Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Devvy Kidd: ARE AMERICANS REALLY THIS STUPID?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Devvy Kidd: ARE AMERICANS REALLY THIS STUPID?



    ARE AMERICANS REALLY THIS STUPID?

    By: Devvy
    June 27, 2012
    NewsWithViews.com


    "Nature gave man two ends - one to sit on and one to think with. Ever since then, man's success or failure has been dependent on the one he used most." George R. Kirkpatrick (1867-1937) Lecturer
    In mid-2007, the housing market crash predicted by many and ignored by tens of millions "suddenly" became a raging path of destruction across this country. By summer 2008, panic set in and the thieves in the U.S. Congress literally stole the fruits of your labor to unconstitutionally bail out banks and the auto industry. Without a scintilla of constitutional authority, the federal mafia bled us dry while 401(k)s bled in millions of households.


    Americans got angry. They said we will hold you responsible in November 2010!


    Sure, they did. With an approval rating of 11% for the gangsters in the Outlaw Congress, a whopping 86% of incumbents were sent back to Washington, DC., after the 2010 elections to continue stealing us blind and passing more and more unconstitutional laws while allowing alphabet soup agencies like the FDA, EPA and USDA to continue running amok. I suppose one could say it was an improvement over the usual 96% reelection stats for incumbents.


    Great fanfare went on though over the success of getting tea party candidates elected. Newbies who said all the right things while saying nothing. A new set of Band Aid pushers who have yet to understand the critical issues destroying this country: the disabilities of our monetary system, heavy progressive taxation, unconstitutional foreign aid, getting the US out of the UN; the list goes on and on. They just keep on voting for unconstitutional funding while saying the latest flavor of what appeals to voters.


    In a June 24, 2012, poll finding from Rassmussen: "Only 22% of the nation's likely voters believe the government today has such consent."


    In other words, 78% of the American people believe the U.S. Congress is doing whatever the hell they want without any regard to we the people.


    There is a great rage blowing across this country because the thieves in the Outlaw Congress aren't just spending us into poverty, they are destroying a once great constitutional republic. Well, guess what? People are so dang mad, they've gone to the polls and once again voted for their own destruction during the 2012 primary cycle.


    There are still many primaries before the November pretend elections covering the U.S. House of Representatives. Since no one has the legal right to vote for any U.S. Senator, I've ignored those numbers. But, let's take a look at just how angry people are and we'll remember in November!


    Using two web sites, ballotpedia and the official U.S. house web site, I looked at the primary election results for a handful of states - just the U.S. House. It made me sick.


    Alabama - 7 districts - 7 incumbents won
    California 53 districts - 44 incumbents won
    Illinois 18 districts - 14 incumbents won
    Indiana - 9 district - 6 incumbents won
    Iowa - five districts - 4 incumbents won
    Mississippi - 4 districts - 4 incumbents won
    North Carolina - 13 districts - 10 incumbents won
    Ohio - 18 districts - 15 incumbents won
    Pennsylvania - 19 districts - 16 incumbents won
    South Carolina - 7 districts - 6 incumbents won
    Texas - 36 districts - 30 incumbents won
    Virginia 11 districts - 11 incumbents won


    Some seats were uncontested, either party, so the incumbent will walk right back in come November. New districts were created as a result of the 2010 census based on counting illegal aliens; those seats are up for grabs. Some incumbents are retiring, which you and I will pay for until they leave this earth in retirement and benefits.


    The American people in those states are so happy with the destruction of their rights and the fleecing of their wallets by their incumbents, collectively they're going to send back 167 of the same crooks, cowards and incompetent jackals to finish us off. There is still a pretend election in November where Republican incumbents will square off against a Democrat who won the primary on their party ticket; the same applies just the opposite.


    However, with the average return of incumbents to the Outlaw Congress being 96%, most of those 167 primary winners will win. There are 435 U.S. House seats. With many more primaries to go, those numbers will increase by the hundreds.


    It is virtually impossible to remove a member of Congress once they're in the door. In some of the primaries above, the incumbent had no opposite party challenge because incumbents like Sheila Jackson Lee and Mad Max Waters get reelected for decades because they are hard core socialists and their constituents love feeding off your paycheck.


    How in the hell do voters expect to change the direction of this country and stop the bleeding if they continue to vote for incumbents?


    Oh, that's right. It's not my representative, it's the Democrats and visa versa. I've lived here in West Texas for six years and not once did I vote for the incompetent, constitutionally challenged Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX). I have voted for a Republican running against him the past three elections who never had a chance because the challenger wasn't kissed and blessed by the party machine. Old Randy is the standard in Congress: he votes for unconstitutional legislation everyday, but he loves veterans!


    How is it the American people are so furious with the mantra across the country, throw the bums out, yet the bums continue to win their primaries and the general election? Are Americans really that stupid?


    Yes, but it's also electronic vote fraud, illegals voting and voter registration fraud to keep the puppets in office who will continue the agenda desired by the shadow government and those who pull the strings in Washington, DC.


    Let me give you a prime example: John Boehner, speaker of the U.S. House. He has voted for every destructive trade treaty that's come down the pipeline. <>His vote for NAFTA and GATT/WTO killed hundreds of thousands of jobs in his state. Boehner violated the U.S. Constitution when he voted for the TARP theft of your wallet. He voted yes on making the Bill of Rights killer, the "Patriot" Act, permanent.


    In 2000, Boehner voted against getting us out GATT/WTO - a killer for America and vital for one world government. Full page ad, New York Times, April 15, 1994:


    "1944. Bretton Woods: The IMF and the World Bank. 1945. San Francisco: The United Nations. 1994, Marrakech: The World Trade Organization. History knows where it’s going. The final act of the Uruguay Round....to the WTO, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the UN and the IMF."


    Boehner has voted for every critical treaty to advance one world government in lockstep with the impostor in the White House, yet that vile individual continues to win going on 22 straight years. I believe in his case it has been vote fraud keeping Johnny in office. Make sure the puppets stay in office to do the bidding of those who really control our lives. As Kelleigh Nelson reminded people in her last column:


    "Remember the words of Clinton's mentor, Carroll Quigley, professor of history at Georgetown University and author of the 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope. "The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies."

    Vote fraud has already played a role in the primaries. Again. Here are some numbers from my Blind Loyalty booklet published many years ago. I have no doubt that if you compare those numbers to the last six elections (California), the winning percentages for those life time incumbents will be virtually the same.

    Don't look to any change come this November as far as the U.S. Congress. The same outlaws will get reelected after winning their primaries and it will be back to business as usual come January. Remember that Rassmussen poll I cited above? 78% of the American people believe the outlaws in the U.S. Congress are governing without their consent, yet they have gone to the polls and voted to reelect the same parasites in dozens of primaries. You hire someone to do a job, they do just the opposite and you turn right around and give them your vote - again.


    Does any of this make sense to you? It does to me. Between uninformed voters, vote fraud, blind party loyalty and special interest blocks of useful fools casting ballots, it all spells a receipe for more disaster. That is why we have to put our time and resources into the state legislatures. More to come on that.

    Links:

    1- Re-electing the Band Aid Brigade (May 2010)
    2- Electing new Band Aid Pushers (May 2012)
    3- Uninformed, disinterested, brainwashed & special interest voters (2006)
    4- Is it treason and who will stop it?

    Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.


    Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.


    E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net


    Devvy Kidd -- Are American's Really this Stupid?




    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    339
    It's pretty sad really. If the American people are sick and tired of these Democrats and Republicans in Congress as indicated by their approval rating, then why the hell do they keep voting for these same idiots? It's mind boggling. And then we have Obama and Romney and the country is virtually split 50/50 on these two incompetent leaders. If the American people are so fed up with our government then STOP VOTING FOR THEM! And it's probably true that most of those only vote for the R or D simply because they don't like the other D or R. So then why not rally behind a formidable third party? It's about damn time we get a competent party that will be these two to shame.

  3. #3
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    ....because America isn't yet "ready" for a third party. Anyone running as a third party candidate ends being labeled as a kook. After a few more election cycles MAYBE - IF we last that long. In the meantime, America needs to GROW UP, wake up and smell the coffee, etc....
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Member SeaBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    87
    The Tea-Party candidates didn't stand up for our rights, but Glenn Beck more or less predicted that anyway. You need money to run, so the liberal notion of states paying for candidates would be the only way to get a chance at decent real representatives. Too much money in politics.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by SeaBee View Post
    The Tea-Party candidates didn't stand up for our rights, but Glenn Beck more or less predicted that anyway. You need money to run, so the liberal notion of states paying for candidates would be the only way to get a chance at decent real representatives. Too much money in politics.
    Thank you for saying this. Money is indeed the problem. Sure, at the end of the day we people go to the voting booth, but those with the money give us the terrible choices from which to pick from. The candidates need the money to make themselves known and those with more money and Super PAC backing will have an unfair advantage over the little guy wanting to make a real difference.



    Quote Originally Posted by SicNTiredInSoCal View Post
    ....because America isn't yet "ready" for a third party. Anyone running as a third party candidate ends being labeled as a kook. After a few more election cycles MAYBE - IF we last that long. In the meantime, America needs to GROW UP, wake up and smell the coffee, etc....
    America keeps kicking the can down the road. We don't want to do the hard work so we'll let future generations take care of it. It's an apathetic attitude.

    The third party candidates get labeled as a kooks by the mainstream media and their corporate handlers. But we have the Internet and the power of social media and can fight back and overwhelm their propaganda efforts. William of ALIPAC, Rush Limbaugh, Drudge, these people can reach millions and set in motion a viral campaign for a viable third candidate. The only problem is all of these people, except for one, seem to be Republican stooges. We need Internet leaders like William to come together and discuss how to best go about such a revolution.

  6. #6
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    Don't look to any change come this November as far as the U.S. Congress. The same outlaws will get reelected after winning their primaries and it will be back to business as usual come January. Remember that Rassmussen poll I cited above? 78% of the American people believe the outlaws in the U.S. Congress are governing without their consent, yet they have gone to the polls and voted to reelect the same parasites in dozens of primaries. You hire someone to do a job, they do just the opposite and you turn right around and give them your vote - again.
    Two reasonsL 1. Lack of choices. Unfortunately the choices all too often come down to parasite #1 or parasite #2. This is because we have a two party system that has morphed into basically a party and one half. As noted by googler, third party candidates are at a severe disadvantage and virtually never win (Lieberman was an exception, but he was also an incumbent).

    2. Legalized bribery. This much loved tradition in Washington DC will kill this country within 30 years if not fixed. By legalized bribery I mean the billions and billions of dollars special interest groups ranging from the World Council of Churches to the Junior Chamber of Commerce to the unions etc contribute to campaigns. This year we may see over 2 billion dollars spent on the presidential campaign alone. How can we possibly expect decent government with that kind of money being wafted under every incumbent and candidate's nose? Who would you be concerned about, the organization that promises you 100K for your campaign if you support the legislation they want, or the poor schmuck out the suburbs or the boondocks who sends you a fax threatening to take his vote elsewhere if you do not shape up?


    There is an answer to both of these issues, and it is relatively simple. But, like most simple solutions to problems there is not much support for it because there is no money in it for the key players. The answer is federal funding of all federal elections (and if implemented, states would be wise to follow suit). This takes the billions and billions of dollars out of the politicians hands. Their incentives would be limited to promises from support groups to place ads for them, but there could be no contact between the candidate and those support groups. Outlaw all PACs. 'Again take the money, as much as possible, out of the campaigns. Not only does this provide more incentives for incumbents and politicians to listen to their constituents as opposed to special interest groups, it gives 3rd party candidates a better shot at getting heard and gaining support. It would also provide disincentives for a large number of the 'lifers' in Congress, and would we hope motivate them to seek greener pastures because the big bucks would not be available to them any more. Finally, I have always believed that since it is unlikely we will ever get term limits established for members of the Congress the next best thing is to make life as miserable for them as we can so they no longer look at as a career, and if they are uncomfortable enough they will, to borrow a term we like at ALIPAC, be inclined to self-deport from Washington.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

  7. #7
    April
    Guest
    What Devvy is not addressing is the rampant voter fraud. Everything is rigged and people need to REALIZE and address that so we can keep the crooks out of office. There are millions of ways to rig an election and the crooks are doing it all the time.

    http://www.alipac.us/f19/how-help-sa...-fraud-230630/

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •