As I was wondering earlier why the legal voting latinos voted for Hellary over Obama.
Hellary's Amnesty plan is more stric than Obama's plan so you would think the latinos would vote for Obama. The difference is Hellary doesn't want to give illegals drivers licenses and Obama does.

The overwhelming majority of legal immigrants voted for Hellary and her more strict form of Amnesty.

So why is this?
They must be seeing and realizing the economic impact it is having on them as well. The legal immigrants want to bring their family members and hence we have amnesty, but they don't want everything given to the illegals as they had to work and obey the laws to get their citizenship and do not think its fair to give everything to the illegals. Some things must be earned. So, they would rather give the illegals amnesty but not drivers licenses? Does that make sense? Or, will the illegals be able to get drivers licenses anyway once they are documented by the government. Not citizens as they will have to go through the process but documented until they are citizens.

If this is the case we see the legal immigrants value some laws here in America but they want amnesty and less strict immigration laws so they can bring yet more family immigrants in. Is this part of it? Are there any latino Americans that can answer this on this board?

I'm interested in everyones opinion on this.
Why did they vote for Hellary?