Thread: Close the door to all immigration.

Lets face it, NOBODY is going to look out for the Amerian citizen but us Americans, we love our country and we all know that what is happening here is the destruction of our country, our culture, our infrastucture and the future of our children and grandchildrens very right and existence as American citizens to live in the country our ancestors built, fought and died for.

We all know who built this country and it was not illegal aliens, if they had ever built any country they would not be here looking for a better life, because the countries they came from would not at this time be third world nations and they would not be here looking for a better life.

We need a moritorium on all immigration, I don't mean forever but until we stop or slow the crime, and fix some of the social problems that illegal,legal immigration, and insourceing and outsourceing,has caused our country.

It is our country and we have every right to want to fix it before it is to late, and anyone who is not a citizens has no right to tell us how many people we can and should take in. We the people know and recognize the changes in our country and it is our right to want to correct the damages to our society.

Originally Posted by Saki

“ There's no precedent for a successful(long-term) multicultural society, particularly if there's no shared language or tradition. Ultimately, only an authoritarian regime can keep the whole thing from flying apart. I don't know why the US thinks it will be the exception to the historical rule.

Case in point:.............IRAQ.

Saddam was the only thing keeping that mish-mosh of people together as one nation. Before that, it was colonialism, and now: occupation. Yugoslavia, the former USSR, Austro-Hungarian Empire -- you name it. Poly-got nations DO NOT work. As proven by the above examples, as well as the Roman Empire on the eve of its collapse. It is empiracle fact that multi-cultural, multi-lingual nations do not work unless under the heal of authoritarianism, colonialism, or foreign occupation......the USA is headed that way with the NAU, and eventual World Goverment dictatorship.

If we devolve into a poly-got nation with half a billion people, our fututre is cealed: a Third World nation of 1/2 billion people with no cultural and linguistic glue, under the heal of World Government dictatorship.

Harvard professor George Borjas found that by "increasing the supply of labor between 1980 and 2000, immigration reduced the average annual earnings of native-born men by an estimated $1,700, or roughly 4 percent." Of course, this is only part of the story.

Although I strongly believe in legal immigration, it's probably time to decrease the huge numbers of people who we allow to legally emigrate here. This would be good economically for working and middle class natives, and this would cause less density and strain on our neighborhoods, schools, health care system etc.

U.S. POPClock Projection

According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the resident population of the United States, projected to 10/01/07 at 01:13 GMT (EST+5) is

303,015,455

COMPONENT SETTINGS FOR SEPTEMBER 2007
One birth every.................................... 7 seconds
One death every................................. 13 seconds
One international migrant (net) every.. 26 seconds
Net gain of one person every................ 10 seconds

http://www.census.gov/population/www/popclockus.html

With the population that we now have I believe our doors to all immigration should be closed.

WE SHOULD ONLY ACCEPT NEW IMMIGRANTS IF CURRENT IMMIGRANTS LEAVE OR DIE. WE HAVE PLENTY OF IMMIGRANTS AND WE DONT NEED MORE.

After reading all the posts I can only wish everybody understands what Thomas is trying to say in the following article

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/opini ... =permalink

Note: toordaal posted a link to a NYT article written by Tom Friedman. Read at your own risk and displeasure. I personally strongly disagree with Friedmans opinions.

He is a Globalist!!! I couldn't disagree with anyone more than I do him!!!

SOSAD...

Yes, so the NYT has their resident Globalist on staff.... where's the resident 'protectionist' (eg. nationally-focused pro-American) writer at the NYT??? Oh, wait, that's right, there isn't one.

Originally Posted by PhredE

SOSAD...

Yes, so the NYT has their resident Globalist on staff.... where's the resident 'protectionist' (eg. nationally-focused pro-American) writer at the NYT??? Oh, wait, that's right, there isn't one.

Well Phred, it is the NYT need we say anything else!! Where is Sen. Diane Feinstien NOW!! I don't hear her do you, why is she not crying about fair and balanced reporting