Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    65,351

    Democrats weigh reconciliation bill for immigration action

    Democrats weigh reconciliation bill for immigration action

    Caroline Simon 5 days ago

    Another budget reconciliation bill is likely on the horizon, and Democrats are eyeing the measure as a vehicle for a policy priority long mired in partisan disagreement: immigration overhaul.

    Provided by Roll Call Speaker Nancy Pelosi, joined by other House Democratic members on March 18, discusses two bills to help certain immigrants: so-called Dreamers and undocumented farmworkers. In the coming months, congressional Democrats and the White House could use a budgetary maneuver requiring a simple Senate majority to advance a sweeping infrastructure package. The possibility became more serious Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a revised budget resolution could potentially be used to pass another reconciliation bill.

    [Second filibuster-proof maneuver OK’d by Senate parliamentarian]

    Democrats used a fiscal 2021 budget resolution earlier this year as the vehicle for a $1.86 trillion coronavirus relief package.

    It’s far from certain that any immigration provisions could make it into another parliamentarian-approved reconciliation bill, and the comprehensive overhaul of the immigration system backed by the White House is even less likely.

    But, spurred on by immigration advocates desperate for legislative action, Democrats plan to try.

    “We think we can make a case about the budget impacts of immigration in our country, and we are going to try to do that,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on a call with Asian American Pacific Islander leaders last week, referencing the Byrd rule, which excludes nonbudgetary provisions from reconciliation bills.

    The legislative push reflects the reality in a narrowly divided Congress that has struggled for years to reach any consensus on immigration policy. The current situation at the U.S.-Mexico border, with the government scrambling to accommodate thousands of unaccompanied migrant children who have crossed in recent weeks, has both heightened those divisions and underscored the need to take some sort of action.

    “I think that there is a substantial appetite for doing something in this space,” said a Democratic aide familiar with the budget negotiations, adding he’s spoken with multiple Democratic senators about including immigration provisions in a future reconciliation bill, including Judiciary Chair Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Budget Committee member Alex Padilla of California.

    Sen. Bob Menendez, the New Jersey Democrat sponsoring the comprehensive immigration bill backed by the White House, “will not foreclose any tool that will ultimately allow Democrats to give a pathway to citizenship to as many undocumented immigrants as possible,” said his spokesman Robert Julien.

    In March, the House passed two immigration measures to provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. One was intended for those brought to the U.S. as children and temporary protected status holders, and the other was for undocumented agricultural farmworkers. Neither measure is likely to get 60 votes in the Senate.


    [House passes immigration bill to help ‘Dreamers’]

    Those provisions, plus a path to citizenship for essential workers, are the focus of the legislative push.

    “We feel very strongly as a progressive caucus that there should be a pathway to citizenship for essential workers, so I imagine that will be an area where we try to ensure that we push on that front,” Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said on a press call last week. “We think that there is good reason to believe this falls within the reconciliation guideline.”

    It’s not unprecedented for reconciliation legislation to touch on immigration. The 1996 welfare overhaul law, which passed through budget reconciliation, restricted the eligibility of certain groups of immigrants for federal benefits.
    Any successful attempt to include immigration-related provisions in a future reconciliation bill would likely make government benefits such as stimulus checks available to immigrant populations, said Molly Reynolds, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. She’s less sure about broader provisions to provide a pathway to citizenship to immigrant groups.

    “For a lot of the bigger, more straightforward immigration policy changes, I would be somewhat skeptical that those would fit in the confines of the Byrd rule,” she said.

    She noted, however, that majority parties in recent years have been more aggressive in using reconciliation to make major policy changes. She said those policy changes have a stronger chance of making it into extremely broad reconciliation packages that incorporate instructions from several committees, as the latest pandemic relief bill did.

    “If someone says, ‘We might fold a provision related to making stimulus payments accessible to certain immigration communities in this next reconciliation bill,’ you could put that in a big bill that is mostly infrastructure given the kind of setups that have lots of committees all doing the work,” she said.

    Republicans, who focused their criticism of the latest pandemic relief package on provisions they viewed as unrelated to COVID-19 recovery, staunchly oppose any attempts to weave liberal policy priorities into an upcoming infrastructure package.

    “It would come as no surprise if Democrats tried to convince themselves and the Senate Parliamentarian that somehow amnesty for illegal immigrants belongs in a budget reconciliation bill,” House Budget ranking member Jason Smith, R-Mo., said in a statement. “They clearly have little concern with throwing any number of their liberal wish list items into a reconciliation package in the hopes of jamming their agenda through Congress and radically changing the country.”

    Democrats are largely undeterred by such criticisms, hoping to take advantage of their current control of the White House and Congress.
    Padilla, who was appointed to the Senate in January and chairs the Judiciary Committee’s Immigration and Citizenship panel, “is exploring all options to include immigration provisions in a future reconciliation package and thinks there is a strong case to make sure that they are included,” according to a statement from his office.

    Immigration advocates, impatient for change after the Trump administration’s hard-line approach to immigration, want lawmakers to consider any tool available to make headway on the issue, whether that involves overruling the Senate parliamentarian or nixing the filibuster altogether.

    “Those are all tools that Democrats should seriously consider using to pass citizenship, because we have seen how Republicans are unwilling to pass anything,” said Juliana Macedo do Nascimento, state and local policy manager at United We Dream, an organization that advocates for immigrant youth.

    “We are using every tool at our disposal to get this done. We’re asking Senate Democrats to do the same.”
    The post Democrats weigh reconciliation bill for immigration action appeared first on Roll Call.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...on/ar-BB1fo3wt
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    65,351
    Second filibuster-proof maneuver OK’d by Senate parliamentarian

    Reconciliation being discussed as way to pass infrastructure, other priorities

    Purple line construction continues in in Silver Spring, Md., on Friday. (Caroline Brehman/CQ Roll Call)








    By Paul M. Krawzak
    Posted April 5, 2021 at 6:26pm, Updated at 7:40pm

    The Senate's top referee on procedural matters ruled Monday that a revised budget resolution could potentially be used to pass another reconciliation bill, according to Senate Democratic officials.
    That could give Democratic leaders at least one more opportunity to pass legislation that could skirt a Senate filibuster, with Republicans already signaling that President Joe Biden's infrastructure and other proposals won't get the 60 votes needed to advance in that chamber.
    The opinion from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough "allows Democrats additional tools to improve the lives of Americans if Republican obstruction continues,” Justin Goodman, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement.
    Goodman added that “some parameters still need to be worked out,” a reference to unanswered questions about any potential limitations that a second reconciliation process might face.



    Senate leaders had been anxiously awaiting the pivotal decision since last week. Democrats had already been prepping to use the fiscal 2022 budget reconciliation process to try to pass pieces of their agenda that face GOP opposition. But the use of Section 304 of the 1974 budget law to try to pass another reconciliation bill through a revision of a previously adopted budget has never before been attempted.
    Democrats succeeded in using the reconciliation process to pass a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief law earlier this year. In past years, Senate parliamentarians have said lawmakers get only one chance to pass a revenue and spending package per budget resolution, unless they separate the revenue and spending pieces into separate bills.
    Lawmakers can also use reconciliation to raise the statutory debt limit, which will become necessary later this year.
    The novel use of Section 304 would require Democrats to adopt an amended fiscal 2021 budget resolution, which would mean another exhausting "vote-a-rama" on the Senate floor.
    But it could allow them to potentially employ the Biden administration's strategy of breaking up their infrastructure plans into two — one focused on the plan Biden rolled out last week, and a second focused on education, health care and child care. The second package could theoretically travel via the fiscal 2022 reconciliation process, if the parliamentarian's decision allows for that.


    But MacDonough's opinion was cursory and left some questions unanswered.
    Schumer and other Democrats had argued to use the provision to pass additional reconciliation measures under a revised fiscal 2021 budget blueprint, for instance, rather than having to wait and use the procedure twice during the fiscal 2022 cycle. Monday's ruling doesn't specify whether use of an amended fiscal 2021 budget would be allowed for that purpose, a GOP aide pointed out.
    Some budget experts also wonder whether the revised budget resolution can only be used to raise the debt limit, since the previous pandemic-focused reconciliation bill included spending and tax components. The GOP aide noted the parliamentarian's opinion doesn't say anything about whether it's OK to use Section 304 to pass an infrastructure package, for instance.
    Goodman said in the statement that “while no decisions have been made on a legislative path forward” or whether to use a second revised budget resolution, MacDonough's ruling "is an important step forward that this key pathway is available to Democrats if needed.”
    Biden's proposals would be financed in part by tax increases, including several provisions rolling back tax cuts enacted in 2017 under GOP control of the White House and Congress — also done through reconciliation.


    On Monday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said at an event in his home state of Kentucky that the infrastructure plans were likely a nonstarter on his side of the aisle.
    "At the heart of the bill being described as an infrastructure bill is a complete reversal of the tax reductions that we made in 2017, not just for businesses but for individuals as well, which jumpstarted our economy," McConnell said. "So I can't imagine myself, if that's the package — a bunch of more borrowed money plus undoing the tax relief that drove our economy to a 50-year high — I can't imagine that's going to be very appealing to many Republicans."
    Lindsey McPherson contributed to this report.

    https://www.rollcall.com/2021/04/05/...rliamentarian/


    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    65,351

    Call as many US Senators as possible then share this call to action by email and on (FACEBOOK HERE) .. (TWITTER HERE) .. (GAB HERE) .. (ALIPAC HERE) .. (LINKED HERE) .. (PARLER HERE) .. (MINDS HERE) .. (SLUG HERE) .. (BRIGHTEON HERE) .. (CLOUTHUB HERE)

    https://www.alipac.us/f8/pac-moves-s...mnesty-384172/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. AZ. Gubernatorial candidates weigh in on immigration bill
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 11:54 PM
  2. House posts copy of reconciliation bill
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-18-2010, 09:55 PM
  3. Democrats, Reconciliation and 1/6th of the U.S. Economy
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 11:50 AM
  4. Contractors weigh in on new Colorado immigration bill
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 10:31 AM
  5. Increased H1-B Visas Hidden in Budget Reconciliation Bill
    By Bootsie in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-01-2005, 11:37 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •