Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: David BROOKS: OBAMA EXECUTIVE AMNESTY MEANS AN 'EXTREME ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE POWER'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    David BROOKS: OBAMA EXECUTIVE AMNESTY MEANS AN 'EXTREME ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE POWER'

    BROOKS: OBAMA EXECUTIVE AMNESTY MEANS AN 'EXTREME ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE POWER'

    BACK TO BREITBART TV

    WATCH VIDEO AT LINK

    on BREITBART TV 8 Nov 2014 POST A COMMENT
    On Friday's broadcast of PBS's "NewsHour," New York Times columnist David Brooks explained that while he supports immigration reform, in particular status for illegals, President Barack Obama's proposed executive amnesty is a step too far.Partial transcript as follows:

    BROOKS: Well, politically, they obviously made a mistake by thinking demographics could carry them along the way and they didn’t actually need issues. And that was a consultants’ fantasy. And that hurt the Democrats.

    On President Obama, the immigration thing is important. I support the idea of giving all these people this new status. But doing it by executive functioning — function, executive action, redefining the status of millions of people without a law, without going through the normal process, that strikes me as an extreme abuse of executive power, whether you support it on policy or not.

    And that is why that particular action that he’s talking about is so confrontational, because it’s not only policy a lot of Republicans object to it. But as members of Congress, they object to it.

    (h/t RCP Video)

    Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...xecutive-Power





  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Well, thank you, David Brooks, sort of, but why don't you explain why you support giving all these people this new status? Is it because your employer, the New York Times, and it's owner from Mexico support it? Do you intend to pay for it with loss of your money or job? Do the owners of the New York Times? But oh yes, I totally agree with you that the Obama announcement of intentions to give these people this new status is an absolute outright nub job wacko looney gone mad abuse of power, because you can bet your wet willy, Obama doesn't intend to pay for it. Oh No, he'll want his healthy stipend, medical care and secret service for life like all the rest of them. And I'm sure he plans another money-making Book about how his "dreams" to impoverish the American People and bankrupt the nation actually did just that.
    Last edited by Judy; 11-24-2014 at 01:36 PM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. McConnell: We'll Use Purse Power to 'Restrain' Executive Amnesty
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-30-2014, 05:10 AM
  2. Sen. David Vitter: We’ll Go to Court to Block Any Executive Amnesty
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-18-2014, 11:14 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-25-2014, 02:42 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-11-2013, 11:29 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •