concern that the woman who directed the IRS unit that deals with these tax-exempt organizations and targeting these conservative groups is also in charge at the IRS of ObamaCare and enforcing ObamaCare?

    GARRETT: That's right. Sarah Hall Ingram is her name. I've asked several White House officials this morning, is that a position that she's going to retain going forward, because that has policy implications and it has political implications. And Republicans are really going to shift this IRS question – not just from what past practices, which the President called unforgivable and unpardonable – but also, what the IRS will do in the implementation of the President's health care law.

    Now, this woman, Sarah Hall Ingram, who was there at the tax-exempt office when these questionable practices were under taken, is now at the very position of implementing that IRS supervision and gathering of fees or taxes under ObamaCare...She will be a political target for Republicans – and a juicy one at that – and the White House knows it.

    Earlier, Rose had also wondered if "the White House worries that this will preempt everything else – take the attention of Washington on scandal, and not on immigration reform and a whole lot of other issues." Garrett claimed that "the immigration issue seems completely untouched by all of this scandal/controversy. It is moving on its own momentum." He added, however, that "because of the IRS issue, significant Republicans I've talked to don't believe a grand bargain on federal budget issues is possible with this White House."
    The full transcript of the Major Garrett segment from Friday's CBS This Morning:
    05/17/2013
    07:08 am EDT
    CBS This Morning

    CHARLIE ROSE: Over the past few days, the White House has tried to contain three big scandals.

    NORAH O'DONNELL: But has the damage been done, or can the White House get beyond the controversies?

    Major Garrett is at the White House this morning. Major, good morning.

    MAJOR GARRETT: Good morning, Norah and Charlie.

    [CBS News Graphic: "Presidential Pressure: White House Reacts To Recent Scandals"]

    O'DONNELL: Well, how much has the White House been on the defensive this week, and what are they doing?

    GARRETT: Well, the White House has felt in a defensive crouch all week. And I've covered lots of White Houses in defensive crouches in the middle of a scandal, and this White House feels about the same as those previous ones – hunkered down and trying to get its message out over the din of scandal-related questions.

    The White House feels, by Friday of this week – today, that they've succeeded in, at least, putting some distance between the President and the IRS scandal; a great distance between the President and the scandal involving the Justice Department search of phone logs from the Associated Press; and they're still dealing with Benghazi, but they believe that wound has largely been cauterized by the release of more than 100 pages of e-mails about all the conversation there. So, on balance, the White House feels it's in stronger position today than it was on Monday, when it felt like it was a bit under siege.

    ROSE: Major, the Republicans are pushing forward on this. Is it possible they may overplay their hand and somehow squander what they think is opportunity?

    GARRETT: In politics, that is always possible, and it's a huge concern the Republican leaders have on Capitol Hill. They don't want rank and file members to lob charges that can't be substantiated by the facts. Every investigation has a fact pattern, and when you stick with facts, you can win a political argument. The White House believes its greatest ally, in all these scandals, are Republicans who overreach, and they will try to exploit that to the maximum whenever they can.

    ROSE: One question is whether the White House worries that this will preempt everything else – take the attention of Washington on scandal, and not on immigration reform and a whole lot of other issues.

    GARRETT: Well, let's take up immigration for a second, Charlie. I've talked to a significant number of Republicans; people here at the White House; and Democrats who are allies of the White House on the immigration bill. And the immigration issue seems completely untouched by all of this scandal/controversy. It is moving on its own momentum – a momentum that Republicans and Democrats largely share. The Senate is looking toward a vote next month – could be 65, 70 votes for an immigration bill. That will put real pressure on House Republicans to move that forward. That doesn't appear to be in any way slowed by this scandal/controversy.

    [CBS News Graphic: "Presidential Pressure: Can White House Return To Agenda?"]

    I will tell you this, though: because of the IRS issue, significant Republicans I've talked to don't believe a grand bargain on federal budget issues is possible with this White House, because their base will not accept, not tolerate a deal with a President who, either willingly or unwillingly, oversaw an IRS that dealt with their base groups – their constituent Republican groups as aggressively as the IRS did. I think that has diminished possibilities for a grand bargain between Republicans and this White House.

    [CBS News Graphic: "IRS Scandal: Following closely, 54%; Following some, 22%; Not following, 24%; Source: Gallup Poll: Margin Of Error: +/- 4% Pts."]

    O'DONNELL: And Major, what about the concern that the woman who directed the IRS unit that deals with these tax-exempt organizations and targeting these conservative groups is also in charge at the IRS of ObamaCare and enforcing ObamaCare?

    GARRETT: That's right. Sarah Hall Ingram is her name. I've asked several White House officials this morning, is that a position that she's going to retain going forward, because that has policy implications and it has political implications. And Republicans are really going to shift this IRS question – not just from what past practices, which the President called unforgivable and unpardonable – but also, what the IRS will do in the implementation of the President's health care law.

    Now, this woman, Sarah Hall Ingram, who was there at the tax-exempt office when these questionable practices were under taken, is now at the very position of implementing that IRS supervision and gathering of fees or taxes under ObamaCare – is there. She will be a political target for Republicans – and a juicy one at that – and the White House knows it.

    [CBS News Graphic: "Feelings About Affordable Care Act: Unfavorable, 40%; Favorable, 35%; Don't know/refused. 34%; Source: Kaiser Family Foundation Health Tracking Poll, April 18-21; Margin of Error: +/- 3%"]

    O'DONNELL: Major Garrett, thank you.

    — Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.



    http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/charlie-rose-wonders-if-republicans-will-overplay-their-hand-obama-scandal

    No amount of "over Play" will outdo what this Commander and thief has done, with the help of his merry Band of criminals, including you Charlie Rose!!!


    Lets keep all their feet to the fire folks they are not liking it one bit, keep that pressure on!!!!
    Last edited by kathyet; 05-21-2013 at 09:29 AM.

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    newseditor May 19, 2013

    Big Government is watching you

    inShare

    Email
    FB share




    By Tom Keane



    “ THREE SCANDALS — shifting explanations about the attacks in Benghazi, the targeting of conservative political groups by the Internal Revenue Service, and the administration’s secret inquiry into the Associated Press — dominated politics last week. All self-inflicted wounds, they threaten to upend Barack Obama’s second-term agenda as the inevitable investigations, denials, revelations, and resignations divert attention from everything else.
    But the real story here is less about misdeeds than it is about power. Consider how these three scandals mesh with other stories of the day: Escalating drone strikes, bullying investigations of targets such as cyber-genius Aaron Swartz, the shelter-in-place commands in the aftermath of the Marathon bombings, the rush to a never-ending surveillance state, and the like. The impression one gets is of government at all levels consolidating power unto itself and of a government that is ever more willing to use that power. It makes for scary stuff, stuff that has the potential to reset our politics. “
    Read More

    TOM KEANE

    http://conservative50plus.com/blog/b...-watching-you/

    Big Government is watching you


    By Tom Keane

    | Globe Columnist May 19, 2013


    AFP/Getty Images
    President Obama paused while making a statement Wednesday at the White House about the IRS scandal.


    ThREE SCANDALS — shifting explanations about the attacks in Benghazi, the targeting of conservative political groups by the Internal Revenue Service, and the administration’s secret inquiry into the Associated Press — dominated politics last week. All self-inflicted wounds, they threaten to upend Barack Obama’s second-term agenda as the inevitable investigations, denials, revelations, and resignations divert attention from everything else.

    But the real story here is less about misdeeds than it is about power. Consider how these three scandals mesh with other stories of the day: Escalating drone strikes, bullying investigations of targets such as cyber-genius Aaron Swartz, the shelter-in-place commands in the aftermath of the Marathon bombings, the rush to a never-ending surveillance state, and the like. The impression one gets is of government at all levels consolidating power unto itself and of a government that is ever more willing to use that power. It makes for scary stuff, stuff that has the potential to reset our politics.
    The story of America has been a tale of two competing visions of government: one expansionist, the other sharply curtailed. Many of those who fought for independence were suspicious of centralized authority. They had seen what a monarchy could do and they didn’t want it repeated on their soil. Thus the first government they set up under 1781’s Articles of Confederation was extraordinarily weak, without even the power to tax or enforce congressional decisions.
    Eventually, those weaknesses were so overwhelming that almost everyone was forced to admit something more was needed. That led us to the 1788 Constitution (the one we still have), which gave the national government more powers but was still fundamentally grounded on a philosophy of limited government. Power was fragmented among the three branches (legislative, executive, and judicial). The idea was to make change difficult and, sure enough, it’s hard to get stuff done in Washington.
    Related





    Still, we’ve strayed far from the 18th century’s ideals of limited government. Much of that has been purposeful, pushed by people who see the value of a more powerful state. The 16th Amendment, for example, approved the income tax (prohibited in the original Constitution) and gave the federal government access to personal information it never had before. The vast social programs of the New Deal and the Great Society (Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid) brought about enormous new levels of spending and, necessarily, new powers to police that spending. And regulation — the automatic response to every perceived ill — means bureaucrats are deeply involved in almost every aspect of economic life.
    The impression is of a government consolidating power unto itself.


    The most profound recent change, however, has been our current era’s rapidly advancing technology. Government now has the technological tools at hand to know far more about the details of citizens’ lives than ever before. If officials wanted to, they could use surveillance cameras to follow every one of us around through almost every moment of our lives. If they wanted to, they could use electronic eavesdropping to track every web search, text, social post, or phone call we make.
    We’ve comforted ourselves in all of this with the belief that, while government might potentially have all of this power, it would rarely use it or that, when it did, its use would be well-intentioned and circumscribed. Plus we had rules and systems to stop any abuse: The Bill of Rights, the due process clause, oversight by the media and courts, the two-party system, and strong procedural requirements.
    What the Benghazi-IRS-AP scandals suggest — and what victims of drone strikes and people such as Aaron Swartz might testify — is that these protections are inadequate. Rules can be bent or ignored, people are venal, and in the pursuit of what government officials think are good ends, any means become acceptable. Power, as the saying goes, corrupts, and absolute power — and surely, we’re getting close to that point, aren’t we? — corrupts absolutely.
    The trio of current scandals has already caused heads to roll and, doubtless, more will. More broadly, they may also cause people to rethink the intrusiveness of government in their everyday lives. There is a perception, largely correct, that Democrats favor a more expansionist view of the state while Republicans desire to scale it back. In the ying and yang of one party versus the other, the administration has handed the GOP a powerful argument for its own resurrection.
    Tom Keane can be reached at tomkeane@tomkeane.com.

    http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2...Q0J/story.html

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •