Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree13Likes
  • 1 Post By Newmexican
  • 1 Post By joe s
  • 1 Post By Judy
  • 2 Post By patbrunz
  • 4 Post By patbrunz
  • 2 Post By joe s
  • 2 Post By Judy

Thread: Donald Trump: Fox News Is ‘In Love’ with Marco Rubio, They Protect Him

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    35,837

    Donald Trump: Fox News Is ‘In Love’ with Marco Rubio, They Protect Him

    Donald Trump: Fox News Is ‘In Love’ with Marco Rubio, They Protect Him



    AP/Phil Coale



    by
    JULIA HAHN
    18 Feb 2016Washington D.C.

    GOP frontrunner Donald Trump slammed Fox News and the broader Rupert Murdoch empire for its open adoration of donor-class favorite Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) . As Breitbart News has previously reported, Rubio has been Congress’s biggest champion of Rupert Murdoch’s open borders advocacy efforts. Trump explained that Fox News has “protected” Rubio — constantly buoying his campaign, even as he has continued to perform dismally.

    “They’re in love with Rubio. Why? I have no idea, but they’re in love with Rubio,” Trump declared on Thursday’s program of Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM Patriot 125.

    “They are in love with Rubio and it’s amazing to me,” Trump said.

    Perhaps further delineating the chasm between the media’s portrayal of Rubio and his actual performance, Trump has previously described Rubio as “a choke artist… And we can’t have that as a president can we?” Trump explained that, under pressure from Chris Christie, Rubio could not stop sweating during his televised debate meltdown. “I was standing next to Rubio and I thought he just got out of a swimming pool” Trump said.

    Yet Trump pointed out that Fox has gone to great lengths to “protect” Rubio. “After he [Rubio] cratered in the debate, they protected him,” Trump said.

    Indeed, prominent conservatives have noted the Rupert Murdoch empire has gone to great lengths to boost Rubio’s campaign. As conservative columnist and best-selling author Ann Coulter has noted, “Rupert Murdoch enterprise… is implacably pro-open borders, pro-amnesty and, consequently, anti-Trump.”

    As Breitbart News has previously reported, Rupert Murdoch serves as the co-chair of the Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE)—arguably one of the most powerful immigration lobbying firms in the country. Via his lobbying firm, Murdoch endorsed Rubio’s 2013 border opening amnesty bill, which would have doubled the annual admission of foreign workers and would have dispensed 33 million green cards to foreign nationals in the span of a single decade.

    Rubio’s 2013 bill would have permanently resettled a population of new immigrants that is seven times larger than the entire population of South Carolina.

    Via his lobbying firm, Murdoch also endorsed Rubio’s 2015 immigration expansion bill, which would have allowed for unlimited Muslim migration into the United States.

    Murdoch similarly joined executives at Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup in urging Congress to fast-track President Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, which Rubio said would be a central “pillar” of his hoped-for Presidency.

    As Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)
    and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told The New Yorker‘s Ryan Lizza, Murdoch’s organization was essential to ushering through the Senate Rubio’s bill to open America’s borders. Lizza wrote:
    McCain told me, ‘Rupert Murdoch is a strong supporter of immigration reform, and Roger Ailes is, too.’ Murdoch is the chairman and C.E.O. of News Corp., which owns Fox, and Ailes is Fox News’s president. McCain said that he, [Lindsey] Graham, [Marco] Rubio, and others also have talked privately to top hosts at Fox, including Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Neil Cavuto… “God bless Fox,” Graham said. “Last time [i.e. during the 2007 immigration push], it was ‘amnesty’ every fifteen seconds.” He said that the change was important for his reelection, because ‘eighty per cent of people in my primary get their news from Fox.’ He added that the network has ‘allowed critics to come forward, but it’s been so much better.’
    As such, Trump’s candidacy — which has pledged to secure the nation’s borders, pause Muslim migration, and stop one-sided globalist trade deals — seems to represent a direct threat to Murdoch’s efforts to open America’s borders. Indeed, Murdoch’s lobbying firm has even promulgating material directly attacking Trump’s position on immigration moderation.

    Trump’s most recent attack on Murdoch comes after a Wall Street Journal poll suggested that Trump was in second place — despite polls from CBS and Reuters, which show Trump maintains a strong lead as the frontrunner. “You know Wall Street Journal – Rupert Murdoch hit,” Trump explained.

    The editorial board of Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal is — like Murdoch — decidedly open borders. In 1984, the WSJ editorial board wrote, “If Washington still wants to ‘do something’ about immigration, we propose a five-word constitutional amendment: There shall be open borders.”

    Murdoch and his organization’s championing of open borders places them far outside the mainstream of Republican voters. More than 9 in 10 Republican voters oppose the immigration policies pushed by Murdoch, Rubio, and The Wall Street Journal editorial board. Additionally, only 11 percent of GOP voters think so-called “free trade” deals will improve wages. By a nearly five-to-one margin, Republican voters believe these trade deals championed by Rubio, Murdoch, and the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal will reduce wages rather than raise them.

    In today’s interview, Trump also called out specific pundits who seem to play favorites: “Megyn Kelly is very biased,” Trump continued.

    Indeed, on the night of the New Hampshire primary, as reports emerged in indicating that Rubio’s campaign had crashed the Granite State, Megyn Kelly seemed to try to frameRubio’s dismal fifth place finish as a “nail-biter” race to third:

    It has been an all-out nail-biter between @tedcruz, @JebBush and @marcorubio to figure out who’s placing in the third position. #NHPrimary


    Moreover, when interviewing Rubio prior to his now-infamous debate glitch, Megyn Kellypitched Rubio a question that seemed designed to fend off criticism of his being scripted. Kelly said: “[Chris Christie] says you’re too scripted. You are very smooth. Your acceptance – well, not acceptance [speech] – but your remarks last night were amazing. You were so articulate. There was no teleprompter. To those who say, ‘Oh he’s scripted’– is that scripted or is that just how you talk?”

    Trump continued to explain that Fox’s problem was not just with Megyn Kelly, but with other members of Fox’s punditry class as well — such as Charles Krauthammer and Karl Rove.

    “The worst treatment I get is from Fox,” Trump said, “Between Karl Rove — who’s a moron — between Krauthammer — he can’t say anything good no matter what… I get treated very badly there.”

    Both Rove and Krauthammer have been supportive of Rubio’s border-opening immigration agenda.

    In 2013, Karl Rove even began to echo Sen. Rubio’s talking point — one which Sen. Rubio continues to use to this day — that the Senate Gang of Eight bill, which would have granted citizenship — and, by extension, welfare access and voting privileges — to illegal immigrants, was “not amnesty.” Rove took to the pages of the open borders Wall Street Journal, to write: “It is also important that Republicans avoid calling a pathway to citizenship ‘amnesty.’ Amnesty is the forgiveness of wrongdoing without penalty… The current Senate bill has plenty of penalties and hurdles for those here illegally who seek citizenship.”

    In a separate piece, entitled, “More white voters alone won’t save the GOP,” Rove outlines his fundamental disagreement with conservative icons like Phyllis Schlafly and Pat Buchanan: “Some observers, including Phyllis Schlafly, Pat Buchanan and the Center for Immigration Studies, argue that if Republicans want to win back the White House, they should focus on white voters (who comprised 72% of the electorate in 2012) rather than worrying about Latinos… This argument is incomplete,” Rove writes.

    Similarly, in 2013 Charles Krauthammer — who has been open in suggesting that by backing Rubio’s desire to legalize the illegal population, “I support amnesty”– wrote, “Americans are a generous people. They don’t want 11 million souls living in fear among them. They would willingly, indeed overwhelmingly, support amnesty — as long as it is the last. I know many Republicans are coming over to immigration reform because of the 2012 election results. Fine. I’ve been advocating this for seven years (“First a wall — then amnesty,” April 7, 2006). Welcome aboard… but remember: Enforcement followed by legalization is not just the political thing to do. It is the right thing to do.”

    As Breitbart News has previously reported, the Rupert Murdoch empire and corporate media’s backing of Rubio has demonstrated its ability to change the political rules to favor the donor-class candidate. By normal standards, given Rubio’s 3rd place finish in Iowa and 5th place finish in New Hampshire, at this point he would largely be discounted from the race.
    As Vox recently noted in a piece entitled, “Finishing 2nd in New Hampshire Has Been Mandatory To Be President:” “In the past 60 years, no eventual nominee finished worse than second in New Hampshire. (Note: Two weren’t in the race when the New Hampshire primary happened — Hubert Humphrey in 1968 and Estes Kefauver in 1952.)”

    However, given Rubio’s enormous backing from Party donors and corporate media, the normal political rules do not seem to apply to Sen. Rubio. FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver has explained how the Establishment can draw out the race and change the rules to pick its favored nominee. Silver has observed that the Party establishment’s candidate may be the beneficiary of “a lot of second and third chances” because the Party holds the “power to set the rules of engagement and strategically encourage winnowing of the field.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journal...rubio-protect/

    patbrunz likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    856
    As conservative columnist and best-selling author Ann Coulter has noted, “Rupert Murdoch enterprise… is implacably pro-open borders, pro-amnesty and, consequently, anti-Trump.”
    Just one question, where is Rupert Murdoch from?

    A lot of these so called staunch republicans consider Fox News their political bible, guess what, the establishment has been wrong for years. It is undergoing an unprecedented tectonic change in what supporters are seeking from their party and will clearly have to redefine itself in the near term. Now matter how much money the establishment throws at this candidate, the people will be heard not the donors. Rubio is not a strong enough candidate and did lose today by a lot. Enough of this third place is first garbage.
    patbrunz likes this.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,872
    Just one question, where is Rupert Murdoch from?
    Australia.
    joe s likes this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member patbrunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,386
    Trump is right on this. Just watch Fox and you'll see it. I have. Sometimes it's subtle, other times it's not. They're totally pushing Rubio.
    Newmexican and Judy like this.
    All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke

  5. #5
    Senior Member patbrunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,386
    Quote Originally Posted by joe s View Post
    Just one question, where is Rupert Murdoch from?

    A lot of these so called staunch republicans consider Fox News their political bible, guess what, the establishment has been wrong for years. It is undergoing an unprecedented tectonic change in what supporters are seeking from their party and will clearly have to redefine itself in the near term. Now matter how much money the establishment throws at this candidate, the people will be heard not the donors. Rubio is not a strong enough candidate and did lose today by a lot. Enough of this third place is first garbage.

    I think voters are sick and tired of having the Establishment candidates shoved down their throats and they're not going to take it any more.
    Newmexican, Judy, joe s and 1 others like this.
    All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    856
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
    Australia.
    Thank you. The puppeteer is from down under and please don't think Rubio is nothing more than just a puppet. Fox should be one of many different news sources for a conservative, not the ONLY source. The next Fox debate is coming up (March 3.) and hopefully Megyn Kelly can be unbiased this time (she won't though and Trump knows it).
    Judy and patbrunz like this.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,872
    Megyn Kelly without a script is an idiot. Very disappointing.
    joe s and Mayday like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Jeb Bush: Marco Rubio Can’t Beat Ted Cruz, Donald Trump
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-18-2016, 08:55 PM
  2. Donald Trump, Marco Rubio Won GOP Debate, Poll Finds
    By Judy in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-11-2015, 08:08 PM
  3. MARCO RUBIO: DONALD TRUMP WAS ‘A SUPPORTER OF AMNESTY’
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2015, 03:09 PM
  4. Donald Trump and Marco Rubio: Two candidates in Vegas
    By Judy in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-09-2015, 03:10 AM
  5. Marco Rubio: ‘I Don’t Believe that Donald Trump Will Be Our Nominee’
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2015, 08:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •