Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 129

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #71
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    Quote Originally Posted by usanevada
    McCain and Rudi made it very clear that they would have to
    pay a fine , learn English and get amnesty and get to stay

    Romney made it very clear there would be no amnesty and the
    would not be allowed to stay

    Now it doesn't get any clearer than that and he said it
    3 times
    At the ABC debate , Sunday on the Chris Wallace show
    and at the Fox forum debate
    Exactly. Amazing that some people don't comprehend this, or I guess, don't want to comprehend this. It's very obvious: Giuliani, McCain, & Huckabee are the amnesty threats, not Romney. And as we know, this whole "paying a fine, learning English" business is BS as there is no way we're going to have a language police. These are just smokescreens to try to provide political cover for amnesty.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #72
    Senior Member Bren4824's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    Okay, I lied. I couldn't let this pass without commenting:

    Bren wrote:

    ""well it technically isn't amnesty because you make them pay $5,000"

    This is sarcasm!!! I cannot believe that you do not see it
    The only folks that would view what Romney said as sarcasm are Romney fans. It definitely was not saracsm. He waffled, pure and simple.
    No, anybody who watched the debates would understand how/why this ended up being said. It was when McCain kept INSISTING that it was not amnesty----because they have to pay $5000, learn English, blah blah.

    So, in a sarcastic manner-----Romney said "well it technically isn't amnesty...." .......Then he said "do they all have to go home senator??"------McCain said NO. Romney then said----it is amnesty if they do not all have to leave.
    "We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works." --- Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant.

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Populist
    Quote Originally Posted by usanevada
    McCain and Rudi made it very clear that they would have to
    pay a fine , learn English and get amnesty and get to stay

    Romney made it very clear there would be no amnesty and the
    would not be allowed to stay

    Now it doesn't get any clearer than that and he said it
    3 times
    At the ABC debate , Sunday on the Chris Wallace show
    and at the Fox forum debate
    Exactly. Amazing that some people don't comprehend this, or I guess, don't want to comprehend this. It's very obvious: Giuliani, McCain, & Huckabee are the amnesty threats, not Romney. And as we know, this whole "paying a fine, learning English" business is BS as there is no way we're going to have a language police. These are just smokescreens to try to provide political cover for amnesty.
    I've figured this out Populist
    In any election you will have people that no matter what will vote for Ralph Nadar or Timothy Leary
    As I stated earlier , no sense bashing your head against the wall because you won't win against them no matter what you say,
    Romney can come out today and say he would deport 20 million in the first 30 days and they would still argue with you
    Like any political contest , time will tell

  4. #74
    jjmm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    744
    So, Duncan is still in??? That is awesome.

    He truly is My favorite candidate. Hoping that this also garner's him some more attention.

    There is still SO, SO much more time ...anything can happen in almost a year's time! As long as he stays in the race ... anything can happen.

    GOOOOOO DUNCAN HUNTER!!!!!!

  5. #75

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    clay pigeon, CA
    Posts
    511
    Romney's record on immigration?
    http://www.factcheck.org/tough_guy_on_immigration.html
    Mitt Romney casts himself as tough on illegal immigration in a new ad in which he says that, as Massachusetts governor, "I authorized the State Police to enforce immigration laws." He doesn't mention that his order never took effect. It came in the closing days of his administration and was rescinded by his successor, as we wrote back in August.
    He also promises, "As president, I'll . . . cut funding for sanctuary cities." Maybe so, but as governor he took no action against several such towns in his state.
    We find Romney misleading on both counts.
    ...Well, yes. But, as we noted in August, he didn't do so until he had less than a month left in his term. He was already considering running for president, and the new governor-elect was expected to rescind the arrangement.
    Romney began talking about giving troopers the power to make arrests on immigration charges earlier in 2006, but he didn't sign an agreement with the federal government - a necessary condition for that authority to be granted - until Dec. 13 of that year. Romney was scheduled to leave office Jan. 4, 2007. Democrat Deval Patrick, who had won the race to succeed Romney, had already said the program was a "bad idea" because troopers were busy enough as it was.
    Sure enough, Patrick rescinded the agreement within his first week in office so troopers could "focus on enforcing Massachusetts laws." The policy never had a chance to take effect, because those troopers chosen to carry it out hadn't yet begun a required six-week training course.
    Romney might well get tough on sanctuary cities in the future, but he didn't when he was governor.
    During his tenure, at least four Massachusetts cities enacted or renewed legislation declaring themselves sanctuaries for illegal immigrants.
    Brookline and Cambridge reaffirmed their longtime status as sanctuary cities in so many words. Somerville and Orleans didn't officially deem themselves "sanctuaries," but Somerville affirmed its "long-standing policies in support of all immigrants," while Orleans forbade city officials from turning in illegal immigrants without probable cause.
    We asked Romney's campaign if he had acted against these cities, but they didn't provide us with any examples. As far as we were able to determine in our own research, Romney made no attempts to penalize, censure, or cut funding to them.
    - by Viveca Novak and Jess Henig, with Emi Kolawole
    Sources
    Zezima, Katie. "Massachusetts Rescinds Deal on Policing Immigration," The New York Times, 12 January 2007.

    Zezima, Katie. "Massachusetts Set for Its Officers to Enforce Immigration Law," The New York Times, 13 December 2007.

    Town of Brookline, MA. Board of Selectmen. Minutes. 24 Oct. 2006.

    Town of Orleans, MA. "Annual and Special Town Meeting Warrants." 12 May 2003.

    City of Cambridge, MA. City Council. "Policy Order Resolution." 8 May 2006.

    City of Somerville, MA. Board of Aldermen. "Minutes of the Regular Meeting." 11 May 2006.

    Tapper, Jake, and Jan Simmonds. "Giuliani Vows to End Illegal Immigration." ABC News. 14 Aug. 2007.
    Just posting the facts folks!
    "As has happened before in our history, if you have open borders poor country governments will pay people to move here, promising them a better life in the New World"*
    George Phillies (Libertarian)

  6. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,753
    First off

    Romney did partner with ICE
    Its not his fault the lib symp new gov pulled the plug , the facts
    are he did do it

    As far as sanctuary cities , Thats bs also
    A state gov has no power to pull federal funds or federally mandated program funds from any city
    State funding is mandated by their legislators so just what is a
    governor suppose to do against a state sanctuary city?

    You have tough governors against illegals right now
    that are running states with sanctuary cities and can't do a thing
    about it

    So thats hogwash , debunked and false information

  7. #77
    Senior Member Bren4824's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by sturmruger
    Romney's record on immigration?
    http://www.factcheck.org/tough_guy_on_immigration.html
    Mitt Romney casts himself as tough on illegal immigration in a new ad in which he says that, as Massachusetts governor, "I authorized the State Police to enforce immigration laws." He doesn't mention that his order never took effect. It came in the closing days of his administration and was rescinded by his successor, as we wrote back in August.
    He also promises, "As president, I'll . . . cut funding for sanctuary cities." Maybe so, but as governor he took no action against several such towns in his state.
    We find Romney misleading on both counts.
    [quote:2cw6vdoc]...Well, yes. But, as we noted in August, he didn't do so until he had less than a month left in his term. He was already considering running for president, and the new governor-elect was expected to rescind the arrangement.
    Romney began talking about giving troopers the power to make arrests on immigration charges earlier in 2006, but he didn't sign an agreement with the federal government - a necessary condition for that authority to be granted - until Dec. 13 of that year. Romney was scheduled to leave office Jan. 4, 2007. Democrat Deval Patrick, who had won the race to succeed Romney, had already said the program was a "bad idea" because troopers were busy enough as it was.
    Sure enough, Patrick rescinded the agreement within his first week in office so troopers could "focus on enforcing Massachusetts laws." The policy never had a chance to take effect, because those troopers chosen to carry it out hadn't yet begun a required six-week training course.
    Romney might well get tough on sanctuary cities in the future, but he didn't when he was governor.
    During his tenure, at least four Massachusetts cities enacted or renewed legislation declaring themselves sanctuaries for illegal immigrants.
    Brookline and Cambridge reaffirmed their longtime status as sanctuary cities in so many words. Somerville and Orleans didn't officially deem themselves "sanctuaries," but Somerville affirmed its "long-standing policies in support of all immigrants," while Orleans forbade city officials from turning in illegal immigrants without probable cause.
    We asked Romney's campaign if he had acted against these cities, but they didn't provide us with any examples. As far as we were able to determine in our own research, Romney made no attempts to penalize, censure, or cut funding to them.
    - by Viveca Novak and Jess Henig, with Emi Kolawole
    Sources
    Zezima, Katie. "Massachusetts Rescinds Deal on Policing Immigration," The New York Times, 12 January 2007.

    Zezima, Katie. "Massachusetts Set for Its Officers to Enforce Immigration Law," The New York Times, 13 December 2007.

    Town of Brookline, MA. Board of Selectmen. Minutes. 24 Oct. 2006.

    Town of Orleans, MA. "Annual and Special Town Meeting Warrants." 12 May 2003.

    City of Cambridge, MA. City Council. "Policy Order Resolution." 8 May 2006.

    City of Somerville, MA. Board of Aldermen. "Minutes of the Regular Meeting." 11 May 2006.

    Tapper, Jake, and Jan Simmonds. "Giuliani Vows to End Illegal Immigration." ABC News. 14 Aug. 2007.
    Just posting the facts folks![/quote:2cw6vdoc]

    Romney did more against illegals while he was in office----than any other person!!!

    And, this was LONG before the issue became as hot as it is now-----and before Tom Tancredo came into the picture!!

    Are the millions going to show up for Ron Paul tomorrow----just like they did in Iowa??
    "We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works." --- Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant.

  8. #78
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Bren wrote:

    Romney did more against illegals while he was in office----than any other person!!!
    Nope, he didn't. Duncan Hunter has a history of fighting illegal immigration that dates back almost 27 years. Do your homework, Bren.

    usaneveda wrote:

    First off

    Romney did partner with ICE
    Its not his fault the lib symp new gov pulled the plug , the facts
    are he did do it
    It was all a ploy to better situation himself for a run for President of the United States. Not one law enforcement officer from Mass. ever attended ICE training. Romney knew his replacement was was going to stop the program before it got legs. When submit paperwork for the program? Wasn't it about a month before he left office?

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  9. #79
    Senior Member Bren4824's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    Bren wrote:

    Romney did more against illegals while he was in office----than any other person!!!
    Nope, he didn't. Duncan Hunter has a history of fighting illegal immigration that dates back almost 27 years. Do your homework, Bren.
    In regard to doing homework-----please look at all of the current polling results-----in the states and nationally!!

    You are supporting someone who does not have a chance of winning----and by doing this----you and others are just helping Guliani, McCain, or Huckabilly to win!!!!
    "We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works." --- Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant.

  10. #80
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Bren wrote:

    You are supporting someone who does not have a chance of winning----and by doing this----you and others are just helping Guliani, McCain, or Huckabilly to win!!!!
    I don't know if you realize this, but you're starting to sound like a broken record. Just thought you might want to know.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •