Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    776

    Is this the excuse that the liberals need ?

    Here we go again,will our government use a terrorist attack as an excuse to curtail our freedoms again?

    FOXNews.com
    - November 10, 2009
    Senate Panel Conducting Fort Hood Probe Warned of 'Homegrown' Threat

    The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee served up startling warnings of "homegrown" threats in a May 2008 report, describing scenarios eerily similar to the mass shooting at Fort Hood last week, which left 13 dead and 29 wounded.

    More than a year before the massacre at Fort Hood, a Senate panel conducting an extensive investigation into the threat of homegrown terrorism warned that "radicalization" had spread beyond Afghanistan training camps to the United States and that lone wolves fueled by Internet propaganda would present a growing threat.

    The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which produced the report, is the same panel set to conduct what one lawmaker called a "no-holds-barred" investigation into Fort Hood, with hearings scheduled to begin next Thursday. Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., has said he sees signs that alleged shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was an "Islamist extremist."

    But the panel has been looking at the issue of homegrown threats for years, and its May 2008 report served up startling warnings, describing scenarios eerily similar to the mass shooting at the Texas military post last week, which left 13 dead and 29 wounded.

    "Radicalization is no longer confined to training camps in Afghanistan or other locations far from our shores; it is also occurring right here in the United States," the report stated.

    Hasan is accused of reaching out to an Al Qaeda associate via e-mail. Officials say he communicated 10 to 20 times with a radical cleric overseas who had used his own Web site to incite Muslim violence against U.S. troops.

    The Senate committee report warned that the Internet was serving as a "virtual terrorist training camp," and cited that as a contributing factor in the United States becoming more and more susceptible to homegrown extremists.

    Though the report said that the lack of a "sympathetic audience" and presence of an integrated Muslim community historically has made homegrown terrorism less likely in the United States, it cited recent homegrown plots -- like a foiled plot against Fort Dix, N.J. -- as an "early warning" that the trend is reversing.

    "No longer is the threat just from abroad, as was the case with the attacks of September 11, 2001; the threat is now increasingly from within, from homegrown terrorists who are inspired by violent Islamist ideology to plan and execute attacks where they live," it said.

    Though there is ongoing debate over whether the Fort Hood shooting should be considered a terrorist act, some have called it the worst since Sept. 11.

    Neil Livingstone, terrorism analyst and chairman of GlobalOptions, said Hasan was a "walking time bomb" who showed "all the signs" of instability. Livingstone said "political correctness" may have prevented other officials from taking action against him, but that his actions fit the "definition" of terrorism.

    "He was a loner. ... He was in contact with radical elements overseas. He was obsessed with his Muslim faith. And I think nothing was done," Livingstone told Fox News. "I think we have to face up to the fact that this guy was killing innocent people because of his Muslim faith, and we need to say that, and I think that's going to come out in the hearings and in the trial."

    Mike Baker, a former CIA covert operations officer, said Hasan -- particularly as a member of the U.S. military -- would have made an "attractive candidate" for radicals overseas. If he was influenced by such elements, Baker said, Hasan would be more than just an "unhinged fellow" accused of going on a shooting rampage.

    If so, the attack certainly did not follow the Sept. 11 model, where hijackers were recruited from overseas in the Middle East. As the 2008 report detailed, "the violent Islamist threat to the homeland has evolved and expanded."

    The committee cited the acts of "homegrown terrorists" in the 2004 Madrid and 2005 London attacks as examples of the evolving trend. FBI Director Robert Mueller previously warned of a similar threat in the United States.

    But top senators on the homeland security panel, which has held nine hearings since late 2006 on the topic of homegrown extremism, are suggesting that when it came to Hasan, warning signs may have been missed or ignored. The Washington Post reported Monday that in a slide presentation delivered by Hasan, he suggested that Muslim soldiers should be allowed to leave the military as 'conscientious objectors' in part to avoid "adverse events."

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, ranking Republican on the Homeland Security Committee, told Fox News that it appears the "red flags" surrounding Hasan should have prompted an investigation.

    "Certainly it's worrisome if red flags were ignored, if behavior issues were not targeted for further review," Collins said Tuesday. "This is something we have to have a no-holds-barred investigation of."

    A Lieberman spokeswoman told Fox News that the upcoming investigation will be a continuation of the homegrown terrorism probe the Connecticut senator has conducted for years.

    http://tinyurl.com/y8as65q
    We can't deport them all ? Just think of the fun we could have trying!

  2. #2
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    What they will fail to see, is that if there had been anyone armed - including an MP, it is likely that it either would not have happened or at least not as many would have been killed or hurt.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    765
    Quote Originally Posted by SicNTiredInSoCal
    What they will fail to see, is that if there had been anyone armed - including an MP, it is likely that it either would not have happened or at least not as many would have been killed or hurt.
    Yes, you are certainly right. They also fail to see ...
    "No longer is the threat just from abroad, as was the case with the attacks of September 11, 2001; the threat is now increasingly from within, from homegrown terrorists who are inspired by violent Islamist ideology to plan and execute attacks where they live," it said.
    Being so politically correct in our country is dangerous as we can see when the govt. and the media dare not even whisper that it had anything to do with him being a Muslim inspired by Islamic radicals.
    "When injustice become law, resistance becomes duty." Thomas Jefferson

  4. #4
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    While the Senate investigates, I am left scratching my arse wondering why they, and how many, and what implications where considered concerning the admission of these "home grown terrorists?"

    Who opened the door, and why? Where was the media, or the Jews, or the rednecks for that matter. Rocket science was not needed, history speaks loudly. Our country had a choice, did we make the right one?

  5. #5
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    Hypocrisy thy name is government. From everything I have read, the Feds had all the info they needed on Hasan to arrest him and remove him from the equation. They didn't. Now they are worried about 'homegrown' "threats"? Please note the absence of the word "terrorist". Wasn't Timothy McVeigh a "domestic terrorist"? Why not Hasan?

    Controlling 'homegrown threats' ought to be a piece of cake. Stake out all the known mosques. Arrest every speaker who advocates attacking US citizens and military personnel, or who advocates violence against US military installations in the US. If they are not citizens, deport them with a permanent ban on ever returning. If they are citizens, prosecute them under the Patriot Act. Isn't that why we have the damn thing? Oh yeah, they might also want to take a look that Muslim compounds that have been set up all over the country and see what they are teaching; how they are training their recruits; and what they are stockpiling.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

  6. #6
    Senior Member Reciprocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    New York, The Evil Empire State
    Posts
    2,680
    The cold hard fact is that the religion of Islam is in direct contradiction to traditional American values and lifestyles. Even though most might appear to be assimilated into the American way of living, most struggle at best to adapt while they are surrounded with infidels on a daily basis. In reality,to them, americans and america are the enemies of Islam. What happened at Fort Hood is a clear example of that.
    “In questions of power…let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” –Thomas Jefferson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •