Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Decision Day for Hazleton
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
07-26-2007, 07:09 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 282
Decision Day for Hazleton
Decision Day: Judge expected to rule on Illegal Immigration Relief Act today
Thursday, 26 July 2007
By WADE MALCOLM
Staff Writer
A federal judge is expected to rule today on the constitutionality of Hazleton’s illegal immigration ordinance, setting the stage for a long-awaited decision that could affect dozens of communities locally and hundreds more around the country.
U.S. District Judge James M. Munley’s ruling in the landmark case will decide whether local governments, specifically Hazleton, have the right to pass laws dealing with illegal immigrants by punishing landlords and employers doing business with them.
The American Civil Liberties Union and several other advocacy groups sued the city in federal court on behalf of residents and community groups, arguing the ordinance infringed on the civil rights of Latinos and conflicted with federal immigration law. A nine-day trial was held in March at the William J. Nealon Federal Building in Scranton.
Although judges have ruled on illegal ordinances in other parts of the country, Munley’s would be the first following a full trial, giving it more precedent-setting power.
The decision will “most likelyâ€<div>"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."- James Madison, The Federalist Papers No.49</div>
-
07-26-2007, 07:14 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 282
I apologize for the duplicate posts in the General Discussions and News Stories, but I wanted to make sure all viewers on the site knew that the decision was coming today.
JDPA<div>"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."- James Madison, The Federalist Papers No.49</div>
-
07-26-2007, 07:18 AM #3
The very fact that we have to take "security measure" against these people speaks volumes. They don't belong here -- they're dangerous and demanding something that just isn't theirs. God help Hazelton.
-
07-26-2007, 09:46 AM #4The very fact that we have to take "security measure" against these people speaks volumes. They don't belong here -- they're dangerous and demanding something that just isn't theirs. God help Hazelton.
-
07-26-2007, 09:47 AM #5
I'm SO nervous about this. This ruling is going to set a precedent that will either make our cause much easier, or....
Calderon was absolutely right when he said...."Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico".
-
07-26-2007, 09:56 AM #6Originally Posted by jjmm
-
07-26-2007, 10:50 AM #7
It blows my mind that we actually have to get a RULING on whether or not to obey our own laws!!
First, the federal govt has to obey them - that's the key - then, all these communities would be able to do what they need to do to keep out illegals.
It's just f-'in unbelievable. It's like a farcical play, for goodness sakes. I was in one in high school, but this one is more amusing! But, disgusting!
-
07-26-2007, 10:55 AM #8
I hope the ruling is for common sense and rule of law in Hazelton!
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Georgia Grand Jury Indicts Illegal Immigrant Suspected of...
05-08-2024, 09:51 PM in Americans Killed By illegal immigrants / illegals