DC Sources: “Rep. Kevin McCarthy & Rep. Renee Ellmers Are Having An Affair”

Here's why Renee Ellmers is betraying her constituents!!


BREAKING, EXCLUSIVE: DC Sources: “Rep. Kevin McCarthy & Rep. Renee Ellmers Are Having An Affair”
January 23, 2015
by Charles C. Johnson

http://gotnews.com/wp-content/upload...59-740x499.jpgRep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC) and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) (center) at the U.S. Capitol July 28, 2011 in Washington, DC.

Multiple sources within Bakersfield, North Carolina, & on Capitol Hill tell Gotnews.com that Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Renee Ellmers (R-NC) have been carrying on a long-running affair since 2011.

The affair is something of an open secret in Washington, D.C. Reporters at other publications, lobbyists, congressional staffers of both parties all know about it. One staffer for a congressman describes it as the “biggest open secret” in D.C. A lobbyist describes Ellmers as a “social climber who has ingratiated herself” with McCarthy.

House leadership also knows about the affair. Speaker John Boehner reportedly told McCarthy to stop the affair once McCarthy was elected Majority Leader says a well placed congressional staffer. At least one leadership staffer doesn’t think the affair ended. “They are unusually close,” says the staffer who insists that the affair is going on. “It’s weird if he’s not ****ing her.”

Ellmers, who was elected in 2010, has traveled with Kevin McCarthy throughout North Carolina on the campaign trail in 2014. McCarthy campaigned for Ellmers during her 2014 primary challenge with radio talk show host Frank Roche.

The New York Times discussed McCarthy and Ellmers’s working relationship in a 2011 article.

McCarthy, who can’t stand the sight of blood, appreciates the ex-nurse’s toughness. Ellmers is one of nine women in this high-testosterone freshman class and has to find her own way of being heard. She barraged McCarthy with e-mails and phone calls saying she saw little sense in the G.O.P. leadership’s decision in June to send the White House a message by bringing to the floor a ”clean” (or condition-free) debt ceiling and then resoundingly voting it down. Sometimes when Ellmers is talking to the whip and doesn’t think she’s getting through to him, she claps her hands loudly in front of his face. Sometimes McCarthy giggles and claps back.

The two Republicans travel together, campaign together, and support one another in conferences.

McCarthy has also made a number of trips to North Carolina to visit with Ellmers in North Carolina.

The trips coincide with when the affair is said to have occurred.

Here are some contemporaneous tweets. (See at source link.)

Ellmers was elected in 2010 in a close election after her opponent assaulted someone on the street. She has since been drawn into a safe congressional seat.

A Tea Party darling whose win surprised the party bosses, Ellmers has come into disrepute lately for her controversial positions on amnesty, spending, and abortion. She quickly teamed up with the leadership, though. Ellmers leaked sensitive details from Tea Party-linked representatives to McCarthy and Boehner, says a congressional staffer familiar with the early discussions.

Ellmers also worked with House leadership to pull a pro-life partial birth abortion ban bill.
Ellmers had previously supported the same bill several years prior but said that she was upset with the exception for rape language in the bill.

Calls and emails to Reps. Ellmers’s and McCarthy’s offices were unreturned.

Gotnews.com also reached out to Brent Ellmers, her husband, but hasn’t heard back. His number from his medical practice has been discontinued.


http://gotnews.com/breaking-exclusiv...llmers-affair/

Giggles. Well, this stuff happens, and I certainly won't hold it against either one of them. But this is why they need to both lighten up on what others may do in their private lives, as should the Republican Party in general. Republicans would do well to stay out of a woman's right to terminate an unwanted unaffordable pregnancy and stop picking on gays who want for whatever reasons of their own to get hitched and look after each other with a marriage contract. Here's some food for thought on these social issues:

Judy's Five Real Republican Principles to Abide:

1. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one.
2. If you don't believe in gay marriage, don't marry one.
3. If you want it, you pay for it.
4. If you breed 'em, you feed 'em.
5. If you make it over there, then you sell it over there.

This is how we maintain domestic tranquility, an essential element of our society for both individual well-being as well as the general welfare. Then we have time and energy to focus on those issues that actually concern our nation like the monumental task of taking our country back from these foreign cartels who have bought up enough politicians at every level of government to system by system, institution by institution, destroy our nation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

Giggles. Well, this stuff happens, and I certainly won't hold it against either one of them. But this is why they need to both lighten up on what others may do in their private lives, as should the Republican Party in general. Republicans would do well to stay out of a woman's right to terminate an unwanted unaffordable pregnancy and stop picking on gays who want for whatever reasons of their own to get hitched and look after each other with a marriage contract. Here's some food for thought on these social issues:

Judy's Five Real Republican Principles to Abide:

1. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one.
2. If you don't believe in gay marriage, don't marry one.
3. If you want it, you pay for it.
4. If you breed 'em, you feed 'em.
5. If you make it over there, then you sell it over there.

This is how we maintain domestic tranquility, an essential element of our society for both individual well-being as well as the general welfare. Then we have time and energy to focus on those issues that actually concern our nation like the monumental task of taking our country back from these foreign cartels who have bought up enough politicians at every level of government to system by system, institution by institution, destroy our nation.

---

I do not support late term or federally funded abortions. Furthermore, I do not support gay marriage. However, we are not here to argue those issues.

If these folks are having an affair, they can answer to God and their spouses.

If these allegations are true I hope the information can get out there and spread far and wide enough to cost these to illegal aliens amnesty supporters and John Boehner servants their positions as elected officials as soon as possible!

Traitors against America like Ellmers’s and McCarthy need to be taken out of power by any peaceful political means necessary.

W

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

I do not support late term or federally funded abortions. Furthermore, I do not support gay marriage. However, we are not here to argue those issues.

If these folks are having an affair, they can answer to God and their spouses.

---

The Republican Party wasn't created to argue about them either. That was the point of the post.

Judy, I see you take the Libertarian view of abortion. While I am libertarian in many of my views, I believe the true libertarian view of abortion must be that the baby is a human being who is killed by its mother. Libertarians usually believe that what you do is your business as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, and abortion hurts the unborn child.

One of my Republican rules to abide by is that if you don't want or can't afford children, keep your pants on. It's a choice, and neither I nor the unborn child should have to pay for someone's poor choice. (Rape and incest not included.)

Another of my Republican rules is that if you've been elected to public office, you should conduct yourself accordingly. While I don't care who Renee Ellmers sleeps with, I do care that it is indicative of poor judgement, untrustworthiness, and a lack of self-control on her part. That tells me that I don't want her representing me in office. That was the point of posting the article. Also that her allegiance to her paramour is greater than her allegiance to those whom she represents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imblest

Judy, I see you take the Libertarian view of abortion. While I am libertarian in many of my views, I believe the true libertarian view of abortion must be that the baby is a human being who is killed by its mother. Libertarians usually believe that what you do is your business as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, and abortion hurts the unborn child.

One of my Republican rules to abide by is that if you don't want or can't afford children, keep your pants on. It's a choice, and neither I nor the unborn child should have to pay for someone's poor choice. (Rape and incest not included.)

Another of my Republican rules is that if you've been elected to public office, you should conduct yourself accordingly. While I don't care who Renee Ellmers sleeps with, I do care that it is indicative of poor judgement, untrustworthiness, and a lack of self-control on her part. That tells me that I don't want her representing me in office. That was the point of posting the article. Also that her allegiance to her paramour is greater than her allegiance to those whom she represents.

---

There is no correct political view of abortion, because it's not a political issue, it's a private personal medical issue. And as a Republican I don't want our government paying for anyone not keeping their pants on when they don't want or can't afford a child. That's why as a Republican, I oppose Medicaid funding for pregnancies, i. e. you want it, you pay for it, and Free School Lunch, i. e. you breed 'em, you feed 'em. I am not a Libertarian. I'm just a Republican. The Republican Party has been around a very long time, since 1854, and it has never involved itself in these personal issues until around the 1980's and only then due to pressure from religious groups operating on 501 C 3 tax exempt money trying to impact public policy and influence the outcome of elections in direct violation of their 501 C 3 tax status which prohibits such activity, which is one of the reasons I'm such a fan of the FairTax because it shuts down this illegal use of their funds.

Imblest, I liked your article and always enjoy reading about those who want to tell everyone else how to live their lives like Elmers and McCarthy getting caught with their own pants down. The irony of it gives me the giggles because it exposes them as social and religious hypocrites. But again, I won't hold that against them, I will however hold their actions or inactions on public issues like illegal immigration against them.

Well, the issue here with Ellmers is not abortion.

The issue is that if she is conducting an ongoing affair with a more powerful man in DC while betraying her vows before God and the state while destroying any trust her husband had in her at the same times it means...

Nobody else can trust Renee Ellmers to be honest or true to vows and oaths either and that she will betray trust and loyalties for people she sees as more powerful and influential.

That would explain all of her behavior and why she is in political bed with John Boehner and Obama and the US Chamber of Commerce and Billionaire Mark Zuckerberg on amnesty for illegal aliens over the interests and trust of the people in NC that elected her!

The illegal alien invasion of America is being conducted, and many of our citizens are being slaughtered or losing their jobs, homes, and families over illegal immigration due to an abundance of people in America that are literally willing to say or do anything for more power and money.

If Ellmers is diddling McCarthy behind her husbands back as this article suggests, then it is probably because she wants more powerful committee or leadership position assignments in the future and McCarthy is her meal ticket up.

Besides, it took a heck of a lot of big money for her to survive her last election so whether Ellmers is physically sleeping around to pay her debts or not she most certainly is being a political whore for the powers that are destroying America!

W

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Well, the issue here with Ellmers is not abortion.

The issue is that if she is conducting an ongoing affair with a more powerful man in DC while betraying her vows before God and the state while destroying any trust her husband had in her at the same times it means...

Nobody else can trust Renee Ellmers to be honest or true to vows and oaths either and that she will betray trust and loyalties for people she sees as more powerful and influential.

That would explain all of her behavior and why she is in political bed with John Boehner and Obama and the US Chamber of Commerce and Billionaire Mark Zuckerberg on amnesty for illegal aliens over the interests and trust of the people in NC that elected her!

The illegal alien invasion of America is being conducted, and many of our citizens are being slaughtered or losing their jobs, homes, and families over illegal immigration due to an abundance of people in America that are literally willing to say or do anything for more power and money.

If Ellmers is diddling McCarthy behind her husbands back as this article suggests, then it is probably because she wants more powerful committee or leadership position assignments in the future and McCarthy is her meal ticket up.

Besides, it took a heck of a lot of big money for her to survive her last election so whether Ellmers is physically sleeping around to pay her debts or not she most certainly is being a political whore for the powers that are destroying America!

W

---

Here is an article on her immigration votes from the News Observer:

Quote:

---

Rep. Renee Ellmers breaks with GOP on immigration votes By Renee Schoof
McClatchy Washington BureauJanuary 14, 2015




http://media2.newsobserver.com/smedi...g.AuSt.91.jpeg Republican U.S. Rep. Renee Ellmers speaks to supporters and reporters, Nov. 4, 2014, at the Barrington House in Dunn, N.C.


TRAVIS LONG — MCT






WASHINGTON — Rep. Renee Ellmers of North Carolina was one of 10 Republicans who voted with Democrats on Wednesday against legislation that would roll back President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration.


The immigration provisions were attached to a bill that funds the Department of Homeland Security. The House of Representatives passed the bill, 236-191 along party lines. All but two Democrats voted against it.


While Ellmers criticized Obama’s executive actions, saying she would “fight tooth and nail to put a stop to his amnesty plan,” she said in a statement that the bill was “overly broad in scope, as it has the potential to have a real negative and lasting impact on jobs and families in North Carolina.”


“There are businesses in the Second District who contract with Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and many of these jobs could be put in jeopardy with the passing of this legislation,” Ellmers said in the statement her office issued in response to questions.
North Carolina’s other nine Republicans and three Democrats in the delegation voted with their parties.


Obama angered Republicans after they won control of Capitol Hill in November by circumventing Congress with his immigration executive orders. They vowed to block his efforts.


Ellmers, who agreed that the president had overstepped his authority, nonetheless was one of seven Republicans who opposed a measure that would undo his actions. They provide temporary relief from deportation for about 5 million illegal immigrants.

Ellmers said she also had concerns that the amendments to undo Obama’s actions on immigration “may remove protections for victims of sexual assault or domestic abuse.”


One of them, which Ellmers was the only Republican to vote down, would block funding for Department of Homeland Security programs if officials don’t make deportations of illegal immigrants convicted of domestic abuse, sexual abuse and other crimes a top priority.


She also was one of 26 Republicans who voted against an amendment that would eliminate the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which has granted work permits and stopped deportation of 600,000 immigrants who arrived illegally as children.


And she was one of just two Republicans who opposed a measure that objected to the exemption of DACA immigrants from the employer mandate in the Affordable Care Act.


Ellmers did support an amendment that declared that it was the sense of Congress that immigration officials should not put the interests of illegal immigrants ahead of those who were in the country with documentation.


Ellmers was elected in 2010 to represent the Second District, which is considered a safe Republican seat. Her district also doesn't have a large Latino population; just 12 percent, according to the 2012 Census. Last spring, in the Republican primary, her challenger, commentator Frank Roche, asserted that she favored amnesty. Ellmers denied it.


In an op-ed in The Fayetteville Observer in January 2014, Ellmers wrote that she supported stronger border security, as well as legal status for those who acknowledge entering the country illegally and make amends.


In her statement, Ellmers said she intended to be a “leading voice in the area of immigration reform.” She complained that she wasn’t included in discussions on the legislation, and that two amendments she offered that would have addressed her concerns were not given a vote.

Email: rschoof@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @reneeschoof.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2015/01/...with.html?rh=1

---

These are all the wrong votes on immigration. There should be no support of DACA, that should be undone as soon as possible. There should be no support of Executive Amnesty, all this must be stopped and all these people in our country in violation of US immigration law need to be removed from our premises and deported, families intact, including US citizens born here to illegal aliens who are minors at the time their parent or parents are deported, because these children by nature of their parentage, are already citizens of another country as well or with the filing of a form will be automatically provided citizenship by the country of their parents. This ridiculous nonsense has to stop on citizenship for children of illegal aliens, amnesty for "children" many of whom are not even children but adults in their 20's and 30's, and all adults with their minor children must go home and be escorted home or procedures established to ensure their departure from the US and arrival in their home country.

All federal and state benefits and employment must be denied to anyone who did not either arrive in our country legally or overstayed and violated their visa. For those who feel this is "harsh", wake up! There wasn't room for them here, so the only thing "harsh" about enforcing US Immigration Law is the "harsh" conditions these people have created for our own citizens, taking their jobs away from them, deflating their wages, burning through our taxpayer funded benefit programs, increasing the cost of government and running up our debts. We have illegal aliens here from Mexico and Honduras for example, nations with lower unemployment rates than the United States for many years. These people have no rights moral or otherwise to be here, none, zero, zip, and it's time to call a spade a spade and deport them. All this bellyaching, hand wringing, and other Fool's nonsense about illegal aliens and immigrants is truly nauseating while our own citizens and families suffer and struggle and the government is going broke taking care of people who either aren't supposed to be or shouldn't have been allowed into our country to begin with.

This is and should be the attack on Renee Ellmers and every other politician who thinks more of illegal aliens and immigrants than US citizens and supports any part of this nonsense including using their vote to prevent or weaken our efforts to correct this disaster.

It works both ways.


“If a man’s own wife cannot trust him, how can the American people?
Ross Perot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Newmexican

It works both ways.


“If a man’s own wife cannot trust him, how can the American people?
Ross Perot

---

And if a nation of citizens cannot trust him, how can the wife?

We've had plenty of traitors who as far as know didn't cheat on their wives. So, I'm not sure this is a standard we can use to select politicians or husbands.

The old saying that I remember is "A man that will cheat on his wife, will cheat on his boss" It is a character issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Newmexican

The old saying that I remember is "A man that will cheat on his wife, will cheat on his boss" It is a character issue.

---

Well, we need to be careful about mixing these personal matters in our policy issues because take Vitter for example, who was involved in a scandal, but is now Vice Chairman of Jeff Session's Immigration Committee, and one of our staunchest allies to stop illegal immigration. I yearn for the Republican Party that I grew up with where these personal private issues were not part of a party agenda and were not discussed in the political arena, because no one cared or was interested or wanted to talk about other people's private concerns let alone elect candidates over it. That party wanted our candidates to take care of the nation's business, protect our civil rights, get the job done, and come home.