Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
11-19-2016, 07:14 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 4,815
Congress DEFIES Obama! The Vote was 419 to 1
Congress DEFIES Obama! The Vote was 419 to 1
by Kosar | ThePoliticalInsider.com | published on November 19, 2016
There is no question: The American voters have soundly rejected 8 years of President Barack Obama’s policies by electing Donald J. Trump as our next President.
Obama shockingly (and incorrectly!) announced at a recent press conference that Trump probably wouldn’t scrap the dangerous and unconstitutional deal with the hostile Iranian regime, which has sent billions of dollars to our country’s enemy.
Obama announced:“My suspicion is that when the president-elect comes in and is consulting with his fellow Republicans on the Hill, that they will look at the facts. To unravel a deal that’s working and preventing Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon would be hard to explain.”However, the U.S. House of Representatives just rejected Obama’s policies about Iran in a huge way! The House voted to extend Iranian sanctions for a decade. The House sees Iran is a threat, and Obama’s weak foreign policy has made our country unsafe.
This is incredible:The House voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to extend an Iran sanctions law for another 10 years, amid growing worries that the U.S. needs to keep some leverage over Iran as it pushes for that country to implement the nuclear agreement.Read the full article: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/d...breaking-news/
-
11-19-2016, 09:12 PM #2
Obama was trying to let his muslim brothers get nuclear weapons. Hopefully it's not too late to stop them.
All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
-
11-19-2016, 09:38 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 4,815
They got the billions though...and seems even more. traitor obama
U.S. may have given Iran $33.6 billion in secret payments
Report reveals cash, gold transferred to Tehran in years before nuke deal
Published: 09/08/2016 at 5:43 PM
President Obama’s administration may gave gifted Iran an extra $33.6 billion in secret cash and gold payments between 2015 and 2016, an expert on the Iran nuclear deal told Congress.
Tehran received $700 million every month between January 2014 and July 2015 as Obama nailed down details of the nuclear agreement, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
Ultimately, the U.S. was set to pay Iran $11.9 billion, but Mark Dubowitz, executive director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said even details surrounding those funds are questionable.
“Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion
\in cash or in gold and other precious metals,” Dubowitz told Congress.
The latest news comes on the heels of reports that the U.S. gave Iran $1.7 billion in hard currency – more than $400 million more than originally reported – just prior to Iran releasing four American hostages.
The Obama administration delivered $400 million to Iran on Jan. 17, the day Iran agreed to free the Americans. Then, the U.S, presented Iran with two more installments totaling $1.3 billion on Jan. 22 and Feb. 5.
“Top administration officials were adamant that the cash payments were the best way to ensure that Iran got immediate access to this money due to its ongoing difficulty accessing international funds still sanctioned by the West,” the Free Beacon reported.
Now members of Congress are questioning the Obama administration payments to Iran in the years leading up to the final nuclear deal.
“In July, the Associated Press cited U.S. officials who estimated that Iran ‘brought home less than $20 billion.’ Were these funds repatriated to Tehran in cash or in gold and precious metals? Through the formal financial system? Or through some combination?” Dubowitz asked in his testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.
“The administration should also clarify if the $20 billion is inclusive of the $11.9 billion in [Joint Plan of Action] funds, or if the $20 billion was in addition to the $11.9 billion,” he said. “Either way, it is important to understand how funds were sent. The worst-case scenario here is that Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals.”
Dubowitz said a portion of the money was probably distributed in cash and other assets.
The Obama administration has argued that a cash payment was the only way to bypass sanctions and banking restrictions and ensure Iran received the money immediately.
“Iran had to have it in cash,” Paul Ahern, assistant general counsel for enforcement and intelligence at the Treasury Department, told Congress. “Iran was very aware of the difficulties it would face in accessing and using the funds if they were in any other form than cash, even after the lifting of sanctions.”
A cash payment “was the most reliable way that they received the funds in a timely manner, and it was the manner preferred by the relative foreign banks,” Ahren said.
Dubowitz said past disbursements were more than likely handled in the same way.
“If the White House could only send cash to Iran from the start of the JPOA period through the Tribunal payment that could amount to a grant total of 33.6 billion,” he said. “Did any of this money go through the formal financial system? If so, the administration is not being truthful about the 1.7 billion. If many billions arrived in Iran on pallets [of cash] this would be a pretty astounding revelation.”
Former Pentagon official and rogue regime expert Michael Rubin called cash payments “highly irregular,” according to the Free Beacon.
“There’s no reason it needed to be paid now. After all, successive administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have delayed payments so as to avoid funding Iranian terrorism,” Rubin said. “Likewise, if the United States freezes accounts linked to al Qaeda or Hamas, releasing it and saying, ‘It’s their money anyway,’ would not be a tenable explanation. Cash payments are highly irregular.”
Rubin said Iran has made it abundantly clear that Iran “perceived the payment to be a ransom,” regardless of what the White House has claimed.
“Not only has the delivery of the millions of dollars been perceived as a ransom, provided as an incentive to seize more hostages … but because the money was delivered in cash the payment bolstered the strength of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and augmented its ability to finance and conduct terrorism,” he said.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/u-s-may-have-given-iran-33-6-billion-in-secret-payments/#bGhDIE7Qio2hi8Bq.99
Last edited by artist; 11-19-2016 at 09:40 PM.
-
11-19-2016, 10:16 PM #4
Good Lord! That much money goes a long way towards them getting the bomb.
All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
-
11-20-2016, 09:49 AM #5
Why didn't they shut this SOB down long, long ago.
People are counting the days until he is OUT, 61 days.
I am counting my garbage days...9 garbage days to go and the TRASH is out!Last edited by Beezer; 11-20-2016 at 09:57 AM.
-
11-20-2016, 01:23 PM #6All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
Similar Threads
-
How many traitors in Congress will vote for Obama’s nuke deal with Iran?
By johnwk in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 08-31-2015, 08:45 PM -
Law Professor Jonathan Turley: WH Heading Into A Buzzsaw If Obama Defies Congress
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 06-07-2014, 09:04 PM -
Obama Defies Congress And Keeps Immigration Position They Eliminated
By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 2Last Post: 09-24-2013, 11:17 PM -
Holder Again Defies Congress UPDATE
By AirborneSapper7 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 11-14-2011, 07:27 PM -
Congress passes Obama budget with party-line vote
By Dixie in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 04-03-2009, 12:28 AM
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters